Sorry if this has been posted, but I've just had a nearly total meltdown. Not just the heat but my brain having to find that men would presume to say challenging trans identity is a form of genocide 
... The Lemkin Institute cannot read the new EHRC guidance as anything other than an attempt to make life harder for the trans and intersex communities in the UK and to erase them from public life as much as possible. There are also several instances where the Code of Practice tends towards the forced outing of trans people who dare to exist in public spaces, which is incredibly harmful and puts trans and intersex people at risk of violent assault.
The guidance is based on the bizarre notion that services cease to be single-sex if trans people are allowed to use them. It goes on to state that this would “very likely to amount to unlawful sex discrimination against the people of the opposite sex who are not allowed to use it.” This means that if a business, for example, allows both trans and cis women to use the women’s toilet, but does not allow cis men to use that same toilet, cis men could claim discrimination on the basis of sex, even though a men’s toilet exists. It is unclear what disadvantage or unfavourable treatment cis men in this scenario would be facing, which are required components of discrimination according to the Code of Practice itself. Given that women’s toilets tend to be busier and have longer lines, we believe that being able to use the male toilet could actually be described as an advantage. ...
https://www.lemkininstitute.com/statements-new-page/statement-on-the-anti-trans-and-anti-intersex-ehrc-code-of-practice-in-the-united-kingdom