Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sexist Unions boycott Labour women's conference

93 replies

fromorbit · 29/07/2026 10:53

Unison, Aslef, Usdaw and the Musicians Union are planning to not attend Labour Women's Conference on 26 September 2026 in Liverpool because men are not allowed.

This is breaking Labour party rules against sex discrimination against women and that the Supreme Court judgement is correct:
https://labour.org.uk/resources/supreme-court-judgment-faqs/

This could be a huge issue for Burnham and Labour. Especially as Unison, & Unite are already facing court cases over their refusal to admit women exist.

Like the recent Amnesty trainwreck this could be a self inflicted car crash for TAs in the unions. It will force Labour to choose between reality and catering to a bunch of sexists who don't like it when women get have political meetings without male supervision.

Supreme Court Judgment FAQs – The Labour Party

Supreme Court Judgment: Frequently Asked Questions On 16 April 2025, the Supreme Court clarified that references to “women” in the Equality Act 2010 refer to biological sex (meaning the sex of a person at birth), not gender. This means that certain sex...

https://labour.org.uk/resources/supreme-court-judgment-faqs/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 25/09/2026 17:24

borntobequiet · 25/09/2026 11:17

Well, there goes the Burnham bounce. Talk about playing into the hands of Reform.

Yup. A few pointed, well-placed, public words from Burnham when he first became PM, backed up by his closest advisors and his Cabinet, could have nipped this all in the bud at the start of his term. A storm there might have been, but it would all be over by now.

Instead, Burnham has kept his head down because he wants to maintain his "nice guy" image, and so the problems rumble on and grow.

Not a good look for Labour at all, Andy. Time to get a grip.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 25/09/2026 18:00

Given the levels of emotional incontinence and rage displayed by so many transactivists this may be a very educational demo for the public to see.

Steph threatening a labour MP with the courts for accurately sexing men is another example showcasing how GI has been imposed via threats.

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 25/09/2026 18:08

Given the levels of emotional incontinence and rage displayed by so many transactivists

I imagine these are exactly the "members of our community" that Simon Blake was thinking about when he made his latest statement in Stonewall's website. These kinds of activists cannot be contained in pleasant little rainbow boxes.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 25/09/2026 22:19

BridgetYourFortyDaysAreUp · 25/09/2026 18:08

Given the levels of emotional incontinence and rage displayed by so many transactivists

I imagine these are exactly the "members of our community" that Simon Blake was thinking about when he made his latest statement in Stonewall's website. These kinds of activists cannot be contained in pleasant little rainbow boxes.

Do you mean when he says this? Is this the formal roll back of #nodebate ?
"Disagreeing well is an important discipline especially in the face of a well organised attack on our rights. Disagreeing well calls on us to stay in the room, to assume good faith before bad, to have robust discussions about ideas without shouting at those who hold them. A movement that can only survive if there is complete consensus is not really a movement. Real change, real progress, brings people in with generosity and kindness, however hard that might be".

I'm not sure his underlings are listening? Suppose we'll know if women are able to meet / attend conferences / speak freely without threats and violence.

IwantToRetire · 25/09/2026 23:00

I hope it doesn't get too unpleasant tomorrow, and part of me feels, not far any love of Labour, that there should be a squad of flying feminists to turn up and show support.

Its such a shit action but member of a Party against other members.

Good luck to the women attending the conference.

MrsOvertonsWindow · 25/09/2026 23:03

IwantToRetire · 25/09/2026 23:00

I hope it doesn't get too unpleasant tomorrow, and part of me feels, not far any love of Labour, that there should be a squad of flying feminists to turn up and show support.

Its such a shit action but member of a Party against other members.

Good luck to the women attending the conference.

It is a shit action.

"Right comrades, Labour women in the party are having a women's conference so we're doing everything we can to stop it. To the barricades! Bring your placards, your insults, your loudhailers, your masks and let's have at them" 😑

OP posts:
BernardBlacksMolluscs · Yesterday 09:32

Join us to hear how lesbian rights clinched the FWS Supreme Court ruling, why “Gay Teens Aren’t Sick”,

cor, that’s going to whip some people into a frenzy. Best of luck to the women attending today.

SirChenjins · Yesterday 13:03

Any update on whether the lads decided to behave themselves?

ChequerToRed · Yesterday 14:10

Example #3476 of ‘How the hell did these guys become so influential?’
If they really wanted to make a statement they could have had transmen actually at the conference, even the odious Whittle. It’s not as if they wouldn’t qualify. Instead it’ll be the usual band of male agitators and their dysfunctional hangers on out the front of the building screeching at any woman brave enough to walk past. But we know full well that they don’t give even a seconds thought to transmen, because they’re female and therefore unimportant.
Funny, isn’t it?

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 17:17

Nothing in the news about the conference.

Have seen a video clip on twitter of protestors arriving, sucking dummies, and wearing animal face masks, https://x.com/mindsci/status/2103799858041626898

But worse in the number of unions posting about the solidarity for trans women and proud to boycott the event ....

And its not as if Burnham is going to do his cheeky northern chappie routine and say right lads enough is enough or anything.

How can the Labour Party not be ashamed that this is the public response. None. Let women be bullied.

Barry Thain 🟥 (@mindsci) on X

Protesters arrive to demonstrate outside @UKLabour's Women's Conference

https://x.com/mindsci/status/2103799858041626898

tripleginandtonic · Yesterday 17:21

Let them boycott. What labour mustn't do is cancel the conference.

borntobequiet · Yesterday 17:24

Dummies and animal face masks. Dear God.

GailBlancheViola · Yesterday 17:34

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 17:17

Nothing in the news about the conference.

Have seen a video clip on twitter of protestors arriving, sucking dummies, and wearing animal face masks, https://x.com/mindsci/status/2103799858041626898

But worse in the number of unions posting about the solidarity for trans women and proud to boycott the event ....

And its not as if Burnham is going to do his cheeky northern chappie routine and say right lads enough is enough or anything.

How can the Labour Party not be ashamed that this is the public response. None. Let women be bullied.

Um, you might want to check the provenance of that video - it is clearly from Cologne Pride in Germany.

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 17:36

GailBlancheViola · Yesterday 17:34

Um, you might want to check the provenance of that video - it is clearly from Cologne Pride in Germany.

Edited

Sorry, just went by the heading to the video!

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 17:44

This is the only one I can find, but am only going by what the poster says it is! See image below
https://x.com/charleshart/status/2103762746525245684

Judging by most sources, whether MSM or SM the only protest that is making news is the Palestine Solidarity march, although rumours of farmers also taking to the streets.

𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚛𝚕𝚎𝚜 𝙶. 𝙷𝚊𝚛𝚝 🇮🇱 (@charles_hart) on X

Outside the National Women’s Conference in Liverpool.

https://x.com/charles_hart/status/2103762746525245684

GailBlancheViola · Yesterday 17:46

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 17:36

Sorry, just went by the heading to the video!

Suggest you ask for your post containing it to be removed.

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 17:48

GailBlancheViola · Yesterday 17:46

Suggest you ask for your post containing it to be removed.

Why?

Its a good example, which I am happy to be part of, that twitter and other sm sources should be double checked.

GailBlancheViola · Yesterday 18:13

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 17:48

Why?

Its a good example, which I am happy to be part of, that twitter and other sm sources should be double checked.

Okay if you are happy to look foolish to have been taken in by an obvious wind-up that's up to you but be prepared for those on the TRA side of the debate to use your gullibility to their utmost.

Its a good example, which I am happy to be part of, that twitter and other sm sources should be double checked. Which you failed to do.

MrsOvertonsWindow · Yesterday 18:15

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 17:48

Why?

Its a good example, which I am happy to be part of, that twitter and other sm sources should be double checked.

Your comment includes this: "How can the Labour Party not be ashamed that this is the public response. None. Let women be bullied".

But that image is evidently not the "public response".
There's nothing wrong in being misled by social media and nothing wrong in asking MNHQ to delete the image. Surely it's the mature thing to do?

MrsOvertonsWindow · Yesterday 18:25

What does appear to be good news is that for all the threats and whining, there appear to be 8? people & a couple of flags trying to silence women. With Steph producing a very self centred leaflet about his alleged "advocacy for women" - the larger demo photographed appears to be about Palestine?

So maybe all the union hype was just hot air - or maybe Labour did suggest that they STFU and leave women alone?

https://x.com/charles_hart/status/2103762746525245684

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 18:53

GailBlancheViola · Yesterday 18:13

Okay if you are happy to look foolish to have been taken in by an obvious wind-up that's up to you but be prepared for those on the TRA side of the debate to use your gullibility to their utmost.

Its a good example, which I am happy to be part of, that twitter and other sm sources should be double checked. Which you failed to do.

I know!

So am happy to be an example.

And even if the turn out at Liverpool to today was smaller, it is still bullying endorsed by Labour, even if only its silence.

alcovecupboards · Yesterday 19:07

There was never going to be a major demonstration - there doesn't need to be. The unions have all spoken and the overwhelming narrative is not one of a successful conference. And I'm afraid the groups inside aren't helping themselves by claiming it's 'standing room only' next to pictures of a tiny room and empty chairs. This has become a major problem for us - there is no need to lie or be outrageously hateful.

alcovecupboards · Yesterday 19:08

IwantToRetire · Yesterday 18:53

I know!

So am happy to be an example.

And even if the turn out at Liverpool to today was smaller, it is still bullying endorsed by Labour, even if only its silence.

You need to get a grip. A handful of people standing outside in silence is not bullying. Genuine question - how on earth do you cope in every day life?