Linehan tweeting misogyny and racism now

There would be half as many posts about GL on FWR if it weren't for the threads that tell us off about not being critical enough of him.

So you are not brave enough to confront him directly but rather came on here to berate women?

What 'constant glazing' do you see on here?

There are a wide range of opinions on Linehan on here, many of them pretty negative.

I'm as GC as they come, but he's consistently been a spiteful, vindictive little man

On the contrary at 6'4" Linehan is a big man.

To my mind, the more significant issue here are the numbers of misogynistic men who refusal to treat these men as men.

They presumably don't want to deal with men who present as effeminate. Much easier to declare them women and mak3 them women's problem to deal with. As an added bonus they get to yell at women who don't agree and call them bigots. Win/win.

Guys, he is available on X if you want to go chastise him.

What is? Have you been questioned on this practice before?

I don’t know who you’re thinking about, but I’ve been about for 5 years. I do change my name now and then. Do you think there’s something nefarious about that? Why?

“female prisoners are not locked up with transwomen and haven’t been since 2017”

This is not true though, it was a few years after 2017 before they stopped in England and Wales. And if someone has a GRC, can they be traced in the system currently? if a wing is in a female prison and the prisoners mix for part of the day, that is also not segregated.

Has they stopped putting male prisoners in female prison estates in Scotland yet?

After all these misogynistic men are more likely to not want to treat a cross dressing man like they’re a woman.

They aren't women, why would you treat them like one?

Gosh…. It is like déjà vu….

I think Graham Lineham knows what a woman is and is a racist misogynist. After all these misogynistic men are more likely to not want to treat a cross dressing man like they’re a woman. The fact he is anti-gender ideology doesn’t make him an ally for feminism in any sense. I personally despise the man. He is no ally for women.

Remembering, however, that I didn’t call anyone “sheeple”.

Why are you attempting to connect current usernames to older ones? What an odd pastime.

And there it is in plain sight, already in 1977: the fetishization of Womanhood combined with utter contempt and hatred for actual women. The spiteful grandiosity and the sour-grapes belittlement of the power to give birth because they can't have it.

I'm beginning to wonder if the reason some of the TRAs who come here bang on so much about us wanting to "erase" them, is because they dream of erasing us.

It's not all of them, of course; far from it; but the toxic, misogynist element was clearly part of the mix from very early on.

I must admit to laughing at the accusation of women who don’t agree with the accuser being called sheeple. When those accusations are made by usernames prone to regurgitating shallow argument as if it was profound insight when it doesn’t even withstand basic analysis.

I am reminded though, Eresh, of usernames of the past who complained that their flawed arguments weren’t treated gently enough. The ‘I am only stating my opinion’ type argument, while that poster is rather prone to quickly resorting to name calling and using derogatory language for anyone who disagreed with them is common. Or perhaps it is more accurate to point out it is a commonality of some posters.

Male prisoners are also disproportionately affected by DV, child abuse, poverty, brain injury and so on. That doesn’t mean they are not guilty of violent crimes. It is true that several hundred female prisoners have committed violent crimes out of the 3,500 that are currently prisoners indicating the vast majority of female prisoners are not violent. Your post merely confirms what I wrote, that over 90% of women are in prison for nonviolent crimes.

I stated that trans prisoners are kept in a separate wing, which you called shite and not fact checked, and referenced Karen White. Well that happened in 2017 and it wasn’t sexual assault but stabbing. It’s been almost a decade since transwomen were anywhere near women in prisons not “five minutes” as it is 2026.

a) female prisoners are not locked up with transwomen and haven’t been since 2017
b) gender pay gap reporting has been the basis of several successful court cases where women have received back pay and increased wages and not just for middle class workers at the BBC or rich actresses, but also the women working in Amazon warehouses and the women on the shop floors of major grocers like Tesco, Aldi, Lidl, Morrisons, Sainsbury’s and Waitrose because the men were being paid more than the women. It does make a difference because with no evidence, women can’t file a class action civil suit against a company that is not complying with the fair pay act. You seem to think just because there is a law on the books making it illegal that companies won’t pay men more than women for the same job, this is very childish. We all know they do and they get away with it. The gender pay gap reporting is essential to ensure companies actually do follow the law.

A reminder of how long these discussions have been happening.

This letter from Angela Douglas back in 1977 is something to remember.

(The tweet linking it also has an article from Germaine Greer which is also a very good reminder.)

https://x.com/hennieinglis/status/2031067162975117536?s=46

Dear Sister,

In regards to the Sandy Stone controversy: genetic women- Gennys-have never had to suffer the discrimination, self-hatred or fear that a transsexual must endure and survive in their lives. Genetic women are not ridiculed as severely, killed, tortured and arrested simply because they are
transsexual, as are transsexuals.

Genetic women have many rights, in comparison to transsexuals, who have
none.

Genetic women cannot possess the very special courage, brilliance, sensitivity and compassion-and overview-that derives from the transsexual experience. Free from the chains of menstruation and child- bearing. transsexual women are obviously far superior to Gennys in
many ways.

As some of you have discovered. because of the severity of the genocidal attitudes we must deal with all of our lives, many transsexuals have learned how to fight without giving any quarter or showing any mercy.

Genetic women are becoming quite obsolete, which is obvious, and the
future belongs to transsexual women. We know this, and perhaps some of you suspect it. All you have left is your “ability" to bear children, and in a world which will groan to feed 6 billion by the year 2000, that's a negative asset.

Transsexual and veryproud,
Angela Douglas
Berkeley

Reprinted from Sister August-September, 1977

Here is a tweet that links to a clip from an early UK TV show with men discussing how they are women .

https://x.com/Jonnywsbell/status/2030798915423887413?s=20

"1973: Transsexuals smugly declare: "we chose to be women, transsexualism is the tip of the iceberg, sex is fluid, and birth certs must change"..

2026: They played the long game and won, biology is erased, dissent is crushed and women's rights are gutted...mission accomplished..."

”Welcome to modernity”

Indeed.

This conversation is like the hydra. You cut off one head and 3 more grow. They are now saying that it is anti-transmen for single sex toilets.

Therefore I am now boiling it down to- only females are allowed in female only spacesbecause of the known threat to women by men. If transmen don't want to go into female only spaces then I don't think men will care because they won't be causing a threat to them.

If a transman feels uncomfortable in a male space but is read as a man in a female space then they have to make a choice about what they want.

Someone rebranded the classic marketing theory with a new image and believe think it is a cool and modern theory. It is almost like … marketing in action.

and believe ‘they’ think

apologies.

This is pretty much what the purpose of destabilisation of language was by that group of activists from the start. Make words that are describing a very specific group of people mean everyone and call that move ‘inclusive’, ‘tolerant’ and ‘progressive’ when the outcome is the very opposite of ‘inclusive’ and take a long term view (like the Denton’s report) and you are well on your way.

The strategy is not a new one. But add in a new look and just watch who believes.

Considering Gillard has tried the ‘it was different times’ distancing tactic over the past month, I suspect there are going to be many people in leadership roles across the world who will be doing the same.

It took the IOC over two decades to acknowledge their error, they were supposed to be sports scientists first with their finger on the pulse of innovation in performance science. But we can see how they were sold this philosophical theory as if it were established and proven science.They then doubled down until the general public’s voice pointing out the emperor was naked become too embarrassing and they had to back track.

I think it is always interesting to see the language pressure from those letters and interviews published from the 1970s. It serves as a reminder of the journey of ‘true = true and false = false, but also true = false and false = true’.

Don’t forget it is ‘modernity’, innit!

Fucking hell! Someone rebranded the classic marketing theory with a new image and believe think it is a cool and modern theory. It is almost like … marketing in action.

However, when you see the level of understanding and susceptibility to believe neatly packaged consultant speak that went into that piece of brilliance, all the other posts that come from the poster fall into place.

I should be allowed to say it, right? And yes, I do find Graham Linehan’s online behaviour disturbing.

You seem to take up an awful lot of online space disagreeing with people, so …

I think the problem Genderist logic faces is that in classical logic, if one of your axoims is false than any conclusion is fair game.

In other words, if you assert as truth that A = !A, any statement after that evaluates to true because the fundamental statement is itself a contradiction. You are effectively framing the world as one in which not only does true = true and false = false, but also true = false and false = true. So anything true is true, and anything false is also true.

And of course, Genderist "logic" always starts with the axiom transwoman = woman, so....