Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Conflict in the Middle East

New Hamas video of hostages

513 replies

Muthaofcats · 22/05/2024 17:00

The new Hamas video released today of the female hostages selected as the ones they planned to get pregnant was so sickening and I wish I hadn’t seen it.

however, I am also wondering WHY it has not been more widely picked up and broadcast? I don’t understand the silence from the bleeding left; why don’t they see stuff like this and not just feel desperate and sick about those poor poor girls and their families who must be beyond devastated.

Watching the men in those videos helps to counter balance the idea of Israel as the aggressor. I wish more would see it and reflect or even just place those women of equal value to those in Gaza.

How is the world so perverse right now that this warrants a shrug from so many? Or worse, is viewed as justified !?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
Mummy2024 · 24/05/2024 18:37

Humdingerydoo · 24/05/2024 18:31

What about the child at the very end of this video, running around with some kind of rifle in his hands while the adults are kidnapping a 12 year old boy? Can you maybe see how it's not as simple as you're trying to pretend it is?

Honestly I want hamas Brought to justice for what has been done to Israel, but the destruction of the nation can never be justified.

I understand that things are complicated but children are innocent regardless. Even one with a gun in hand cannot be held responsible for being brain washed. Israel need to let water food and medicine in, in large amounts immediately.

ChickyBricky · 24/05/2024 18:37

Scirocco · 24/05/2024 18:31

"Sabaya" translates as "female captive".

Yes, but can you comment on the connotations? it was ages ago that the Nova kidnappings were discussed here, but unless I've gone mad I thought someone said that the meaning is more nuanced than just "female captive" and that having a captive female confers certain rights.

For example, a quick Google says:
Islam allows women to be taken as war captives, once taken captive they become slaves. Those who are taken as slaves are referred to “those your right hand possess.” Sahih Muslim 1456 explains what can be done with captive women.

Is this true? I don't trust what I read on Reddit, but it does suggest there might be more to the word than just someone you have captured.

Humdingerydoo · 24/05/2024 18:41

Scirocco · 24/05/2024 18:36

I think the meaning those 'men' attach to it is pretty clear from the video.

Yes, I'd say so. Shame others on here can't bring themselves to acknowledge it.

MrsAllsorts · 24/05/2024 18:44

Scirocco · 24/05/2024 18:33

I'm guessing there's going to be no apology for the false accusations levelled at me.

There was no intention at all to accuse you specifically of anything. You cannot honestly expect me read every single post of yours, I only know what you say to me.

Regardless, protestors, certainly many of them, are wittingly and unwittingly supporting Hamas. That is my view. And some of the signs carried at protest have been disgraceful even implying that the victims of Oct 7 actually deserved it. And in fact I think the OP had a point and it seems to me that the events of that terrible day are being glossed over by too many people. That’s all.

Auvergne63 · 24/05/2024 18:44

as sending civilian bombers into Israeli hospitals under the guise of receiving medical treatment.
Link to this, please.
Are you talking about the same hospital where the IDF, disguised as medics, shot the paralysed man? Or is it another hospital?

Mummy2024 · 24/05/2024 18:46

MrsAllsorts · 24/05/2024 18:34

Oh my, thank goodness! So they only have the ability to commit such atrocities as they did on October 7th, not to mention sending rockets on an ongoing basis, and actions such as sending civilian bombers into Israeli hospitals under the guise of receiving medical treatment. Nothing to worry about then!

The whole point of drawing attention to the Hamas statement that they wish to eradicate the Jews, is that Hamas do not want peace. Do you not think their threats, their actions to date, their absolute promise that they will commit the October atrocities again, should be taken seriously? They want the Israelis gone, and they are quite happy to use their own civilians, including children and women, as martyrs, cannon fodder, human shields. Then they have the nerve to turn around and demand that Israel stop being nasty to innocent people, when they themselves have no care whatsoever. They do not even give a damn about basic human rights, let alone actual lives.

Give it a break! I suggest when Hamas begin having a care for their own people, they might be seen as possessing a little humanity and desiring of peace, instead of which they are brutal savages. Total utter brutal, fascist savages who kill their own. Fact. Maybe you should write to the Hamas leader and tell him to stop regarding civilians as “martyrs”.

So because Hamas doesn't care and is happy to let their own civilians die Israel shouldn't either? Is this what you are saying?

Israel cannot be irradiated because it is far to powerful I point that out and you acknowlege it and instead say that it is justified because they will carry out another October? Is this correct? It's a question not a accusation.
Israel can chose to follow international law... it can stay within the rules of war to defend itself I am not against that.

ChickyBricky · 24/05/2024 18:47

OK so I've done a bit more Googling and found this on Quora, but don't have a subscription so can't read the whole thing.

As suspected, Reddit were talking bollocks.

As @Scirocco says, though, the intentions of those idiots is so clear that they could have used the word "ice cream" and we'd all know what they meant! 🤦🏻‍♀️

New Hamas video of hostages
Dulra · 24/05/2024 18:50

Humdingerydoo · 24/05/2024 18:31

What about the child at the very end of this video, running around with some kind of rifle in his hands while the adults are kidnapping a 12 year old boy? Can you maybe see how it's not as simple as you're trying to pretend it is?

If I saw a child running around with a rifle my instinct would be to protect the child not use it as reason for killing children. Given the fact that 14,000 children are dead I think the suggestion that some of them could be combatants inappropriate.

PoloMum · 24/05/2024 18:50

MrsAllsorts · 24/05/2024 18:44

There was no intention at all to accuse you specifically of anything. You cannot honestly expect me read every single post of yours, I only know what you say to me.

Regardless, protestors, certainly many of them, are wittingly and unwittingly supporting Hamas. That is my view. And some of the signs carried at protest have been disgraceful even implying that the victims of Oct 7 actually deserved it. And in fact I think the OP had a point and it seems to me that the events of that terrible day are being glossed over by too many people. That’s all.

@MrsAllsorts if you read through some of the other Middle East threads, you will soon see that Scirocco is one of the most balanced and fair posters on the subject, and often expresses empathy with Israeli victims.
In fact it often occurs to me, while reading through these threads, that if instead of the likes of Hamas and Netanyahu we had people like @Scirocco and @EllaDisenchanted in charge of Gaza and Israel, then we would have had a feasible peace process in place a long time ago.

dungiven · 24/05/2024 18:50

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

dungiven · 24/05/2024 18:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ChickyBricky · 24/05/2024 18:54

MrsAllsorts · 24/05/2024 18:44

There was no intention at all to accuse you specifically of anything. You cannot honestly expect me read every single post of yours, I only know what you say to me.

Regardless, protestors, certainly many of them, are wittingly and unwittingly supporting Hamas. That is my view. And some of the signs carried at protest have been disgraceful even implying that the victims of Oct 7 actually deserved it. And in fact I think the OP had a point and it seems to me that the events of that terrible day are being glossed over by too many people. That’s all.

I think this is how I feel, too. I'm sure some of my posts (like the one earlier in this thread) have been deleted because I've been assumed to be Islamophobic, which is annoying. I've had a lifetime of being totally indifferent to race or religion, and my closest friend at school was Muslim. But what's happened on and since 7 October has made me feel nervous and wary, and ashamed of feeling nervous and wary, and really fucking anxious about the way things are going. On MN at least, it feels as though compassion is entirely one-directional, and that upsets me. It's also distressing that I can't express that upset without upsetting people I don't want to upset. It's beginning to feel like humanity is trapped in some kind of cruel endgame of our own making.

Scirocco · 24/05/2024 18:55

@ChickyBricky In itself, the word doesn't imply anything sexual or to do with pregnancy. It's pretty clear what those 'men' were interested in, having found female captives, though.

IS / ISIS / ISIL used it as a descriptor for sex slaves. Which is disgusting.

As for the concept and history of slavery in Islam, that's a full and controversy-filled thread in itself. In brief: At the time of the Qur'an and ahadith, slavery in the non-Islamic Middle East was widespread and brutal. Islamic law set out standards for treating and liberating slaves, including encouraging people to not have slaves at all. Islam also stated that people should adhere to secular law (unless it compels someone to do something clearly un-Islamic), and international law is clear about slavery, so slavery is not acceptable. Violent misogynists won't let a little thing like actually following the teachings of their claimed faith, get in the way of being violent misogynists though. So, they go "yay, this bit here said how to treat slaves back hundreds of years ago so it must still be fine to have slaves today... oh, and we'll just forget the bits about freeing them, giving them rights, etc".

ChickyBricky · 24/05/2024 18:55

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I'm surprised you didn't use the word "Hasbara" 🤣🤣🤣

Welcome back!

ChickyBricky · 24/05/2024 18:57

Scirocco · 24/05/2024 18:55

@ChickyBricky In itself, the word doesn't imply anything sexual or to do with pregnancy. It's pretty clear what those 'men' were interested in, having found female captives, though.

IS / ISIS / ISIL used it as a descriptor for sex slaves. Which is disgusting.

As for the concept and history of slavery in Islam, that's a full and controversy-filled thread in itself. In brief: At the time of the Qur'an and ahadith, slavery in the non-Islamic Middle East was widespread and brutal. Islamic law set out standards for treating and liberating slaves, including encouraging people to not have slaves at all. Islam also stated that people should adhere to secular law (unless it compels someone to do something clearly un-Islamic), and international law is clear about slavery, so slavery is not acceptable. Violent misogynists won't let a little thing like actually following the teachings of their claimed faith, get in the way of being violent misogynists though. So, they go "yay, this bit here said how to treat slaves back hundreds of years ago so it must still be fine to have slaves today... oh, and we'll just forget the bits about freeing them, giving them rights, etc".

Thanks so much for taking the trouble to share that clear explanation. I think our posts crossed, in the meantime I did a bit more digging and came to the same conclusion. 😊

Scirocco · 24/05/2024 18:57

Thank you, @PoloMum ♥️

dungiven · 24/05/2024 18:58

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Auvergne63 · 24/05/2024 18:59

There was no intention at all to accuse you specifically of anything. You cannot honestly expect me read every single post of yours, I only know what you say to me.
Sorry but you did
Read your post at 14:39. You clearly implied that Scirocco was a Hamas supporter, which I find utterly disgraceful.
Scirocco has remained, for the last 7 months, measured and composed in her posts. I know she has lost loved ones in Gaza and is grieving.
Have some compassion and humanity. God knows, it's lacking at the moment in the world we live in.
@Scirocco Sorry but could not remain silence in the face of such a denial. I wish people had the courage of their conviction.

ChickyBricky · 24/05/2024 18:59

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I know. That's why I lap it up!

Limesodaagain · 24/05/2024 19:04

Scirocco · 24/05/2024 18:55

@ChickyBricky In itself, the word doesn't imply anything sexual or to do with pregnancy. It's pretty clear what those 'men' were interested in, having found female captives, though.

IS / ISIS / ISIL used it as a descriptor for sex slaves. Which is disgusting.

As for the concept and history of slavery in Islam, that's a full and controversy-filled thread in itself. In brief: At the time of the Qur'an and ahadith, slavery in the non-Islamic Middle East was widespread and brutal. Islamic law set out standards for treating and liberating slaves, including encouraging people to not have slaves at all. Islam also stated that people should adhere to secular law (unless it compels someone to do something clearly un-Islamic), and international law is clear about slavery, so slavery is not acceptable. Violent misogynists won't let a little thing like actually following the teachings of their claimed faith, get in the way of being violent misogynists though. So, they go "yay, this bit here said how to treat slaves back hundreds of years ago so it must still be fine to have slaves today... oh, and we'll just forget the bits about freeing them, giving them rights, etc".

Thank you for your even handed and fair response.
Violent misogynists won't let a little thing like actually following the teachings of their claimed faith, get in the way of being violent misogynists though.”
We have those kind of people in my religion too .😣

Humdingerydoo · 24/05/2024 19:15

Dulra · 24/05/2024 18:50

If I saw a child running around with a rifle my instinct would be to protect the child not use it as reason for killing children. Given the fact that 14,000 children are dead I think the suggestion that some of them could be combatants inappropriate.

More or less inappropriate than all the posters on this thread minimising or denying what Hamas have done?

All I did was post a video showing a child terrorist to show it's not as straightforward as some people are trying to pretend it is. Nothing about any of this is straightforward.

But before my words get twisted - I don't think the so far almost 8000 dead children were terrorists. I don't think all Palestinians are terrorists, regardless of sex or age. I think Palestinians deserves a whole lot better than their current representatives and I think they deserve a state of their own, one that isn't so heavily controlled by Israel. I just think Hamas is very, very widespread and needs dealing with. I personally wouldn't have done what Israel have done though.

EasternStandard · 24/05/2024 19:19

LordPercyPercy · 24/05/2024 18:13

There was nothing said about rape or pregnancy. Thats Israeli propaganda.

Why are some people so eager to do Hamas' PR work for them?

Yes

Why?

Ategnatos · 24/05/2024 19:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

So they didn't murder over 1200 people? Rape women? Kidnap children?

You do realise that supporting Hamas is illegal?

threeoldbicycles · 24/05/2024 19:33

@ChickyBricky "What I tend to see is people paying lip service, in passing, to the horror of the atrocities committed by Hamas, all while insisting that Israel's response is disproportionate and that the IDF are "the real terrorists."

They flood thread after thread after thread with trauma-porn images from Gaza, go into gruesome detail about the suffering of dying babies, and copy/paste comments from social media and dubious news outlets without any analysis or comment of their own, as though no one else has access to the internet and they are performing an important public broadcast service. Sometimes I can't help wondering if these are bots working in Hamas's interests, although I suppose most of it is just lazy posters bouncing around in their echo chamber."

This with gold-plated bells on ^

I suspected bots as well, especially with the plethora of posts from Quds a news outlet with links to Hamas.

MN has been asked to shut this stuff down in the interests of good taste but so far hasn't done so.

MrsAllsorts · 24/05/2024 19:42

PoloMum · 24/05/2024 18:50

@MrsAllsorts if you read through some of the other Middle East threads, you will soon see that Scirocco is one of the most balanced and fair posters on the subject, and often expresses empathy with Israeli victims.
In fact it often occurs to me, while reading through these threads, that if instead of the likes of Hamas and Netanyahu we had people like @Scirocco and @EllaDisenchanted in charge of Gaza and Israel, then we would have had a feasible peace process in place a long time ago.

Yes, maybe I don’t usually follow these threads. And you are right, we need people who want peace actually in charge.