I agree with you the titans of this world should not be considered to be beyond reproach. However I do not agree with you that an organisation which is transparent about its motives is not biased. That it not how bias works. (That would be like saying the Labour Party is not biased).
I do feel like you are judging me by a different yardstick to the one you are using for yourself because, ironically, I’m getting the impression that you think the work of WHO, the Lancet etc has no value - especially as you said something like WHO is politically and ideologically motived. To be fair on me, I have acknowledged it when I think you have a point - which is what I have also done in the first paragraph here!
Do you honestly believe that the numerous peer-reviewed scientific papers that WHO refers to have got all the science wrong and are merely ideologically or politically motivated?
The Cass Review certainly found some important and serious issues with the care of children but I don’t see how you can assume the same applies to adults. Although of course you are entirely justified to raise concerns.