Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AGAIN - Nursery worker found guilty [CONTENT WARNING: Details of CSA]

248 replies

AliceAbsolum · 09/02/2026 15:57

https://www.whitchurchherald.co.uk/news/national/25838680.nursery-worker-guilty-multiple-sexual-offences-children-care/

Seriously when are they going to ban men from nurseries? I don't care if some other innocent men have to find other jobs.

It makes me feel so sick, I can't even comprehend it.

[title edited by MNHQ to include content warning]

Nursery worker guilty of multiple sexual offences against children in his care

Nathan Bennett was convicted of eight charges after previously admitting 13 others.

https://www.whitchurchherald.co.uk/news/national/25838680.nursery-worker-guilty-multiple-sexual-offences-children-care/

OP posts:
SteelMaiden · 09/02/2026 20:22

queenofwandss · 09/02/2026 16:22

Disgusting and I agree they should be female only and rigorous checks (and better pay!).

does anyone know what kind of sentence he will be looking at?

All the checks done only mean they haven't been caught yet.

What they should be doing is no adult working alone with a child ever. To be honest, id like to see 3 adults minimum with any child, and if that means they have half height cubicles, maybe with frosted glass from the floor, to change nappies on the main floor, then thats what they should be doing.

Mysterian · 09/02/2026 20:22

All men working with children are paedophiles, and paedophiles should be killed? So all men who work with children should be killed then? Wonder why they can't get more men to do the job?

Pasta4Dinner · 09/02/2026 20:23

There was a man at DDs last nursery. He was such a nice guy, a loud gregarious character. DD still talks about him 10 years later. He’s still there and an asset to them. Lots of the children there had absent fathers so an important male figure for them.
I think we need more rigorous background checks.

OtterlyAstounding · 09/02/2026 20:24

So remove all men from nursery, I've got no skin in the game and don't care about the menz. But what are you going to do when the next child is harmed?

In the real world, no safeguarding will be 100%, so here's an idea: Why don't we do BOTH? Remove men, AND increase safeguarding across the board.

Notgonnalieaboutthis · 09/02/2026 20:25

Time to stop employing men in nurseries.

FlakyRedDreamer · 09/02/2026 20:25

Whocares63 · 09/02/2026 20:20

Because they are exactly the kind of jobs peados seek out

and you translate that by " only paedos" can do these jobs? charming.

Whocares63 · 09/02/2026 20:25

Pasta4Dinner · 09/02/2026 20:23

There was a man at DDs last nursery. He was such a nice guy, a loud gregarious character. DD still talks about him 10 years later. He’s still there and an asset to them. Lots of the children there had absent fathers so an important male figure for them.
I think we need more rigorous background checks.

And if it's a peados who has never been caught before. What use be background checks then?

HotChocCreamAndMarshmallows · 09/02/2026 20:25

Whocares63 · 09/02/2026 20:20

Because they are exactly the kind of jobs peados seek out

That is absolutely not the same as the question asked

OtterlyAstounding · 09/02/2026 20:27

HotChocCreamAndMarshmallows · 09/02/2026 20:25

That is absolutely not the same as the question asked

Male sexual offenders are 3 times more likely to seek work with children than the average man.

Do you like those odds, when the risk is your child being vaginally or anally raped by an adult man? Do you think that's a risk you should expose your child to?

Whocares63 · 09/02/2026 20:28

FlakyRedDreamer · 09/02/2026 20:25

and you translate that by " only paedos" can do these jobs? charming.

That's not what I'm saying and you know it

FlakyRedDreamer · 09/02/2026 20:28

Mysterian · 09/02/2026 20:22

All men working with children are paedophiles, and paedophiles should be killed? So all men who work with children should be killed then? Wonder why they can't get more men to do the job?

not just all men who work with children, but all men who work with vulnerable women too apparently.

It might be quicker to just kill all men and be done with it.

What's frightening is imagining that some of these posters have boys. Imagine having a mum who hates men so bitterly and think her own child is a paedophile because he's male. It's terrifying the way some kids must be raised.

FlakyRedDreamer · 09/02/2026 20:28

Whocares63 · 09/02/2026 20:28

That's not what I'm saying and you know it

I am just reading your posts, that's exactly what you are saying!

AnotherHormonalWoman · 09/02/2026 20:29

OtterlyAstounding · 09/02/2026 20:20

Why do people say, 'oh, women are still a risk, so let's not eliminate the biggest, most overwhelming risk (men), lest we become complacent'?

That's like saying that having seatbelts doesn't eliminate risk, only making the speed limit 15mph would eliminate it, so therefore we shouldn't have seatbelts – it might create a false sense of safety.

No. First, eliminate the biggest, easiest risk to get rid of: men. Now fewer children will be sexually abused. Yay! Second, work on better safeguarding overall, to reduce the remaining risk to as close to zero as possible.

This is simple.

Also, why is it that people understand and are okay with men not being allowed to be mammographers for adult women, to protect their dignity, but aren't okay with men not being allowed to be nursery workers to protect babies and small children from being raped?

Why do so many people want to enable child rape in order to protect a small number of men's feelings?

I'm really not trying to stand up for men, but I don't believe that men working in nurseries are the biggest risk factor for harm to children in a childcare setting. I absolutely accept that the sex most likely to abuse a child is overwhelmingly men, but I suspect that things like improper training and safeguarding practices, and insufficient staff levels carry a far higher causal link to harm to children in nurseries, than whether or not there's a man working there.

As I have said, I've no skin in the game, ban men I'm perfectly happy with that - but I do think we need to do more than that to prevent harm from coming to children in nurseries.

UltraHorse · 09/02/2026 20:29

Get cameras in nursery s and care homes

CoffeePleaseBlack · 09/02/2026 20:29

NotThatSerious · 09/02/2026 16:07

This is why I refuse to send my kids to nursery it’s awful. And this is only what gets reported

How lucky for you that you have an option

FlakyRedDreamer · 09/02/2026 20:31

OtterlyAstounding · 09/02/2026 20:27

Male sexual offenders are 3 times more likely to seek work with children than the average man.

Do you like those odds, when the risk is your child being vaginally or anally raped by an adult man? Do you think that's a risk you should expose your child to?

If you are that frighten about your child's safety (and why not) i'd question why you would abandon them in a childcare setting in the first place instead of keeping them safe with you frankly.

There were 2 male nursery workers in the nursery where my kids went. I was happy with the safeguarding that was in place, but then I make assessments based on everything, not just based on a person's sex or gender.

AnotherHormonalWoman · 09/02/2026 20:33

UltraHorse · 09/02/2026 20:29

Get cameras in nursery s and care homes

100%. I think it's diabolical that care homes can tell families that they may not have nanny cams in their relatives rooms.

The tech needs to be VERY secure, if we're talking cameras in nursery toilets, but it's not impossible. I don't think it'd have universal support though.

HowMuchIsThatDoggyInTheWindow123 · 09/02/2026 20:34

This is why we decided to have much less disposable income and I be a sahm than send our kids to nursery. I'd sooner be flat broke than take the risk.

Eastie77Returns · 09/02/2026 20:35

Most of the women involved in the SA of children in nurseries do so at the behest of male partners. It’s extremely rare for a woman to SA a child completely of her own volition. I’m not downplaying their culpability but if you take men out of the equation, the rate of child abuse will dramatically decrease.

Personally I would not allow men to work with children under the age of 4 / in nursery settings. It’s very sad for innocent men of course but I care more about children men’s hurt feelings and I think good men would understand.

I have no issue with men teaching primary school aged children and upwards. Both DD and DS have had the most amazing male teachers since they were in Y1. But babies/non verbal children/toddlers - no. I remember DC’s old childminder when they were tiny was very popular and always had waiting lists and I honestly think it was partly because she was single with no adult men in the house. Really sad but that’s the reality of the situation and the blame for this lies with…men.

Anxioustealady · 09/02/2026 20:35

AnotherHormonalWoman · 09/02/2026 20:20

The thing that annoys me second about these threads (the first being the perpetrators obviously) is the number of mumsnetters who will wang on about statistics and risk, without actually understanding either.

So remove all men from nursery, I've got no skin in the game and don't care about the menz. But what are you going to do when the next child is harmed?

When the oil industry had a particularly awful year for deaths, the likes of Shell, BP and ExxonMobil went all out to prevent not just deaths but injuries. I was a frequent visitor to various offices, and you could not enter without watching a safety video every time, you had to sit down to drink a coffee (no carrying it further than to the nearest table, not even to your desk, and you must always use a lid), you could NOT walk up a step without holding onto the handrail and every single employee carried traffic light cards on their lanyard and they were forced empowered to give a yellow or red card to ANYBODY at all, no matter what the status. I never visited the more risky sites or rigs, but I can only imagine. And for all that it felt ridiculous getting a red card for not having put the fiddly lid on my coffee cup properly, damn it worked. Accident stats went almost non-existent.

What I'm trying to say is that the same things SHOULD be possible to make abuse in childcare a never incident. Massive, end your business or career penalties for procedures not being up to scratch and staff not following them properly. Government funded support and training. An industry wide review of the actual statistics and every reported incident, and development of procedures that are both workable in real settings AND that prevent people from being able to cover up child abuse.

Edited

....what!?

Notgonnalieaboutthis · 09/02/2026 20:35

We did the same. No way did I want complete strangers changing my children’s nappies.

usedtobeaylis · 09/02/2026 20:36

Pasta4Dinner · 09/02/2026 20:23

There was a man at DDs last nursery. He was such a nice guy, a loud gregarious character. DD still talks about him 10 years later. He’s still there and an asset to them. Lots of the children there had absent fathers so an important male figure for them.
I think we need more rigorous background checks.

Background checks are already rigorous but as I said earlier I think they're geared towards mitigating the risk posed by women. The risk posed by men is different.

Applecharlotte2 · 09/02/2026 20:36

HowMuchIsThatDoggyInTheWindow123 · 09/02/2026 20:34

This is why we decided to have much less disposable income and I be a sahm than send our kids to nursery. I'd sooner be flat broke than take the risk.

I’m know I wanted to say this earlier but- it does feel a bit odd - to not want to look after them yourself and then say the nursery is full of risk - also it’s supposed to be empowering women to work and then saying men can’t do childcare..

AnotherHormonalWoman · 09/02/2026 20:37

HowMuchIsThatDoggyInTheWindow123 · 09/02/2026 20:34

This is why we decided to have much less disposable income and I be a sahm than send our kids to nursery. I'd sooner be flat broke than take the risk.

Your children and your choice, but I do think it's a massive shame for your child to miss out on a lot of lovely early years developmental opportunities that cannot, with the best will in the world be provided at home with one parent.

The overwhelming majority of nurseries are safe.

Most of life for all of us - adults and children - involves calculating and mitigating risk, not avoiding it completely.

usedtobeaylis · 09/02/2026 20:38

FlakyRedDreamer · 09/02/2026 20:31

If you are that frighten about your child's safety (and why not) i'd question why you would abandon them in a childcare setting in the first place instead of keeping them safe with you frankly.

There were 2 male nursery workers in the nursery where my kids went. I was happy with the safeguarding that was in place, but then I make assessments based on everything, not just based on a person's sex or gender.

Best parent ever, cool.

Edit: sorry wrong post 👀