Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Do you support “trans” or are you a monster? New Good Law Project billboard campaign.

871 replies

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/07/2026 17:39

The reliably foolish Good Law Project have commissioned a new outdoor campaign, coming to a street near you.

https://monster.goodlawproject.org/

Of course I support trans – I’m not a monster - Monster

Trans people should be able to live their lives in peace.

https://monster.goodlawproject.org/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
46
AlwaysExtraHot · 14/07/2026 11:07

Shedmistress · 14/07/2026 11:06

This is about the cartoon posted earlier not the GLP campaign.

I see; crossed wires. Thanks!

Shedmistress · 14/07/2026 11:06

AlwaysExtraHot · 14/07/2026 10:41

As in, pics of kids in nappies? [vom]

Is it Martin Firrell? I can't find much about him just searching his name, and don't really want to search is name + anything to do with kids...

This is about the cartoon posted earlier not the GLP campaign.

RareGoalsVerge · 14/07/2026 10:59

AimsAndObjectives · 14/07/2026 09:07

Why is it that TRAs can only communicate in cartoon form? Is it because they never grew up?

No it's because it's easier to portray the person they want to show when it's cartoon. With photographic images you either need to select the person modelling from the tiny fraction of people who come close to "passing" (not available in the average "mom's basement" where these things are made) and then choose the angles and filters very carefully, or use photoshop heavily. Otherwise anyone who isn't blinded by sexist belief that gender-coded clothing must override all other signals is going to react to the image as "well that's just clearly a bloke in makeup" or "well that's just clearly a young woman trying to look tough" and in a cartoon it's way easier to pitch the image in the middle ground of "hmm is that supposed to be a male or female?"

The cartoon that @DieWaarheid thought "relevant" really shows how little thought they have given to people's real thoughts and needs. It's not bad for illustrating how a crusty old stick-in-the-mud can learn to accept and celebrate diversity (yay! We are all for diversity and living free and authentic unrepressed lives - and GC people aren't disputing that) but totally fails to even register that being GC is not about being a crusty old stick-in-the-mud with no appreciation for diversity, but is most usually about being a kind hearted, left-of-centre non-judgemental person who celebrates and accepts diversity and upholds the rights of women and girls to single sex spaces and recognises that a female only space that any male person can enter if he says the magic words can never be single sex.

TheThirteenthFairy · 14/07/2026 10:57

MNLurker1345 · 13/07/2026 18:47

No sadly they are not! They are mad, they will never stop! They are very wealthy, they are backed by strong ideological and legal forces and they ain’t going nowhere.

Keep It Coming, as far as I'm concerned! The Good Laugh Project has given everyone on this thread a spring in their step - again. I really can't wait for the next instalment.

Bertiebiscuit · 14/07/2026 10:52

Boiledbeetle · 13/07/2026 20:36

"Be kind"

NO

In fact F*CK NO

WrongKindOfFeminist · 14/07/2026 10:52

He did this:

'Woman=Man (Stockholm, Sweden)
International Women's Day Finland, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Sweden, UK, 2025
International Women's Day calls for equality regardless of gender; at its simplest, a world where woman=man. '

Which is spectacularly po-faced, tin-eared, and silly.

He seems to make a point of talking FOR people he sees as having less social capital/power than him. Thank goodness for mediocre white men telling us who we are, eh?

https://www.martinfirrell.com/

WrongKindOfFeminist · 14/07/2026 10:49

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/07/2026 10:45

Martin Firrell appears to be a shite artist, but nothing suggests he is that much of a wrong un.

Like a rip off Jenny Holzer.

There are quite a lot of these slogan artists about, at the moment.

WrongKindOfFeminist · 14/07/2026 10:47

Choose your monster, ladies!

I am mostly thinking Banshee, at the moment. Bean-nighe, for a bit more Scottish flavour.

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4VXCArE1mBQ

WomanInnaWoods · 14/07/2026 10:46

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/07/2026 10:43

It’s the cartoons they’re talking about.

Ah, Assigned Male.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/07/2026 10:45

Martin Firrell appears to be a shite artist, but nothing suggests he is that much of a wrong un.

OP posts:
SabrinaThwaite · 14/07/2026 10:45

Why the T Rex? Or is it supposed to be Godzilla?

Either way it seems pointless, since one has been extinct for 66 million years and the other is a figment of imagination.

MNLurker1345 · 14/07/2026 10:44

Shedmistress · 14/07/2026 10:36

Mainly to those of us that have been here a fair old while.

You can google his name. He calls himself a 'daiperful artist' which might help your research.

What the hell!

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/07/2026 10:43

AlwaysExtraHot · 14/07/2026 10:41

As in, pics of kids in nappies? [vom]

Is it Martin Firrell? I can't find much about him just searching his name, and don't really want to search is name + anything to do with kids...

It’s the cartoons they’re talking about.

OP posts:
WomanInnaWoods · 14/07/2026 10:42

WrongKindOfFeminist · 14/07/2026 10:38

What's his name again? I know who you mean, can't remember the name. Horrible man. Sophie something?

Sophie/Guillaume LaBelle is the creepy tracer.

(I hate that I know this)

Edit: not the poster board artist for this thing though, I think

AlwaysExtraHot · 14/07/2026 10:41

Shedmistress · 14/07/2026 10:36

Mainly to those of us that have been here a fair old while.

You can google his name. He calls himself a 'daiperful artist' which might help your research.

As in, pics of kids in nappies? [vom]

Is it Martin Firrell? I can't find much about him just searching his name, and don't really want to search is name + anything to do with kids...

Bertiebiscuit · 14/07/2026 10:39

SergeantWrinkles · 13/07/2026 18:19

Conservationists might have a word or two to say about gorillas and sharks being portrayed as monsters, especially as both those species are far more endangered than ‘trans’. 🙄

And much more likeable. Je suis monstrous

WrongKindOfFeminist · 14/07/2026 10:38

What's his name again? I know who you mean, can't remember the name. Horrible man. Sophie something?

Shedmistress · 14/07/2026 10:36

AlwaysExtraHot · 14/07/2026 10:29

Who is it? are they known?

Mainly to those of us that have been here a fair old while.

You can google his name. He calls himself a 'daiperful artist' which might help your research.

Bertiebiscuit · 14/07/2026 10:36

Thehorticulturalhussie · 13/07/2026 18:04

Well I can tell you that the gorillas are not happy about this.

Looks a little bit racist to me

WrongKindOfFeminist · 14/07/2026 10:34

'Because they have separated 'trans' as The Latest Thing from the people that are actually involved.'

They are using 'Trans' as a stand in for a concept, not talking about people with trans identities. That's how they get to 'I support trans'. They don't mean 'trans people'. They mean the concept.

AlwaysExtraHot · 14/07/2026 10:32

WrongKindOfFeminist · 14/07/2026 10:30

Because they have separated 'trans' as The Latest Thing from the people that are actually involved.

This has been going on for a long time. Lots of people On the Right Side of History have very little clue who they are actually agitating for. See, say, 'Guides Against Trans Inclusion', who have been a bit bamboozled when Melissa Poulton and other equally unsavoury trans identifying men have flocked to their cause.

No, I mean specifically the wording.

WrongKindOfFeminist · 14/07/2026 10:30

AlwaysExtraHot · 14/07/2026 10:28

No, it didn't really work Grin
I do wonder how/why it got signed off though. Did someone at GLP actually go, 'Yep, that's great, not at all dehumanising, makes great grammatical sense – send it to print!'?
Or did GLP produce them themselves in someone's garden shed?

Because they have separated 'trans' as The Latest Thing from the people that are actually involved.

This has been going on for a long time. Lots of people On the Right Side of History have very little clue who they are actually agitating for. See, say, 'Guides Against Trans Inclusion', who have been a bit bamboozled when Melissa Poulton and other equally unsavoury trans identifying men have flocked to their cause.

AlwaysExtraHot · 14/07/2026 10:29

Shedmistress · 14/07/2026 10:00

Also the 'artist' is well dodgy. Like 'taking photos of kids and redrawing them into porn' dodgy.

Who is it? are they known?

Ereshkigalangcleg · 14/07/2026 10:29

RedToothBrush · 14/07/2026 08:15

There comes a point where in terms of grifting, it's not my responsibility to protect stupid people. If you still haven't grasped that the GLP is a grift at this point, you are much removed from the old fat bloke who believes that Scarlett Johansson is chatting you up online. Even when his whole family and all his friends shout "it's a scam" to him and he willfully ignores because he WANTS to believe it.

And really the only way that this will be dealt with if legal procedures against this grift are taken.

What Red said.

OP posts:
AlwaysExtraHot · 14/07/2026 10:28

Chersfrozenface · 14/07/2026 10:23

I suspect the designer used "trans" or more likely Trans* as a noun to represent a whole philosophy, belief system, world view, rather than people.

If so, that didn't really work, did it?

*Difficult to tell when the slogan is in shouty caps.

No, it didn't really work Grin
I do wonder how/why it got signed off though. Did someone at GLP actually go, 'Yep, that's great, not at all dehumanising, makes great grammatical sense – send it to print!'?
Or did GLP produce them themselves in someone's garden shed?

Swipe left for the next trending thread