If the majority of women voted in favour of self ID?

If you didn't want a discussion about data you shouldn't have stated this, especially without a link:

Apparently YouGov polling shows that the majority of young women in the UK 'overwhelmingly support self ID'.

Your point is also relevant because there is not just two answers to the question.

You are the one who made claims about the majority currently supporting it.

You personally drifted into making claims that you cannot support with reliable evidence.

Most posters have already answered your question within their posts, one way or another.

It is relevant to mention the poor quality of the information that you, personally, introduced into the thread.

Yes. Even a basic translation showed this is a really poor quality questionnaire.

If I wanted to show support for a concept, I would limit a questionnaire like this. It is ambiguous and will only get a general positive response. Because, the outcomes of this law is not a well understood.

The people commissioning the poll understood that by keeping it all very unclear, they would get the positive result they wanted.

I look forward to a native German speaker being able to give a deeper understanding to questions. But from basic google translation , it relied on people knowing nothing about the outcomes of the legislation

That's a swerve, because you have been shown to be wrong.
Let's pretend that there are just 6 sparrows and 5 blackbirds and no other birds in the garden. When you look in the garden, you would be incorrect to say that it's mainly sparrows in the garden.

In addition, following the link to the results, the two questions asked were as follows (again using a translate tool) -

'On November 1, the law will be passed in Germany on self-determination in relation to the Gender entry comes into force. How would you like your Assess the level of knowledge on what exactly it is about This law goes?'

'The Self-Determination Act is intended to support the process.facilitate trans, intersex and non-binary persons register their gender entry in the Change the civil status register and your first name want to leave. After everything you know about it,Do you support the Self-Determination Act or reject it? Do you want it off?'

So a very general question about an act poorly understood by most respondants.

Again, eeesh.

Yep.

and there was no follow up question to verify this answer either.

Garbage In : Garbage Out.

Did you read this ?

They asked about support without any follow up with checking whether the respondents agreed with male people accessing female single sex spaces?

Other polls that ask vague questions about supporting transgender rights show a positive result. However as soon as it is drilled down with a direct and clearly defined question that support diminishes significantly.

Not reviewing the data and the questions asked for polls such as this is an error. It is way AI reporting is not to be trusted.

You've missed a bit out. From that link (using translate) -

'A quarter (25 percent) of all respondents in Germany say they know quite well what the Self-Determination Act is about. Another 47 percent say they know roughly....However, 28 percent of all respondents in Germany stated that they did not really know what the law was about.'

So only 25% of a sample size of 2,028 people really knew what the Act was about?

Eeesh.

If a popular vote goes against logic, logic always wins.

We just have to hope that those with power to implement any changes also have the mental capacity to follow the logic and see the obvious flaws. If not we would be in for some very dark times while the obvious flaws play out. I think we're well beyond that possibility now. Tide has turned.

That's not true.
If there are more sparrows than blackbirds in my garden, that's not the same as saying it's mainly sparrows in my garden.

There could be 6 sparrows and 5 blackbirds.

Edit to give an example

No. It really is not an accurate statement at all.

The majority of female people are not supporting self ID. Your statement can be misinterpreted.

Plus, the Brexit referendum would've had its result voided if it had been binding, due to illegality.

Unlikely - this legal action failed;

Wilson and others v R (on the application of ) v the Prime Minister [2019] EWCA Civ 304

This Court rejected any notion that any breaches of the rules affected the outcome of the referendum result...

https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/2019/03/09/judicial-review-is-not-politics-by-another-means/

For publicly accessed toilets and changing rooms, the ‘rights’ are that that they are segregated by sex or a safe single use provision. There is no expectation of privacy away from other users of the same sex beyond what is reasonable. For instance, it is reasonable to expect a door that locks on a toilet cubicle but not reasonable to expect privacy when washing hands in a shared communal space shared by other female people.

There are exceptions to the human rights article 8 that gives the right for single sex provisions based on safety. Hence there is no over riding right for male people to access female single sex provisions. That is a privilege not a right. It is often, through misinformation, called a ‘right’ but it is not.

Too often, some people misrepresent what is a right vs what is a privilege. It goes along with the empty mantras we so often see.

Good explanation

I'd like the women who are happy to give away my rights to a single sex space in the UK to explain to me whether they also want to remove women in India's right to access single sex toilets, which is a far more recent development.

Or do they somehow think Western males pose no risk, as charities such as Oxfam appear to?

People campaign against all sorts of things which are popular with the public, even legal. Look at abortion, surrogacy.