Covent Garden - why don't I trust the reporting ?

Suggest you read the thread. It's all explained therein

Being a woman (female human) really is just about biology.

Everything else is just being human.

Gender is indeed a social concept, but personally I find it rather oppressive. It sounds very subjective, and a poor basis for organising people.

Why don't you believe it?

I am like a mare because I am female.

I am like a man because I am human.

Are you denying that women are human?

Why is it offensive to acknowledge the impact of sex?

Having an account on a website is just an administrative detail. A person's gender exists within a much broader social and legal context, shaped by lived experience and how they're recognised in society. Reducing something as complex as womanhood to the equivalent of a website login category says far more about how narrowly you view people than it does about reality.

Nobody's identity is being dismissed.

You just can't change your sex and that has consequences.

Interesting statistics there.

The thing you are missing is that while the number of trans identifying men in prison is low, the number of women who are convicted of committing certain kinds of crime is even lower, so recent misreporting of sex by the police and courts has a huge impact on the understanding of data.

For example, Women make up 4% of the prison population, and only about 3% of those women have been imprisoned for sexual offences, so these women make up 0.12% of the prison population.

On the other hand according to the Ministry of Justice 60% of the male trans prison population has been convicted of sex related offences, so using an estimate of 0.26% for trans identifying males, 0.15% of the entire prison population.

Women are sceptical of data on women committing 'male' crimes because the numbers have been inaccurate.

what you call 'statistically microscopic' figures have a huge influence when we look at small numbers.

It's pure statistical delusion driven by an online obsession

No, it's perfectly reasonable to insist on accurate reporting on sex.

Dismissing a person's identity as a 'performance' is just a cheap way to avoid treating them with basic human dignity. Transitioning isn't playing a role; nobody faces social stigma, navigates complex medical systems, and rebuilds their entire life just to 'put on an act.' Transitioning isn't playing a role for an audience-it's living authentically. Accusing trans women of 'acting' just reveals how
desperate you are to invalidate their lives.

Yes, because the transactivists already took 'woman' from us and made it seem so terribly complicated, so we only have female left.

Having said that, Dr Upton, a male who was allowed to use female changing rooms at the hospital where he worked, referred to himself, in Court as a Biological Female, so that's not really safe either

https://x.com/lucyamarsh/status/1888996664104419418

..reduce human beings to mere livestock-style biological criteria...

So close. Soooo close.

Humans are mammals. As in all mammals, or livestock as you put it, sex in humans is binary and immutable. Humans cannot change sex.

A male human is male from conception to death - and beyond, in the case of his remains.

The word in English for an adult male human is 'man', plural 'men'. Not 'woman', plural 'women'.

That is the truth. Any media distorting those terms is lying and I therefore don't trust them.

Well put.
Exactly.

Sex is a biological category. It doesn't reduce anyone to anything to be correctly categorised. It just means that everyone within the category shares this particular trait, and everyone who does not possess that trait is outside the category. At any rate, if you hate categories, why are you so obsessed with getting men into the wrong one?

You are in the category of a MN user, and not in the category of people without a MN account. Is it reductive or dehumanising to say that?

To the topic of the thread I agree mentioning the word woman in these media reports makes be instantly sceptical. It's different when they say female, more believable.

I've been on a female psychiatric unit. There were several women who should have been in PICU/secure but no beds.

I can absolutely well believe a woman in acute psychosis is capable of that unfortunately.

If your counter-argument relies on personal insults and comparing women to animals, you've already lost the point. Reducing human women to animal anatomy to claim we are 'just biology' doesn't disprove what I said, it proves it.

The key word there is "also". Without the biology you are a man performing femininity, which isn't the same thing as being a woman.

As an interesting aside: St Mungos' has always, and will continue, according to its 'Womens' (sic) Strategy 2026-2029 to allow trans-identifying men to use its woman's hostels. The law means nothing to it, and it apparently is not keeping its residents and passers-by safe:

"At St Mungo’s, we recognise that homelessness is a deeply
personal and varied experience, particularly for women. Our
Women's Strategy is built on the understanding that women's
experiences of homelessness are not only distinct from those of
men but also diverse among women themselves. We approach
our work with an intersectional lens, acknowledging that factors
such as race, ethnicity, age, sexuality, gender identity, or
disability all play crucial roles in shaping these experiences. Our
commitment to inclusivity extends to all women, including trans
women, and strives to understand the experiences of women
regardless of social capital, economic status, culture, parental
or relationship status".

https://www.mungos.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/StM-Womens-Strategy-2026-29.pdf

Wasn't it a woman in that terrorist attack at the shopping centre some years back? I know a lot of very fit, strong women who would be physically capable of stabbing 4 people (not all men are strong. some can be very frail) especially if they weren't watching for it (as in there are times when we're all being more observant/careful than others).
I don't know any details of what you're discussing, though no doubt there will be more details soon, sadly there's too many awful events. So sorry for the victims and families.

Thank you for your agree @ThisShyTaupeFinch. But now please do bore off

Oh bore off

Plenty of speculation about that elsewhere on SM.