So this looks like Scot Gov has gone tits up again

So, women, you thought that once pregnancy was over, you'd have a spot more bodily autonomy. No more lectures about half a glass of wine once a week, slowlt downed over the course of an entire evening, or lectures about avoiding soft cheese and not so much as looking at a cat.

But if you plan to breastfeed, be careful about garlic, onions, alcohol, over the counter painkillers, antibiotics and, well, an endless list, really. Otherwise your baby could suffer untold damage!

But if you're a TIM, just stuff down all these hormones with unknown impacts for the baby at the other end, so that you can 'lactate'. It'll all be fine!

As ever, one rule for the blokes and another for the women.

Sick fuckers. Since when it is acceptable for a grandfather to have the right to experience the bond of breast feeding. Why would a daughter allow her child to be abused in this way?

Does any fucker ever ask WHY 'Lactation induction in transgender women is a clinical and research priority in the field of breastfeeding medicine', HOW it came to be that 'Lactation induction in transgender women is a clinical and research priority in the field of breastfeeding medicine' and WHO THE FUCK decided that 'Lactation induction in transgender women is a clinical and research priority in the field of breastfeeding medicine'?

I have no words. Appalling.

Also registered as a company on Companies House

LGBT HEALTHY LIVING CENTRE
Company number SC246290

ed. 14 active Directors and 1 Secretary

It’s always all about their wants. Men enabling men. Through the ages.

LGBT Health and Wellbeing

What about the Health and Wellbeing of BABIES?

I do hope that this is picked up by the media more widely. It's such a clear expose of how children are being used by proponents of this ideology to indulge their fetish.

There is no good reason for this. The NHS has spent a lifetime promoting and supporting women to breast feed their babies. Yet in Scotland they're suddenly throwing money at proposals to enable a group of men to undermine mothers breastfeeding their babies. And pretending that male bodily secretions are equivalent, despite all the evidence that proves they're not.

.

The LGBT Healthy Living Centre (known as LGBT Health and Wellbeing) is recognised as a charity by the Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator, no. SC034216.

LGBT Health and Wellbeing CEO, Chair of the Board, Vice-Chair of the Board: all male. Because of course they are.

I won't link their "Our Team" webpage, because that's been deleted in the past (different charity), but it's not difficult to find.

ps. But check it quickly, if you are interested, before they start deleting pages!

Did JS need to go to the “safe room” to deal with his anxiety over being asked questions in the Scottish Parliament? 🤨

That is pretty clear.

And yet not only do we see support for male people feeding untested secretions to infants from their nipples, we also have seen the argument that any female who wishes to take testosterone throughout their pregnancy should be supported, when we know that testosterone causes health issues during pregnancy for both mother and the foetus. And that development may be impacted.

I remember that the group who campaigns for female people to continue to take testosterone even accused women of being ableist bigots when women pointed out the issues.

This needs repeating ^ about the dual implications of fetishisation and misogyny.

is it about feeding the dysphoria?

Yes, obviously, but it is also much more than feeding ‘dysphoria’. It’s about feeding a purely male compulsion to dominate and destroy what women do naturally with their bodies whilst also feeding a sexual fetish.

That is what some men are compelled to do. Not really a surprise.

But it is beyond grotesque and enraging, indicative of the madness in the NHS, that these men are actively supported to abuse newborn infants in plain sight. The Left is heading to oblivion when no kink can be criticised and every disturbing male impulse is to be applauded and celebrated.

Edited to add: There seems no boundary that they won't breach is there? None. With the NHS cheering on from the sidelines.

https://lgbthealth.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Safeguarding-Policy-April-2024.pdf

From LGBT Health and Wellbeing Safeguarding Policy, page 3

Definition of abuse
Child abuse as defined in Scottish Office guidance refers to circumstances where a child’s basic needs are not being met in a manner that is appropriate to his/her individual needs and stage of development and the child is, or will be, at risk through avoidable acts of commission or omission.
^^
Abuse has also been defined as the wrongful application of power by someone in dominant position. Whether abuse occurs in institutions or in the home, it involves the elements of a power imbalance, exploitation and the absence of full consent. It also involves acts of omission and commission.
[my bold]

In all these trials and experiments there is never any consideration whatsoever on the impact on the baby. There is no benefit to the infant yet why is the NHS supporting and funding the concept. Right in front of our eyes.

For those questioning how we got to this point, maybe these are useful background to skim:

Here is the NHS's stance 2024

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-10892531/NHS-accused-putting-babies-harm-advice-trans-women-wanting-breastfeed.html

and more on Scottish charities

https://www.thetimes.com/article/8a3f3784-e7b5-4d4e-bda4-fbb6128fd3b9?shareToken=0a544096c5296b8a5b6ebbafea2061d6

warnings from ex-La Leche trustees

www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5209721-chest-feeding-men-should-not-be-put-above-women-and-babies-by-la-leche-league-reasonable?page=1

There is a long history of discussion though on MN here are two important

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4315027-Its-World-Breastfeeding-Week-2021-Who-is-it-for?reply=109685247

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/4810003-brighton-nhs-trust-recommends-drug-induced-male-breastfeeding-in-their-maternity-protocols?reply=126299895

It seems that way @MrsOvertonsWindow

Feeding a baby is sacrosanct, the most sacrosanct of all human activities. In Scotland the government obviously doesn’t see it this way.

Yes, good point. Like when Sturgeon was asked on camera about Isla Bryson and fluffed it.

Just asking the question, "Do you approve of public funds being given a charity that attempts to assist men who think they are women to feed newborn babies chemically-laden secretions from their fake breasts?" and receiving no answer, and having that on camera would be worth a lot!

In Scotland too and horrified (once again). This needs reporting wide and far.

After years of all this I'm still shocked at how relentless the assault on safeguarding children is by advocates of transgenderism.
There seems no boundary that they won't breach is there?

He doesn't answer questions. I read the report from first minister's "question" time most Thursdays by Alex Massie in the Times and the common theme is JS huffing at the discourtesy of the opposition to ask questions.

Another male lactation paper
A recent case study.

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13006-024-00624-1

Case presentation
In this case a 37-year-old transgender woman, who was under the care of the centre of expertise on gender dysphoria in Amsterdam, and in 2020 started lactation induction because she had the wish to breastfeed her future infant. She was in a relationship with a cisgender woman and had been using gender affirming hormone therapy for 13 years.

Prior to initiating gender affirming hormone therapy she had cryopreserved her semen. Her partner conceived through Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection, using our patient’s cryopreserved sperm.

To induce lactation, we implemented a hormone-regimen to mimic pregnancy, using estradiol and progesterone, and a galactogogue; domperidone. Our patient started pumping during treatment. Dosage of progesterone and estradiol were significantly decreased approximately one month before childbirth to mimic delivery and pumping was increased. Our patient started lactating and although the production of milk was low, it was sufficient for supplementary feeding and a positive experience for our patient.

Two weeks after birth, lactation induction was discontinued due to suckling problems of the infant and low milk production.

Conclusions
This case report underlined that lactation induction protocols commonly used for cisgender women are also effective in transgender women.

However, the amount of milk produced may not be sufficient for exclusive nursing.

Nevertheless, success of induced lactation may be attributed to its importance for parent-infant bonding, rather than the possibility of exclusive chestfeeding.

🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮🤮

And don’t let’s forget that male people find watching women feed babies a sexual fantasy as well. Indeed, we have have MNers tell us of male people in the past of joining breastfeeding online groups, making mothers uncomfortable with comments and questions etc. And those mothers, iirc, were asked to leave some groups because they were not accepting of those male people.

reduxx.info/uk-trans-identified-male-who-sparked-backlash-after-using-womens-changing-room-during-teen-swim-meet-engaged-with-erotic-breastfeeding-account/