I think the issue is how some (and it certainly isn't the majority) think the way to promote their view of the world is to stop everyone else from being able to discuss anything.
Foran himself said he didn't want the bullying of students to go on.
But what this means is that 2 complete nincompoops who are doing nothing more that masturbating the egos in public for no other reason than to virtue signal, are denying the majority from attending a talk.
And their complete arrogance of assuming they should be listened to and obeyed.
I think every time a student/s attempts this type of disruption they get issued with a warning by whichever university and their parents written to and told we dont believe you told your children they could behave like this, so just to let you know if they do it 2 more times they will be expelled.
This isn't anything to do with being student, it is about have they grown up enough to now how to behave as a member of society.
If it is too "traumatising" to hear or even been aware that other people dont think like them, then obviously they shouldn't be putting themselves at risk by attending university.
Maybe students should be made to sign a contract before being admitted that says they agree that they will not be disruptive.
Obviously if outside of lectures students are being bullied by other students then some action by the University authorities need to provide support and again censor those who are doing the bullying.
There must be some of this going on as I cant believe these two idiots standing up and make complete fools of themselves are that charismatic that all other students are over come and submit.