You know, I remember years ago discussions on mumsnet about the corruption of the word 'woman' to include men who want to be accepted as women and the concern about women's words to talk about ourselves being removed.
Some posters thought that this was an over-reaction and that we should include those men under the definition of 'woman' and "be kind" because, anyway, we still had the word 'female' to describe ourselves.
Some posters pointed out that once these men had successfully colonised the word 'woman' to redefine it as anyone who "identifies as a woman" (based on whatever they individually believe 'womanly feelings' to be) they would absolutely come for the word 'female'. This was because the whole point is that it is unacceptable to those men for women to define themselves as anything different from them and they wanted to obfusticate the issues that arise from said "identification" and make it difficult to discuss in plain language.
In other words, the appeasement position of "oh, just give them this and hopefully they'll leave us alone" was doomed to fail and Poland would, indeed, be invaded.
This was seen in many quarters to be an extremist, conspiracy-theory-esque position and suspicion at the time.
But here you are.
You would be less confused and will understand the issues better if you remember that what you call "trans female students" are in fact "trans male students", but something tells me you have some vested interest in obscuring that very simple truth.