Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Talk
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Feminism: chat

Original poster

Stella Creasy

132 replies

Arran2024 · 03/06/2026 22:58

Stella Creasy has been posting on X about using archaic process to overturned the EHRC guidelines and publicly arguing with the likes of Akua Reindorf KC. She is being given a pretty hard time but not backing down. Why does she want this so badly?!

https://x.com/stellacreasy/status/2062174750235845041?s=20

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
HolyMonthof · 03/06/2026 23:34

What is her motivation. I just don't get it. That video made me think of Helen Webberly

Hedgehogforshort · 03/06/2026 23:30

there is an excellent book written by the secret barrister that scrutinises how politicians pretend to not understand the law, and pass laws that are not really needed.

Baileyonice · 03/06/2026 23:29

Arran2024 · 03/06/2026 22:58

Stella Creasy has been posting on X about using archaic process to overturned the EHRC guidelines and publicly arguing with the likes of Akua Reindorf KC. She is being given a pretty hard time but not backing down. Why does she want this so badly?!

https://x.com/stellacreasy/status/2062174750235845041?s=20

Because scrutiny & debate aren't being applied here which as she says are fundamental pillars of the UK parliamentary process designed to hold the government to account, ensure transparency and improve proposed legislation.

KnottyAuty · 03/06/2026 23:20

Oh good grief I just watched the video above!

Shes spent 16 years refusing to sign any Early Day Motions but shes decided to pop her cherry being a sponsor to an EDM hoping to destroy women’s rights?!

[slow hand clap] 👏🏻

BunfightBetty · 03/06/2026 23:19

Stella has been an abysmal disappointment on preserving women's single sex spaces.

All the banging on about being a feminist, and then to fight tooth and nail to get dick into women's spaces.

She's an absolute disgrace.

KnottyAuty · 03/06/2026 23:17

I was wondering the same - baffling - didnt she benefit from an all woman short list when she became an MP?

Imagine if she’d been edged out of that list by a TIM back then and had ended up on a totally different career path?

Hedgehogforshort · 03/06/2026 23:15

It is such a strange thing that politicians do not, more often than not, understand LAW.

As we all on here know, the ECHR guidance is not the law. The FWS Supreme Court ruling is the law, and even if the guidance was not passed into a statutory code, it would make no difference

So i can safely conclude that she is talking a load of bollocks