Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Don't release violent male offenders, repurpose women's prisons for them instead

114 replies

CohensDiamondTeeth · 26/07/2026 12:03

Article in the Telegraph.

Instead lets release women from prison instead, and repurpose their prisons to house the men.

It sounds like an excellent idea to me!

Repurpose women’s prisons for men, campaigners tell Andy Burnham

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
WarriorN · 02/09/2026 04:58

Oliwiaa · 26/07/2026 12:30

I don't think any non-violent offenders should be in prison, it causes more problems than it solves.

Fines, community service, mental health treatment, house arrest etc

The professional man I know round here who was convicted of CSA material
didn’t go to prison so yes it’s galling that women who do much lesser crimes appear to do so.

SadiraOfTyr · 01/09/2026 23:43

Heggettypeg · 01/09/2026 23:13

I wonder how the long-term economics would work out?:
The cost of repurposing a number of women's prisons, versus the cost - to the police, the NHS, the courts etc and the general public - of having the relevant number of violent and predatory criminals on the loose instead.
I don't know. Does anyone?

Those aren’t the only two alternatives. Building new men’s prisons and expanding existing ones is ongoing.

Heggettypeg · 01/09/2026 23:13

I wonder how the long-term economics would work out?:
The cost of repurposing a number of women's prisons, versus the cost - to the police, the NHS, the courts etc and the general public - of having the relevant number of violent and predatory criminals on the loose instead.
I don't know. Does anyone?

SadiraOfTyr · 01/09/2026 22:37

My understanding is that this has been considered but is not workable. The three category A women’s prisons would need to be retained for violent and dangerous female offenders, which leaves you with a choice of just 9 low security/open prisons, none of which would be suitable for housing male offenders without effectively having to rebuild them from the ground up as they simply don’t have the security features needed to keep staff and the public safe from the much greater threat posed by male inmates.

Tearannosaurus · 01/09/2026 22:10

Female or male you should only be in prison if you're a danger to the public or you've committed the most heinous crimes with no thinkable alternative. The number of females fitting either category must be tiny to non existent. Crimes have to be punished of course and there are many alternative and sometimes more productive sentences.

ElizaMulvil · 01/09/2026 19:50

TheignT · 27/07/2026 19:40

No you haven't answered my question. Forget sex for a minute, prisoner A failed to pay court fines, in prison for six months. Due to overcrowding released after two months. Prisoner B failed to pay court fines and in prison for six months. Overcrowding but not released early as they are a B. That doesn't seem fair does it

Now think A is male and B is female and now is it fair that A gets released early because he's male. That doesnt seem fair.

Now reverse the sexes and A gets released early because she's female but B isn't. You say that's fair. Why?

.

Neither should be in prison. We should be able to come up with a system that doesn't mean US paying more ( by keeping them in prison) than the amount owned in the first place. Community work etc?

TheignT · 01/09/2026 17:21

Manyanamanyana · 01/09/2026 02:13

What kind of question is that?

It's a question about should men and women be treated equally. If we have to let people out early I'm all for the nonviolent ones getting out regardless of sex and at the same time I'm all for violent ones staying in again regardless if sex. So for me it isn't should we let women out it's which prisoners can safely be released.

Manyanamanyana · 01/09/2026 02:13

TheignT · 26/07/2026 12:33

Do you also think dangerous women should be in prison?

What kind of question is that?

TheignT · 31/08/2026 21:19

Hypatiasdisciple · 31/08/2026 09:58

If prisons are so crowded that the government is seeking early release for rapists and murderers, the priority should be to give early release to all nonviolent criminals first. Most women in prison are there for nonviolent crime.

Exactly my point why not all non violent prisoners? Doesn't matter if it's a higher percentage of women, I can't see why non violent women are some how more entitled than nonviolent men.

missmollygreen · 31/08/2026 20:58

AStonedRose · 26/07/2026 12:08

Makes perfect sense to me

vert, very few women belong in prison. Literally the tiny handful who commit murder. Absolutely no others

Well that is a hot take.
So why cant we release all the men who have not committed murder then?

Hypatiasdisciple · 31/08/2026 09:58

TheignT · 26/07/2026 12:11

Why shouldn't women be in prison? We fought for equality so if a woman commits the same crime as a man she should do the same time.

If prisons are so crowded that the government is seeking early release for rapists and murderers, the priority should be to give early release to all nonviolent criminals first. Most women in prison are there for nonviolent crime.

BlueWallsareCool · 12/08/2026 00:58

You need to staff prisons appropriately. I am not sure that using a prison designed for women and staffed by women, for housing violent men would work.
You would have to put the women elsewhere, I doubt they would all be suitable for early release.
It isn't just building more prisons, it is staffing them that is likely to be a bigger problem.

Jane379 · 12/08/2026 00:57

AnonyMumAuDHD · 28/07/2026 12:02

Actually NOONE (male or female) is imprisoned for non payment of council tax. It’s a civil debt, not a criminal one and therefore cannot be addressed for this reason. In theory a magistrate CAN sentence someone to 3m for wilful non-payment, but clearly they never do.

Apparently only 0-2 people per year end up in prison as a result of nonpayment of TV licence fines (Ministry of Justice data).

So all of this is a bit of a distraction to the core discussion.

70% of women have sentences of less than 12m; over 50% for less than 6m indicating that these are relatively minor offences (shop lifting, petty theft) and better addressed with ankle tags and community service. Men should not be in the estate for those same level of crimes, either, imho opinion and could equally be ankle tagged, given community service, or supported in returning to work/job training.

Prison should be about a) the containment and rehabilitation of serious offenders and b) about removing from society those who presents a longer-term and continued danger to it. Life sentences for murder/multiple murder/gang rape and organised crime… should mean life.

'Apparently only 0-2 people per year end up in prison as a result of nonpayment of TV licence fines (Ministry of Justice data).

So all of this is a bit of a distraction to the core discussion.'

  • This.
Jane379 · 12/08/2026 00:54

nutmeg7 · 27/07/2026 14:21

TheignT seems to be very strongly invested in there being no differences at all between the typical behaviour of males and females.
To the point of trying quite hard to misread and misinterpret every comment. Why so touchy about this?

I don't think so. I think she's been very clear that she doesn't think male and female crime is the same, and I agree with her points.

If I remember correctly, elsewhere she's said she 's an ex police officer, so she has some experience directly

Jane379 · 12/08/2026 00:29

AStonedRose · 26/07/2026 12:08

Makes perfect sense to me

vert, very few women belong in prison. Literally the tiny handful who commit murder. Absolutely no others

I don't fully agree with that. If a woman commits a serious fraud, for one, causing a lot of harm, I think prison should be done potentially.

Lexibletheflexible · 29/07/2026 00:14

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 27/07/2026 11:13

I think we really need to be clear and use actual data, not just received wisdom here. This is a very serious matter, both for public safety and for women in the criminal justice system.

1 - The idea that roughly 2,500 women in prison are there for non-violent offences is not supported by the current Ministry of Justice figures. On 31 March 2026 there were 3,461 women in prison, including 848 on remand. Of the 2,593 women serving immediate custodial sentences, 1,063 were sentenced for violence against the person, 144 for sexual offences and 217 for robbery: 1,424 women, or 54.9%, across those three categories alone. The official tables do not provide a simple violent/non-violent total, so subtracting the “violence against the person” category from the whole female population is not valid.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/offender-management-statistics-quarterly-october-to-december-2025
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69f0c7400bb62e692c5d6dae/prison-population-31-Mar-2026.ods

2 - Women are not routinely in prison merely because they could not pay council tax or a TV-licence fine. The Government says nobody has been imprisoned for council-tax non-payment as their main offence since 2018; committal is possible only after a finding of wilful refusal or culpable neglect, not simple inability to pay. On 31 March 2026 there were just two female fine defaulters in prison for all kinds of fines combined. For TV licensing, there were zero people in prison for failure to pay the fine on 30 June 2020; 91 custodial sentences in 2015–18 arose from failure to pay a court-imposed fine, not from licence evasion itself.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65ba708df51b1000136a7e4a/CouncilTax_collection-_government_response.pdf
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-publishes-response-to-decriminalising-tv-licence-evasion

3 - It is also incorrect that most women in prison are serving sentences of under 12 months for fraud and petty theft. There were 349 sentenced women serving less than 12 months: 10.1% of all women in custody and 13.4% of sentenced women. In the immediate-custody offence table there were 404 women sentenced for theft and 63 for fraud, compared with 1,063 for violence against the person. Source: the same MoJ prison-population publication and spreadsheet above.

4 - It is plainly wrong that only the “tiny handful” of women who commit murder belong in prison, or that women in custody are almost all harmless petty offenders. The current figures include 1,063 women sentenced for violence against the person, 144 for sexual offences and 217 for robbery, as well as serious non-violent offences whose victims may still suffer grave harm.

5 - Murderers are not being released early under these schemes. Murder carries a mandatory life sentence; release can occur only after the minimum term and a Parole Board risk decision, while some offenders receive whole-life orders. The Sentencing Act 2026 also excludes life sentences, IPP sentences and extended determinate sentences from earlier release. The “killer” example reported in the Telegraph involved manslaughter, not murder.

https://sentencingcouncil.org.uk/about-sentencing/types-of-sentence/life-sentences/
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2026/2/notes/division/7/index.htm

6 - Early release has not been restricted to men. In October–December 2025, SDS40 produced 10,164 releases from male establishments and 1,013 from female establishments. The 2026 progression model is based on sentence type, offence and behaviour, not sex.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69f1d916c42061e837e3ac16/Standard_Determinate_Sentences__SDS40release_data__England_and_Wales.pdf
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/sentencing-bill-2025/sentencing-bill-progression-measures-factsheet

7 - “Women reoffend less” needs an important qualification. Across all offenders in the January–March 2024 cohort, the female proven-reoffending rate was lower: 24.7%, versus 29.7% for men. But among people released from prison in the April 2023–March 2024 data tool, 1,752 of 3,491 women reoffended (50.2%). Combining comparable male category A–D/local prison groups gives 18,253 of 44,297 (41.2%). Women in that prison-release cohort also recorded more reoffences per reoffender, 8.54 versus 6.74. These are unadjusted figures and do not prove that sex causes the difference, but they directly contradict the blanket claim about female prisoners.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/proven-reoffending-statistics-january-to-march-2024/proven-reoffending-statistics-january-to-march-2024
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6978dace316fd8f801552068/PRSQ_adult_releasing_prison_data_tool_apr23_mar24.xlsx

8 - Women do not simply receive “the same time” as men in practice. In the official 2023 comparison, women convicted of indictable offences were 28% less likely than men to receive immediate custody. For theft the figures were 20% for women and 37% for men; for violence against the person, 15% and 41%. Average custodial sentence length was 12.2 months for women and 21.8 for men, although the MoJ cautions that the different offence mix explains part of that gap.

https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/women-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2023/statistics-on-women-and-the-criminal-justice-system-2023-html

9 - It is too sweeping to say women’s prisons are not secure or reinforced. The women’s estate includes both open and closed prisons. Bronzefield is a purpose-built closed prison holding restricted-status/high-risk women. It is fair to say there is no women’s prison built to the same high-security specification as the male high-security estate, so conversion could require additional work; that is not evidence that conversion would necessarily be “prohibitively expensive”.

https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2023/05/Restricted-status-thematic-web-2023.pdf
https://www.justiceinspectorates.gov.uk/hmiprisons/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2019/04/Bronzefield-Web-2018-1.pdf

  1. Repurposing one women’s prison would not create 3,500 places. Approximately 3,500 is the entire female prison population. Bronzefield, for example, held 483 women on 31 March 2026. Nor does the Telegraph proposal itself establish the cost or feasibility: the article reports a campaign proposal to repurpose at least one prison, not an implemented, costed government plan. The latest overall annual cost per prisoner was £56,618, but that does not tell us what converting a particular establishment would cost. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/07/25/repurpose-womens-prisons-men-government-urged-tories-uk/ https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/69bbeea2f7b1c24d8e23ce44/costs-per-place-costs-per-prisoner-2024-2025-summary.pdf
Edited

I want to add something to this.

When we talk about female prisoners being separated from children, we have to remember that many of those female prisoners would have lost or handed over custody of their children before they were jailed due to the numerous issues they have that eventually landed them there.

That doesnt mean they didn't see their children in a much better environment than jail or that they are now more separated, but many if not most of them I was locked up with or have volunteered with were a long way from being a primary caregiver for their children.

In fact, I'd go as far as to say it was more likely the ones that were "only" violent that did have custody of their kids immediatelt before jail because drugs were less likely to be a feature in their lives.

I say this because the idea that the majority of female prisoners will leave jail and go back to properly mother their children isn't the case. For some children, it will mean a person who evokes great chaos is back on the loose.

AnonyMumAuDHD · 28/07/2026 12:02

AStonedRose · 27/07/2026 18:06

but for the record, I don't think anyone should be in prison for not paying their council tax.

no-one's said that women aren't violent and men are. However as a class men are much, much more violent than women.

And Fred/Rose West - no, actually, I really can't be arsed. Something about pigeons shitting everywhere.

Actually NOONE (male or female) is imprisoned for non payment of council tax. It’s a civil debt, not a criminal one and therefore cannot be addressed for this reason. In theory a magistrate CAN sentence someone to 3m for wilful non-payment, but clearly they never do.

Apparently only 0-2 people per year end up in prison as a result of nonpayment of TV licence fines (Ministry of Justice data).

So all of this is a bit of a distraction to the core discussion.

70% of women have sentences of less than 12m; over 50% for less than 6m indicating that these are relatively minor offences (shop lifting, petty theft) and better addressed with ankle tags and community service. Men should not be in the estate for those same level of crimes, either, imho opinion and could equally be ankle tagged, given community service, or supported in returning to work/job training.

Prison should be about a) the containment and rehabilitation of serious offenders and b) about removing from society those who presents a longer-term and continued danger to it. Life sentences for murder/multiple murder/gang rape and organised crime… should mean life.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 27/07/2026 21:07

Thank you for your post, @SingleSexSpacesInSchools.

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 27/07/2026 20:32

TheignT · 27/07/2026 19:46

I don't know if anyone goes to prison for not paying council tax, I was using something that men and women could both do and you couldn't start banging on about violence.

they don't. I did go into some detail on the stats a few comments earlier...

AStonedRose · 27/07/2026 20:21

TheignT · 27/07/2026 19:44

Patronising much?

Yep.

AStonedRose · 27/07/2026 20:20

CohensDiamondTeeth · 27/07/2026 19:45

@TheignT yes I did, see attached.

And your new post puts words in my mouth I have not said, and uses a new scenario you have just come up with.

Either you don't just don't understand what I'm saying, or you're wilfully misreading my posts and are on the wind up. Either way, I'm getting fed up of going back and forth with you on this.

Edited

They're wilfully misreading, @CohensDiamondTeeth . They've done it with a few of my posts too. I'm not bothering as they've completely banjaxed the thread.

TheignT · 27/07/2026 19:50

CohensDiamondTeeth · 27/07/2026 19:46

I've never not agreed with that simple position, it should apply to both sexes, obviously.

OMG that's what I've said and you kept disagreeing.

TheignT · 27/07/2026 19:49

CohensDiamondTeeth · 27/07/2026 19:45

@TheignT yes I did, see attached.

And your new post puts words in my mouth I have not said, and uses a new scenario you have just come up with.

Either you don't just don't understand what I'm saying, or you're wilfully misreading my posts and are on the wind up. Either way, I'm getting fed up of going back and forth with you on this.

Edited

Do you think if a man gets locked up for one of those things that a woman gets locked up for her should be treated the same?

Once again I'm asking you where I said violent male prisoners should get released rather than non violent women? You can't because I didn't say it. So are you lying or confused?

CohensDiamondTeeth · 27/07/2026 19:46

TheignT · 27/07/2026 19:43

"the early release scheme should apply to both sexes". Well that's what I've been saying and bizarrely Cohensdiamondteeth suddenly agrees with it.

I've never not agreed with that simple position, it should apply to both sexes, obviously.

OP posts:
TheignT · 27/07/2026 19:46

AStonedRose · 27/07/2026 18:06

but for the record, I don't think anyone should be in prison for not paying their council tax.

no-one's said that women aren't violent and men are. However as a class men are much, much more violent than women.

And Fred/Rose West - no, actually, I really can't be arsed. Something about pigeons shitting everywhere.

I don't know if anyone goes to prison for not paying council tax, I was using something that men and women could both do and you couldn't start banging on about violence.