Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

James Murray on R4 just now - TWANW

139 replies

FlossieF · 01/06/2026 08:31

New health secretary asked if he thinks TWAW- said he has changed his mind about this (as per Wes S) and supports single sex spaces on the basis of biological sex. As well he should, but still good to hear.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Thread gallery
5
Emilesgran · 01/06/2026 20:58

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 01/06/2026 15:33

Thinking with their "career prospects" not their brains. Gets you every time!

I suppose it's a change from what many men usually use to think with!

CraftandGlamour · 01/06/2026 20:22

SwirlyGates · 01/06/2026 10:53

Well yes, there are deluded people who believe in a myriad of untrue things. But I wasn't referring to the mentally unwell.

WarriorN · 01/06/2026 17:57

UtopiaPlanitia · 01/06/2026 17:20

All the Labour politicians asked about this always cite the Supreme Court ruling as their moment of epiphany 🙄 They're all such 'rules lawyers' that apparently they need the SC to explain biology to them.

I think it’s fucking appalling that they’ve had to rely on lawyers rather than the basic scientific / biological facts that every farmer knows.

Proof positive that the patriarchy really does exist.

UtopiaPlanitia · 01/06/2026 17:34

BendoftheBeginning · 01/06/2026 17:28

So there’s this thing called party discipline, all the parties tend to follow it unless they’re on one of their recently frequent leadership meltdowns. (God I hate that particular outcome of Cameron’s referendum!)

Edited

If party discipline means deliberately lying to the electorate then I prefer outspoken backbenchers and independents who tell you what they're really thinking.

Cameron & co were not good for the UK's political landscape, it feels like we'll be cleaning up their mess for decades to come.

Heggettypeg · 01/06/2026 17:30

KnottyAuty · 01/06/2026 10:54

What excellent news!

He’s a politician so no doubt there is advantage in him saying this - but to say it now is quite unexpected and fabulous.

Especially as there are MPs who will now start campaigning to have the EA changed to match Australia’s situation…. I think we may soon have a lot to thank Sal Grover for. If not for her case many MPs might be unaware of the implications which are now being played out in Oz and which they’ll have no desire to be caught up in prior to the next UK General Election.

My question is what is happening behind the scenes in Westminster that has allowed this shift?

The Health Minister publicly saying he’s changed his mind and MPs now accepting the EHRC Guidance - maybe the year of procrastination and recent enslaught of negative court cases/tribunals/publicity has got us to the tipping point?

What has changed in the last few weeks in the unions and Labour Party to get us here when they were all previously no debate. Even my rabid TWAW MP seems to be softening (only slightly) their messaging on this… when only in April they were still hard line…?

Edited

Was it the May 7 local/Welsh/Scottish election results that did it?

BendoftheBeginning · 01/06/2026 17:28

UtopiaPlanitia · 01/06/2026 17:20

All the Labour politicians asked about this always cite the Supreme Court ruling as their moment of epiphany 🙄 They're all such 'rules lawyers' that apparently they need the SC to explain biology to them.

So there’s this thing called party discipline, all the parties tend to follow it unless they’re on one of their recently frequent leadership meltdowns. (God I hate that particular outcome of Cameron’s referendum!)

UtopiaPlanitia · 01/06/2026 17:20

allthingsinmoderation · 01/06/2026 15:22

Did he explain why he changed his mind on this matter?

All the Labour politicians asked about this always cite the Supreme Court ruling as their moment of epiphany 🙄 They're all such 'rules lawyers' that apparently they need the SC to explain biology to them.

WarriorN · 01/06/2026 17:14

PrettyDamnCosmic · 01/06/2026 16:21

Are we going to have to shuffle every Labour MP into the health sex role to get them all to say this ffs?!

It will be interesting to hear the answer of junior health minister Stephen Kinnock the Minister of State for Care when he is asked the question. His daughter Camilla has had her breasts removed & now answers to the name of Milo.

Edited

It would be interesting and it’s likely that that has been a big issue for Labour.

(that was supposed to say health Sec!)

Neversofaraway · 01/06/2026 16:32

On World at One, there was an item about trade union members now supporting Reform. Paul Nowak, General Secretary of TUC banged on about "not getting message across" and was asked about Durham council, now Reform, not funding the Pride march and trade unions stepping in. His reply showed how completely out of touch the unions are with the general public by saying that it is OK for councils amd unions to fund such events.
Also no mention of asking their members why they might support Reform.

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 01/06/2026 16:24

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

PrettyDamnCosmic · 01/06/2026 16:21

WarriorN · 01/06/2026 16:05

Are we going to have to shuffle every Labour MP into the health sex role to get them all to say this ffs?!

Are we going to have to shuffle every Labour MP into the health sex role to get them all to say this ffs?!

It will be interesting to hear the answer of junior health minister Stephen Kinnock the Minister of State for Care when he is asked the question. His daughter Camilla has had her breasts removed & now answers to the name of Milo.

HenriettaSwanLeavitt · 01/06/2026 16:10

WarriorN · 01/06/2026 16:05

Are we going to have to shuffle every Labour MP into the health sex role to get them all to say this ffs?!

😂

WarriorN · 01/06/2026 16:05

Are we going to have to shuffle every Labour MP into the health sex role to get them all to say this ffs?!

AmaryllisNightAndDay · 01/06/2026 15:59

NotMyRealAccount · 01/06/2026 08:51

Agree. We need people in positions of power and influence to be saying this, even if we're inclined to dislike them or distrust their motives. I hope this is a considered statement and he's prepared to back it up with action to support the Supreme Court ruling.

It would be cruel to ask him exactly what it was that had caused him to changed his mind.

Cruel and as you rightly say counter-productive. But fun!

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 01/06/2026 15:33

Datun · 01/06/2026 15:26

This is what I mean. Claiming even once that transwomen are women just fucks anyone's credibility irreparably.

I find it shocking that anyone, least of all a politician could ever have done it.

Thinking with their "career prospects" not their brains. Gets you every time!

Datun · 01/06/2026 15:26

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 01/06/2026 15:17

So, they used to be women in 2022, but they are not women now? What happened? He "thought about it" a lot. So, he didn't think about it at all before?

Oh, not a good look, James. Not a good look at all.

This is what I mean. Claiming even once that transwomen are women just fucks anyone's credibility irreparably.

I find it shocking that anyone, least of all a politician could ever have done it.

allthingsinmoderation · 01/06/2026 15:22

Did he explain why he changed his mind on this matter?

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 01/06/2026 15:17

fromorbit · 01/06/2026 15:06

Mail and ITV now covering it. Great point from Seen in Journalism. The Health Sec only got confronted because people kept the receipts. Keep asking questions. Record what they say. It is important.

SEEN in Journalism
@JournalismSEEN
Don’t forget this question was asked today because of the long memories and receipts held by accounts on X who have assiduously documented politicians’ words on the issue, and raised the alarm within the hour
Quote
Daily Mail
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15864151/Labours-new-Health-Secretary-reverses-past-claim-trans-women-women-vows-protect-single-sex-spaces-NHS.html?

https://www.itv.com/news/london/2026-06-01/health-secretary-i-would-no-longer-say-trans-women-are-women

So, they used to be women in 2022, but they are not women now? What happened? He "thought about it" a lot. So, he didn't think about it at all before?

Oh, not a good look, James. Not a good look at all.

fromorbit · 01/06/2026 15:06

Mail and ITV now covering it. Great point from Seen in Journalism. The Health Sec only got confronted because people kept the receipts. Keep asking questions. Record what they say. It is important.

SEEN in Journalism
@JournalismSEEN
Don’t forget this question was asked today because of the long memories and receipts held by accounts on X who have assiduously documented politicians’ words on the issue, and raised the alarm within the hour
Quote
Daily Mail
https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15864151/Labours-new-Health-Secretary-reverses-past-claim-trans-women-women-vows-protect-single-sex-spaces-NHS.html?

https://www.itv.com/news/london/2026-06-01/health-secretary-i-would-no-longer-say-trans-women-are-women

Health Secretary reverses his past claim that 'trans women are women'

James Murray said he had thought 'in quite some detail' about his use of the phrase in the wake of a landmark Supreme Court ruling last year.

https://www.dailymail.com/news/article-15864151/Labours-new-Health-Secretary-reverses-past-claim-trans-women-women-vows-protect-single-sex-spaces-NHS.html

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 01/06/2026 15:04

I glad to hear him say it, my trust in politicians is not existent at this point, so I'm not going to fall over myself to prise him for stating the bloody obvious, but I'll give him points for saying it out loud.

Hopefully this means he's not going to reverse the ban on puberty blockers, but unless he manages to clear this GI claptrap from the health service, it's just all talk.
We'll be watching matey. 👀

Davros · 01/06/2026 14:41

BoreOfWhabylon · 01/06/2026 14:22

Well done to Justin Webb for continuing to ask the question. What an ally he is.

I do hope he gets the chance to ask Andy Burnham the same thing.

Incidentally, does anyone know if BBC Woman's Hour and the lovely Nuala had anything to say about this?

I didn’t hear anything but, apart from the Gisèle Pelicot item, I only half listened

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 01/06/2026 14:23

MyAmpleSheep · 01/06/2026 13:42

I need a TRA to arrive and explain to me. But there’s never one about when you need one.

Shall I spin around three times widdershins and snap my fingers?

Edited

Please don't!

BoreOfWhabylon · 01/06/2026 14:22

Well done to Justin Webb for continuing to ask the question. What an ally he is.

I do hope he gets the chance to ask Andy Burnham the same thing.

Incidentally, does anyone know if BBC Woman's Hour and the lovely Nuala had anything to say about this?

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 01/06/2026 14:07

BendoftheBeginning · 01/06/2026 13:56

No, you’re bang on. People are thinking the matter through. That doesn’t mean we’ve defeated misogyny (I wish!) but this particular line of attack is running out of steam.

The most important lesson for me from all this has been how easily people were deterred from thinking by hooking TWAW to homophobia and reactionary politics. It’s reminded me that piggybacking on other issues is a pretty standard aspect of misogyny, because a proportion of women can be counted in to budge up/self-sacrifice for the “greater good.” See also: “don’t have a job or expect equal pay for your work, think of all the children who need mothering and men who need looking after.”

The pendulum always swings, but the pressure on women never does.

Great point... must remembering the "piggybacking" (just filing a note in my head for a different thread).. Thanks!

BendoftheBeginning · 01/06/2026 13:56

thirdfiddle · 01/06/2026 13:22

We know from the ongoing opinion polls that the population are increasingly changing their minds in a GC direction. Why wouldn't this include politicians? They (politicians and general public) were coming from a perspective that organisations they trusted were manipulating them to not even listen properly to the arguments. For the general population, and I don't see why not for politicians too, when people start thinking properly about the questions, it all falls out. There's a whole "peaking" trope for the process.

Am I a hopeless optimist? The population in the opinion polls aren't lying for political advantage.

No, you’re bang on. People are thinking the matter through. That doesn’t mean we’ve defeated misogyny (I wish!) but this particular line of attack is running out of steam.

The most important lesson for me from all this has been how easily people were deterred from thinking by hooking TWAW to homophobia and reactionary politics. It’s reminded me that piggybacking on other issues is a pretty standard aspect of misogyny, because a proportion of women can be counted in to budge up/self-sacrifice for the “greater good.” See also: “don’t have a job or expect equal pay for your work, think of all the children who need mothering and men who need looking after.”

The pendulum always swings, but the pressure on women never does.