There is an important distinction between state-level complicity and individual responsibility. When I refer to the UK being “complicit,” I am specifically referencing the actions and policies of the British government and institutions not individual civilians. However, in a democratic society, the population holds a level of indirect accountability through electoral and civic mechanisms, particularly when the state engages in internationally significant actions.
The UK has continued to issue arms export licenses to Israel during the ongoing conflict. According to the UK government’s own data, between 2015 and 2022, over £400 million worth of military equipment was approved for export to Israel, including components for aircraft, targeting systems, and other weaponry. British-manufactured components are known to be used in F-35 fighter jets, which have been deployed in aerial operations over Gaza.
Additionally, the UK has repeatedly abstained or voted against UN resolutions calling for immediate ceasefires or independent investigations into potential war crimes. This provides a degree of diplomatic shielding that weakens international accountability mechanisms.
The argument that this would equate to “the average Gazan being complicit in Hamas’s actions” is a false equivalence. Gaza is under a military blockade and operates without full democratic processes; Hamas’s control is not equivalent to a liberal democratic system where citizens have both the right and practical capacity to influence government policy. Palestinians in Gaza cannot freely assemble, vote Hamas out of power, or speak against them without fear of reprisal. By contrast, UK citizens have freedom of expression, access to information, and the ability to engage in democratic and legal processes to oppose their government’s foreign policy.
Therefore, raising concerns, protesting, and holding the UK government accountable is not only valid but necessary. Silence or disengagement, particularly when aware of ongoing international law violations, contributes to a broader system of passive complicity, not in terms of moral blame, but in the failure to interrupt or resist enabling mechanisms.