@Finallyloggedin Finallyloggedin · Today 20:24
Re your post
Unfortunately, I think anyone reading should be careful about this. Though not untrue as such, it is misleading in that it really ‘throws out the baby with the bathwater’ when removed in this way from the whole context - which is one in which there are most certainly corroborated, credible witness accounts and other evidence of many rapes.
Look at this excellent, exhaustive and analytical account from Haaretz below which covers everything regarding this subject, and the reports and counter reports since Oct 7 in a way nothing else I have seen written has.
Having just stumbled on it tonight, I now consider that that Times article posted on one of these threads a week or so ago gives rather too limited sense of the evidence - though it never said no rape happened - and so do those concentrating only on debunking some individual, mistaken accounts, even if that is important too.
This article is very long, so I will not copy and past it all. But you can paste the headline into archive ph. (See image)
(Warning: upsetting and graphic accounts.)
On the archive ph page you paste the headline in the lower of the two boxes.
This Haaretz article goes through all the evidence of rapes, any mistaken evidence, the media reports and counter-reports, and the misuse for propaganda etc to give an impressive and extensive measured analysis. This is an article to believe imo.
15 Witnesses, Three Confessions, a Pattern of Naked Dead Bodies. All the Evidence of Hamas Rape on October 7
Hamas' acts of rape on October 7 have turned into one of the massacre's most contentious topics. Each testimony and detail that emerges is weaponized in the clash between Israel's supporters and its opponents. Now, based on conversations with dozens of sources, a Haaretz investigation delineates which proof exists for sex crimes committed by Hamas – and what is missing
Liza Rozovsky
April 18 2024