I think the 'Russian bots' line is overlooking the fact that, as I always say, somebody on FWR knows everything - not only are we keen fact-checkers, but we also have a lot of sources of specialist knowledge.
It so happens I know a bit about amateur boxing, there were a few keen amateur boxers amongst my uncles, and although I don't agree with professional boxing, I keep an eye on amateur boxing, which is a popular sport in Ireland. And one where we are most likely to get an Olympic gold medal😄
So before the Lin/Khelif thing, I already knew about the IBA. I already knew about its corruption - which it admitted and allegedly has 'addressed' - and its financial links with Russia.
I already knew about the boxers who had beaten Khelif in the past - which was given as 'proof' that he didn't have an unfair advantage - and I was aware of the significance of the change of weight categories in a male and a female body - Khelif's extra kilos would have been in the form of bone density and muscles.
I gather from other posts at the time that I wasn't alone in having existing knowledge into which to set the Lin/Khelif issue, and we were able to acknowledge that the criticism of the IBA was completely valid, while at the same time seeing that there was objective evidence against Lin/Khelif.
We didn't need any help from Russian bots because we had our own store of information about the dogy goings-on in global amateur boxing.
It was never an IOC bad/IBA good split, and several of us who knew the background pointed this out at the time. The IBA was crooked; Lin and Khelif are not women. The two statements are equally true.