Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

NHS Fife tries to silence nurse - Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife Health Board and Dr Beth Upton - thread #7

1000 replies

nauticant · 08/02/2025 15:40

Sandie Peggie, a nurse at Victoria Hospital in Kirkcaldy (VH), has brought claims in the employment tribunal against her employer; Fife Health Board (the Board) and another employee, Dr B Upton. Ms Peggie’s claims are of sexual harassment, harassment related to a protected belief, indirect discrimination and victimisation. Dr Upton claims to be a transwoman, that is observed as male at birth but asserting a female gender identity.

The Employment Tribunal hearing started on Monday 3 January 2025 and is expected to continue for 2 weeks. The hearing commenced with Sandie Peggie giving evidence. Dr Beth Upton started giving evidence on 6 February.

Access to view the hearing remotely can be obtained by sending an email request to [email protected] headed Public Access Request (Peggie v Fife Health Board) 4104864/2024 and requesting access.

The hearing is being live tweeted by https://x.com/tribunaltweets and there's additional information here: https://tribunaltweets.substack.com/p/peggie-vs-fife-health-board-and-dr. This also has threadreaderapp archives of live-tweeting of the sessions of the hearing for those who can't follow on Twitter, for example: archive.is/xkSxy.

An alternative to Twitter is to use Nitter: https://nitter.poast.org/tribunaltweets

Thread 1: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5186317-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse

Thread 2: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5267591-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-thread-2

Thread 3: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268347-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-3

Thread 4: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5268942-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-4

Thread 5: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269149-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-5

Thread 6: https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/5269635-nhs-fife-tries-to-silence-nurse-sandie-peggie-vs-nhs-fife-health-board-and-dr-beth-upton-thread-6

OP posts:
Thread gallery
37
KnottyAuty · 09/02/2025 18:41

TWETMIRF · 09/02/2025 18:16

@RethinkingLife 'It will be interesting to learn more about that email and Searle's role in 'supporting' Upton to write the Datix of shame'

If this is ever made into a film then it has to be called Dr Upton and the Datix of Shame

Oh yes excellent back to the movie!
We now have the title thanks to @TWETMIRF
Dr Upton & The Datix of Shame

Starring (suggestions from thread #5?)

David Tennant as Dr U (DH said really it should be TW role for fairness so suggestions please)

Imelda Staunton as JR due to vocal similarities with Prof Umbridge - but would be better to find someone closer to JR’s age?

Glen Close as NC (? Think we’re all showing our age here - any younger suggestions please?)

SP still casting

suggestions please!

GailBlancheViola · 09/02/2025 18:41

Thank you NotMaroonButRaspberry that was the review I was thinking of. As you say we were hopeful that would permeate but it hasn't and now those who ignored it are facing public tribunals.

RobinStrike · 09/02/2025 18:44

Jeffrey for Upton?

AlbertCamusflage · 09/02/2025 18:46

Sarah Lancashire for Nurse Peggie?

Harassedevictee · 09/02/2025 18:46

NotMaroonButRaspberry · 09/02/2025 18:40

I think there's been some crosse dwires here

I was referring to the costs of the case in terms of paying the legal teams, accomodation costs, court time, etc rather than costs awarded.

When they said it may be postponed I was figuring that obviously people like NC and JR have blocked out their diaries for this and not only is that time then not used for the ET court time, but they also have to find another 10 days etc later in the year, travel to Scotland again etc.

That was what I was responding to.

eulittleb831 · 09/02/2025 18:48

KnottyAuty · 09/02/2025 17:57

This is all good relevant stuff.

Why do biological females have separate CRs?
We have them for need of safety, privacy and dignity as set out in MF’s Witness Statement.
Biological males do represent a risk to women.

Why do TW need separate CRs?
For need of safety, privacy and dignity as per females with respect to biological males. It would be for TW to evidence this need as MF has done for biological females. (It probably won’t be hard to find that evidence)

Why do TW want to use female only CRs?
They are existent and not available to biological males.
To be accepted and with “their people” as “a female” or “woman. For acceptance.

Needs and Wants are two different things
Most important is to “meet need”

Is a biological female’s need more or less important than a TW’s need for acceptance as a woman? The panel must decide what would the average person think?

@KnottyAuty “reasonable observer” is a more fitting expression I think - emailed the et for access tomorrow, this forum is such a valuable resource, thanks.

NC must surely ask why Beth/Brian/Frank to differentiate between “his community,
his people” and why they should have access to the changing room of an entirely
different community altogether, circumventing the safeguards to protect women.

interested in everyone’s views on this.

TriesNotToBeCynical · 09/02/2025 18:48

The trope of the mens changing room is one of everyone letting it all hang out - definitely not avoiding eye contact and facing the wall.
@MahoosivePaws

I feel bound to say Not All Men ...

I certainly wouldn't be 'sad' not to be able to proudly display my naked body in a changing room. It is not only a male trait but a particularly histrionic and self-absorbed trait to want to do this - or indeed to be actively attracted to changing rooms in general.

ArabellaScott · 09/02/2025 18:50

User0103 · 09/02/2025 14:41

It also shows he isn’t prepared to validate the identity of Bryson, who without casting aspersions is both trans and a rapist (separately and variously)

The main problem with that in my view was that Peggie referred to prisons, and Upton 'assumed' she meant Bryson, based on fuck-all.

Subsequently, his 'assumption' has been tacitly transformed into fact.

He created an accusation that Peggie never made.

FallenSloppyDead · 09/02/2025 18:52

@KnottyAuty David Tennant as Dr U (DH said really it should be TW role for fairness so suggestions please)

Karla Sofía Gascón is available, I believe

GailBlancheViola · 09/02/2025 18:52

Women are skilled at getting into/out of a bra and into/out of a swimming costume without taking their jumper off.

Ah yes, the getting the bra off without taking the jumper off trick and putting bottom half of swimming costume on whilst still wearing skirt learnt many moons ago at the all girls school I attended.

oldwomanwhoruns · 09/02/2025 18:55

Re the changing room - is also worth commenting that Dr U's behaviour in grabbing and laying claim to his 'territory' (ie the corner area) is unbelievably male behaviour!
Females don't do this, we will just go to a free space. But always going to the same space, to 'his' space is male behaviour. And he said that he always goes to the corner.

Iamnotalemming · 09/02/2025 19:01

CriticalCondition · 09/02/2025 10:50

I've been musing on the role of lawyers in all of this. A lawyer's first duty is to the court. As an in-house lawyer that duty may require you to disclose the shortcomings of a 'client' who is also your employer. Not a comfortable position to be in.

I watched a lot of the Post Office enquiry. During the evidence of one senior lawyer it was clear that the tension between those duties to the court and her employer caused her to quit.

In a lot of civil law countries it is not possible to have a practising certificate as a lawyer and work in house, whether for a private company or public sector, for this very reason. Employment alone means the lawyer cannot truly be independent.

Tmpnamenb · 09/02/2025 19:06

oldwomanwhoruns · 09/02/2025 18:55

Re the changing room - is also worth commenting that Dr U's behaviour in grabbing and laying claim to his 'territory' (ie the corner area) is unbelievably male behaviour!
Females don't do this, we will just go to a free space. But always going to the same space, to 'his' space is male behaviour. And he said that he always goes to the corner.

I would imagine that many women would not get changed close to Dr U's corner in case he came in

oldwomanwhoruns · 09/02/2025 19:09

Ooh yes, you'd soon learn to keep well clear of the man corner! One wonders of he realised why 'his' corner was always so conveniently free...

GailBlancheViola · 09/02/2025 19:10

I would imagine that many women would not get changed close to Dr U's corner in case he came in

Imagine the notes in the black book if a women was actually in his corner when he came in. The shock, the horror, the micro and macro aggression an immediate sacking offence surely.

Tmpnamenb · 09/02/2025 19:15

Today in the Times

"Labour shelves plans to make gender change easier"

www.thetimes.com/article/04892a42-1268-4b74-a818-7289c7a0e97e?shareToken=aea5dd60de12d8d195ebb6ab51e2153e

Zebracat · 09/02/2025 19:17

Going back to the grounds for whistleblowing, I think Sp is both drawing attention to the illegality of a man in the female changing room, and also explicitly telling him that he is damaging her health and safety. I have no sense that she was setting up for a grievance. It just so happens that her conversation with DU covered 2 of the categories.

Witchlite · 09/02/2025 19:21

PersephonePitstop · 09/02/2025 18:14

The case I talked about earlier was a TIW requesting access to the male changing room, it didn’t generate any complaints, I doubt anyone, (who didn’t know them), noticed.

I strongly suspect if it was the other way round we’d have had another Darlington.

Yes I agree.

However this is because men have not learned to fear changing, in public, in front of women - even if they prefer SSC. women are highly attuned to spotting men - it is a survival mechanism.

UrsulasHerbBag · 09/02/2025 19:26

It does feel like Dr U has some preconceptions about women’s behaviour in CR and these haven’t been met. I remember an exchange I was part of on X a while ago, the TW seemed to really believe that it was an inherently female experience to sit on your bed with your friends in “your panties” (puke) and do each others make up. I never let my friend do my make up and I might have my knickers on show for a brief instant before a dress was pulled over my head but that’s it. We weren’t running around the bedroom getting ready for nights out in the nip. He thought that’s what we did and felt he had been denied this part of “womanhood” and it was his right that women recreate it with him.

FallenSloppyDead · 09/02/2025 19:27

PepeParapluie · 09/02/2025 17:46

That’s interesting (and concerning). I suppose the things we know for sure right now (until the Supreme Court decision offers at least a bit of clarity) are that (a) the law is a bit uncertain on the meaning of woman/ man and male/female and the effect of the GRA and (b) the people who tend to be the most vocal and most politically active on this topic are trans identified individuals or their allies.

If you are a workplace with a trans identified person, then you know you’ve got one person likely to make a complaint if you enforce a single sex policy. What you probably don’t know is how many people among your workforce might take a stand against a self-ID policy.

So, until we get some legal clarity, workplaces are probably trying to just avoid upsetting the loudest or most litigious contingent in their workforce. You don’t know who your Sandie Peggie’s are until they’re backed into a corner. But if you’ve got some Dr Upton’s, perhaps that’s why employers are making policy a certain way.

I’m not saying I think that’s right by the way, but if the aim is to limit risk of being sued where the law is presently unclear, you need to try and appease the people most likely to sue you.

This makes a lot of sense. Even if you don't have any trans-identified employees, or you are a service like a gym, you will consider the possible future threat from a trans-identified male greater than the threat from any women. Indeed, you might consider that there is already a threat from transactivists outside the organisation trawling your policies to look for 'wrong think'.

So to win our spaces and our laws back we have to be a greater litigation threat than the transactivists.

KnottyAuty · 09/02/2025 19:32

AlbertCamusflage · 09/02/2025 18:46

Sarah Lancashire for Nurse Peggie?

Genius!

KnottyAuty · 09/02/2025 19:33

RobinStrike · 09/02/2025 18:44

Jeffrey for Upton?

As in … & Bungle?
really showing my age now 😂

larklane17 · 09/02/2025 19:35

Would I care if a woman was in the men's changing room? Some men would but, speaking for myself, I wouldn't, regardless of how she identified, provided I wasn't expecting to strip completely naked. I really couldn't be bothered about a woman seeing me in my underwear. She isn't going to see any more than she would at the swimming pool (and, sadly, no woman is going to be driven wild with desire by seeing my somewhat overweight and no longer young body).

A somewhat surprising contribution sir, but duly noted.

AlbertCamusflage · 09/02/2025 19:35

KnottyAuty · 09/02/2025 19:33

As in … & Bungle?
really showing my age now 😂

And Bungle could play NHS Fife (Bungle by name ...)

KnottyAuty · 09/02/2025 19:35

eulittleb831 · 09/02/2025 18:48

@KnottyAuty “reasonable observer” is a more fitting expression I think - emailed the et for access tomorrow, this forum is such a valuable resource, thanks.

NC must surely ask why Beth/Brian/Frank to differentiate between “his community,
his people” and why they should have access to the changing room of an entirely
different community altogether, circumventing the safeguards to protect women.

interested in everyone’s views on this.

Sorry I got that wrong ACAS says “typical” person

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread