Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

A TIM in women’s changing room at the gym, how can you prove it?

66 replies

NotTodayPhyllis · 19/06/2026 19:08

Sorry this is so long and has taken so long to write that I have to go out now so will need to read any responses later.
I just wanted to add this in case anyone wondered why I’d start a thread then not engage

I go to a gym that’s part of a hotel chain with a pool and have been going for 15 years on and off.

After some health issues (physical and quite severe mental) I’ve been going 5-7 times a week from being practically housebound so it’s a really safe important space for me.
I’ve made vast improvements on my health and made friends, lost weight and started to change my life.

A lot of my mental health problems stem from childhood sexual abuse and later assault and I think contributed to being in more than one abusive relationship.
Because of this I am very wary and scared of men and even had to leave my last job as it included working with men in a small space and I couldn’t cope because despite telling them to give me space they wouldn’t listen.

The last few days in the gym I noticed someone who is very obviously a man using the women’s changing room which is open plan with benches and lockers except one cubicle.
He wears a one piece swimming costume and gets dressed and undressed either under a towel or in the cubicle so isn’t flashing anyone but I don’t want to get changed in front of him and the other women seem very uncomfortable as well.
No one has said anything out loud but we’ve all exchanged worried looks and I’ve noticed some women changing in the toilet who had no issues using the open space before.
Some hours are child friendly and I go just as they are finishing and I’ve noticed he’s been in the changing room at the same time as the women who have children with them.

I live very close to the gym so I’ve been going with my kit on then after using the gym I’ve been changing for the pool quickly in the cubicle then going to shower at home and just quickly drying off and throwing a tracksuit on.
But now my skin is covered in a really itchy rash from not rinsing off the chlorine and so dry from not instantly putting moisturiser on.
I also have been really panicky and frantically getting changed in case he comes in and sometimes leaving early because the constant state of adrenaline in case of being alone in a space with him is leading to panic attacks.

I went to speak to the gym manager today to ask why this is happening when it isn’t legal and the Supreme Court ruling and further guidance means he should be using men’s spaces.

I know the manager well because he’s been there for years so he was open with me and said he’s aware of this man and trying to deal with it but it’s difficult because he’s registered at the gym as a woman and there is no way of actually proving he’s a man (despite it being obvious) and he’s not sure if he can ask him to leave and say he knows he’s a man by the obvious things like his height, size of hands, gait and most importantly his deep voice!
He said that if this man just says he’s a masculine woman and insists he is then where does he go from there?
The gym is a separate business from the hotel chain and just using the space so he’s asking for legal advice but said he’s angry that this is on him to prove and risk an altercation with a man that’s bigger then him and clearly happy to ignore to the law so he clearly doesn’t have any respect for the staff or women using the gym and is just intent on getting what he wants.

This happened a few years ago when I was taking a break and the gym manager told me the man who tried it in the past just kept coming back and shouting “trans people exist” when confronted.
I don’t even understand what this means because clearly they exist or this wouldn’t be an issue?!

I asked what happened in the previous situation and the manager said most women stopped using the changing rooms and were arriving and leaving in their kit and using a hotel room to change for swimming next to the gym that they were discreetly told about.
The man stopped coming when the women weren’t there for him to invade their space but women had to sacrifice their space in the meantime rather then just getting him to be the one to leave.

The law is clearer now and this should be easier to deal with the previously but how are you supposed to 100% prove someone is a man when their ID says they are a woman and they insist they are? He’s a big man and I doubt any of the women want to challenge him either so we are all going to end up losing our space again unless there is a clear way of dealing with this and preventing it happening again.

The gym manager said he’s going to get legal advice and ask if he has the right to ask someone to leave based on just appearance.
I know a lot of women on here are very knowledgeable about these things and thought I’d ask in the meantime if anyone can suggest what the right approach might be? I’ve been looking online and can’t see any clear answer.
The TRA’s say they know they can’t be properly challenged or forced into “pants inspections” so they will continue to use our spaces and insist they are the opposite sex.

It’s really upsetting and frustrating that the law has been made so clear and yet it seems impossible to enforce.
Even if you ring the police and say there is a man in women’s spaces whilst they are undressing how do they then prove it?
Am I just being very naive over this or are we still in the same situation we were before the Supreme Court ruling only now it’s more frustrating knowing that the law is being broken and you can’t challenge it?

OP posts:
atalkingtree · 19/06/2026 21:00

If this story is true, which it isn't, the manager would just need to tell him to stop using the female changing room, and ban him from the premises / revoke his membership if he doesn't comply.

Why pretend it's difficult? It's not.

TrainedByTheBiddyMafia · 19/06/2026 20:57

Children are with their parents. If there are changing cubicles available nobody is forced to consent to being watched.

Parents can’t consent to their children being viewed partially naked by a voyeur. It doesn’t matter if they stand there and say to him ‘crack on mate and watch my 3 year old getting undressed I don’t mind’ they can’t consent for them and a child should not be expected to insist on using a cubicle to their mothers who may have a misplaced sense of not wanting to offend

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 19/06/2026 20:46

TrainedByTheBiddyMafia · 19/06/2026 19:54

Fucksake I should have been here long enough to spot this, I did think the ‘pants inspection’ term was odd.

I'm just hyper aware at the moment, due to other threads I've been on, and clocked it straight away. The emotional backstory also stood out.

spannasaurus · 19/06/2026 20:43

The women should sue the gym for harassment under the Equality Act for allowing the man to continue using the women's changing room

Ereshkigalangcleg · 19/06/2026 20:40

He could threaten to sue, which might be intimidating but as a man he has no leg to stand on in court, providing it’s communicated to him in a reasonable way.

Gowlett · 19/06/2026 20:37

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 19/06/2026 20:18

You don't have to worry about how the service provider follows the law. That is for them to sweat over. And the law and the SC ruling from last year are not in the least bit confusing.

Just asking as person who doesn’t know a whole lot about it. I think plenty of women wouldn’t be sure. Especially in the position the OP is in. I suppose men could challenge women using their spaces in the same way, but there’s so much more to the issue for women.

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 19/06/2026 20:33

drspouse · 19/06/2026 20:26

It would be the same if a member of the gym were shaving, clipping their toenails, dropping rubbish or taking other people's shampoo. A warning to cease the behaviour, if they don't stop, they get banned.
If they think the gym is in the wrong, they can take the gym to court.
The manager doesn't need proof - the gym is innocent until proven guilty.

And the onus is on the man to "prove" he is female. The gym does not have to prove he is not.

drspouse · 19/06/2026 20:26

Dadalus · 19/06/2026 19:29

As I understand the way it works, the gym manager doesn't need to prove anything. They say the suspected bloke can't go in to the female changing area, and if the customer objects he has to take legal action against the gym.

It would be the same if a member of the gym were shaving, clipping their toenails, dropping rubbish or taking other people's shampoo. A warning to cease the behaviour, if they don't stop, they get banned.
If they think the gym is in the wrong, they can take the gym to court.
The manager doesn't need proof - the gym is innocent until proven guilty.

Shortshriftandlethal · 19/06/2026 20:24

somanychristmaslights · 19/06/2026 20:12

What happens if the person is indeed a female? I’ve seen someone on Facebook, she’s over 6ft, built like an American footballer, but is very much a biological woman. Are you 100% sure???

Well, then she'll say, re-assuringly, " Don't worry/ I am a woman", and you'll know it as soon as you hear her voice. Then you will say " Oh, sorry!"

Shortshriftandlethal · 19/06/2026 20:22

If you are pretty certain this is a man, then politely approach him and suggest he is in the wrong space. If enough women do this, and certainly if the establishment management is notified, he'll get the message.

This whole business about "genital inspections' and "proving someone's sex" is a wilfull obfuscation.

SlackJawedDisbeliefXY · 19/06/2026 20:18

Since you haven’t consented to him watching you as you change he is committing an offence under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and the Voyeurism (Offences) Act 2019

As long as there are cubicles available for women to avoid him looking at them and they willingly change in front of him, then he hasn't committed this offence.

Is this true? From the Op's description (... obviously a man using the women’s changing room which is open plan with benches and lockers except one cubicle ...) the women's changing room appears to be open plan with a single cubicle.

A number of scenarios are put women at disadvantage

  • women who don't consent to changing in front of men are in the process of changing when this man walks in. They are now changing in front of a man with out their consent
  • the man could try to change in the cubicle (if it is available) but will need to walk through women changing to get to it
  • if the man arrives at the cubicle and it is occupied, does he just stand there waiting for it to be become available?
  • Alternately, a woman who does not want to see men in a state of undress enters the changing room where a man is in the process of changing. Should this woman walk away? Should she be forced to use the cubicle? Is the cubicle even available?

There are likely cubicles in the men's changing room - by the logic of 'if there are cubicles there is no harm done', why doesn't the man go and use of one of the cubicles in the men's changing room?

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 19/06/2026 20:18

Gowlett · 19/06/2026 20:13

Yes, pitfalls, I don’t know if that’s the right word, just looking from the point of view how to handle this from company points of view. Considering so many are buying into trans equality / the zeitgeist around the issue. But interesting to read about EHRC guidance & the actual law as outlined by Gerri1992. This is why it’s hard to really understand…

You don't have to worry about how the service provider follows the law. That is for them to sweat over. And the law and the SC ruling from last year are not in the least bit confusing.

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 19/06/2026 20:16

somanychristmaslights · 19/06/2026 20:12

What happens if the person is indeed a female? I’ve seen someone on Facebook, she’s over 6ft, built like an American footballer, but is very much a biological woman. Are you 100% sure???

The Rapid Onset Women with Alopecia, Cancer Survivors and Butch Lesbians Concern (or Rapid Onset Everyday-looking Women Concern) tactic: women who look "like men" will be challenged in women's toilets and changing rooms

MabelAnderson · 19/06/2026 20:15

Gowlett · 19/06/2026 19:34

Just, out of interest, what is the legal standing on this? Is there anything in law yet?

As in if you are Billy but dressed as Betty, and you are Billy on your passport, then you’re a man. You still have male anatomy.

But if you were Billy and have had transitioning surgery, can you officially change identity to Betty & get a passport to reflect that?

So, only once you are fully a woman (is it recognised legally?) can you access women’s spaces. That should be the rule?

The only problem is that these new mixed spaces will start to be the norm…

Anyway, my question is, can a not-woman actually become a woman (in identity term?)

You don’t need any surgery to become ‘Betty’. Surgery is not a legal requirement at all. It’s ‘living as a woman’ whatever than means.

Gowlett · 19/06/2026 20:13

Yes, pitfalls, I don’t know if that’s the right word, just looking from the point of view how to handle this from company points of view. Considering so many are buying into trans equality / the zeitgeist around the issue. But interesting to read about EHRC guidance & the actual law as outlined by Gerri1992. This is why it’s hard to really understand…

somanychristmaslights · 19/06/2026 20:12

What happens if the person is indeed a female? I’ve seen someone on Facebook, she’s over 6ft, built like an American footballer, but is very much a biological woman. Are you 100% sure???

Gowlett · 19/06/2026 20:02

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 19/06/2026 19:59

How many men who should not be in women's changing rooms would be acceptable, from this "very small percentage" would you say? Is one enough? It would be for me.

ps. And there are no "pitfalls." Service providers are required to follow the law. The EHRC guidance is not the law, just a (very bad, in my opinion) attempt at explaining the law to people who don't normally read a lot of law. If a service provider refuses to follow the law, they can and will be taken to court.

Edited

No, I agree with you Bridget. Was just re-reading my post, I mean that women should of course take precedence over the percentage of trans folk. Of course! I can totally see how OP feels the way she does. It’s very important for women to challenge all of this!

Imdunfer · 19/06/2026 20:02

TrainedByTheBiddyMafia · 19/06/2026 19:52

Children can’t be considered to have consented to be watched.

Women can expect to have privacy in a female changing room, they could be considered to have consented if they were changing in the male changing room but this is a female changing room. The onus is not on women to check no men present before they start changing. A solitary cubicle should not be considered sufficient provision for all women using the pool & gym.

Children are with their parents. If there are changing cubicles available nobody is forced to consent to being watched.

It's easy to chuck around comments about calling the police but it isn't a criminal offence to be in there, it's a civil offence of trespass.

I'm really sorry but if we women want him out of there then some of us are going to have to grow a pair and say so to his face.

After that he will bully guilty of a criminal offence of harassment.

No, it's not fair, it just is.

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 19/06/2026 19:59

Gowlett · 19/06/2026 19:56

Thanks for the answers here, interesting to see where the pitfalls are with all of this. One can see the predicament for business owners, companies etc… But it is a very small percentage of the population at the same time.

How many men who should not be in women's changing rooms would be acceptable, from this "very small percentage" would you say? Is one enough? It would be for me.

ps. And there are no "pitfalls." Service providers are required to follow the law. The EHRC guidance is not the law, just a (very bad, in my opinion) attempt at explaining the law to people who don't normally read a lot of law. If a service provider refuses to follow the law, they can and will be taken to court.

Gowlett · 19/06/2026 19:56

Thanks for the answers here, interesting to see where the pitfalls are with all of this. One can see the predicament for business owners, companies etc… But it is a very small percentage of the population at the same time.

TrainedByTheBiddyMafia · 19/06/2026 19:54

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 19/06/2026 19:42

Ok, I'll bite.

OP, that's a lot of words and backstory just to say that you think men will just continue to use women's changing rooms and there's nothing we can do about it.

I was wondering why the manager was speaking to you so candidly about one of his customers, and also seemed to know how all the other women were feeling about it, and what they did during the period that you weren't using the facilities. I thought that was odd, but then you continued on, ticking off every single "concern" that women have, including "his height, size of hands, gait and most importantly his deep voice!". No one who hasn't been in this game for a very long time knows or uses the word "gait" unless you work in physiotherapy or sports medicine.

But, you know when you lost me? "pants inspections"

I have never heard this term used on this forum, or used by anyone else who knows enough about this issue to comment on it, on any platform. The term used is normally "genital inspections." So either you're coining a new phrase, or this is a windup.

I have no advice other than to say that yes, women can demand that service providers follow the law, it's for service providers to work out how best to achieve that, and if you're not happy with the result, you can sue the provider.

Edited

Fucksake I should have been here long enough to spot this, I did think the ‘pants inspection’ term was odd.

TrainedByTheBiddyMafia · 19/06/2026 19:52

Imdunfer · 19/06/2026 19:32

Since you haven’t consented to him watching you as you change he is committing an offence under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and the Voyeurism (Offences) Act 2019

As long as there are cubicles available for women to avoid him looking at them and they willingly change in front of him, then he hasn't committed this offence.

Children can’t be considered to have consented to be watched.

Women can expect to have privacy in a female changing room, they could be considered to have consented if they were changing in the male changing room but this is a female changing room. The onus is not on women to check no men present before they start changing. A solitary cubicle should not be considered sufficient provision for all women using the pool & gym.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 19/06/2026 19:47

@BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth quite.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 19/06/2026 19:44

Gerri1992 · 19/06/2026 19:36

This was one of the major problems of the EHRC advice to my mind. It says you can ask trans people to leave the loos/changing rooms but also say there is no documentation in the UK that shows biological sex so there is no way to ask people to prove it and be sure.

Most of these men don’t have a GRC so a birth certificate would be enough for them. Men should not be using women’s spaces and the onus is on the service provider to deter them.

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 19/06/2026 19:42

Ok, I'll bite.

OP, that's a lot of words and backstory just to say that you think men will just continue to use women's changing rooms and there's nothing we can do about it.

I was wondering why the manager was speaking to you so candidly about one of his customers, and also seemed to know how all the other women were feeling about it, and what they did during the period that you weren't using the facilities. I thought that was odd, but then you continued on, ticking off every single "concern" that women have, including "his height, size of hands, gait and most importantly his deep voice!". No one who hasn't been in this game for a very long time knows or uses the word "gait" unless you work in physiotherapy or sports medicine.

But, you know when you lost me? "pants inspections"

I have never heard this term used on this forum, or used by anyone else who knows enough about this issue to comment on it, on any platform. The term used is normally "genital inspections." So either you're coining a new phrase, or this is a windup.

I have no advice other than to say that yes, women can demand that service providers follow the law, it's for service providers to work out how best to achieve that, and if you're not happy with the result, you can sue the provider.