I'm still concerned about Justine's comments about the Doghouse needing to "change its ways", and would like her to to explain/justify this. There are plenty of areas of MN including AIBU where a robust exchange of views is positively welcomed - why is the Doghouse suddenly being singled out? How exactly would Justine like us to sugar coat things? The statistics I quoted about dogs killed in Council pounds are that - factual and correct. Should we refer to these dogs as "going to live on a nice farm in the country"? Should we stop alerting people to the issues of dog theft, dog fighting, puppy farming and the horrible ongoing problems with breed specific legislation?
I say again, if MN's justification is to make the life of parents easier (well, nice welcome there for those of us who haven't had kids) - actually, the Doghouse does that. If it really is about making life easier, WHY NOT HAVE STICKIES? Most forums do.
We could cover all the FAQ like how to find a good breeder, how to spot a bad breeder, how to find a good behaviourist, etc. etc. We wouldn't have to repeat ourselves for the 874th time when a numpty/fellow MNetter who we must be supportive and positive to, says "Well of course it's known that all Staffies are slavering child eating demon beasts of the pit" or "I'd never have a rescue dog - they are all slavering child eating demon beasts of the pit" or similar.
DBF is someone who has posted tirelessly to educate and inform people about the reality of life with a rescue dog, and the reality of life and death for dogs in pounds. Many posters have said that they have had their eyes opened to the realities of pounds/puppy farms etc by some of the posts in the Doghouse. If that means even one more rescue dog finding a home, or one less puppy being bought from a puppy farm, then the odd bruised ego is probably acceptable. A bruised ego is quicker to mend than a needle after seven days.