Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Wings Over Scotland questioned under caution by police on account of Lynsay Watson

539 replies

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 03/08/2026 21:47

No details yet. He says he will post about it at length tomorrow and it will be worth the wait. So this is just a placemarker for the moment.

Wings Over Scotland questioned under caution by police on account of Lynsay Watson
OP posts:
Thread gallery
26
NoWordForFluffy · 04/08/2026 18:18

Differentforgirls · 04/08/2026 18:17

That’s a caramel wafer.

I believe they're synonymous.

Differentforgirls · 04/08/2026 18:17

NoWordForFluffy · 04/08/2026 18:17

One of these!

That’s a caramel wafer.

NoWordForFluffy · 04/08/2026 18:17

Differentforgirls · 04/08/2026 18:03

What’s a caramel bar?

One of these!

Wings Over Scotland questioned under caution by police on account of Lynsay Watson
tobee · 04/08/2026 18:16

As an aside I’d like to know how Watson and his ilk have had their “lives ruined” or “live in fear” as mentioned in those SEEN quotes. It sounds like typical TRA spouting unsubstantiated claims and extreme fear mongering in keeping with cults everywhere

Differentforgirls · 04/08/2026 18:03

Hoardasurass · 04/08/2026 13:43

Tea cakes or caramel bars?

What’s a caramel bar?

Wishesandhorses · 04/08/2026 17:54

Thank you for the second article share. The depressing part is that there seems to be no accountability of any kind in this country, and the double standards are now normal.

Endless tweets threatening real, serious violence made by activists with a long history of instability - nothing happens.

Women fight through court, endlessly, win the case, the judgments are frequently scoriating, costs are involved - and nothing happens.

CompleteGinasaur · 04/08/2026 17:49

Do we know whether (I am crossing everything I've got at this point) Wings got names and badge numbers of all the specific officers involved in this piece of Stasi-larping?

princessleah1 · 04/08/2026 17:44

The 2am visit is probably because they had better thinga to do for the reat of the shift (like actual crime) so wait until the proper jobs have been dealt with before they deal with nonsense like this.

FaithHopeCarnage · 04/08/2026 17:36

I posted the wrong Wings earlier - on Fat Tony rather than Watson. I’ve just re-read his article on Watson, and having found it disturbing on original read-through, this time I find it quite chilling.

THIS is Wings on Watson.
https://wingsoverscotland.com/down-on-the-beaches/

Down On The Beaches

We’ve written already about the magnitude of the error transactivists have made in bringing about the arrest of Graham Linehan on trumped-up incitement charges. But thanks to the excellent wo…

https://wingsoverscotland.com/down-on-the-beaches/

Wishesandhorses · 04/08/2026 17:28

BunfightBetty · 04/08/2026 16:15

Absolutely.

There’s a clear pattern here that should be investigated for inappropriate use of police powers and public funds.

The fact the copper didn’t even bother to do the smallest soupçon of due diligence on the complainant is disquietingly shoddy as well.

We deserve a better police force than this.

This.

As the article makes clear; the police had not bothered to even carry out the kind of basic fact checking that a MN thread would have managed in five minutes before they started this circus. Glinner went to the time and trouble and intense stress for years to push through the courts at five armed police arresting him for no reason, and the £25,000 he was paid has obviously had no impact at all.

Before Burnham requires us all to tighten our belts and get by while handing more of our income over to the government to spaff around, I want to see the actual funding not being repeatedly used for nonsense like this with no accountability, no consequences and no change.

Rightsraptor · 04/08/2026 17:27

If they'd really wanted to get him at 2am they'd have brought a battering ram, like you see when the go into druggie houses on the telly. I reckon they were bored and thought 'let's go and annoy Wings!'

It'll backfire on them.

Also - can a dead person be harassed? Wings is accused of 'harassing' Brianna Ghey. I'd imagine that, like almost everyone else in the country, Wings hadn't heard of Brianna until the dreadful murder, so I can't think he was harassing a hapless 16 year old in life. Makes no sense. But then the rest doesn't either.

RoyalCorgi · 04/08/2026 17:25

Why are the police so stupid? It beggars belief.

MelOfTheRoses · 04/08/2026 17:24

Datun · 04/08/2026 17:01

Yeah, you're not wrong. And the armed police waiting for Graham Linehan.

It beggars belief how any of this gets signed off.

All massively over the top for the situation.

PronounssheRa · 04/08/2026 17:23

WarriorN · 04/08/2026 15:45

I don’t know how true this is but there’s also something happening with Hayden

https://x.com/ptrjms/status/2084589243897094490?s=46&t=A2fpFNgDRyXF2d6ye97wEA

Crikey. That sounds serious.

That twitter account has been orbiting Hayden and Brooks for sometime. Some of the more recent posts are enlightening..........

MrsOvertonsWindow · 04/08/2026 17:19

Datun · 04/08/2026 16:59

So they look the person up on their database, they see 300 fruitless harassment claims, one involving having to fork out 25 grand, and then they read ex-copper, and they go with the ex-copper?

Edited

Do all the police databases "talk to each other"? All these mini fiefdoms with senior officers able to indulge their niche interests that bear no relation to the needs of the population, let alone fighting crime

MrsOvertonsWindow · 04/08/2026 17:13

SidewaysOtter · 04/08/2026 16:02

Good Lord. An excellent article but poor Wings, having to go through that level of batshittery.

Why do the police keep taking Watson’s side?

Maybe all that "trans training" misrepresenting the law?
Maybe the senior officers over keen on men sexually assaulting intimately searching women prisoners have had a word?
Maybe the police recruit a poor quality of officers who are unable to investigate or exercise due diligence ?
Or even corruption?

Who knows.

ProtectedlyInsufferable · 04/08/2026 17:13

Given recent farcical developments elsewhere following actions taken to bolster the DEI credentials of their instigators, I’m wondering if the explanation is simpler and more bureaucratic. So many of us are asked routinely what we have done to promote inclusivity. Maybe it’s also on a police checklist at some level, and so they grab any opportunity to show they’ve told off a bigoted misgenderer, to balance all the stops of black youths they’ve been doing. Tempting then not to bother doing any background, and a shock when they sue you

Hedgehogforshort · 04/08/2026 17:11

I wish i cod say am gobsmacked but i am not.

Tallisker · 04/08/2026 17:09

Defences are at their lowest in the wee small hours. That’s when they used to kill people (capital punishment) because their resistance was low so it was easier on the executioner.

PronounssheRa · 04/08/2026 17:09

Ye gods. The police really are a bunch of muppets (auto correct changed that to puppets, ironically). What a waste of time, money and resources

And yes to Free Speech Union for anyone who has even a vaguely identifiable profile and speaks out.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 04/08/2026 17:09

Datun · 04/08/2026 16:52

So how would they have justified the 2 o'clock in the morning bollocks.

I understand bringing him in and let's see if he can incriminate himself.

But 2 o'clock in the morning for those two tweets?

there's no way they could be imagining that he might incriminate himself into something requiring a 2 o'clock in the morning visit.

to me there's just a disconnect. A proper disconnect. Between saying knock on his door at 2 o'clock in the morning because of these two tweets - and bring him in for questioning to see if we can nail anything else on him.

God I hope the bloody papers get hold of this

Edited

This is what he said according to Wings. What are these “regulations” he’s referring to that means it can’t wait until the morning? Or is he just bullshitting?

Due to this, we will need to ask you about the allegation and gather your account of things. This will be by way of questioning at custody. The plan will be for you to be released following this.

Due to PACE (Police And Criminal Evidence) Act, I cannot 'postpone' this and this will need to be done this morning. I apologise for the inconvenience of the time of day; however, regulations do not allow me to wait. You will be allowed to have a solicitor present in interview.

Dumbo12 · 04/08/2026 17:08

Datun · 04/08/2026 16:59

So they look the person up on their database, they see 300 fruitless harassment claims, one involving having to fork out 25 grand, and then they read ex-copper, and they go with the ex-copper?

Edited

Yep, pretty much, the police "service" is very very misogynistic and also utterly captured by the Stonewall "law". They also always believe that the police are right. In a past life I worked with the mental health act 1983 and visited police stations in that role, the number of times police officers told me a garbled version of the law (which coincidentally allowed them to behave in illegal manners) was astonishing. I have had more than one stand up argument in a custody suite about it, and had to stop them violating a patients rights.

Datun · 04/08/2026 17:03

Shedmistress · 04/08/2026 17:01

They don't expect a lawyer that is versed in the issue to be available at 2am. They don't expect people to be awake and in full capacity at 2am.

2-3am is the time when most disasters happen, like Bhopal etc. Because it is sleepy time even for night shifters. They are using psychology and physiology against innocent people to entrap them.

Right, that makes sense.

Thank you Shed. I'm trying to find the logic behind it.

I can't, in all conscience, just go with 'spite'. Because they don't even know wings.

Shedmistress · 04/08/2026 17:01

Datun · 04/08/2026 16:52

So how would they have justified the 2 o'clock in the morning bollocks.

I understand bringing him in and let's see if he can incriminate himself.

But 2 o'clock in the morning for those two tweets?

there's no way they could be imagining that he might incriminate himself into something requiring a 2 o'clock in the morning visit.

to me there's just a disconnect. A proper disconnect. Between saying knock on his door at 2 o'clock in the morning because of these two tweets - and bring him in for questioning to see if we can nail anything else on him.

God I hope the bloody papers get hold of this

Edited

They don't expect a lawyer that is versed in the issue to be available at 2am. They don't expect people to be awake and in full capacity at 2am.

2-3am is the time when most disasters happen, like Bhopal etc. Because it is sleepy time even for night shifters. They are using psychology and physiology against innocent people to entrap them.

Datun · 04/08/2026 17:01

BezMark · 04/08/2026 16:58

This was like Caroline Farrow and Sorry Police Force. Battering her door, confiscating devices etc

Yeah, you're not wrong. And the armed police waiting for Graham Linehan.

It beggars belief how any of this gets signed off.