Latest nspcc schools guidance

Safeguarding needs to be clear, if the NSPCC can't be clear on single sex spaces and the law they should be disbanded.

Stop reading the Daily Mail - this is simply untrue.

www.nspcc.org.uk/about-us/news-opinion/2026/false-media-report-supervision/

This is worth restating in response to the ‘don’t read the Daily Mail’ scolding on this post today.

The NSPCC used to understand clarify in language was important.

Women have discovered that unless something is explicitly excluded activists will use that ambiguity to prise away those rights and safeguards.

All the NSPCC had to do was change the word ‘gender’ to ‘sex’. Instead when that removal was highlighted by women they’ve whined, blamed others, said ‘it’s not fair’ and obscured the truth. That’s a lot of effort when reinstating a single sentence with the word ‘sex’ instead of ‘gender’ would have resolved the issue.

Rightly or wrongly as soon as you remove a stated restriction you are considered to be allowing it. It’s regarded differently to if you’d never had a stated restriction.

NSPCC are in a position of responsibility and authority for child safeguarding. We must be able to highlight when we think they have got it wrong, particularly when there’s a fear they may have been influenced by individuals or organisations that want to see reduced child safeguarding measures.

Stop saying men can be women - this is simply untrue.

Is the EHRC consulting on whether male teachers should be allowed to watch girls undressing in changing rooms? I've not read every section but am certain that if they were proposing this, those who have read it all, would have raised it as a massive red flag. So why the NSPCC believes they must wait in case a rule allowing predatory men access is a result of the consultation makes no sense.

But removing that section is very telling. Plus the fact that they're whining rather than simply confirming that the NSPCC is very clear that no man, no matter how he self identifies, should ever be in changing rooms where girls are undressing. It says a lot about how their view of safeguarding children has been weakened by their pandering to the powerful trans cult.

Another thought. Given that KCSIE and other school guidance is now explicit about no mixed sex changing, showering, dormitories etc. No teaching that GI is a fact etc, why on earth are the NSPCC even raising the possibility that the EHRC guidance might want men watching girls undress? It makes no sense.

Unless of course they're still taking instructions from the trans lobby who, as we see daily demonstrated, are working very hard to wedge men back into where they're not allowed?