Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Views on androgen insensitivity and women’s sport participation

241 replies

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 06:41

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOugAoGDbo6/?hl=en

It's about androgen insensitivity.

Okay, so I come across this person on my reels during the night. Probably due to discussions here and the algorithm and Big Brother.

I also tried to do a search here but nothing come up about previous discussions. Might be the imperfect search functions.

Now unusually for me, I will give my actual position on what I'm about to say and ask.

I don't think trans women should compete with women in the majority of single sex sports events past a childhood grassroots level. Where it really doesn't matter, we should probably have those sports be mixed at a professional level to increase participation but that's another subject entirely.

When it comes to DSDs and the like, I think things like normal or average hormonal levels need to play a part in determining their participation. The athletes most discussed in here, I agree (somewhat reluctantly) they shouldn't compete with women. Reluctantly just because I think they are good athletes/people and haven't acted maliciously.

The person in the clip I have shown above, however, I don't think they are quite the same. I wouldn't begrudge them a space on a women's sports team, though from the sounds of it, they might not be very good, anyway.

I'm actually not sure if this is the clip of them I've watched as I watched them on Facebook. They talk about several of their aunts having the same disorder so they had some idea they would vs most people who have it not knowing until they get older.

So I guess I'm asking for people's opinions on this person and disorder when it comes to single sex spaces and sports.

Jackie Blankenship • Intersex 101 on Instagram: "✨ Born with XY chromosomes, but my body never listened to testosterone. My testes became my natural estrogen factory - Here is the scientific way it all worked! 💛💜 #IntersexProud #Intersex #CAIS #Inte...

4,999 likes, 206 comments - mrsjackieblanks on September 17, 2025: "✨ Born with XY chromosomes, but my body never listened to testosterone. My testes became my natural estrogen factory - Here is the scientific way it all worked! 💛💜 #IntersexProud #I...

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DOugAoGDbo6?hl=en

OP posts:
Helleofabore · 25/09/2026 08:31

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 07:59

I'd have to know that they are taller than a global average of women, not just white American women or something like that.

Also, I don't think menstrual cycle is relevant. Let's say I'm a really dedicated athlete who never wants kids and hates how my periods interrupt my training schedule. Should I not be allowed to compete with female athletes because I opt for an elective total hysterectomy?

What about if I am a person who naturally has infrequent, short, light periods? Should my opponents get a headstart on that basis?

We have been having these exact discussions for years. Perhaps you should start reading the FWR threads covering sports so that you get the breadth of the issues and the wealth of information and links that are in the many threads here. Including what the current screening process is and the history of the tests.

NotBadConsidering · 25/09/2026 08:31

Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:27

Because up to 25% of women share his pelvis shape so using pelvis shape to exclude him from women's sport would be ridiculous.

You didn't use the word floor in the comment I responded to, you mentioned only his "male pelvis".

Fair enough I used “male pelvis” as a way of emphasising they are male in the first paragraph but I qualified that in the second paragraph to point out the organs are different.

25% of women would share the pelvic bone shape of a male, but how many women share the pelvic floor musculature and organ distribution with males? Zero.

So having a hysterectomy in no way makes a female athlete match a CAIS athlete, even if their bones are that 1 in 4 the same, because the rest is different, on account of one being male and one being female.

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:30

I think periods vary so much in terms of how disruptive it is to one's life that it should be excluded as relevant to who should compete.

OP posts:
Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:29

user1471538275 · 25/09/2026 08:18

and that judgment can be swayed by ideology, money, political pressure etc.

Sharron Davies 'Unfair play' is clear how much corruption exists in the politics of sport.

This is my concern.

I can't find any record of actual measurable, testable things which is allowing Lin Yu-ting to continue to batter women in a boxing ring.

Women's boxing should be for women, not for men who failed to develop properly as men.

borntobequiet · 25/09/2026 08:28

Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:19

Can we stop with the male pelvis comments please?

Up to 1 in 4 women have what's known as an android pelvis in common with men. Especially tall ones.

If up to 25% of women have an android - somewhat narrower - pelvis, then that is fairly normal for women. Their internal organs are those of women. It doesn’t make them men.

I have an android pelvis, and it made me a good sprinter. Unfortunately my heavy, painful periods forced me to give up sport in my mid teens, my potential unfulfilled.

Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:27

NotBadConsidering · 25/09/2026 08:22

Why? CAIS athletes are male. By definition they have a male pelvic floor. They have no internal female organs - uterus/ovaries - and my comment holds true that a female who has had a hysterectomy has a completely different pelvic floor to a male.

Because up to 25% of women share his pelvis shape so using pelvis shape to exclude him from women's sport would be ridiculous.

You didn't use the word floor in the comment I responded to, you mentioned only his "male pelvis".

NotBadConsidering · 25/09/2026 08:24

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:18

It all seems way too complicated and subjective. I think the pelvis thing is more of a spectrum than definitive hence why forensic archeologists make mistakes that are only corrected via DNA or other definitive evidence.

My comment was about the organs and musculature, not the bones. It’s really not complicated. Having a hysterectomy doesn’t make anyone the same as a CAIS athlete.

borntobequiet · 25/09/2026 08:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

NotBadConsidering · 25/09/2026 08:22

Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:19

Can we stop with the male pelvis comments please?

Up to 1 in 4 women have what's known as an android pelvis in common with men. Especially tall ones.

Why? CAIS athletes are male. By definition they have a male pelvic floor. They have no internal female organs - uterus/ovaries - and my comment holds true that a female who has had a hysterectomy has a completely different pelvic floor to a male.

Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:19

NotBadConsidering · 25/09/2026 08:15

No you wouldn’t. Because the potential criteria would be anyone who has CAIS - who is anatomically male with a male pelvis and no uterus and therefore doesn’t have to make medical decisions about periods - is excluded.

If you theoretically decided to have a hysterectomy to have no periods, you have done something a CAIS athlete never has to think about. So you’re not the same.

And a post-hysterectomy pelvic floor is not the same as a male pelvic floor.

Can we stop with the male pelvis comments please?

Up to 1 in 4 women have what's known as an android pelvis in common with men. Especially tall ones.

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:18

Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:16

For CAIS over PAIS ? No I don't believe it is. The issue is that hormones are present but there is a failure to react to them. The difference between partial and complete is a matter of judgment.

CAIS

OP posts:
user1471538275 · 25/09/2026 08:18

Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:16

For CAIS over PAIS ? No I don't believe it is. The issue is that hormones are present but there is a failure to react to them. The difference between partial and complete is a matter of judgment.

and that judgment can be swayed by ideology, money, political pressure etc.

Sharron Davies 'Unfair play' is clear how much corruption exists in the politics of sport.

spannasaurus · 25/09/2026 08:18

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:13

Well surely the test is definitive?

Which test are you referring to?

The SRY gene test doesn't give any information about the level of testosterone sensitivity. Im not sure there is a definitive test to determine CAIS vs PAIS

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:18

NotBadConsidering · 25/09/2026 08:15

No you wouldn’t. Because the potential criteria would be anyone who has CAIS - who is anatomically male with a male pelvis and no uterus and therefore doesn’t have to make medical decisions about periods - is excluded.

If you theoretically decided to have a hysterectomy to have no periods, you have done something a CAIS athlete never has to think about. So you’re not the same.

And a post-hysterectomy pelvic floor is not the same as a male pelvic floor.

It all seems way too complicated and subjective. I think the pelvis thing is more of a spectrum than definitive hence why forensic archeologists make mistakes that are only corrected via DNA or other definitive evidence.

OP posts:
Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:16

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:13

Well surely the test is definitive?

For CAIS over PAIS ? No I don't believe it is. The issue is that hormones are present but there is a failure to react to them. The difference between partial and complete is a matter of judgment.

NotBadConsidering · 25/09/2026 08:15

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:11

It wouldn't be to match them but if the presence of periods was to determine who was allowed to compete with other females, I'd be excluded for not having them.

No you wouldn’t. Because the potential criteria would be anyone who has CAIS - who is anatomically male with a male pelvis and no uterus and therefore doesn’t have to make medical decisions about periods - is excluded.

If you theoretically decided to have a hysterectomy to have no periods, you have done something a CAIS athlete never has to think about. So you’re not the same.

And a post-hysterectomy pelvic floor is not the same as a male pelvic floor.

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:14

user1471538275 · 25/09/2026 08:12

Errr...

Yes in response to someone else proposing that the presence of periods would have to be looked at eventually.

OP posts:
Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:13

Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:12

I have a problem with CAIS people into women's sport because it's a matter of judgment how complete the insensitivity is and whether it has given any male advantage,

And as soon as you introduce human judgment into it there can be mistakes and even corruption.

And I provide in defence of that argument the two Gold winning DSD boxers from the last Olympics. Iman Khalif has been excluded from women's sport as PAIS. Lin Yu-ting can box on as CAIS because somebody somewhere, in spite of his appearance and boxing dominance over women, has decided his insensitivity is complete.

Female inclusion in sport should mean female, not "incomplete development as a man".

Edited

Well surely the test is definitive?

OP posts:
Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:13

spannasaurus · 25/09/2026 08:07

Why? SRY screening is relatively cheap. If there is no SRY gene present the person is female so no further tests are required.

To determine if there should be more categories than male and female essentially.

OP posts:
Imdunfer · 25/09/2026 08:12

I have a problem with CAIS people into women's sport because it's a matter of judgment how complete the insensitivity is and whether it has given any male advantage,

And as soon as you introduce human judgment into it there can be mistakes and even corruption.

And I provide in defence of that argument the two Gold winning DSD boxers from the last Olympics. Iman Khalif has been excluded from women's sport as PAIS. Lin Yu-ting can box on as CAIS because somebody somewhere, in spite of his appearance and boxing dominance over women, has decided his insensitivity is complete.

Female inclusion in sport should mean female, not "incomplete development as a man".

user1471538275 · 25/09/2026 08:12

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 07:59

I'd have to know that they are taller than a global average of women, not just white American women or something like that.

Also, I don't think menstrual cycle is relevant. Let's say I'm a really dedicated athlete who never wants kids and hates how my periods interrupt my training schedule. Should I not be allowed to compete with female athletes because I opt for an elective total hysterectomy?

What about if I am a person who naturally has infrequent, short, light periods? Should my opponents get a headstart on that basis?

Errr...

Helleofabore · 25/09/2026 08:12

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 07:55

I searched CAIS and found threads from here on it.

So really, we should test sensitivity to androgen vs chromosomes in the women's categories, it seems like.

The screening process does cover this.

The initial screen for the SRY gene is just the start. It is not the only testing done if the SRY gene is detected.

Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:11

user1471538275 · 25/09/2026 08:07

No. It wouldn't. It is best we keep it simple, cheap and non invasive.

You should not test for the tiny minority, you test for the majority. There is provision for that tiny minority, but they do not come first.

All the rest of your talk about periods, height is flim flam, designed to distract from the main issue.

Which is biological sex.

I didn't bring up height or periods.

OP posts:
Lexibletheflexible · 25/09/2026 08:11

NotBadConsidering · 25/09/2026 08:09

because I opt for an elective total hysterectomy?

The fact you have to decide to undertake major surgery to match them shows that CAIS athletes have an advantage over you.

It wouldn't be to match them but if the presence of periods was to determine who was allowed to compete with other females, I'd be excluded for not having them.

OP posts:
NotBadConsidering · 25/09/2026 08:09

because I opt for an elective total hysterectomy?

The fact you have to decide to undertake major surgery to match them shows that CAIS athletes have an advantage over you.