Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop

306 replies

FeministFrequencyFan · 20/01/2019 01:56

"Tens of thousands of pounds has been raised for transgender charity Mermaids, thanks to a Twitch streamer playing Donkey Kong 64 for an entire day.

HBomberGuy (Harry Brewis), a popular UK-based content creator who has more than 300,000 subscribers on YouTube, came up with an unlikely way to raise money for the embattled transgender children’s charity, which recently had part of its lottery funding suspended after a campaign from anti-trans activists."

www.pinknews.co.uk/2019/01/19/mermaids-trans-donkey-kong-twitch/

Thoughts?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
38
LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 22/01/2019 19:27

Dont listen to professionals! Listen to enthusiastic amateurs with an axe to grind! What’s the worst that can happen?

What do they supposedly do for a living again?

Bluestitch · 22/01/2019 19:31

Yes Rowantrees that passage struck me too. Very perceptive. Surprised the judge hasn't been targeted for transphobia tbh.

GrinitchSpinach · 22/01/2019 19:35

Apologies if this been linked here before, but it belongs in the discussion of Mermaids:

Sarah Phillimore, a family lawyer, examines the implications of "The Decisions in re: J" by Mr Justice Hayden:

childprotectionresource.online/in-whose-best-interests-transgender-children-choices-and-consequences/

nauticant · 22/01/2019 19:40

Did anyone else do a double-take at Mr Justice Hayden?

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 22/01/2019 19:53

I did! I thoughts someone had got delusions of grandeur

AugustL · 22/01/2019 20:23

So just to be clear, the mother that was found by the High Court to have been forcing her son to live as a girl, was being advised by Mermaids.

"the mother, who was being advised by the group, forced her seven-year-old son to live as a girl."

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/mermaids-uk-charity-ban-as-boy-forced-to-live-as-girl-dvx3j99cn

The child was removed from the mother and lives happily as a boy now with his dad. After all this, Mermaids still says the child a trans girl:

metro.co.uk/2017/10/08/charity-advised-mum-to-force-her-son-7-to-live-as-a-girl-6984649/

And this doesn't concern some people?

Or people don't bother to research, as they think anyone criticising Mermaids is a " transphobe "...

Thanks @Bluestitch I'll read.

"This judgment was delivered in private. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published " - this version, does that mean there's things ommitted? Or just that names have been removed?

Since I posted the Times link, I'll post the correction about Court Order vs. mother saying the Judge told her to cease further contact with Mermaids.

"Mermaids has informed us that it has not been the subject of a court order; rather, it was told by the child’s mother that the judge had said that the child was to have no contact with Mermaids."
www.thetimes.co.uk/article/corrections-and-clarifications-mermaids-transgender-charity-svh8mvm0t

"Contrary to what is implied in the Times article, Mermaids has not been banned from contact with the child by the high court, and Mermaids was directly referenced only once during proceedings, to state that the mother had been receiving support from the charity. Following the proceedings, the mother informed us that the judge had ordered the child should have no further contact with the charity. While we have not received any legal notice to support this statement, we have respected this request.

In a High Court case, reported last year, Mr Justice Hayden removed the child – known only as ‘J’ – from his mother after finding she had caused him ‘significant emotional harm’ and ‘pressed [him] into a gender identification that had far more to do with his mother’s needs and little, if anything, to do with his own’. After the judgement, the Sunday Times reported, the charity Mermaids attacked the ‘horrific decision’ and insisted that J did in fact identify as a girl, and said there was ‘no evidence at all to support this judge’s views’.
J was being home-schooled and dressed in girls’ clothes, the court found. After being removed from his mother, the boy was sent to live with his father and was sent to school, and has since ‘asserted his own masculine gender’ by living life as a boy, the judgement said.
Read more: metro.co.uk/2017/10/08/charity-advised-mum-to-force-her-son-7-to-live-as-a-girl-6984649/?ito=cbshare

Ok, but the thing I don't like here is the term "'masculine' gender" he doesn't have to be "masculine" to be a boy. He has stated that he is a boy, according to court evidence and is happy as a boy.
Boys and girls should be able to play with and wear whatever they want.

---

And to Dr Webberley about the other kid, girls don't have to wear dresses, and can play with the boys, this doesn't mean they are boys and have to transition to be a boy. Ffs. Stop with this. It's personally offensive. How can you live with yourself? I hope there is more to it than that. I'm so glad I didn't grow up now, and actually I'm so glad I have the family I have, because they wouldn't subscribe to this. This is going backwards.

Bluestitch · 22/01/2019 20:36

The child was removed from the mother and lives happily as a boy now with his dad. After all this, Mermaids still says the child a trans girl

Yes this is what happens within this ideology. Once you identify yourself (or are identified by others in this case) as trans that is that. Anybody who later desists is either in denial or was a faker. You should look at Lily Maynard's pinned tweet about how her daughter grew out of wanting to be a boy- apparently 'he' will kill himself because of his unsupportive mother. And detransitioners are invariably abused, as are those who speak negatively about their transition ie Leanne Mills.

It's particularly worrying though with Mermaids- an abundance of evidence and a thorough court judgement yet they are still claiming he's trans. It's very concerning for any kids they are involved with who may have second thoughts about the path they are on.

LordProfFekkoThePenguinPhD · 22/01/2019 20:40

Court cases will follow.

GrumpyGran8 · 22/01/2019 20:43

‘Mumsnet! Your users are supporting a site that doxes and targets individuals! Please ‘deal with’ the following named individual posters.’
I've just had a look at that site and young Harry is getting a kicking from the forum members - most of whom seem to be fellow gamers. Some of them are also pointing out all the stuff about Mermaid's activities that Mermaids would rather people not know about. So it may be that some good will come out of this.

R0wantrees · 22/01/2019 20:45

So just to be clear, the mother that was found by the High Court to have been forcing her son to live as a girl, was being advised by Mermaids.

The court report raises a number of serious issues connected with the mother's treatment of her son.

Mermaids have no professional understanding or experience of Child Protection or child development.

Other agencies had recognised possible indicators of neglect/abuse. Not only do I doubt that Mermaids would be able to do this, the lobbying of policies within CafCass, education, Social Care etc by Mermaids, Stonewall etc will have significantly hindered professionals from responding appropriately to the child J.

R0wantrees · 22/01/2019 20:51

from the Metro article linked above,

"After the judgement, the Sunday Times reported, the charity Mermaids attacked the ‘horrific decision’ and insisted that J did in fact identify as a girl, and said there was ‘no evidence at all to support this judge’s views’."

How anyone reading the court report could have both the arrogance & ignorance to react like this is extraordinary.

That Mermaids are still influencing policy, government, schools and children is a mystery.

Mermaids do not understand Safeguarding or Child Protection.

Children questioning their gender identity are vulnerable.

Those supporting vulnerable children must aways be sufficiently informed, regulated, skilled and monitored by professionals.

TinselAngel · 22/01/2019 20:58

BBC Look North had a completely uncritical section on this tonight, including an interview with Susie Green. The only connection to justify it being on the local (Yorkshire) news, seemed to be Mermaids being based in Leeds. (Also where Look North is produced).

BlackForestCake · 22/01/2019 21:14

No Lib Dems on Harvie's proposal?

There are only five Lib Dem MSPs in the Scottish Parliament.

R0wantrees · 22/01/2019 21:45

MNHQ has removed a proportion of this text so as not to infringe copyright*

For those not aware rather than 'chimping' around after Glinner and determindly reporting posts on this thread.

This is the background to The National Lottery investigation into funding Mermaids Charity:

Sunday Times Andrew Gilligan
December 16 2018
Child sex-change charity Mermaids handed £500,000 by national lottery
An ‘aggressive’ group that says under-16s should be allowed to alter their bodies medically plans to go nationwide'

A transgender charity that campaigns for children to be given prohibited sex-change treatment has been awarded £500,000 by the national lottery.

The payment to Mermaids has angered MPs, feminists and women’s organisations, who accuse the charity of bullying doctors, promoting falsehoods and using “emotional blackmail” to pressure parents to support life-changing medical interventions for their children.

Mermaids will use the money to create a network of 45 groups nationwide.

David Davies, the Tory MP for Monmouth, called for the grant, which has been approved but not yet paid, to be halted pending an investigation.

“I am absolutely horrified that the Big Lottery Fund are handing out a fortune to this aggressive organisation,” he said. “What they are doing is utterly wrong.”

The chief executive of Mermaids, Susie Green, who took her son for a now illegal sex-change operation in Thailand when he was 16, believes medical intervention is “absolutely vital” for children unhappy with their biological sex. Her view is disputed by NHS gender specialists who say intervention is not always right.

Mermaids also wants to overturn an NHS ban on under-16s being treated with cross-sex hormones, which cause permanent body changes and compromise fertility; those taking them require lifelong medical support. Clinicians say children are too young for such a step.

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/child-sex-change-charity-handed-500-000-by-national-lottery-dvbt7t2kb

threads:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3452489-Mermaids-given-500-000-by-National-Lottery-Sunday-Times

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3481426-Mermaids-and-the-Lottery-are-they-hoping-well-forget

R0wantrees · 22/01/2019 21:51

MNHQ has removed a proportion of this text so as not to infringe copyright*

Green said Mermaids did “vital work” and that her claims on suicide were supported by the advocacy group Stonewall

see also,
Sunday Time Andrew Gilligan
December 23 2018
Lottery thousands pay for former trans stripper to sway public opinion
After the £500,000 given to Mermaids, the same amount has gone to Stonewall to ‘empower transgender leaders’

(extract)
"Life has moved on for Page since then. Now in London, she is working for the advocacy group Stonewall on its “transgender leadership programme”, which is managing a new national lottery grant of almost £500,000. This was given to Stonewall to “empower trans leaders and organisations” with a “particular focus on leadership, media and influencing”.

Page’s views on the debate she is paid to influence are as explicit as her descriptions of her former customers. Britain is “losing its mind over trans people . . . bigotry has reached a fever pitch,” she has written.

While trans people in North America are “bogeymen primarily for Trump voters . . . anti-trans sentiment among feminists here in the UK has long been a problem, inflamed by the popularity of affluent white columnists [and] conservatives dressed up as feminists”.

Page’s activism in Canada may not assuage those feminist concerns. In 2012, amid some controversy, she ran a workshop called Overcoming the Cotton Ceiling. The “cotton ceiling” is a term used by some trans lesbian women to criticise biological lesbian women for refusing to have sex with them because they have penises.

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/lottery-thousands-pay-for-former-trans-stripper-to-sway-public-opinion-6lw9xbwgr?shareToken=b07556def357e6853787357102a661cb&fbclid=IwAR1Cuh3wih8EZ593-01DRTe46FYDoJeNjpB5Q_9yCR7wqB5ZSj1F2gQjRFk

Bluestitch · 22/01/2019 22:42

*her whole animus is making what she did to her child OK isn't?

by persuading other people to do the same things to their children

it's chilling*

This from earlier in the thread is so true.

R0wantrees · 23/01/2019 11:49

This thread has had an unusual amount of reports & deletions.

A number of my posts have been deleted.

I have been posting on MN FWR for about a year and am fully committed to civilised discussion.

(for the record I think that targetted reports especially from without are not especially civilised.)

This thread and this board has been targetted over the weekend more than usual.

Its always worth asking why and how?

R0wantrees · 23/01/2019 11:54

Context:
"Why I Am Permanently Banned From Twitter And Why This Should Make You Worry"
POSTED ON 24TH MAY 2018 BY MIRANDA YARDLEY (A Transwoman)
“During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act.”

attributed to George Orwell

I have been permanently banned from Twitter. The reason for this ban is given as follows:

Violating our rules against hateful conduct.

You may not promote violence against, threaten or harass other people on the basis of race, ethnicity, national origin, sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, religious affiliation, age, disability or serious disease.

What merits a permanent Twitter ban on the grounds of ‘hateful conduct’?
(see article as quoting this led to my previous post being reported and deleted)

According to the rules of Twitter, it is now ‘hateful conduct’ to call someone who is a man, a man. The implication of this is that the concept of proscribed speech, things we are now not allowed to say, now extends to the truth. This is fundamentally illiberal.

“To tell the truth, to arrive together at the truth, is a communist and revolutionary act.”

Unsigned, written by Antonio Gramsci in collaboration with Palmiro Togliatti, L’Ordine Nuovo, 21 June 1919.

It’s interesting the rules about what is hateful appear not to extend to one glaringly obvious category – biological sex. And it is this that reveals the real agenda that lies behind this curtailment of freedom of speech and the ability to state the truth:

This is not about me. This is part of a much larger, broader attack on the rights of women.

If women are now no longer able to publicly acknowledge that an adult human male is a man, this takes away from women the ability to describe their own lived lives: they can no longer use meaningful language to describe their interactions with members of the dominant sex class:

Women lose the language and ability to differentiate between themselves and the dominant sex class;
Women lose the language and ability to describe themselves even as women;
Women lose the language, right and ability to describe the perpetrators and acts of sexual violence;
Women lose the right to challenge the sexual enslavement and exploitation of members of their own sex class.
We are in a world of proscribed truth and compelled thought. Whatever your political stance, this should should strike you cold with terror." (continues)

mirandayardley.com/en/i-permanently-banned-twitter-make-worry/

R0wantrees · 23/01/2019 12:05

This thread and this board has been targetted over the weekend more than usual.

Its always worth asking why and how?

& of course by whom.

on cuurent thread, OP OrangeJuicy Wed 23-Jan-19 wrote:
"Emma G who declared war on Graham Linehan, and seemingly compared him to US neo-Nazis

See here:
mobile.twitter.com/Glinner/status/1087617063277993984

Graham, I am well-known for devastating the neo-Nazi movement in the US. I've helped swing US Military policy. People have gone to jail. They're afraid of me. They've kept me busy, but not for much longer.

And you're in my sights next."

mobile.twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/1087297309388562432

Has now written a thread on their activism tactics.

Which sound... familiar. I can understand why Graham may want the thread reported for encouraging harassment, but maybe it should stay up to show everyone their tactics. Let's look and learn.

Thread:

mobile.twitter.com/EmilyGorcenski/status/1087785050857504769

current thread:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3487089-Trans-activist-shares-their-activism-tactics

This thread is dicussing both Mermaids Charity, Graham Linehan and the online gaming community.

The twitter account Helen@MimmyMum signposting this male transperson to Mumsnet is/has been associated with the charity Mermaids.

Understanding Safeguarding requires that we identify and name the possible sources of risk.

I understand Safeguarding and also what is civilised discussion.

Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
R0wantrees · 23/01/2019 12:13

Context

The same twitter account was identified by The Times in description of the attempted silencing of Womans Place UK
artcle by Dominic Kennedy
July 23 2018
'Facebook blocks links to women’s rights group'
(extract)
Facebook has blocked links to the website of a feminist campaign group after been targeted by transexual activists.

Woman’s Place UK fights for women-only spaces and raises concerns about people being able to self-declare as transgender. Links to the site were blocked over the weekend by Facebook on suspicion that they were spam or breaching community guidelines.

The clampdown coincided with a message posted on Twitter by @mimmymum, whose profile said it belonged to “Helen”, an “intersectional cis feminist” who is “passionate about acceptance for transgender people & trans kids, equality & making the world a better place”. “Cis” is a term used for people who identify their gender as the same as the body they were born in.

The Twitter profile posted a guide on how to report Woman’s Place UK to Facebook for breaching guidelines. “Helen” accused the website of transphobia and excluding transwomen. (continues)

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/facebook-blocks-links-to-women-s-rights-group-q367rvz5m

WPUK statement on Social Media Attacks:

"We are not interested in a petty social media battle with people who oppose our aims. We are a campaign established to ensure that women’s voices and women’s rights are upheld in any proposed changes to a law that affects them.

This morning, our supporters are reporting that FB posts which link to our website are being removed. The reason give is that ‘they may be in breach of community standards’. They are not in breach of community standards. We would urge you to visit our website, read the posts and decide for yourself.

We have five demands. If you agree with these demands we would ask you to stand with us now and share our various posts far and wide to expose the spiteful attempt to shut us down instead of engage with our substantive demands.

We refuse to be side tracked by the vindictiveness of such campaigns. We are interested in a resolution that upholds the rights of everyone. We are not afraid of debate. We welcome it."

womansplaceuk.org/social-media-attacks-on-wpuk/

Bluestitch · 23/01/2019 13:07

Love this.

Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
R0wantrees · 23/01/2019 13:09

twitter.com/green_susie100/status/1059817455395237888?s=09

relevent threads:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/a3477104-NHS-say-ignore-parents-even-if-child-is-not-Gillick-competent

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3452489-Mermaids-given-500-000-by-National-Lottery-Sunday-Times

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3453738-Mermaids-review

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3458163-Mermaids-Response-to-the-Times-Article

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3454694-Very-good-Mermaids-thread

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3459350-Mermaids

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3158443-Mermaids-Teaching-in-Schools

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3194747-mermaids-and-children-in-care

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3454658-recording-of-mermaids-training

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3457686-Janice-Turner-article-in-the-Times-about-Mermaids

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3384565-National-Autistic-Society-and-Mermaids-Title-edited-by-MNHQ

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3452340-What-is-it-with-Mermaids-and-the-police

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3420861-children-in-need-and-mermaids

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3457897-Mermaids-and-a-well-known-uniformed-organisation-that-isn-t-the-girls-only-one

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3314779-The-Times-reporting-on-the-harassment-of-A-Womans-Place-UK

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3242812--Amnesty-International-Mermaids-and-Stonewall-have-signed-an-open-letter-to-Penny-Mordaunt-stating-the-importance-of-reforming-the-Gender-Recognition-Act

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3215941-Susie-Green-s-Ted-Talk

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3193748-Susie-Green

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3384335-Susie-Green-article-in-the-Graun

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3177923-This-is-what-Helen-from-Mermaids-writes-about-MN-feminist-posters

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3299393-Trans-Children-in-their-own-words

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3294478-Victoria-Derbyshire-show-today-transgender-children-buying-time-by-delaying-puberty

Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
R0wantrees · 23/01/2019 13:28

Context
article published by Transgender Trend by Micheal Biggs 'who researched and wrote this analysis in September 2018 in response to the trailer for the new ITV drama Butterfly which promoted the line “I’d rather have a happy daughter than a dead son”.

Michael Biggs is Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Oxford and Fellow of St Cross College. He researches social movements and collective protest
(extract)
‘I want a happy daughter, not a dead son’, proclaims Anna Friel in the new ITV drama Butterfly. This line required no creativity from the scriptwriter, as it is a constant refrain in interviews with parents. ‘I’d rather have a live daughter than a dead son.’ ‘We prefer to have a living son than a dead daughter’. ‘Our only choice was to have a dead son or a living daughter.’ ‘I’d rather have a living son than a dead daughter’. ‘Do you want a happy little girl or a dead little boy?’ ‘My wife and I decided that we would much rather have a happy, healthy daughter than a dead son.’

ITV’s drama was heavily influenced by Mermaids, the British organization invested in the transgendering of children. According to its chief executive, Susie Green:

‘I have my daughter, whole and alive, but if I had refused to listen then it’s very likely that I would have a dead son.’

Like other transgendering advocates, she never shies from raising the spectre of suicide:

(see screen shot)

Her tweet implies that four trans-identified youths committed suicide last year, though the language is ambiguous and does not specify age. Another mother associated with Mermaids announced two trans teenage suicides in under a week:
(see screen shot)

When transgendering organizations cite evidence on suicide, it almost invariably comes from surveys that recruit respondents haphazardly—without random sampling from a defined population—and ask them whether they have ever attempted to commit suicide. These surveys have been scrutinized in two earlier posts, and also on 4thwavenow. One problem is that trans-identified respondents might be primed to respond affirmatively to such questions by the continual emphasis on suicide in transgenderist discourse. Toby Sinbad Walker, for example, suggests that trans-identified females will kill themselves if they have to wait for breast amputations:
(see screen shot)

What is the evidence on actual suicide amongst trans-identified young people in Britain? I submitted a Freedom of Information request to the NHS Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS), which serves patients aged under 18 in England and Wales. It provided information from 2016 to August 2018. One patient committed suicide (in 2017) and two attempted suicide. In addition, two patients on the waiting list committed suicide (in 2016 and 2017) and two attempted suicide. This makes a total of three suicides in two and a half years. Each case is a tragedy for the young person and for their family and friends. But the number is hard to square with the claims of Susie Green and @ transmum.

Although GIDS told me that it could not provide information before 2016, its website in 2017 stated that ‘suicide is extremely rare, with one case in the service in the last decade, of a young person in an inpatient ward who was referred with severe psychiatric difficulties.’ Presumably this case occurred before 2016. This brings the total—for over a decade—to four. (continues)

concludes
Although calculated from only four suicides, the suicide rate is much higher than for teenagers overall—in my rough (over)estimate, 13 times greater. This is a genuine cause for concern. By comparison, anorexia multiplies the risk of suicide by 18 or 31 times (depending on the method of estimation), while depression multiplies it by 20 (Smith, Zuromski, and Dodd 2018). One study finds that autism multiplies the risk of suicide by a factor of 8 (Hirvikoski et al. 2016). This latter figure is especially relevant, given the fact that 35% of children referred to GIDS recently have moderate to severe autism (Butler, De Graaf, Wren, and Carmichael 2018).

Whether the higher rate of suicide among trans-identified teens is due to gender dysphoria or to co-incident conditions such as autism deserves urgent research. At the same time, we must realize that suicides of trans-identified children are rare tragedies and not—as transgendering organizations like Mermaids imply—a common occurrence. Rational and compassionate policy-making cannot be driven by the threat of suicide."

www.transgendertrend.com/suicide-by-trans-identified-children-in-england-and-wales/

Protest against delayed elective mastectomies for female transpeople discussed:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/3368777-To-think-that-in-the-current-dire-state-of-the-NHS-finances-its-a-no-brainer-that-first-priority-for-mastectomies-goes-to-cancer-patients

Michael Biggs:
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3257819-Michael-Biggs-Sociology-Dept-Oxford-Free-speech-at-Oxford-Do-women-have-the-right-to-meet-to-discuss-legislation

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3260270-Michael-Biggs-Oxford-Sociology-dept-The-Open-Society-Foundations-the-transgender-movement-incl-comparison-with-funding-for-women

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3433485-Prof-Michael-Biggs-How-Queer-Theory-Became-University-Policy-re-Oxford-Gendered-Intelligence

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3406042-Oxford-Student-newspaper-doxes-Twitter-account-by-possible-criminal-unauthorised-use-of-a-comptuer-system

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3394224-Let-A-Woman-Speak-Observer-Letter

Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
R0wantrees · 23/01/2019 13:53

Helen Saxby article

'Have Women and Girls Got Too Many Rights?'
April 5, 2018
(extract)
"Do you think women and girls have got too many rights? Should some of these be rolled back now? Are we too equal? Too safe? Too represented? Too visible? Too powerful? Do you believe there should now be a reduction in women’s rights? Has it all gone too far? Are women actually the oppressors now? Would you support policies which would curtail some of those rights? Do you believe that women should have fewer rights?

Well, if you do, you’re in good company. It’s not just Men’s Rights groups who agree with you: there are increasing numbers of public institutions and businesses who believe that women and girls are so equal now that we no longer need the legislative and social protections which were fought for and won by previous feminists. We are so safe now we no longer need the provisions in law intended to ensure our safety. We have such a major voice now that we no longer need the mechanisms intended to increase our political representation. We have so much recognition for our work that we no longer need women-only prizes and awards. We are so equal in opportunity to men and boys that we no longer need any special treatment to level the playing field.

Do you agree? Lots of people do". (continues)

"In schools there is a definite move towards ensuring that girls grow up with fewer rights than their mothers had. A recent story from Transgender Trend documents the methods used to ensure compliance at one school in Essex, which was coerced into converting its girls’ toilets into unisex toilets, after a campaign led by local trans group Transpire. The Equality Act specifically warns against giving one protected group rights at the expense of another, but when this is trans rights versus girls’ rights, trans groups are ignoring it and misleading schools into putting trans rights first. It is always girls who lose out.

Trans advocacy group GIRES has this advice in their factsheet about trans inclusion:
(see screenshot)

The advice to schools provided by LGBT support group Allsorts, in Brighton, follows the same pattern. This is from their East Sussex Schools Toolkit:

( See screenshot)

This advice was written in 2013 and since then the toolkit has been listed as a resource on the Mermaids website, and used by many schools across Sussex to inform and educate staff on trans inclusion. The aim to teach girls that a boy can be ‘in every other respect a girl’ clearly makes absolutely no sense, and moreover it conflicts with all other initiatives in schools designed to empower girls to respect and assert their own boundaries. It also compromises safeguarding practice. The sentence about the trans pupil’s rights under the Equality Act is a straightforward lie.

In addition to this, girls should get used to the idea of having fewer rights to compete equally in sports:
(see scrennshot)

In a tortured attempt to spin the language, Allsorts believes that girls who object to a male competing with them should be ‘supported to do a different activity’. We all know that that really means ‘be chucked off the team’ though. This is a blatant and intentional misrepresentation of the Equality Act. Girls and women are protected under the category of sex, but trans groups going into schools and workplaces are providing materials which deliberately hide that fact in order to prioritise trans people. Women and girls are always the ones adversely affected.

Trans groups providing guidance for schools and businesses include Mermaids, Gendered Intelligence, GIRES, Educate and Celebrate and the Intercom Trust, as well as Allsorts and Transpire. They all believe that girls and women don’t really need all the rights they currently have, and some of these should be rolled back. It is no longer necessary for girls to enjoy bodily privacy as they grow up, for example, or to expect a level playing field in sporting activities. These are unnecessary cherries on the cake of female equality, and can be removed with no consultation and no impact assessment."(continues)
notthenewsinbriefs.wordpress.com/2018/04/05/have-women-and-girls-got-too-many-rights/

Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
R0wantrees · 23/01/2019 15:25

Context

^its a shame that my post has been misquoted as it has missed the link I make (not on that occasion to Kiwi Farms but to what may be very helpful to many who are reacting very emotionally at the moment)

"Kiwi Farms talk about 'chimping out'

see Steve Peters, 'The Chimp Paradox' which has been used effectively by many sports teams.
Twitter demonstrates how many people (especially males) who need to learn to manage their chimp and be more human:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0TkV34ynzE

The youtube link is narrated by Sir Chris Hoy who is one of many elite sports men and women to benefit from Professor Steve Peters' model which,

"explains the struggle that takes place within your mind and then shows how to apply this understanding to every area of your life so you can:

Recognise how your mind is working
Understand and manage your emotions and thoughts
Manage yourself and become the person you would like to be"

chimpmanagement.com/

Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
Gamer raises $100,000 (and rising) for trans charity Mermaids by playing Donkey Kong non-stop
Swipe left for the next trending thread