Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Would you expect to pay for child

224 replies

Whatdidyoudo99 · 21/09/2022 11:52

Would you expect to pay for 5.5 year old if pricing is

0-5 free
6-17 £25

I was charged and told under 5s are free and as 5.5 years old I have to pay!

OP posts:
AryaStarkWolf · 21/09/2022 14:41

Igneococcus · 21/09/2022 14:34

Following their logic 17.5 year olds can go the pub and buy an alcoholic drink.

Exactly.

pigsDOfly · 21/09/2022 14:49

God there's some hard of understanding posters on here.

I'm wondering if when their children have a birthday they immediately add on a year: child has 5th birthday they tell everyone that child is now 6 years old.

0-5 includes all those months when child is 5 and however many months or days, right up until the child's 6th birthday.

It's really not difficult.

NippyWoowoo · 21/09/2022 14:52

If they intend to only offer free care to under 5s, they've clearly worded that very wrongly. I'd pull them in on it.

It would probably just lead them to change their offer though to say under 5's, but at least it would be clear.

SirChenjins · 21/09/2022 14:57

pigsDOfly · 21/09/2022 14:49

God there's some hard of understanding posters on here.

I'm wondering if when their children have a birthday they immediately add on a year: child has 5th birthday they tell everyone that child is now 6 years old.

0-5 includes all those months when child is 5 and however many months or days, right up until the child's 6th birthday.

It's really not difficult.

Exactly. Or do posters go around telling everyone they’re a year older than they are?

I’m amazed at the level of confusion around something so simple.

IncompleteSenten · 21/09/2022 15:04

"I’m amazed at the level of confusion around something so simple."

It's fucking painful to read is what it is.

Free chocolate for those aged 45 to 48.

I am 48 years and 9 months old.

Am I 49? No. I'm fucking not. Give me the bloody chocolate.

Pinkpeony2 · 21/09/2022 15:09

If it was as you wrote it then no you shouldn’t have had to pay
BUT
in all my 14 years of taking kids on 100’s days out I have never once seen a place saying this. It’s 0-5 free. Over 5 pay. Unless I see the actual website I’m calling bollocks on this.

Marmite17 · 21/09/2022 15:20

Jules912 · 21/09/2022 12:04

If displayed exactly as you've written it I'd expect 5 year olds to be free, though I'd be surprised as that's the normal age places start charging. If they'd written:
0-5 free
5-17 £25
I'd expect to pay for a 5 year old as 5.5 is technically older than 5.

This. Their pricing structure isn't clear, which is their fault.

FormerlySpeckledyHen · 21/09/2022 15:31

Should be free until their sixth birthday.

littlequestion · 21/09/2022 16:11

Ages, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 are free.
Ages 6 and above pay.

Lesserspotteddogfish · 21/09/2022 17:04

Email the manager quoting their sign and ask for a refund.

Baggingarea · 21/09/2022 17:05

Sorry I accidentally hit YABU. YANBU!! Your child is 5 so is in 0 - 5. Blates a ticket seller who doesn't understand the rules properly.

Lesserspotteddogfish · 21/09/2022 17:06

Marmite17 · 21/09/2022 15:20

This. Their pricing structure isn't clear, which is their fault.

It is clear. The OP doesn’t say 5-17, it says 6-17, so clearly she should not have been charged for a 5 year old.

NippyWoowoo · 21/09/2022 17:07

Pinkpeony2 · 21/09/2022 15:09

If it was as you wrote it then no you shouldn’t have had to pay
BUT
in all my 14 years of taking kids on 100’s days out I have never once seen a place saying this. It’s 0-5 free. Over 5 pay. Unless I see the actual website I’m calling bollocks on this.

If you've been paying for your child at 5, then more fool you.

Free 0-5 means you pay from the day they turn 6.

NippyWoowoo · 21/09/2022 17:25

Even the TFL 16-25 railcard recognises that it is valid and can still be purchased right up until the day before you turn 26.

Would you expect to pay for child
StanleyStanleyStanley · 21/09/2022 17:26

Pinkpeony2 · 21/09/2022 15:09

If it was as you wrote it then no you shouldn’t have had to pay
BUT
in all my 14 years of taking kids on 100’s days out I have never once seen a place saying this. It’s 0-5 free. Over 5 pay. Unless I see the actual website I’m calling bollocks on this.

That just says exactly what the OP said

0-5 free
Over 5s (so 6+) pay.

So if you are saying what you actually see everywhere you are constantly paying too much.

Beees · 21/09/2022 17:29

Pinkpeony2 · 21/09/2022 15:09

If it was as you wrote it then no you shouldn’t have had to pay
BUT
in all my 14 years of taking kids on 100’s days out I have never once seen a place saying this. It’s 0-5 free. Over 5 pay. Unless I see the actual website I’m calling bollocks on this.

Why do you call bollocks? If anything we should be calling bollocks on your claim you've always paid for a 5 year old even if the rules say 0-5s are free.

If it says 0-5s are free then why the fuck would you pay for them?

LongLivedQueen · 21/09/2022 17:30

Pinkpeony2 · 21/09/2022 15:09

If it was as you wrote it then no you shouldn’t have had to pay
BUT
in all my 14 years of taking kids on 100’s days out I have never once seen a place saying this. It’s 0-5 free. Over 5 pay. Unless I see the actual website I’m calling bollocks on this.

Do you not understand how numbers work? if 0-5 is free, but over 5's pay...what do you think the number 5 means?
O-5 free means people who are 0 1 2 3 4 AND 5 are free.
So how in the fuck do you think that means 5 year olds pay?

For info purposes, I've just checked with a 6 year old. Her schooling , and therefore maths lessons, are not in English, and even she fully understands the above!

LongLivedQueen · 21/09/2022 17:31

Marmite17 · 21/09/2022 15:20

This. Their pricing structure isn't clear, which is their fault.

It is absolutely 100% clear.

Unless you do not understand the concept of numbers.

fucap · 21/09/2022 17:37

It's clear.
0-5 is free.
6 to 17 pay.
A child who is over the age but not yet 5 is 5 and therefore free.

I would phone again or send an email with a screenshot of the pricing structure and say you were wrongly charged as the child is 5.

I think they are just trying it on....

Beees · 21/09/2022 17:38

Unless you do not understand the concept of numbers.

Unfortunately this doesn't just refer to the person who charged the OP. It appears a fuck ton of adults don't actually understand how numbers work!

LongLivedQueen · 21/09/2022 17:56

Beees · 21/09/2022 17:38

Unless you do not understand the concept of numbers.

Unfortunately this doesn't just refer to the person who charged the OP. It appears a fuck ton of adults don't actually understand how numbers work!

Indeed. I can't even follow the though process here.

There are 2 groups here.

Group 1: 0 to 5 year olds, who are free
Group 2: 6 to 17 year olds, who pay.

Those who think that the 5 year old should pay...can you explain why? This would mean that you think the 5 year old is in Group 2, and not Group 1.
Group 2 clearly states 6 to 17 year olds.

Can you explain how you think a 5 year old is aged 6 to 17? Please?

LilacPoppy · 21/09/2022 18:25

@Pinkpeony2 it's a dentist not a day out.

pigsDOfly · 21/09/2022 19:20

For those who think a 5 year old child is actually 6 years old.

It's my birthday in a couple of months.

At the moment I'm 73. I'm not bloody 74 and I don't tell people I'm 73 and 10 months. I tell them I'm 73 because I won't be 74 until my 74th birthday.

It works exactly the same for a 5 year old child. They're not 6 until their 6th birthday.

Chohlin654 · 21/09/2022 19:33

Wow so many thickos 😂

fucap · 21/09/2022 19:49

A child who is over the age but not yet 5 is 5 and therefore free

Haha I wrote a load of crap here.
I meant a child who is over the age of 5 but not yet 6 is 5 and therefore free.