Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

If changing sex became easy, should society allow it?

135 replies

ByTheRiverside · 04/06/2026 16:16

This is a hypothetical question that lives in a sci-fi like future.

Transgender people currently don't have access to an awful lot of options to change sex characteristics. Early intervention prevents a lot of secondary sex characteristic development. Other than that, there's hormonal and surgical interventions that do not change a lot of their underlying anatomy and genetic/epigenetic sex traits.

In the future, let's imagine that changing sex is an easy medical option available to anyone. Transgender people can quite easily change their anatomy, and even their genetics. They do this while still remaining the same human, with the same prior experiences.

Then the question becomes less 'have they changed sex' but rather 'ought society to allow it'?

What are your thoughts?

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 07/06/2026 13:15

I think the question would actually be "If changing sex became easy, could society stop it?"

Short of lots and lots of fairy godmothers/godfathers/godpersons/goddogs, it ain't going to happen, though.

logiccalls · 06/06/2026 21:55

Not read the thread but changing sex would mean changing every cell in the body. Just like changing into hen, or a banana, would. So it could never be 'easy'. It could never be possible.

Cailleach1 · 05/06/2026 21:49

polypostwonder · 05/06/2026 19:08

I didn't vote. History and lived experience doesn't matter to gender critical people, unless it does.

The only 'acceptable' point in life to 'change sex' would be in the womb, before birth. Most people would object because we have ethics. So, there is never an acceptable point where a person can change sex.

They can do sex selection in embryos now with IVF. That is not changing sex, of course. Indeed it is an illustration that you cannot change the sex, even at that early stage.

I suppose it is at least better than infanticide of baby girls among cultures where they deem girls of a lesser worth.

There may be other instances, such as to avoid fatal conditions in a baby which can be sex linked.

Cailleach1 · 05/06/2026 20:46

No, reasonable people who are not into bunkum pseudoscience believe this. Just like they don’t believe the earth is flat.

Mind you, even the ‘Flat Earth Society’ revealed they didn’t really believe their junk ‘science’ with an alleged facebook post stating ‘The Flat Earth Society has members all around the globe’.

One thing about all this all this anti scientific guff being laid out in the public square is that it has been somewhat educational. Well, much more knowledgeable women than me have expanded on explain the issues. I now know that there are paraphilias/ fetishes which mostly occur in men. They usually present with more than one, and male fetishes can be very dangerous for women and children as they can escalate. Rather like thrill seekers at amusement parks who have to move onto higher/faster rides to set off the same thrill.

Sex is a development pathway in humans. You can’t go back to the beginning. You can’t change anyone’s sex by marinating, or operating. They are just cosmetic changes (and in many cases not convincing), not real.

Shedmistress · 05/06/2026 20:44

polypostwonder · 05/06/2026 19:35

We all know gender critical people believe this.

I was answering in the context of the proposed scenario.

Is that a 'generalisation'? Isn't that banned on here?

polypostwonder · 05/06/2026 19:50

'Paul Takes the Form of a Mortal Girl' by Andrea Lawlor was recommended by a lesbian friend in the US maybe 10 years ago. It was unique, and a somewhat entertaining very queer story about someone who can change sex at will.

polypostwonder · 05/06/2026 19:35

ElenOfTheWays · 05/06/2026 19:29

It's not about whether it's "acceptable" to change sex, it's whether it's possible - and it's not.

We all know gender critical people believe this.

I was answering in the context of the proposed scenario.

AskingQuestionsAllTheTime · 05/06/2026 19:32

Morecoffeewanted · 04/06/2026 16:47

It never seems to work in the Science fiction i read. They still feel like the same people with the same attitudes. Rather like tourists or dressups.

oooooh..... Try Lois McMaster Bujold. In one of her subsidiary worlds, Beta Colony, they are able to perform actual sex-change operations, and one of the characters in one of her books (A Civil Campaign) goes for becoming male in order to keep a truly horrible man from inheriting the estate she's been looking after for decades for her brother. She is successful; he (as he then is) finds being male to be very different from being female in all sorts of ways, not just sexual ones. He remembers his life before he existed (as it were) and makes comparisons. He is both the same person and someone quite, quite different.

But it is not supposed to be real, is it. That's the difference between fiction and fact. If someone cannot tell which is which and invents a fictitious "life" for himself, he is quite likely to be suffering from Walter Mitty syndrome.

ElenOfTheWays · 05/06/2026 19:29

polypostwonder · 05/06/2026 19:08

I didn't vote. History and lived experience doesn't matter to gender critical people, unless it does.

The only 'acceptable' point in life to 'change sex' would be in the womb, before birth. Most people would object because we have ethics. So, there is never an acceptable point where a person can change sex.

It's not about whether it's "acceptable" to change sex, it's whether it's possible - and it's not.

polypostwonder · 05/06/2026 19:08

I didn't vote. History and lived experience doesn't matter to gender critical people, unless it does.

The only 'acceptable' point in life to 'change sex' would be in the womb, before birth. Most people would object because we have ethics. So, there is never an acceptable point where a person can change sex.

RedToothBrush · 05/06/2026 18:40

aberamagold · 05/06/2026 16:59

So imagine some miraculous Star Trek far future, where you can go through a transporter thing that breaks your body down, then rewrites your dna and reassembles your body into a body of the opposite sex. In that case, you would henceforth BE the opposite sex, regardless of your previous history. Of course such a woman should be legally recognised as a woman, and allowed into women's spaces.

It's not your experiences that make you a woman, it's your body. At the moment it is totally impossible to turn a man's body into a woman's body, and there is no prospect whatsoever that it will ever be possible. Extreme cosmetic body modifications that make some men resemble women don't change their sex.

Your previous history would still exist in this scenario. Your learned experiences in your formative years would still be male. You didn't go through having your first period when you were a teen at school like the other girls - your ability to cope emotionally and physically would therefore be a man who had changed to a woman not a woman's still! Likewise your identity is tied up a lot in relational identity - I've talked about this a lot - your identity is formed by stuff like being the eldest daughter or a sister etc. The expectations others have of you are formed by this. If you experience sexual abuse at a young age that is going to shape your confidence - growing up as a little boy the risk of this is fundamentally different and again that may affect how your parents treat you compared to if you had been born a girl.

So the magic wand, really needs to also change your history and lived experience as well as your body.

We know it matters.

GallantKumquat · 05/06/2026 18:20

aberamagold · 05/06/2026 16:59

So imagine some miraculous Star Trek far future, where you can go through a transporter thing that breaks your body down, then rewrites your dna and reassembles your body into a body of the opposite sex. In that case, you would henceforth BE the opposite sex, regardless of your previous history. Of course such a woman should be legally recognised as a woman, and allowed into women's spaces.

It's not your experiences that make you a woman, it's your body. At the moment it is totally impossible to turn a man's body into a woman's body, and there is no prospect whatsoever that it will ever be possible. Extreme cosmetic body modifications that make some men resemble women don't change their sex.

Continuing the thought experiment though - being female isn't just a state of chromosomes. It is the result of a developmental process conditioned by your chromosomes. The development process (gestation and childhood development) includes the brain, skeleton, musculature - indeed every tissue in the human body. What the technology would need to do, at a minimum, is to rerun that develop process, i.e. create a brand new person, with among other things, a new brain.

ElenOfTheWays · 05/06/2026 17:06

aberamagold · 05/06/2026 16:59

So imagine some miraculous Star Trek far future, where you can go through a transporter thing that breaks your body down, then rewrites your dna and reassembles your body into a body of the opposite sex. In that case, you would henceforth BE the opposite sex, regardless of your previous history. Of course such a woman should be legally recognised as a woman, and allowed into women's spaces.

It's not your experiences that make you a woman, it's your body. At the moment it is totally impossible to turn a man's body into a woman's body, and there is no prospect whatsoever that it will ever be possible. Extreme cosmetic body modifications that make some men resemble women don't change their sex.

Then you would genuinely have a "man in a woman's body"
i.e. A woman with a male (socialised) brain.

Freaky!

And of course, the opposite could also be true.

aberamagold · 05/06/2026 16:59

ByTheRiverside · 04/06/2026 16:48

I did wonder this.

It feels hard to say that they could truly ever change sex if they would have the same history. Women cannot have the history of men, so how can a man retain his experiences as a man without retaining their manhood in some way?

So imagine some miraculous Star Trek far future, where you can go through a transporter thing that breaks your body down, then rewrites your dna and reassembles your body into a body of the opposite sex. In that case, you would henceforth BE the opposite sex, regardless of your previous history. Of course such a woman should be legally recognised as a woman, and allowed into women's spaces.

It's not your experiences that make you a woman, it's your body. At the moment it is totally impossible to turn a man's body into a woman's body, and there is no prospect whatsoever that it will ever be possible. Extreme cosmetic body modifications that make some men resemble women don't change their sex.

InconvenientlyMaterial · 05/06/2026 13:35

LittleMissViper · 05/06/2026 11:17

So the premise is that if you can easily reconfigure your genetics and physical form to completely switch sex, should this be legally permitted?

If we have the technology available to do that, the same breakthrough would also mean the door is not only unlocked for changing any existing physical characteristics, but also growing entirely new body features.

Once that technological genie is out of the bottle, enough money will get you the chance to have whatever body you can envisage - there'll be at least one place in the world that is happy to take your money. Some of the bodies created this way will even be life sustaining.

The lawmakers across the globe will then frantically try to work out whether legal limits can and should be applied to any and all excessive or creative anatomic traits. Current society will cease to function, when someone can walk through the door a typical human, and walk out of the door an unrecognisable monstrosity that can overpower and outthink anyone who objects.

So, frankly, someone deciding to simply swap sex will be the least of concerns.

Great points

I'm guessing that two main features of our society will remain

  1. as mentioned by PP, rich people will get choices, poor people will get used

  2. some men will twist shit around to be able to rape children easier

nicepotoftea · 05/06/2026 13:24

Coatsoff42 · 05/06/2026 12:13

Yes, I think people are assuming the surround sound/micronutrition/hormonal rollercoaster/day and night biological feedback the embryo gets from its mother is replicable. It’s probably key in developing the foetus to be exposed to so much fluctuating information on being human.

I always think of that poor woman who died in America and they kept her alive for her baby, and wonder how her baby is doing. I don’t think it’s well.

If we were on track to solve these problems there wouldn't be so many unexplained miscarriages

Slightyamusedandsilly · 05/06/2026 13:20

CassOle · 05/06/2026 12:43

We do police those things though.

For example, age limits, such as being over a certain age, before you can get a tattoo.

An important age limit is the age of consent regarding sexual activity. You can't consent to being choked to death.

Even plastic surgery has limits. For example, regarding transplants, you can't just have any old donor, you need the right donor who is a match to the recipient. Maybe you were thinking of cosmetic surgery, but even then, there are regulations.

The eunuch maker was jailed.

The man who consented to being killed and eaten gave consent, but this didn't stop his killer from being jailed.

Yeah, age of course. I get that.

CassOle · 05/06/2026 12:43

Slightyamusedandsilly · 05/06/2026 11:15

Society can't and shouldn't police what people do with their bodies. Someone enforcing something on someone else's body is wrong of course.

Tattoos
Body modifications
Scarification
Plastic surgery
The type of sex we have
Who we allow to have access to our body

We are all entitled to autonomy with what we do with our own body.

We do police those things though.

For example, age limits, such as being over a certain age, before you can get a tattoo.

An important age limit is the age of consent regarding sexual activity. You can't consent to being choked to death.

Even plastic surgery has limits. For example, regarding transplants, you can't just have any old donor, you need the right donor who is a match to the recipient. Maybe you were thinking of cosmetic surgery, but even then, there are regulations.

The eunuch maker was jailed.

The man who consented to being killed and eaten gave consent, but this didn't stop his killer from being jailed.

Coatsoff42 · 05/06/2026 12:13

FlirtsWithRhinos · 05/06/2026 11:13

I'm really not certain of that at all.

I don't believe we will be able to replicate the feedback between foetus and mother whereby the mother's body adjusts the conditions for the foetus.

We have a terrible track record of thinking we can artificially replicate a natural process but failing to recognise juat how complex it is. Look at the mess we made with UPFs by not understanding how much we need from food other than calories, and that's way simpler than building a baby.

Yes, I think people are assuming the surround sound/micronutrition/hormonal rollercoaster/day and night biological feedback the embryo gets from its mother is replicable. It’s probably key in developing the foetus to be exposed to so much fluctuating information on being human.

I always think of that poor woman who died in America and they kept her alive for her baby, and wonder how her baby is doing. I don’t think it’s well.

Chimneyissues · 05/06/2026 12:12

Slightyamusedandsilly · 05/06/2026 11:15

Society can't and shouldn't police what people do with their bodies. Someone enforcing something on someone else's body is wrong of course.

Tattoos
Body modifications
Scarification
Plastic surgery
The type of sex we have
Who we allow to have access to our body

We are all entitled to autonomy with what we do with our own body.

Most of things individuals are paying for though, should an NHS which is struggling be paying for plastic surgery for men who want to look more feminine.
What about the secondary costs of women taking testosterone- I know a lot of the cost of the NHS is fixing peoples choices, but to pay for those choices and then the fallout is another thing.

Helleofabore · 05/06/2026 11:53

ArabellaScott · 05/06/2026 07:51

Yeah, it would require time travel as well as the transmutation thing.

Exactly.

RedToothBrush · 05/06/2026 11:40

LittleMissViper · 05/06/2026 11:17

So the premise is that if you can easily reconfigure your genetics and physical form to completely switch sex, should this be legally permitted?

If we have the technology available to do that, the same breakthrough would also mean the door is not only unlocked for changing any existing physical characteristics, but also growing entirely new body features.

Once that technological genie is out of the bottle, enough money will get you the chance to have whatever body you can envisage - there'll be at least one place in the world that is happy to take your money. Some of the bodies created this way will even be life sustaining.

The lawmakers across the globe will then frantically try to work out whether legal limits can and should be applied to any and all excessive or creative anatomic traits. Current society will cease to function, when someone can walk through the door a typical human, and walk out of the door an unrecognisable monstrosity that can overpower and outthink anyone who objects.

So, frankly, someone deciding to simply swap sex will be the least of concerns.

Who will have access to changing sex?

Clue: it won't be poor people.

GallantKumquat · 05/06/2026 11:38

Interestingly Helen Joyce addresses this idea in her book Trans.

In our computerised age, mind is imagined as software running on the brain’s hardware. Unsurprisingly, this idea has an intuitive appeal for those who believe that a true self may be housed in a body of the wrong sex. Transwoman Martine Rothblatt, a billionaire biotech entrepreneur and author of From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto on the Freedom of Form, takes it further, arguing that transhumanism, a loose movement that seeks to conquer death, is a natural extension of gender-identity ideology.

She goes into the philosophical aspects in some depth, eventually rejecting the idea that femaleness can be divided into mind and body and the assertion that

if the mind is female, the body male and that of the body can be modified somehow to be female that the resulting person is then a human female in all (or even most) respects.

That doesn't really answer the question about whether a theoretical 'enhanced' sex change should be made illegal, but it does mean that it's still irrelevant to the discussion of trans rights and the rights of women..

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 05/06/2026 11:30

LittleMissViper · 05/06/2026 11:17

So the premise is that if you can easily reconfigure your genetics and physical form to completely switch sex, should this be legally permitted?

If we have the technology available to do that, the same breakthrough would also mean the door is not only unlocked for changing any existing physical characteristics, but also growing entirely new body features.

Once that technological genie is out of the bottle, enough money will get you the chance to have whatever body you can envisage - there'll be at least one place in the world that is happy to take your money. Some of the bodies created this way will even be life sustaining.

The lawmakers across the globe will then frantically try to work out whether legal limits can and should be applied to any and all excessive or creative anatomic traits. Current society will cease to function, when someone can walk through the door a typical human, and walk out of the door an unrecognisable monstrosity that can overpower and outthink anyone who objects.

So, frankly, someone deciding to simply swap sex will be the least of concerns.

very good points, the value of thought experiments like this

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 05/06/2026 11:29

FlirtsWithRhinos · 05/06/2026 11:13

I'm really not certain of that at all.

I don't believe we will be able to replicate the feedback between foetus and mother whereby the mother's body adjusts the conditions for the foetus.

We have a terrible track record of thinking we can artificially replicate a natural process but failing to recognise juat how complex it is. Look at the mess we made with UPFs by not understanding how much we need from food other than calories, and that's way simpler than building a baby.

I should have been less general, I didn't mean 2 years I meant 10 approx, I assume there is already a lot of money in it and probably some religious right money as well (unlike their money in UK TERFing...) medical stuff is on an exponential curve, not quite like tech but certainly improving and unlike a huge amount of AI, there is a market and money for it. We shall see

It is of course, very very very complex and I expect mistakes to be made along the way

Swipe left for the next trending thread