Not all the reports. The reports from Israel, US, U.K., France and Canada have rubber stamped the IDF report. These are not independent reports being close allies of Israel. Reports by Channel 4, Russian, Chinese, Qatar cast doubt on this. Especially since IDF was shown to have fabricated evidence within their report in the first place (audio, & maps)
The primary issue I see is that IDF is not being entirely honest with their allies as to the full arsenal on munitions currently being used on Gaza because all these reports conclude that it wasn’t a JDAM. JDAMs are only one type of air strike Israel is using. They are also using mortar shells- guided, dumb, and the extra damaging white phosphorus and incendiary shells that are banned in urban environments where civilians are present. They are also using tank fire. The failure to examine the other artillery Israel has been lobbing into Gaza tells me these reports are incomplete. Concluding it wasn’t a JDAM doesn’t automatically mean it could not have been IDF. Trusting that IDF would not use a banned type of shell, is naive as HRW has investigated and shown repeated use of banned weapons used on Palestinian civilians.
In addition, I have worked in rockets and a failed rocket launch mid flight would have looked very different visually and left a lot of debris- there is none reported at the site not even by UNWRA officials who arrived shortly after. For those who do not know, UNWRA are United Nations, not Hamas and not Palestinians.
In addition the audio on the hit on the hospital sounds nothing like a failed rocket plummeting down on to Gaza. There is no sound of an explosion mid-air, it has the whistle sound of incoming artillery fire.
In addition, the IDF had previously sent warning shells that hit near the hospital and said the next would be a hit as part of their evacuation warning. So there is both motive and stated intention from IDF that the hospital was a target. They have also shelled other health clinics and hospitals, so it’s clearly not a red line for them. There is the case of a member if the IDF digital spokesteam taking credit for the strike and then deleting it claiming they were repeating a Reuters report- when Reuters has said no such report existed.
In addition, the photos, craters and fire are similar to an incendiary shell not a JDAM. Hamas has used incendiary shells BUT a misfire wouldn’t have caused the damage or the fire. The crater is a direct hit crater and the incendiary explosion then ripped through the people sheltering in the car park and courtyard next to it. Incendiary shells are designed to spew conflagrations after impact causing widespread fire damage. This is consistent to what happened to the innocents who were killed and the burned out cars.
I don’t think it is a closed matter at all.