If the body and the brain "don't match up", why does that mean the person is "really" a girl rather than really a boy?
Why is the mind's self image more authorative than the reality of the body?
The body still exists.
The "girl" doesn't suddenly now have a female body.
So if you think aboit it properly, this whole trans thing only works if you
decide "girl" is really a type of mind.
Do you really think that? That the fundamental defining difference betwen boys and girls, men and women, isn't the fact we simply have different bodies but that we have different types of minds? So different in fact that this difference overrides the very stark and obvious differences of physical sex such that actually being male or female, with all that comes with it physically and socially especially for those of us who are physically female, is less significant than whether a person thinks like "a boy" or "a girl"?
Can you not see how sexist that is?
Because it's not that this boy is "really" a girl at all, it is that you have changed what a girl is to accomodate the boy.
And yet the female children haven't changed. They are still as they always were. And there's no basis on which to assume they are in fact feeling they are the same as whatever it is the boy feels because no one asked them.
And whatever experiences they have or challenges they face because they are female rather than "a girl", whatever that now means, won't go away.
All you've actually done is taken away their name and their link to people who are like them in body in the belief that this is less important than they being infentified as just like a boy who believes himself a girl.
Can you understand how sexist that is?
How dismissive and devaluing of female people and our right to be seen as who we are?