Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

News article: "Inside JK Rowling’s rape support centre that took on Amnesty – and won"

69 replies

singthing · 01/08/2026 09:32

Inside JK Rowling’s rape support centre that took on Amnesty – and won
After defeating ‘anti-rights’ claims, Beira’s Place is standing firm against the trans lobby by providing female-only support

In the Harry Potter books, there is a pub called the Leaky Cauldron, which Muggles – non-magic people – mysteriously never notice, even when they’re walking right past it. Beira’s Place in Edinburgh, the sexual violence support centre set up by JK Rowling in 2022, has a similarly unobtrusive air. Google Maps leads me to the right building, yet somehow I meander past it and have to double back.
Inside, the centre is tranquil and almost silent, with walls painted soothing shades of greige, plants in pots and inoffensive works of art on display. But the centre, which offers support to women only, has found itself at the heart of an extraordinary row that began when Amnesty International UK published a report last month in which it described Beira’s Place – as well as a host of other organisations – as “anti-rights”.
That report followed another document in May, which also framed the “gender-critical” viewpoint – namely, the belief that women are biological females, and men biological males – as a threat. The document claimed that the “growth and influence of the [gender critical] movement” in the UK was “worrying”, given that it “seeks to restrict the rights of trans people”.
Following a public outcry and threat of legal action from lawyers acting for Beira’s Place, Amnesty has since retracted its anti-rights report, and claimed in an apology that “the document should never have been published”. Beira’s Place welcomed the apology, but said that Amnesty’s statement “fails to recognise that those most severely impacted are the staff who work day in day out to support survivors of sexual violence, and the many women who need and use the service”.
Given the events of the past few weeks, it’s understandable that the centre might feel under siege. There has been, one staff member tells me, an increase in threats issued to those who work there “The usual,” she sighs when I ask what kind. “[For example,] ‘Why don’t you think about suicide?’”
Before the Amnesty report, Beira’s Place had repeatedly come under fire from activists both because it restricts its services to biological women, and for its links to Rowling, who has become the figurehead of the gender-critical viewpoint in the debate over trans rights. But the team works hard to make the centre feel safe and calm for the women who use it, whatever might be going on beyond its walls.

Beira’s Place is solely funded by its founder, JK Rowling Credit: Tolga Akmen/AFP
The chief executive of Beira’s Place, Lesley Johnston, who has worked on gender-based violence for three decades, first heard of the Amnesty report pretty much the moment it was published. Her first reaction was to go into emergency mode – convene meetings with staff and board members, and try to work out how best to talk about what happened to the vulnerable women receiving support.
The accusation that Beira’s Place is somehow undermining human rights has hit staff particularly hard, says Johnson. “Some staff really internalised it.” Their work, which mainly consists of one-on-one sessions with victims of rape and other sexual assault, is difficult. “You’re working with very complex trauma... To be doing that job, day in day out, and then to get this report which accuses you of being anti-rights and anti-women – it’s deeply painful, and it’s deeply frustrating because it’s so not true. Part of you thinks, ‘Oh, for f---’s sake. It’s so ridiculous, I can’t take it too seriously.’ But the fact is, it’s out there, and it is taken seriously. And [Amnesty] is quite a big organisation.”
We are sitting in a meeting room with a couple of other staff members, as well as Johann Lamont, 69, the former Scottish Labour politician and campaigner for women’s rights, who serves on the centre’s board (along with its funder and founder, JK Rowling). Lamont’s fury at the Amnesty report is palpable. “To see women who deliver a service here made to feel that what they’re doing in terms of choosing to work in this way is somehow to be dismissed – I think it’s shocking.”
For her generation, Lamont continues, Amnesty was revered for its genuinely effective campaigning on human rights abuses in the likes of Nicaragua, Chile and South Africa. “It was an organisation that shone a light where people didn’t want light to be shone,” she says. “It wasn’t just saying, ‘We really care about there not being bad things. We want there to be good things.’” It called on its supporters, she says, to take action to correct injustices.
In short, Lamont says, Amnesty “isn’t some random off-the-street [organisation] that thinks it’s a good idea to slag off whoever about anything. This is an organisation that is using its institutional history to assert something that’s not true. It’s significant that they said it. And it matters because they said it”.
Lamont is especially disturbed by the idea that Amnesty’s report could discourage women from seeking help at a point where they might desperately need it. She is furious that staff members working to support such women have had their work traduced. “What could possibly be more important in your working life than to be doing something that’s supporting somebody who’s faced trauma, helping them with that?”

Beira’s Place was set up to deliver entirely female-led and female-delivered care Credit: Nicole Jones

Beira’s Place (pronounced By-ra) was set up by Rowling to offer women who have been sexually assaulted “the option of women-centred and women-delivered care”. Men and trans women are not allowed into the centre, though Johnston stresses that when they get enquiries from people who can’t access the service because of their sex, they guide them towards other options. The centre is also happy to support non-binary people, provided they were born as girls.

The female requirement is certainly taken seriously. Before I visit, I mention I’d like to bring a photographer, and the press officer for Beira’s Place requests that they be a woman. The centre does sometimes have to call in the odd handyman, I’m told, but such visits are kept to times when there are no women receiving support in the building.

To some, this approach might seem a little extreme. But, Lamont says, it is a response to a need that women have expressed for care that is entirely female-led and female-delivered. She was inspired to get involved in part because she had learnt that similar services in Scotland were being effectively forced to allow trans women into female spaces, otherwise they might not be granted funding. Beira’s Place, she adds, answers the question, “Where do women go who are dealing with trauma and who want a woman-only space?”

“They know they can come here. It just stands as a service. That to me is the most important thing about it,” she says.

Since the centre opened, it has received more than 1,200 referrals – mainly from women seeking help for themselves, but also from charities, the NHS, police, local authorities and others seeking help on women’s behalf. Rape is the top reason that women come, accounting for 21 per cent of referrals, followed by sexual assault (19 per cent), childhood sexual abuse (18 per cent) and domestic abuse or intimate partner sexual violence (14 per cent). Other reasons include non-fatal strangulation, honour-based crime, stalking and trafficking.
Most of the women seen are under 40, which should come as no surprise, Johnston says, given that “the highest risk factors for being sexually assaulted are being young and being female”.

When a referral comes in, the centre aims to get in touch with the woman in question within three days, but normally does so on the day itself. Then, depending on her need, she will typically be offered 12 one-on-one sessions with a member of the support team. On a tour of the building, I see some of the rooms where the sessions happen. They are comfortable, peaceful spaces. A member of staff shows me a box filled with items – pine cones, fidget toys – that women sometimes like to hold during their sessions to alleviate stress.
Before coming to Beira’s Place, some women had never opened up about what had happened to them. Many, Johnston says, are not dealing with one isolated incident. “It’s very rarely one form of abuse,” she explains. “It’s usually complex. You’ve got your comorbidities – alcohol, substance misuse, perhaps having children taken into care, further sexual abuse and domestic abuse.”

A lot of the work the staff members do revolves around teaching those who have been through unimaginable harm to understand how their body and mind are processing it. For instance, why they might have flashbacks or remember certain details from their assault (cigarette smell, a rough material) painfully sharply. Often, women have to psych themselves up enormously just to come to the first appointment. Johnston has watched women hesitating outside, she says. She understands. “I can’t underestimate how traumatic it is for women who make that first step.”

But the help they get once they are brave enough to cross the threshold is evidently transformative. The women being supported are too vulnerable to be interviewed, but I am given sheets of testimonials, and they make for wrenching reading. “I don’t think I would have managed without the support I received,” one woman writes. “I had spent years hiding under a heavy cloak of shame,” writes another.

Some meetings take place outside the facility, but they’ve had difficulties renting rooms from venues because of how the centre is perceived. Often, cabs for women coming to and from appointments will be paid for by Beira’s Place, to ensure that poorer women get access to support. Still, says Johnston, there are sometimes no-shows. Unfortunately, since the Amnesty report claiming that Beira’s Place was “anti-rights”, no-shows have risen, while referrals to the centre have, she says, “dipped a little bit”.

The centre has previously received abuse on social media and via a chat function, which it previously had on its website, but which has now been closed. The quantity of abuse that has come in after the Amnesty report was published has reached such a pitch that staff have put up a board on which they pin messages of support. One pensioner asked whether he could buy the centre something “with his pension”. The centre doesn’t accept donations, as it is funded solely by Rowling.

But I imagine that it must be depressing, dealing on a daily basis with the aftermath of some of the worst behaviour imaginable, as well as abuse for doing so. Johnston, who is both warm and formidable, tells me she thinks that over the course of her 30-year career, “the levels of violence against women and girls are higher than when I started out”. She reckons that pornography and incels (derived from the term “involuntary celibate”) might be playing a role. It could also be that people are increasingly willing to be open about the abuse they have endured.

Occasionally, the centre will work with a woman who has misgivings about its point of view on gender and sex. One non-binary person it helped said she found it “jarring that we refer to women”, a staff member relates. “Some people believe we’re transphobic bigots,” she adds.

In 2023, The Student, Edinburgh University’s student paper, made its view on the centre clear when it ran an “exclusive” story, revealing in shocked tones that the university had “officially recommended Beira’s Place, a potentially misleading and harmful resource, to students who have experienced sexual assault”.
It would be tempting just to duck out, and work in an area that attracts less anger and fewer death threats. I ask Johnston how she came to become involved in the fight against gender-based violence in the first place. “I actually started when I was 17,” she says. Raised in Fife, she saw a note on a signpost in St Andrews looking for volunteers to set up a rape crisis service. “I thought, ‘Well, that sounds interesting.’” Police in the city were in denial that there was any kind of problem. “‘Oh, we don’t have rape here,’ they’d say.”

Since then, she believes that police attitudes have improved. But now there are other problems, including the time it takes for rape and other sexual assault cases to be dealt with by the courts. It is a problem that Beira’s Place is hoping to turn to next by hiring advocacy workers.
Lamont, the board member and former MSP, chips in to tell me that, with so many factors that lead to violence against women and girls remaining unfixed, it is easy to become “overwhelmed”. Still, she adds: “To me, Beira’s Place is about – well, we can’t sort everything for everybody everywhere – but we refuse to be overwhelmed. We’re going to create what we can. And this place does what it can for as many women as it can, in a way that’s going to help them as much as possible.

“You can have paralysis and think, ‘Oh my God, what do we do with all this?’ Well, actually, as JK Rowling says, ‘We’ll do this.”

https://archive.ph/QmpaY

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
AstonScrapingsNameChange · 20/08/2026 18:12

Happily, in the UK you can't simply sue someone because you 'don't like their narrative'. So we can all breathe easy.

If theyre breaking the law, on the other hand...well, perhaps they should get with the programme and get decent legal advice before 'accidentally' publishing unlawful smear campaigns.

Again, it never ceases to astound me that people can, presumably with a straight face, criticise the person who is seeking to uphold the law of the land, rather than the person/ entity breaking it. Bizarre. Puts me in mind of toddlers getting angry with mummy.

akkakk · 20/08/2026 17:48

MashaPav · 02/08/2026 03:02

TLDR didn’t read.
Maybe summarise it next time that Joanne threatened lawfare at a charity because it didn’t fit her narrative and doesn’t like to be called out. This is why I believe we can agree that the UK needs anti slapp laws?

Edited

If you a) announce in public that you can't be bothered to actually read the thread... (I always wonder if that is laziness, ignorance or arrogance?)
and b) demonstrate such a lack of understanding of JKR and who she is / what she does

then I suspect there will be nothing on which we would agree... 😉

AstonScrapingsNameChange · 20/08/2026 15:09

Sick of this disingenuous shit.

There is no legal right in the UK to 'legally self-identify their gender'

I mean, you can call yourself what you like, but it is of no significance. It gives you no special rights.

Weaselly articles like this try to twist reality to attempt to make it seem like JKR is opposing reasonable and legal rights. These 'rights' don't exist and never have.

I can't get over the wilful stupidity of these people who try to smear her charitable legal fighting fund for women. If laws weren't being broken left and right, the fighting fund would have nothing to sue these people for, would it? As usual, the 'problem' isn't rampant misogyny, it's the women who challenge it.

IwantToRetire · 19/08/2026 19:00

This doesn't really belong here, but dont want to give the vindictive author of this article a FWR thread title.

Despite articles like the one highlighted in the OP, the main stream media continues to trash JKR in a way that I dont think other well known people are written about.

In a silly article about how actors who get parts in Harry Potter films etc., find it a poisoned chalice this paragraph is included in a British Newspaper.

These days, Rowling seems to dedicate much of her time to opposing the rights of trans people to legally self-identify their gender. Last year she set up the JK Rowling Women’s Fund, which – in her words – is “a legal fighting fund for women protecting their sex-based rights”. Online, she is vocal about her thoughts on trans people – and nastier.
https://inews.co.uk/culture/television/harry-potter-cast-cursed-themselves-forever-4707050

Just disgusted but not surprised. It would be easy to write an article about actors having to make choices given the external commentators (like the author of this article!) holding them up to contempt.

And continuing to get their lies printed.

Datun · 03/08/2026 08:27

Ereshkigalangcleg · 02/08/2026 12:59

I think TRAs and their allies generally see the foundation of Beira’s Place as a petty tit for tat thing to “exclude trans women”.

Christ. The compulsion to centre themselves looks completely involuntary.

Treaclewell · 03/08/2026 08:16

Thank you.
It seems that Pav is identifying as SLAPPs anything ha disapproves of, regardless if anyone else would so identify it.
I will continue to ignore him.

Treaclewell · 02/08/2026 13:34

What the hell are anti-slapp laws? I usually now avoid that posters pieces as bollocks, and I am sure that I wouldn't agree that we should should have them, but he's mentioned them several times now.
Incidentally, I've been binge watching Morse/Endeavour lately, and in one a mention of Pav was made, as pertaining to peacocks, and it was derogatory.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 02/08/2026 12:59

I think TRAs and their allies generally see the foundation of Beira’s Place as a petty tit for tat thing to “exclude trans women”.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 02/08/2026 12:58

Yes, exactly. I think that’s a very good point.

GailBlancheViola · 02/08/2026 12:54

Capraro sees that as ideological manipulation to push an agenda (she talked about it on the podcasts) and she probably sees Beira’s Place in a similar way, and imagines the support comes with indoctrination into our “anti rights” gender critical ideology. Which she thinks is funded by religious people anyway.

Caparo is clearly tarring Beira's Place with the same brush as the Rape Crisis Centre with the male Mridul Wadhwa at the helm which made acceptance of GI a condition of being treated and stated that traumatised women should reframe their trauma.

Obviously Caparo cannot accept that a centre dealing with traumatised women would focus solely on them and their trauma. Not everyone is as callous and dismissive of women's trauma and their needs as Caparo, Wadhwa et al.

soddingspiderseason · 02/08/2026 12:19

MashaPav · 02/08/2026 03:02

TLDR didn’t read.
Maybe summarise it next time that Joanne threatened lawfare at a charity because it didn’t fit her narrative and doesn’t like to be called out. This is why I believe we can agree that the UK needs anti slapp laws?

Edited

Maybe actually read the article before making assumptions? If you had you wouldn’t have made such daft comments. Women need single sex services for rape and domestic abuse support. If you genuinely don’t agree with that, then you need to give your head a wobble, and yes maybe actually read full articles rather than jumping to your pre-determined conclusion.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 02/08/2026 11:23

I’ve been thinking about the reason Beira’s Place was dragged into this and I think two main reasons:

  1. JKR and the perception that she funded the FWS case, playing to the gallery where she is public enemy no 1

  2. there are a number of “crisis pregnancy centres” at least partly funded by anti abortion money which purport, rightly or wrongly, to offer support to pregnant women in crisis wondering whether to have an abortion. Capraro sees that as ideological manipulation to push an agenda (she talked about it on the podcasts) and she probably sees Beira’s Place in a similar way, and imagines the support comes with indoctrination into our “anti rights” gender critical ideology. Which she thinks is funded by religious people anyway.

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 02/08/2026 11:02

MashaPav · 02/08/2026 03:02

TLDR didn’t read.
Maybe summarise it next time that Joanne threatened lawfare at a charity because it didn’t fit her narrative and doesn’t like to be called out. This is why I believe we can agree that the UK needs anti slapp laws?

Edited

You really do spout a spectacular amount of bollocks don't you.

I'm sure we used to get a much better class of TRA on this site, ones you could have an actual argument with, rather than just ignore them while they spouted the same shite on every thread.

singthing · 02/08/2026 10:58

MashaPav · 02/08/2026 03:02

TLDR didn’t read.
Maybe summarise it next time that Joanne threatened lawfare at a charity because it didn’t fit her narrative and doesn’t like to be called out. This is why I believe we can agree that the UK needs anti slapp laws?

Edited

I mean, it’s a bold decision to announce to the world you are deliberately choosing to stay ignorant of the facts in preference to your own entirely incorrect assumptions, but hope that works out for you.

OP posts:
FedUpCelery · 02/08/2026 10:48

Whatchamacallitt · 01/08/2026 20:06

As they aren't mentioned, I assume they're making use of the right to exclude trans-identifying women who look convincingly like men (so called 'trans men'). I think that's the right call under the circumstances.

From the website I think anyone entering Beiras place could trust that they had done their due diligence and that anyone they encountered would be female regardless of gender identity or appearance

"Beira’s Place has been set up in response to evidence that many female survivors prefer a women-only service to safely address and recover from their trauma.

Beira’s Place is a women-only service, which means that any contact you have with us, will be from a woman and you can be guaranteed that when you visit our city centre venue, everyone in the building will be women."

Wishesandhorses · 02/08/2026 10:11

Really good article, thank you for the share.

It really brings it home - I hope readers notice it - that this service is for half the population (the half most affected by rape.)

It is the ONLY service for that half of the population exclusively, that is women only. Many women can only access a service that is women only.

EVERY OTHER SODDING OPTION is 'trans inclusive' and will cater gladly to men however they identify. They are lined up with open arms.

And yet this one single one is 'evil' because it doesn't do men.

Which proves beyond all doubt, if something with the word 'woman' on it is not primarily all about trans identified men it shouldn't exist, and the capacity for activists to tolerate any other human's needs being even considered seems pathologically fucked. It's like the toddler who wants to hold all the toys all the time and can't do anything because they're too busy screaming at every other kid that everything is theirs.

tarwars · 02/08/2026 09:37

I’m really sorry to hear that @BirdLandedonmyHead. As far as I understand the black cabs were seen to be a safer option than using Ubers. Most women use public transport to get to BP as it’s very central. Train fairs and bus fairs can be reimbursed by the service. Taxis are usually for women who can’t manage that for whatever reason. If a woman felt unsafe in a taxi alone she can bring a friend to travel with. Although there isn’t a waiting room in BP, there is a policy of giving a gift card for one of the local coffee shops and the friend can have a cuppa there while they wait.
The staff understand that actually getting to the service can be a major block for some women and there is always lots of discussion about how to make this a bit easier. Online/phone appointments are also available if travelling just feels too much.

BellsoftheCarols · 02/08/2026 05:03

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 01/08/2026 09:59

This is really helpful, I see so many posts on Reddit dismissing Beiras place as "just a phone line", it's good to have an article to reply with that details exactly what they do.

Just a phone line! These bozos really have no clue, do they? Don't do the slightest bit of research. They probably think it's only a phoneline because that's how they harass the staff 🙄

JKR is fantastic for setting up Beira's Place. What a legend.

BirdLandedonmyHead · 02/08/2026 04:22

My view on taxis and no shows, from a SA survivor...

I hate tsxis. They force me to be in a confined space with an unknown man from which i cant escape.

Maybe a future step will be employing some female drivers instead?

Chickadeeinme · 02/08/2026 03:43

You seem to be using the phrase “threatened lawfare” as some kind of slur rather than the more normal phraseology “took the appropriate action on behalf of a party who had been defamed”.

MashaPav · 02/08/2026 03:02

singthing · 01/08/2026 09:32

Inside JK Rowling’s rape support centre that took on Amnesty – and won
After defeating ‘anti-rights’ claims, Beira’s Place is standing firm against the trans lobby by providing female-only support

In the Harry Potter books, there is a pub called the Leaky Cauldron, which Muggles – non-magic people – mysteriously never notice, even when they’re walking right past it. Beira’s Place in Edinburgh, the sexual violence support centre set up by JK Rowling in 2022, has a similarly unobtrusive air. Google Maps leads me to the right building, yet somehow I meander past it and have to double back.
Inside, the centre is tranquil and almost silent, with walls painted soothing shades of greige, plants in pots and inoffensive works of art on display. But the centre, which offers support to women only, has found itself at the heart of an extraordinary row that began when Amnesty International UK published a report last month in which it described Beira’s Place – as well as a host of other organisations – as “anti-rights”.
That report followed another document in May, which also framed the “gender-critical” viewpoint – namely, the belief that women are biological females, and men biological males – as a threat. The document claimed that the “growth and influence of the [gender critical] movement” in the UK was “worrying”, given that it “seeks to restrict the rights of trans people”.
Following a public outcry and threat of legal action from lawyers acting for Beira’s Place, Amnesty has since retracted its anti-rights report, and claimed in an apology that “the document should never have been published”. Beira’s Place welcomed the apology, but said that Amnesty’s statement “fails to recognise that those most severely impacted are the staff who work day in day out to support survivors of sexual violence, and the many women who need and use the service”.
Given the events of the past few weeks, it’s understandable that the centre might feel under siege. There has been, one staff member tells me, an increase in threats issued to those who work there “The usual,” she sighs when I ask what kind. “[For example,] ‘Why don’t you think about suicide?’”
Before the Amnesty report, Beira’s Place had repeatedly come under fire from activists both because it restricts its services to biological women, and for its links to Rowling, who has become the figurehead of the gender-critical viewpoint in the debate over trans rights. But the team works hard to make the centre feel safe and calm for the women who use it, whatever might be going on beyond its walls.

Beira’s Place is solely funded by its founder, JK Rowling Credit: Tolga Akmen/AFP
The chief executive of Beira’s Place, Lesley Johnston, who has worked on gender-based violence for three decades, first heard of the Amnesty report pretty much the moment it was published. Her first reaction was to go into emergency mode – convene meetings with staff and board members, and try to work out how best to talk about what happened to the vulnerable women receiving support.
The accusation that Beira’s Place is somehow undermining human rights has hit staff particularly hard, says Johnson. “Some staff really internalised it.” Their work, which mainly consists of one-on-one sessions with victims of rape and other sexual assault, is difficult. “You’re working with very complex trauma... To be doing that job, day in day out, and then to get this report which accuses you of being anti-rights and anti-women – it’s deeply painful, and it’s deeply frustrating because it’s so not true. Part of you thinks, ‘Oh, for f---’s sake. It’s so ridiculous, I can’t take it too seriously.’ But the fact is, it’s out there, and it is taken seriously. And [Amnesty] is quite a big organisation.”
We are sitting in a meeting room with a couple of other staff members, as well as Johann Lamont, 69, the former Scottish Labour politician and campaigner for women’s rights, who serves on the centre’s board (along with its funder and founder, JK Rowling). Lamont’s fury at the Amnesty report is palpable. “To see women who deliver a service here made to feel that what they’re doing in terms of choosing to work in this way is somehow to be dismissed – I think it’s shocking.”
For her generation, Lamont continues, Amnesty was revered for its genuinely effective campaigning on human rights abuses in the likes of Nicaragua, Chile and South Africa. “It was an organisation that shone a light where people didn’t want light to be shone,” she says. “It wasn’t just saying, ‘We really care about there not being bad things. We want there to be good things.’” It called on its supporters, she says, to take action to correct injustices.
In short, Lamont says, Amnesty “isn’t some random off-the-street [organisation] that thinks it’s a good idea to slag off whoever about anything. This is an organisation that is using its institutional history to assert something that’s not true. It’s significant that they said it. And it matters because they said it”.
Lamont is especially disturbed by the idea that Amnesty’s report could discourage women from seeking help at a point where they might desperately need it. She is furious that staff members working to support such women have had their work traduced. “What could possibly be more important in your working life than to be doing something that’s supporting somebody who’s faced trauma, helping them with that?”

Beira’s Place was set up to deliver entirely female-led and female-delivered care Credit: Nicole Jones

Beira’s Place (pronounced By-ra) was set up by Rowling to offer women who have been sexually assaulted “the option of women-centred and women-delivered care”. Men and trans women are not allowed into the centre, though Johnston stresses that when they get enquiries from people who can’t access the service because of their sex, they guide them towards other options. The centre is also happy to support non-binary people, provided they were born as girls.

The female requirement is certainly taken seriously. Before I visit, I mention I’d like to bring a photographer, and the press officer for Beira’s Place requests that they be a woman. The centre does sometimes have to call in the odd handyman, I’m told, but such visits are kept to times when there are no women receiving support in the building.

To some, this approach might seem a little extreme. But, Lamont says, it is a response to a need that women have expressed for care that is entirely female-led and female-delivered. She was inspired to get involved in part because she had learnt that similar services in Scotland were being effectively forced to allow trans women into female spaces, otherwise they might not be granted funding. Beira’s Place, she adds, answers the question, “Where do women go who are dealing with trauma and who want a woman-only space?”

“They know they can come here. It just stands as a service. That to me is the most important thing about it,” she says.

Since the centre opened, it has received more than 1,200 referrals – mainly from women seeking help for themselves, but also from charities, the NHS, police, local authorities and others seeking help on women’s behalf. Rape is the top reason that women come, accounting for 21 per cent of referrals, followed by sexual assault (19 per cent), childhood sexual abuse (18 per cent) and domestic abuse or intimate partner sexual violence (14 per cent). Other reasons include non-fatal strangulation, honour-based crime, stalking and trafficking.
Most of the women seen are under 40, which should come as no surprise, Johnston says, given that “the highest risk factors for being sexually assaulted are being young and being female”.

When a referral comes in, the centre aims to get in touch with the woman in question within three days, but normally does so on the day itself. Then, depending on her need, she will typically be offered 12 one-on-one sessions with a member of the support team. On a tour of the building, I see some of the rooms where the sessions happen. They are comfortable, peaceful spaces. A member of staff shows me a box filled with items – pine cones, fidget toys – that women sometimes like to hold during their sessions to alleviate stress.
Before coming to Beira’s Place, some women had never opened up about what had happened to them. Many, Johnston says, are not dealing with one isolated incident. “It’s very rarely one form of abuse,” she explains. “It’s usually complex. You’ve got your comorbidities – alcohol, substance misuse, perhaps having children taken into care, further sexual abuse and domestic abuse.”

A lot of the work the staff members do revolves around teaching those who have been through unimaginable harm to understand how their body and mind are processing it. For instance, why they might have flashbacks or remember certain details from their assault (cigarette smell, a rough material) painfully sharply. Often, women have to psych themselves up enormously just to come to the first appointment. Johnston has watched women hesitating outside, she says. She understands. “I can’t underestimate how traumatic it is for women who make that first step.”

But the help they get once they are brave enough to cross the threshold is evidently transformative. The women being supported are too vulnerable to be interviewed, but I am given sheets of testimonials, and they make for wrenching reading. “I don’t think I would have managed without the support I received,” one woman writes. “I had spent years hiding under a heavy cloak of shame,” writes another.

Some meetings take place outside the facility, but they’ve had difficulties renting rooms from venues because of how the centre is perceived. Often, cabs for women coming to and from appointments will be paid for by Beira’s Place, to ensure that poorer women get access to support. Still, says Johnston, there are sometimes no-shows. Unfortunately, since the Amnesty report claiming that Beira’s Place was “anti-rights”, no-shows have risen, while referrals to the centre have, she says, “dipped a little bit”.

The centre has previously received abuse on social media and via a chat function, which it previously had on its website, but which has now been closed. The quantity of abuse that has come in after the Amnesty report was published has reached such a pitch that staff have put up a board on which they pin messages of support. One pensioner asked whether he could buy the centre something “with his pension”. The centre doesn’t accept donations, as it is funded solely by Rowling.

But I imagine that it must be depressing, dealing on a daily basis with the aftermath of some of the worst behaviour imaginable, as well as abuse for doing so. Johnston, who is both warm and formidable, tells me she thinks that over the course of her 30-year career, “the levels of violence against women and girls are higher than when I started out”. She reckons that pornography and incels (derived from the term “involuntary celibate”) might be playing a role. It could also be that people are increasingly willing to be open about the abuse they have endured.

Occasionally, the centre will work with a woman who has misgivings about its point of view on gender and sex. One non-binary person it helped said she found it “jarring that we refer to women”, a staff member relates. “Some people believe we’re transphobic bigots,” she adds.

In 2023, The Student, Edinburgh University’s student paper, made its view on the centre clear when it ran an “exclusive” story, revealing in shocked tones that the university had “officially recommended Beira’s Place, a potentially misleading and harmful resource, to students who have experienced sexual assault”.
It would be tempting just to duck out, and work in an area that attracts less anger and fewer death threats. I ask Johnston how she came to become involved in the fight against gender-based violence in the first place. “I actually started when I was 17,” she says. Raised in Fife, she saw a note on a signpost in St Andrews looking for volunteers to set up a rape crisis service. “I thought, ‘Well, that sounds interesting.’” Police in the city were in denial that there was any kind of problem. “‘Oh, we don’t have rape here,’ they’d say.”

Since then, she believes that police attitudes have improved. But now there are other problems, including the time it takes for rape and other sexual assault cases to be dealt with by the courts. It is a problem that Beira’s Place is hoping to turn to next by hiring advocacy workers.
Lamont, the board member and former MSP, chips in to tell me that, with so many factors that lead to violence against women and girls remaining unfixed, it is easy to become “overwhelmed”. Still, she adds: “To me, Beira’s Place is about – well, we can’t sort everything for everybody everywhere – but we refuse to be overwhelmed. We’re going to create what we can. And this place does what it can for as many women as it can, in a way that’s going to help them as much as possible.

“You can have paralysis and think, ‘Oh my God, what do we do with all this?’ Well, actually, as JK Rowling says, ‘We’ll do this.”

https://archive.ph/QmpaY

TLDR didn’t read.
Maybe summarise it next time that Joanne threatened lawfare at a charity because it didn’t fit her narrative and doesn’t like to be called out. This is why I believe we can agree that the UK needs anti slapp laws?

Whatchamacallitt · 01/08/2026 23:01

tarwars · 01/08/2026 22:48

I’ve had a bit to do with Beira’s Place so I can answer some of these questions. No problem with taxis, they have a contract with a black cab firm.
If a trans man wanted to use BP that would be fine as they are biologically female, they could be seen off site in a confidential space. A bit of compromise would need to be reached as it’s likely they couldn’t guarantee a female only building.
I wonder if the referrals dropping could be as much to do with it being the summer holiday in Scotland as much as Amnesty being bellends.
I work in a service for vulnerable people too and we are so quiet.
It’s lovely seeing the support workers at BP get a bit of recognition on this thread. They do such a brilliant job and get consistently strong feedback from the women who use the service.

Good to know they would support her without triggering other women.

Whatchamacallitt · 01/08/2026 23:01

Chickadeeinme · 01/08/2026 21:36

Transmen are women who identify as men. I think it likely that Beira's Place would treat such a person who had been raped, because they are women.

They have to balance it with the perceived threat she would impose on traumatised women. Often they will do things like offer one on one support instead.

Whatchamacallitt · 01/08/2026 22:59

womendeserveequalhumanrights · 01/08/2026 20:12

Who knows, it's not mentioned. What I do know is that the women running this centre are both way more experienced in supporting women who've suffered male violence than most and also extremely empathetic and focused on the women needing help. I'm sure that they have many ways they can resolve this problem, if it even exists, which it may not.

I can't imagine someone identifying as a man and then seeking help from a woman only service, to be honest. They might very well prefer the many other mixed sex services.

I didn't think so either but there's another women's only rape crisis service in Brighton who have posted here saying they supported a male-passing TIF after she was excluded from the local services for being a 'man'. They seem to handle it with open disclosure to other participants that a trans-identified woman who looks male is attending. But I think others will avoid it because it could be triggering to women attending. Maybe they'd offer one on one support.