Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Dozens of men discuss ignoring single sex space rules

290 replies

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 10/06/2026 10:05

https://www.reddit.com/r/transgenderUK/comments/1u1webq/is_anyone_here_actually_going_to_follow_the/

as mentioned in other threads, I really am concerned about compliance. I know it will never be 100% but am concerned about what blatant non compliance may lead to

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
TheKeatingFive · 10/06/2026 19:49

Zoonosis · 10/06/2026 19:47

Victorian prudery mostly.

Really? You genuinely think that?

Women's domestic violence centres sex segregated because of Victorian Prudery? 😵‍💫

Zoonosis · 10/06/2026 19:47

TheKeatingFive · 10/06/2026 18:34

Why do you think we have single sex space to begin with?

Victorian prudery mostly.

Walnutslooklikebrains · 10/06/2026 19:46

MarieDeGournay · 10/06/2026 15:52

Maybe disabled toilets could have a big sign on them saying

THIS ACCESSIBLE TOILET IS FOR DISABLED PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY NEED THE ADAPTATIONS, IT IS NOT A CONSOLATION PRIZE OR A CHEAP WORKAROUND FOR ABLE-BODIED TRANSPEOPLE WHO CAN USE THE TOILET DESIGNATED FOR THEIR SEX BUT JUST CHOOSE NOT TO.

Yeah, or that.

UtopiaPlanitia · 10/06/2026 19:45

StellaAndCrow · 10/06/2026 13:46

One reddit bloke says "I made a statutory declaration stating my intent to live as a woman for the rest of my life, and I plan to do so."

If he was really living as a woman, he'd be taking into account women's feelings, and certainly not trying to make woman feel uncomfortable.

But no, he's clearly continuing to live as a man, taking up space that he isn't entitled to no matter the consequences to others.

I find that type of man really annoying, They’re ‘rules lawyers’ of the mindset that technically correct is the best kind of correct.

I don’t know why ‘Karens’ get all the hate when rules lawyer blokes are ten a penny and have insufferable levels of male entitlement to draw on.

TheKeatingFive · 10/06/2026 18:34

suggestionsplease1 · 10/06/2026 18:20

How many women have commited crimes since then? We have to share the toilets with them too.

Why do you think we have single sex space to begin with?

Pingponghavoc · 10/06/2026 18:30

If women have crimal patterns similar to men, we have to question why we have female only spaces at all, and men want to use them to avoid abuse from men?

AccidentallyWesAnderson · 10/06/2026 18:29

suggestionsplease1 · 10/06/2026 18:20

How many women have commited crimes since then? We have to share the toilets with them too.

No chance of getting raped by one though. Silver linings and all that.

GreyskySexRealistsky · 10/06/2026 18:25

suggestionsplease1 · 10/06/2026 18:20

How many women have commited crimes since then? We have to share the toilets with them too.

You're right, we have to share the toilets with all those women who have raped women 🙄

MyAmpleSheep · 10/06/2026 18:24

spannasaurus · 10/06/2026 10:54

If I'm a service provider who refuses someone entry to a female single sex service because I believe that person is male I don't need to prove their sex.

If that person wishes to sue me as a service provider it is them that needs to prove their sex in court.

Actually I think their sex is irrelevant. It’s up to them to prove that you were unreasonable in your belief. Whether you were right or wrong doesn’t matter.

suggestionsplease1 · 10/06/2026 18:20

FlirtsWithRhinos · 10/06/2026 15:55

I remember that. Quite a while ago.

How many trans identifying men have been convicted of male-pattern crimes since then?

Not equating the two obviously. Just interesting to see how one rare event some time ago is apparently very relevant when a TRA wants to prove that single sex spaces are bad for women, but other rare events that have happened more recently are firmly out of scope when it comes to women who are proving why single sex spaces must be single sex.

How many women have commited crimes since then? We have to share the toilets with them too.

SALaw · 10/06/2026 18:17

KG74 · 10/06/2026 10:08

The guidance is pretty much null and void by the lack of a way to prove sex bit. Honestly, unless they brought in pants inspections, same sex toilets and changing rooms can't realistically be policed anyway. This was a question a lot of us have asked time and time again - okay, you want single-sex spaces...how do you prove what sex people are? Answer there came none, and so this is the situation we now have.

This is such bollocks (or lack of bollocks). There are so so many rules in society that no one questions that determine who can or cannot access various things. Age is the obvious factor that limits access to various things. People use their eyes daily to assess how old someone might be even when that is a much broader spectrum than sex. The law expects compliance and people will self regulate via use of their in built ability to work out sex. It’s rarely wrong!

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 10/06/2026 18:13

JulietteHasAGun · 10/06/2026 12:25

You’re right that if a man wants to assault a woman they will do so regardless of rules. However if the law is strictly enforced that men can’t go in a female toilets then maybe one going in stands out more and is more likely to be confronted/women will warn other women that there’s a man in there, etc.

The person I know who was raped in the toilets at a NT place was 11yo. It was a man who raped her. Not a trans person. Dressed like a man, looked like a man. He’d sneaked in unnoticed and hid in a cubicle. Was quiet and her parents let her go to the toilets on her own. I guess my point is that he had to sneak in. If anyone had seen him back then (this was a long time before trans became a thing), he’d have been stopped. Anyone would have felt confident to turf him out, go and report him, etc. So now someone wouldn’t need to worry about sneaking in unseen. It just makes it all more likely.

Not to mention that any rules that let in trans identifying males give all predators plausible deniability. As you say, no need for sneaking in and full licence to loiter.

This would be likely to negate any criminal charges of indecent exposure (so much harder to prove intent to distress) and potentially voyeurism.

I would imagine that was a feature, not a bug.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 10/06/2026 18:01

KG74 · 10/06/2026 10:08

The guidance is pretty much null and void by the lack of a way to prove sex bit. Honestly, unless they brought in pants inspections, same sex toilets and changing rooms can't realistically be policed anyway. This was a question a lot of us have asked time and time again - okay, you want single-sex spaces...how do you prove what sex people are? Answer there came none, and so this is the situation we now have.

You have a pretty dim view of transpeople if you think they are not capable of following such basic rules. Everyone knows what their sex is and should choose the facilities or services intended for them.

There should be no men (TW) demanding ‘gynaecological’ care, no men putting themselves forward as female carers, no men in any women’s spaces.

Out of interest, are there any other similar rules and laws that you think transpeople are incapable of following? Do you think they can handle traffic light signals? Or the concept of getting a driving licence before driving?

KaleidoscopeSmile · 10/06/2026 16:05

JulietteHasAGun · 10/06/2026 12:25

You’re right that if a man wants to assault a woman they will do so regardless of rules. However if the law is strictly enforced that men can’t go in a female toilets then maybe one going in stands out more and is more likely to be confronted/women will warn other women that there’s a man in there, etc.

The person I know who was raped in the toilets at a NT place was 11yo. It was a man who raped her. Not a trans person. Dressed like a man, looked like a man. He’d sneaked in unnoticed and hid in a cubicle. Was quiet and her parents let her go to the toilets on her own. I guess my point is that he had to sneak in. If anyone had seen him back then (this was a long time before trans became a thing), he’d have been stopped. Anyone would have felt confident to turf him out, go and report him, etc. So now someone wouldn’t need to worry about sneaking in unseen. It just makes it all more likely.

I don't understand how people are too fucking thick to see this

stillcantfindreverse · 10/06/2026 16:02

Pingponghavoc · 10/06/2026 15:46

This new argument that, coincidentally, all TRA are using at once, proves that they know they dont pass.

If they passed they could just carry on, certain they wouldn't cause a fuss.

But they want it known that the system is unenforceable in different ways- no one on the door who can ask for id.

They arent just saying that to each other, TRA MPs are saying it in meetings to get the message out to women. They need women to think that they can't challenge a man when hes in a womens space.

This would seem to link to the issue of men often saying 'but no one noticed because no woman stood still and screamed 'OMG It's a MAN'.

Point taken. It seems rude, but needs must, so I prescribe screaming. When possible. Considering the size, build, instability and frequent bellowing of phenomentally misogynist and threatening abuse by one local at any woman who stretches his regulation capactiy by breathing too loud in his sight, despite his snazzy skirt, if he's in any enclosed women's space I shall just get the fuck out of there as fast as possible without drawing his ire because he's terrifying. At least though I can now go straight to the desk of wherever and ask for the single sex women's facilities because the bloody scary bloke in there appears to indicate one of us has mistaken that room for the mixed sex facilities.

This is all purely about respecting women to the exact same extent as respecting men with gender identities. And the rage (including a number of quite fantastically stupid women for some reason) at the idea of it.

krustykittens · 10/06/2026 15:57

Walnutslooklikebrains · 10/06/2026 15:37

Maybe disabled toilets could have a trans sign added to them for multi purpose use as they are a unisex space anyway.

Nope. If we recognise women need single sex spaces protected, we also need to recognise that disabled people need the spaces created for their specific needs protected.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 10/06/2026 15:55

suggestionsplease1 · 10/06/2026 13:10

You apparently didn't see the Mumsnet thread where someone posted a photo of the winner of a local women's race, claiming they were trans, which started an almighty pile on here and elsewhere, which was very distressing for the mother of 3 in question.

Mumsnet has to pull the thread and then the OP was obliged to start another one apologising.

I remember that. Quite a while ago.

How many trans identifying men have been convicted of male-pattern crimes since then?

Not equating the two obviously. Just interesting to see how one rare event some time ago is apparently very relevant when a TRA wants to prove that single sex spaces are bad for women, but other rare events that have happened more recently are firmly out of scope when it comes to women who are proving why single sex spaces must be single sex.

MarieDeGournay · 10/06/2026 15:52

Walnutslooklikebrains · 10/06/2026 15:37

Maybe disabled toilets could have a trans sign added to them for multi purpose use as they are a unisex space anyway.

Maybe disabled toilets could have a big sign on them saying

THIS ACCESSIBLE TOILET IS FOR DISABLED PEOPLE WHO ACTUALLY NEED THE ADAPTATIONS, IT IS NOT A CONSOLATION PRIZE OR A CHEAP WORKAROUND FOR ABLE-BODIED TRANSPEOPLE WHO CAN USE THE TOILET DESIGNATED FOR THEIR SEX BUT JUST CHOOSE NOT TO.

GoldenGate · 10/06/2026 15:50

I think most MEN quite readily accept the need for single sex spaces and thats not changing. Its that minority who think by changing their appearance to resemble women they can go under the radar without anyone knowing who they really are.

EmpressDomesticatednottamed · 10/06/2026 15:46

Pingponghavoc · 10/06/2026 15:22

Reasons why men follow women and girls into public toilets:

Men will beat them up in the gents.

They have every right to be there

No on can tell

Ok, you can tell, but you can't ask

Some pass, therefore every man should be allowed in

There are no police on the door

Women need a chance to compliment them on their hair.

Someone thought someone was trans, but they weren't.

They are going to do it anyway.

I am most disappointed, where is the "you don't want me to go into then gents, I'm so gorgeous and I'll be seducing your husbands? Have they given up on that one?

Pingponghavoc · 10/06/2026 15:46

This new argument that, coincidentally, all TRA are using at once, proves that they know they dont pass.

If they passed they could just carry on, certain they wouldn't cause a fuss.

But they want it known that the system is unenforceable in different ways- no one on the door who can ask for id.

They arent just saying that to each other, TRA MPs are saying it in meetings to get the message out to women. They need women to think that they can't challenge a man when hes in a womens space.

Walnutslooklikebrains · 10/06/2026 15:37

Maybe disabled toilets could have a trans sign added to them for multi purpose use as they are a unisex space anyway.

FlirtsWithRhinos · 10/06/2026 15:35

whatonearthdoidoz · 10/06/2026 11:09

sure it’s easy to police in theory. But in practice?

would you really go up to someone in a bathroom and say i think you’re a man, prove you’re a woman if you want to stay here? I wouldn’t. I might just huff and tut.

Look at it this way. The closer he gets to nudity or problematic behaviour, the more obvious his sex is going to be. You may not challenge him yourself but you can certainly let the service provider know someone is in the changing room, toilet or other woman-only space who should not be there.

So just as a trespasser who climbs a fence, causes no problem and leaves probably gets away with it, the less problematic the man's behaviour the more likely he is to get away with it. The important thing is that women now have the right to complain about the presence of an obvious male when before they did not.

Pingponghavoc · 10/06/2026 15:33

Chrysanthemum5 · 10/06/2026 15:30

And their coats/hats - don’t forget that. I know I am always complimenting other women on their hat when I’m in the toilets

Also, we need men on hand to give us emergency tampax

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 10/06/2026 15:31

JulietteHasAGun · 10/06/2026 15:29

David Lloyd

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womensrights/5535487-organisations-refusing-to-give-their-single-sex-spaces-policy-david-lloyd-for-example?page=1

If you fancy sending a similar email I think we could make a difference. Sorry for what you experienced.

EDIT wait I cc'd you there before, sorry not hassling!!

OP posts: