Now reported in the Telegraph
https://archive.ph/aFRYf
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10/30/social-worker-removed-from-case0/
Although if anyone has a share token for the Times article....?
From the Telegraph article
Mr Plummer, from Bath, is taking action against Cafcass alongside Bayswater Support Group and an anonymous third claimant to demand that the agency suspend its transgender guidance.
Their pre-action letter, seen by The Telegraph, alleges that the guidance presents “contested propositions” about gender identity “as though they represent settled professional practice”.
The guidance does not acknowledge clinical, safeguarding or legal debates about transgender issues, the group claims.
Cafcass’s official guidance tells staff to write reports using a transitioning child’s “new name and pronouns” to “not invalidate the gender in which the child identifies”. The guidance says children “should not be forced to pretend they are not transgender to please a parent”.
It continues: “Some parents simply do not accept that transgender people exist and carry prejudice and bigotry that they project onto their child.
“In that dynamic, the child cannot be themselves and may become homeless or be abused by the parent or other family members and child protection issues arise.”
It adds: “Evidence shows that young people who have parents/wider family who are supportive of their transgender identity are more likely to have good mental health, including improved outcomes.”
The last paragraph I quoted seems to make several extraordinary claims, particularly that A follows T. I'd like to see the extraordinary evidence that supports them.