Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

This never happens: Transgender woman masturbated in front of hospital nurses

94 replies

RoyalCorgi · 16/06/2026 11:38

Apparently staff could see that "she had her penis in her hand and that her hand was moving up and down."

The fact that a barrister can say these words, and a journalist can reproduce them, apparently without any sense of shame, is extraordinary.

https://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/news/26196742.transgender-barry-woman-masturbated-front-nurses/

Transgender woman masturbated in front of hospital nurses

A Barry transgender woman masturbated in front of shocked staff at the University Hospital of Wales in Cardiff

https://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/news/26196742.transgender-barry-woman-masturbated-front-nurses/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
mrshoho · 16/06/2026 15:48

A Temu Les Dawson character is how someone described them.

ChamonixMountainBum · 16/06/2026 15:40

They always look exactly how you imagined they would.

Wishesandhorses · 16/06/2026 15:30

Quite.

They don't have passes. There's no one on the door. If 'Paula' wants in and any other man can come in then he's coming in. As with several cases, these individuals also tend to be repeat offenders. In one case I'm thinking of, the chap leaves prison, knocks up his new offenses and trots back inside again for another year or so, there's a trail of victims behind him.

There is no way to differentiate between a man who is genuine, a man who is not, many of the men who end up in court in such cases were genuinely living a transitioned life. The population contains dodgy members, as does any population.

Having committed serious sex offenses in women's spaces is no barrier at all to a GRC. And no one's checking anyway. It's not like a man gets his magic pass or wigs removed once he offends, he's as free to live as he pleases like everyone else.

Third spaces that women access by consent are the only possible answer that don't involve just shrugging and leaving the collateral damage of women to be an ugly but worthwhile side effect.

RNApolymerase · 16/06/2026 15:12

Yes and how would you organise things so you can you allow in a "doll" and keep out a "Paula". There's no way to differentiate.

Wishesandhorses · 16/06/2026 15:04

RNApolymerase · 16/06/2026 11:48

Meanwhile the Guardian publish this.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2026/jun/16/labour-mps-ehrc-guidance-biological-sex-ruling-transgender-commons-motion

I don't think those MPs etc. who consider the guidance "unworkable" are thinking about "Paula". Maybe they should be.

I would dearly love to sit those muppets down in front of a whole bunch of these case files, with pictures and court reports, and go through them one at a time.

Should women have to change and shower with this individual?

How about this one?

What about being strip searched by this one?

And your mum sleeping on a hospital ward in the next bed to this one?

What about this one providing your sister's rape crisis support even though she's said her distress and trauma precludes her recieving support from anyone other than a biological female?

And watch the squirming and tantrums. NATWALT would be the bellow. But these men were and are in the population and ARE using women, and have no bloody place at all in a women's single sex space.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/06/2026 15:01

RoyalCorgi · 16/06/2026 14:52

Yes, it's an almost perfect example of the No True Scotsman fallacy.

Of course, it completely contradicts the other statement they constantly come out with, which is "Trans people are who they say they are." In other words, if someone identifies as trans, then they are trans.

It's impossible to reconcile the two positions: if everyone who says they're trans actually is trans, how can anyone be faking being trans?

Indeed.

GreyskySexRealistsky · 16/06/2026 14:56

Whosthetabbynow · 16/06/2026 14:22

It’s a man with a willy.

How do you know, have you done a genital inspection?
/s

RoyalCorgi · 16/06/2026 14:52

MarieDeGournay · 16/06/2026 12:41

The logic seems to be that since transwomen are really really lovely, and only want to get on with quietly living their lives in peace, any man who claims to be a transwoman but does really really nasty things, by definition cannot be really trans. And therefore his crimes have nothing to do with transpeople.
QED.

Yes, it's an almost perfect example of the No True Scotsman fallacy.

Of course, it completely contradicts the other statement they constantly come out with, which is "Trans people are who they say they are." In other words, if someone identifies as trans, then they are trans.

It's impossible to reconcile the two positions: if everyone who says they're trans actually is trans, how can anyone be faking being trans?

OP posts:
thelongesday · 16/06/2026 14:27

Grim.

Whosthetabbynow · 16/06/2026 14:25

It’s a man in a wig.

ChimpanzeeThatMonkeyNews · 16/06/2026 14:24

MarieDeGournay · 16/06/2026 12:41

The logic seems to be that since transwomen are really really lovely, and only want to get on with quietly living their lives in peace, any man who claims to be a transwoman but does really really nasty things, by definition cannot be really trans. And therefore his crimes have nothing to do with transpeople.
QED.

Don’t forget the ‘lovely trans’ constituent she pretends to have.

MagpiePi · 16/06/2026 14:23

Whosthetabbynow · 16/06/2026 14:22

It’s a man with a willy.

How can anyone tell??

Alison Brie What GIF
Whosthetabbynow · 16/06/2026 14:22

It’s a man with a willy.

spannasaurus · 16/06/2026 13:38

CrashBash · 16/06/2026 13:32

Spot on. Thats exactly what the TRAs would tell you.

That's exactly what a poster on the push and pull thread has said.

CrashBash · 16/06/2026 13:32

Shortshriftandlethal · 16/06/2026 12:35

I'm sure Stella would tell us he is "not really trans".

Spot on. Thats exactly what the TRAs would tell you.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/06/2026 13:27

Helleofabore · 16/06/2026 13:07

https://x.com/jk_rowling/status/2066800959536140581?s=12

“135 British MPs are fighting guidance that would deny ‘Paula’ the right to enter women’s and girls’ changing rooms.”

JKR 💪

Pastelpug · 16/06/2026 13:18

Worzel gummidge ..is that you

Igmum · 16/06/2026 13:11

Thank heavens they both got jail time. I hope this means we are past the ETBB induced judicial idiocy when trans women got excused everything.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/06/2026 12:54

Shortshriftandlethal · 16/06/2026 12:48

All of this progressive do-goodery is really a secular religion - supposed to appeal to the transcendent drive which naturally exists in people. Righteousness, Peace, Justice, Kindness, Acceptance, All Embracing love, and so on.

Marx said that religion was 'the opiate of the masses', well so is 'progressivism'.

Agree.

EasternStandard · 16/06/2026 12:50

FriedGold32 · 16/06/2026 12:44

Nadia Whittome can't see what all the fuss is about, it's just a picture of a lovely lady.

That eyes and ears Orwell quote is handy.

mrshoho · 16/06/2026 12:49

And Lorraine Kelly regularly inviting Jake and Hannah onto her show. Saying och all these silly silly women making a fuss about nothing. Don't see her inviting the Paulas or the Jessicas to have a cosy wee chat.

Would she want her wee Rosie or grandchild anywhere near these ones?

Shortshriftandlethal · 16/06/2026 12:48

All of this progressive do-goodery is really a secular religion - supposed to appeal to the transcendent drive which naturally exists in people. Righteousness, Peace, Justice, Kindness, Acceptance, All Embracing love, and so on.

Marx said that religion was 'the opiate of the masses', well so is 'progressivism'.

Swipe left for the next trending thread