Active discussions

Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Minister stripped of puberty blocker brief after expressing safety concerns

35 replies

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 04/07/2026 20:54

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/711ae1d6366e6628

Preet Kaur Gill had voiced alarm prior to her appointment that ‘credible safeguarding warnings’ about drugs were being ignored

Minister stripped of puberty blocker brief after expressing safety concerns

Preet Kaur Gill had voiced alarm prior to her appointment that ‘credible safeguarding warnings’ about drugs were being ignored

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/711ae1d6366e6628

OP posts:
TwoLoonsAndASprout · 05/07/2026 08:32

Archive link to the Telegraph article:

https://archive.ph/K2ut2

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 05/07/2026 08:27

The way the government is systematically removing any inconvenient voices proves this is just all about the government getting it's way.
It doesn't care about the details or the harm that it might do, they've decided they want this and nothing is going to stop them, just like the GRA, they didn't care about the details on that one either.
It's not about the children and their needs it's just politics for them.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 05/07/2026 07:57

MsGreying · 04/07/2026 21:42

Which insurance companies are going to want to insure these doctors?

The NHS covers doctors employed by the NHS. Doctors do not need personal indemnity insurance if they work for the NHS.

HoppityBun · 04/07/2026 23:50

MsGreying · 04/07/2026 21:42

Which insurance companies are going to want to insure these doctors?

Surely it’s us, the taxpayers? We fund any compensation?

Original poster
SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 04/07/2026 23:32

This level of political interference cannot be allowed. I’m stunned it’s so blatant.

OP posts:
ScrollingLeaves · 04/07/2026 23:28

it's blatant rigging the trial.
It really is isn’t it,@Imnobody4

Imnobody4 · 04/07/2026 22:42

This is a disgrace, it's blatant rigging the trial.
Earlier in the year, just a week after the trial was paused by the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) on 20 February,1 the regulator announced that it was excusing its chief medical and scientific officer, Jacob George, from any further involvement with the Pathways clinical trial.
Letter from Sex Matters.
01032026-Letter-to-MHRA-re-Professor-George.pdf share.google/N0UPSiIQcxPt7oNxW

MsGreying · 04/07/2026 21:42

Which insurance companies are going to want to insure these doctors?

JellySaurus · 04/07/2026 21:35

That first para is a quote from the article.

JellySaurus · 04/07/2026 21:34

If this trial had stayed the responsibility of Preet Gill, she would have rightly cancelled it, at least until the child victims of the appalling Tavistock scandal had been tracked down to find out how badly damaged they are.

It beggars belief that this has not yet been done. It is shocking that adult services have not been required to co-operate and allow access to this essential data.