Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Transgender women will not be prosecuted in the use of women’s single sex facilities

464 replies

Theotheruser · 20/06/2026 14:11

You can support transgender rights or not but the law isn’t itself politics. Transgender women will not be prosecuted in the use of women’s single sex facilities in public in the standard use the facilities was built for.

A standard use is:

  • A transgender woman goes into the women’s toilet facilities in a cubicle for the purposes of relieving bodily fluids.
  • A transgender woman goes into the women’s changing facilities in a cubicle for the purposes of removing clothing for leisure activities.
  • A transgender woman goes into the women’s toilet facilities to protect the transgender women of being attacked or sexually assaulted.

A transgender woman in the standard uses of the women’s facilities are not exposing the users of the single sex facilities.

A transgender woman in the standard uses of the women’s facilities are not exposing child users in the single sex facilities.

A child user using single sex women’s facilities can’t deny other women public access of the facilities the child user believes are transgender.

With official documentation of the new sex will be difficult to disprove the claim of the transgender women being the male sex.

No harassment or sexual offences can be found against the transgender woman in the standard use of the women’s facilities with official documentation of the new sex.

A woman in the women’s single sex facility can be prosecuted for an offence and or removed if the woman is abusing or harassing the other user of being transgender without proof.

A woman recording and sharing publicly the other user without proof of being transgender can prosecuted.

The Supreme Court ruling or EHRC guidance has not changed the law to prosecute transgender women in women’s single sex spaces.

Transgender women have history of official records to support beyond a reasonable doubt the new gender identity. Have protection of gender discrimination.

Prosecution of transgender women is not going to work in the standard uses of the women’s facilities.

A woman can complain to management but unless management decides to take action to resolve the issue no action can be taken against the other user.

OP posts:
JellySaurus · 20/06/2026 14:32

Fairy tales are generally untrue, based on stereotypes, and fairly entertaining.

Oh well, two out of three ain’t bad.

EmpressDomesticatednottamed · 20/06/2026 14:29

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 20/06/2026 14:26

Theotheruser · 20/06/2026 14:11

You can support transgender rights or not but the law isn’t itself politics. Transgender women will not be prosecuted in the use of women’s single sex facilities in public in the standard use the facilities was built for.

A standard use is:

  • A transgender woman goes into the women’s toilet facilities in a cubicle for the purposes of relieving bodily fluids.
  • A transgender woman goes into the women’s changing facilities in a cubicle for the purposes of removing clothing for leisure activities.
  • A transgender woman goes into the women’s toilet facilities to protect the transgender women of being attacked or sexually assaulted.

A transgender woman in the standard uses of the women’s facilities are not exposing the users of the single sex facilities.

A transgender woman in the standard uses of the women’s facilities are not exposing child users in the single sex facilities.

A child user using single sex women’s facilities can’t deny other women public access of the facilities the child user believes are transgender.

With official documentation of the new sex will be difficult to disprove the claim of the transgender women being the male sex.

No harassment or sexual offences can be found against the transgender woman in the standard use of the women’s facilities with official documentation of the new sex.

A woman in the women’s single sex facility can be prosecuted for an offence and or removed if the woman is abusing or harassing the other user of being transgender without proof.

A woman recording and sharing publicly the other user without proof of being transgender can prosecuted.

The Supreme Court ruling or EHRC guidance has not changed the law to prosecute transgender women in women’s single sex spaces.

Transgender women have history of official records to support beyond a reasonable doubt the new gender identity. Have protection of gender discrimination.

Prosecution of transgender women is not going to work in the standard uses of the women’s facilities.

A woman can complain to management but unless management decides to take action to resolve the issue no action can be taken against the other user.

Men that call themselves ’transwomen’ have no ‘standard use’ of spaces set aside for women.

The Supreme Court ruling or EHRC guidance has not changed the law to prosecute transgender women in women’s single sex spaces.

Obviously not. It clarified that a GRC or GRC altered birth certificate is irrelevant when considering access to women spaces.

Offences of voyeurism or indecent exposure are covered under the Sexual Offences Act 2003.

Any man entering a women’s space is at automatic risk of prosecution for voyeurism or potentially indecent exposure. If I, my daughters or my husband come across any man entering women’s spaces, we will be reporting it to the space owner to get them removed and banned and calling the police.

It would be deeply transphobic to make the blanket assumption that trans people are not capable of or willing to respect the law. I’m sure men with a trans identity are perfectly capable to reading a sign on the door and choosing the correct space for their sex.

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 20/06/2026 14:26

Theotheruser · 20/06/2026 14:11

You can support transgender rights or not but the law isn’t itself politics. Transgender women will not be prosecuted in the use of women’s single sex facilities in public in the standard use the facilities was built for.

A standard use is:

  • A transgender woman goes into the women’s toilet facilities in a cubicle for the purposes of relieving bodily fluids.
  • A transgender woman goes into the women’s changing facilities in a cubicle for the purposes of removing clothing for leisure activities.
  • A transgender woman goes into the women’s toilet facilities to protect the transgender women of being attacked or sexually assaulted.

A transgender woman in the standard uses of the women’s facilities are not exposing the users of the single sex facilities.

A transgender woman in the standard uses of the women’s facilities are not exposing child users in the single sex facilities.

A child user using single sex women’s facilities can’t deny other women public access of the facilities the child user believes are transgender.

With official documentation of the new sex will be difficult to disprove the claim of the transgender women being the male sex.

No harassment or sexual offences can be found against the transgender woman in the standard use of the women’s facilities with official documentation of the new sex.

A woman in the women’s single sex facility can be prosecuted for an offence and or removed if the woman is abusing or harassing the other user of being transgender without proof.

A woman recording and sharing publicly the other user without proof of being transgender can prosecuted.

The Supreme Court ruling or EHRC guidance has not changed the law to prosecute transgender women in women’s single sex spaces.

Transgender women have history of official records to support beyond a reasonable doubt the new gender identity. Have protection of gender discrimination.

Prosecution of transgender women is not going to work in the standard uses of the women’s facilities.

A woman can complain to management but unless management decides to take action to resolve the issue no action can be taken against the other user.

Just in case this is genuine, I'd like to see your evidence for these assertions, please, OP, thanks!

BiologicalRobot · 20/06/2026 14:25

Are you saying that transgender women (who are biological men) are refusing to obey a very clear law regarding single sex spaces?

I really, really don't want to be around biological men who refuse to accept the law (in any situation).

SecretSquid · 20/06/2026 14:25

Don't know about "in the standard uses of the facilities", but that's a criminal nonstandard use of the English language.

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 20/06/2026 14:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

GCAcademic · 20/06/2026 14:21

SmudgeBrown · 20/06/2026 14:18

Any legal challenge will most likely be against the service-provider or employer, as in Peggie or the Darlington nurses.

It is therefore up to service-providers and employers to ensure they observe the law.

This. OP is either being deliberately obtuse or hasn’t been paying attention.

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 20/06/2026 14:21

Activists have now plumbed new depths in the hunt for new and exciting ways to persuade us to ignore reality and the rule of law: simply deny everything! Simples!

CorvusPurpureus · 20/06/2026 14:20

See, it’s the ‘relieving bodily fluids’ that we don’t like. Well, not just that, obviously, but some of you lads seem to like relieving different fluids from the actual women using the toilet.

CassOle · 20/06/2026 14:20

Once again, we need to point out that decent people will obey the law.

Is the OP implying that men with trans identities are not decent people?

SmudgeBrown · 20/06/2026 14:18

Any legal challenge will most likely be against the service-provider or employer, as in Peggie or the Darlington nurses.

It is therefore up to service-providers and employers to ensure they observe the law.

CassOle · 20/06/2026 14:17

Damn, that's a big cow pat. 🐄

PrettyDamnCosmic · 20/06/2026 14:12

Plop!!!

Swipe left for the next trending thread