Three things strike me about the coverage that I’ve seen of Robbins’s evidence.
It is now obvious and confirmed that Starmer wanted Mandelson irrespective of any checking process. That makes his supposed “outrage” at finding out last week of Mandelson’s negative vetting result laughable. More to the point, unbelievable. That’s the ‘newsy’ bit. It’s easy for newspapers to get their readers interested in.
Starmer tried to get Matthew Doyle a senior diplomatic post. And that Lammy was not to be told. That’s a political bombshell but more of interest to Westminster and the civil service.
And nobody seems to be able to get an answer about whether Starmer knew in September 2025 that there had been a negative vetting result, when the Independent ran their story - after putting it to Starmer’s press chief. The absence of an answer to that - and Starmer was asked in Parliament yesterday - speaks volumes. But that’s again one, for now, for Westminster.
I cannot see how Starmer can possibly survive after May however the elections go.