Gretel is one of those who believe that biological sex was imposed by the British on societies as imperial rule, those societies previously in a state of gender-based peace and harmony.
Alongside that, trans IDing individuals even in Britain were accepted and held up by us just a few scant decades ago, but second wave feminism went rogue in punching down in imperially dominating sex > gender.
I mean, we can see the evidence in the developing world...all those "third gender" individuals so valued by their indigenous...oh, sorry, just why are they almost all bullied in their countries, so many come to the West to be chewed up in the sex industry?
The truth is, there is no imperial colonial "plot" to impose biological sex as a genocidal factor to wipe out gender as the "correct" way to mark differences between individuals.
This is one of the latest, saddest, faddy attempts to find a framework to pan realists as bigots.
Part of the gender euphoria re-writing of history for the hard of critical thinking on trans/Reddit.
People object to this individual in women's cricket not because they're colonialist imperialist, but because they know he's a man permitted into women's sport.
Quite how the simplest of simple facts became a schism at the heart of the liberal West is a question for the ages.