More fuckwittery from Eva Wiseman, Observer

The EHRC guidance was laid before parliament by Bridget Philipsson, who was running to be deputy leader of the Labour Party. How much do you think her electorate (Labour members) are swayed by right wing media? Did she have more to gain or to lose by being seen as right wing in this issue?

Oh please. They won't vote Reform whatever she does. This is about holding on to government not her seat that GC's actively advocate against.

Actually I’d like to know about this. It sounds a bit conspiracist to me. But go on.

EA 2010 was a consolidation of many bits of equalities legislation. It wasn’t either in reality or in presentation really about trans issues, which were not a big media issue. I don’t recall any instance of media holding a gun to the govts head over framing of either sex or trans issues in EA2010. What instance are you thinking of?

Between 2010 and 2026 the influence of media barons fell off a cliff. Who are you thinking of who applied this pressure?

The FWS judgment was a Supreme Court judgment. What leverage does the media have over the justices? What legal errors do you think they made under such duress?

The EHRC guidance was laid before parliament by Bridget Philipsson, who was running to be deputy leader of the Labour Party. How much do you think her electorate (Labour members) are swayed by right wing media? Did she have more to gain or to lose by being seen as right wing in this issue?

According to MAGA & Reform its white women 'failing to do their bit' for the birth rate who are responsible for the brownification of their countries.

But yeah, do keep on looking the other way.

Left leaning 'progressives' are exactly who created Reform, and MAGA too.

And how much do you know about the right wing media outlets that forced their hand? You act as if right wing media haven't held a gun to the labour governments head.

Oh & genuine left leaning women would never enable Reform.

https://x.com/boswelltoday/status/2062807223307268444?s=20

https://x.com/bindelj/status/2062779846237782296?s=20

Barking mad in Trancouver.

How much do you know about this issue? Becuase both the EA 2010 and the Supreme Court decision was made under Labour administrations. For Women Scotland which took the case was founded by left-leaning women, and the EHRC guidance was drafted under a Labour admin and laid before parliament by a Labour govt.

You think that was all a long-running conspiracy to “fight for the survival of the right”?

Another privileged traitor to her own sex.

Are you listening, Nadia?

🎵I wanna live like common people…🎵

It so ironic that the UK Liberal Left will march against the USA at the drop of a hat, yet outsource all their social DEI policies to the same foreign power.

Huge contrast with Victoria Smith's latest-

https://glosswitch.substack.com/p/what-shouldnt-women-have?

I would really appreciate it if MPs who oppose the EHRC guidance could, just this once, express their opposition solely in terms of what it means for female constituents. Just say directly “you shouldn’t have this”, and “it’s wrong for you to expect that”. List everything that’s unacceptable. Name what, if anything, might be aside for the class of humans whom it is perfectly easy to define when doing a PornHub search or looking to hire a surrogate, but not so, apparently, when said humans are wanting to be left in peace. Is there any space on earth in which female humans should be able to congregate without the potential presence of male humans?

And that they are addressing a US audience as much as a UK one.

Also, suggests that she's outsourced her thinking to American TRAs. You tend to catch a lot of 'bathrooms', 'restrooms', 'first grade biology' etc among that cadre.

Take a look at the clip Julie Bindel posted recently. I'm not sure if it was in Canada or the U.S tbh.....but the same madness. The mental health criisis in young people is very evident in their behaviour.

It’s not anti-trans.

I wrote a big response to this but the page got refreshed and deleted.

In short, Eva needs to do some research. All she needs to do is google toilet closures and found out the reasons councils have given. It will be antisocial behaviour and cost associated with trying to supply a service they have no statutory duty to supply in a time councils are cash strapped.

If she spent £15k on each toilet each year but it was used for sex, drugs, and vandalism, what would she do?

Its nothing to do with the EHRC.

Barking and making other dog noises really that's the new thing is it, to show how mature and intelligent their World View is no doubt

If they were true to their characters, they really would be honking and clapping like seals. 😂

Hurray for Terf Island!

All I can say is thank goodness I live in the UK (as bad as it has been, it could be A Whole Lot Worse)!

Sorry, it must be tough for you who are American to have to be associated with either MAGA loons or else swivel eyed, screaming progressives ( Barking and making other dog noises seems to be the latest craze when demonstrating against feminists speakers these days).

It has to be "bathrooms " otherwise all my compatriots won't understand the complexities of those mean, nasty British women not letting tran-identified people men "pee.". She's writing for the online Omicause American audience as much as to virtue signal to her UK cronies.

It probably retains a large cross-over audiience, though. The Guardian, for one, has become ever more dependent on its american audience in recent years.
I'm so sick of Americans TBH - with their political and social hegemony and belief that the whole world dances to their tune.