Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Government launches national taskforce aimed at tackling misogyny across society

45 replies

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 20/09/2026 12:04

'No woman should have to curb ambitions out of fear': National taskforce to tackle misogyny launched | UK News | Sky News

Yawn.

Yet another attempt to "deal with misogyny."

How about starting with a bold, public statement, Bridget: "Stop pretending that men can be women and learn to deal with reality. Women and girls have rights, too."

A national taskforce aimed at tackling misogyny across society has been launched by the government.

The group will seek to root out harmful attitudes online, in workplaces and within communities, bringing together representatives from women's organisations, academia, local leaders and ministers.

Women and equalities minister Bridget Phillipson told Sky News' Sunday Morning with Kamal Ahmedthat the taskforce "will tackle some of the attitudes that we've seen develop, particularly in recent years, that I thought were a thing of the past".

She continued: "And I want women to live lives of opportunity, of freedom, and not to have to worry about whether they feel safe on the street, whether they're safe in their own home, about whether they'll face harassment on public transport, attitudes in our schools that young girls will experience.

OP posts:
CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 20/09/2026 18:00

ElenOfTheWays · 20/09/2026 14:56

This pretty much covers what I wanted to say about this.

They've got no intention of actually doing anything about the real causes of misogyny any more than they've "halved VAWG" It's all talk.

We will halve violence against women (while allowing men into women's changing rooms, dv shelters, prisons etc and housing 1000s of young male undocumented migrants from countries with questionable attitudes towards women in various communities.

How's that working out then?

Agree with you both.

She won’t be dealing with the men who feel entitled to use women’s spaces or the growing numbers of unisex spaces introduced at the expense of women’s safety in a vain attempt to appease said men.

She won’t be tackling the belief systems of a growing cohort of men who believe that it is ok to marry children, that women are worth half a man and should cover themselves or be considered a candidate for rape.

I just wonder what has gone wrong in the brains of women like her that stops her from seeing what she is supporting.

GailBlancheViola · 20/09/2026 18:03

This would be laughable it if wasn't so fucking awful.

ElenOfTheWays · 21/09/2026 01:20

PollyNomial · 20/09/2026 15:50

Many people born/raised here and plenty of documentation clearly haven't been told that or they wouldn't have to be stripped of almost all their unearned privileges or be in jail for sex trafficking minors. It's a dangerous myth for victims to pretend this abuse is limited to some ethnicities or socioeconomic group.

No one is pretending that though.

Pieceofpurplesky · 21/09/2026 01:27

Misogyny is schools is a real thing. I've been teaching for 25+ years and it's never been so bad. It needs to be stopped at an early age. This is not a race issue as it's boys of all races that treat the girls like second class citizens. Some of the things I have seen and heard said are vile. The way the boys talk about sex, making 'shag or not' lists, discussing anal, smashing and oral. It's degrading - and this is what I hear as a teacher!
The way about of boys speak and behave to female teachers is appalling. I'm in my 50s and fat yet have had many sexual comments made ... the problem is that punishment tends to be laughed at as 'he's only being a boy' mainly by their fathers ...

Ablushingcrow · 21/09/2026 04:41

Shedmistress · 20/09/2026 13:30

Cue a drag queen being invited to talk about it.

Wouldn't surprise me.
"And now, in the studio to talk about tackling misogyny, is Miss Fanny Fishy!" <Hearty round of applause>

WarriorN · 21/09/2026 06:11

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 20/09/2026 14:32

From the Government's press release (link previous):

Bridget Phillipson MP, Minister for Women and Equalities, said:

"...No woman should have to make her world smaller or curb her ambitions out of fear – and making that a reality is everyone’s business.

As a whole society, we can and must be better. With political leadership and the best experts from across the country, we will shift the dial on the poisonous attitudes that blight women’s lives, ...."

[my bold]

Think about what you are saying, Bridget. THINK. WAKE UP.

there are a lot of assumptions here.

The law is clarified and BP is using the correct term for adult human female.

I’ve said it before but there a lot of people on this board who try to ignore it. The statutory RSE guidelines and impact statement specifically reference FWS. And that pupils should be taught the facts about sex and gender. And single sex spaces are ensconced fully in all safeguarding guidelines for education. It’s even got detransition and living in stealth in there. Yes there are issues with it but there are issues with Cass, upon which it was based, and also, FWS was very clear that trans identified males are to be respected. Just not as actual women.

All that had to happen before any educational work on misogyny for precisely the reasons you’re describing.

The issue is going to be that a lot of people simply do not want to limit misogyny to women but they’re going to have to now as it’s the law.

WarriorN · 21/09/2026 06:14

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 20/09/2026 14:32

From the Government's press release (link previous):

Bridget Phillipson MP, Minister for Women and Equalities, said:

"...No woman should have to make her world smaller or curb her ambitions out of fear – and making that a reality is everyone’s business.

As a whole society, we can and must be better. With political leadership and the best experts from across the country, we will shift the dial on the poisonous attitudes that blight women’s lives, ...."

[my bold]

Think about what you are saying, Bridget. THINK. WAKE UP.

Quite where has she said that trans identified males are women?

She means women.

WarriorN · 21/09/2026 06:15

And nothing it going to change in the police until misogyny is properly challenged

Imnobody4 · 21/09/2026 12:34

And nothing is going to change while intersectional feminism continues to have a stranglehold on policy as far as I can see.
View from Terf Times
x.com/TERF_Times/status/2101821758005182490

Sausagenbacon · 21/09/2026 12:53

Perhaps she'll have a word with the Archbishop of Canterbury?

MrsOvertonsWindow · 21/09/2026 13:16

WarriorN · 21/09/2026 06:11

there are a lot of assumptions here.

The law is clarified and BP is using the correct term for adult human female.

I’ve said it before but there a lot of people on this board who try to ignore it. The statutory RSE guidelines and impact statement specifically reference FWS. And that pupils should be taught the facts about sex and gender. And single sex spaces are ensconced fully in all safeguarding guidelines for education. It’s even got detransition and living in stealth in there. Yes there are issues with it but there are issues with Cass, upon which it was based, and also, FWS was very clear that trans identified males are to be respected. Just not as actual women.

All that had to happen before any educational work on misogyny for precisely the reasons you’re describing.

The issue is going to be that a lot of people simply do not want to limit misogyny to women but they’re going to have to now as it’s the law.

That's a fair point. I think we're so distrustful as we know this government have had to be dragged kicking and screaming to face reality. And none of these senior politicians (including Burnham) have the confidence to tell all the trans extremists running riot in politics / the civil service to STFU and obey the law. So trust is at an all time low.

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 21/09/2026 18:01

WarriorN · 21/09/2026 06:14

Quite where has she said that trans identified males are women?

She means women.

She means women.

Does she? The point that many posters are making, and which is clearly evident in the rest of the thread, is that her taskforce is full of people who define "women" as "a group which includes some men."

This taskforce will start at cross purposes if Bridget means actual women when she says "women" but the rest of her taskforce means "men, but only the ones who want to be women."

And, as @MrsOvertonsWindow has said, there's the trust issue.

I want the government to tackle misogyny, but the starting point has to be clear definitions based on reality. Gathering together various organizations who think men can be women is not a good starting point.

Thanks to @Imnobody4 , here's the Terf Times article (we on this thread are not the only ones to have noticed Bridget's skirting around the major elephant in the room):

https://www.terftimes.com/p/woman-up-bridget/

Minister for Women and Equalities Bridget Phillipson MP

Woman Up Bridget | TERF Times

The Government’s misogyny taskforce is a circle jerk for faux-feminists

https://www.terftimes.com/p/woman-up-bridget/

OP posts:
WarriorN · 21/09/2026 20:01

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 21/09/2026 18:01

She means women.

Does she? The point that many posters are making, and which is clearly evident in the rest of the thread, is that her taskforce is full of people who define "women" as "a group which includes some men."

This taskforce will start at cross purposes if Bridget means actual women when she says "women" but the rest of her taskforce means "men, but only the ones who want to be women."

And, as @MrsOvertonsWindow has said, there's the trust issue.

I want the government to tackle misogyny, but the starting point has to be clear definitions based on reality. Gathering together various organizations who think men can be women is not a good starting point.

Thanks to @Imnobody4 , here's the Terf Times article (we on this thread are not the only ones to have noticed Bridget's skirting around the major elephant in the room):

https://www.terftimes.com/p/woman-up-bridget/

I get there’s a trust issue but there’s no way she can go against what is the established law.

My points about the STATUTORY RSE guidelines are that she over saw the development of that as education sec and, as I said, it specifically refers to FWS ruling.

TempestTost · 21/09/2026 20:07

Totally apart from the gender ideology question. This looks like it will be very expensive and very ineffective.

Probably will be nice for the people drawing the salaries.

Wishesandhorses · 21/09/2026 20:09

TempestTost · 21/09/2026 20:07

Totally apart from the gender ideology question. This looks like it will be very expensive and very ineffective.

Probably will be nice for the people drawing the salaries.

I think that's probably the best summary of this entire government I've seen so far.

WarriorN · 21/09/2026 20:16

That is the more concerning factor in my opinion.

CompleteGinasaur · 23/09/2026 09:28

Dear Bridget Phillipson. If you are serious about attempting to tackle this huge and pervasive social evil I would suggest getting some real experts in. You could start by taking all the money you're going to be throwing at this smoke and mirrors "taskforce" (so far it doesn't look like you or your handpicked minions know what the tasks need to be, and it hasn't got any force either, so what's the point of it, anyway?) and donate it all to the Centre for Women's Justice, who've been actually doing this shit for decades now on an absolute shoestring, and know more about the subject than you or your desperate attempts to hang on to the yoof vote could even begin to imagine. They've got a ten point plan and everything. But no. You didn't even invite them into your pretty figleaf of a pointless talking shop, did you...?

sunsunmrgoldensun · 23/09/2026 09:36

It feels like a "1984" government...

mrshoho · 23/09/2026 10:28

It's awful that before this has even got going, I already know the most obvious misogyny staring us in the face will be ignored. Would be good if top of the agenda is the government clamping down on all those organisations who say the supreme court ruling is wrong and will be challenged and ignored. Start with the Lib Dems, The Green Party, the Unions. Perhaps also many MPs within the Labour Party. This would fill me with some hope that they are serious about protecting Women.

Feeling totally fucked off by that stupid Labour MP Samantha Niblett on tv. Her suggestion on being confronted by a male in a protected single sex space is to leave and wait til the male is finished. What a disgrace.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread