And the way to do that is to have men in the gents and women in the ladies. Simple.

💯

The OP I have a daughter to support and I need my job to pay the bills and I can’t afford to do that if I start policing the women’s spaces.
Transgender women have won. Prosecuting will not happen and that why I wrote the post. It’s all talk. It will not happen. It takes courage and money and with the cost of living crisis I don’t want to lose my job or house.

Also the OP
The manager told the women in the break room to decide if a transgender woman can use the toilet or not. We know the person for 5 years and non of the women had issues with the person and respected us. We accepted.

So in summary: I'm scared of consequences if I object but it's all OK because no-one objected.

What was the employers legal basis under gdpr asking you to sign that?

😳

Until a woman joins who objects.

This. But good luck getting the average genderist to actually engage with their own logic.

I'm not inclined to go back and read his blog on his journey from eying up men in uniform on the train, throwing out his man clothes except some for doing the gardening, to getting his balls chopped off and his cock inverted but I'm sure he had vocal surgery but it went wrong. Although by all accounts his recollection of whether he had vocal surgery or not may have changed since then.

Don't worry about that. You don't have to fight, others can and will.

Because it has always been true that most women do not have the economic or social power to fight the Feminist fight.

I mean, it's kind of unavoidable given the reason we need Feminism in the first place is exactly because women don't have equal economic and social power to men.

Nevertheless, there are women who can fight and will, and they still fight for you and your daughters just as Feminists have always fought for the women who can't fight as well as the ones who can, and even for women who don't think they need fighting for. Because better to have rights you never need than need them and not have them.

Hardly a groundbreaking suggestion that men still sound like men, even after “voice training”.

I seem to remember something about keeping his male voice as it has more authority in court. According to him. Which is whole can open worms all over the floor in itself.

Under UKGDPR - Your employer isnt allowed to have used consent as their article 9 condition because of the imbalance of power (for sharing the special category data which trans status and disability both are).

they can’t have used compliance with employment law

or vital interests coz thats immediate threat to life or limb

legal claims doesn’t apply

nor does manifestly made public because according to you no one can tell

that only leaves not for profit, but again that has to directly relate to the charitable purposes - so you work for a trans charity?

Edit to be clear

health social care doesn’t apply
public interest is a non starter
so is public health

and it isn’t archiving

the DPIA they’ve done should identify the legal basis. Can you let me know what basis they used?

Absolutely!
And they also need to remind Gary that if Gary persists in using the women's, Gary too will be on a disciplinary.

That is a problem for HR to resolve and they need to resolve it in a way that doesn’t involve coercing their female employees or breaking the law

TRAs really should just tell them 'to be kiiiiiind'.

What a shame that some men make it so difficult for other men to be in men's only spaces. It is awful and they should be more accepting of other men regardless of what they wear. But that doesn't make it women's problem or women's responsibility to fix but opening up their own spaces.

And again, I find myself asking why, if all transpeople want to do is pee in comfort , they are not on board with fourth spaces and actually called me a nazi for suggesting having their own spaces would be a good compromise.

Then management needs to remind those men that Gary will now once again be using the gents and if any of them so much as smirk when he's at the urinal they'll be on a disciplinary.

What part of
all able-bodied people, including transpeople, show a bit of respect for disabled people and leave the accessible toilet free for people who really need an adapted toilet.
in my post at 19:46 do you disagree with?

Obviously there are people who are just nasty pieces of work and are disrespectful of anybody and anything, but surely most of the people you work with are capable of showing basic respect for other human beings, and stayed out of the spaces that are not designated for them?
Especially the accessible toilets which disabled people campaigned for for decades, and which they actually need - not 'feel more comfortable using', but need.

ok, that's twice already!

Didn't he chose not have voice coaching 'coz no one listens to female voices'?

But hey he is a women really.