Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

HMRC gives trans people access to VIP hotline

181 replies

HannahinHampshire · 27/05/2026 18:29

‘HMRC gives trans people to VIP hotline’. Why do the records of transgender people require greater protection? I spent an hour waiting for HMRC to answer my call the other day and then I was cut off before I could speak to an advisor.

www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/cfbb2461a6f96ebf

OP posts:
DeepWinterSleep · 27/05/2026 19:05

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 27/05/2026 18:47

Yup, have read it now. This is a discrimination case waiting to be won. Anyone else who has a protected characteristic should be able to make a case, because they've issued this new edict on the basis of trans people's "gender reassignment" status. Which is favoring one protected characteristic over another.

What would be really interesting, is for someone who doesn't have a GRC to try to sue HMRC for discrimination. Would possibly start to hash out in law, what does "gender reassignment " actually mean?

Nonsense. It's perfectly permissible to "favour" a protected characteristic if it's a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim, as you should already know since that's precisely the basis on which service providers can provide women-only services without it being discriminatory. Trans people's data is dealt with in a particular way to protect their privacy, this is nothing new it's been this way for years, and it's perfectly legitimate to direct them straight to the service that can deal with them. It helps no one if trans people have to call into the main service only to be told they can't be helped and forwarded on - that's taking a space in the queue and an agent away from other people they could be helping. It's also not unusual at all for big contact centres to give out different numbers for different services, it helps them monitor traffic and filter calls, and it most certainly isn't "discrimination" if some services have a shorter wait time than others.

This entire article is just rage bait aimed at the sort of people who'll start fuming about anything that has "trans" in the headline, if you want to waste your cortisol getting pissed off about it when it doesn't affect you in the tiniest bit, more fool you.

BernardBlacksMolluscs · 27/05/2026 18:54

That is a very shit stirring article from The Telegraph. Frankly anyone who has to phone HMRC is about to enter the fifth circle of hell anyway, regardless of what number they’re calling.

still, it’s hard to understand the confidentiality rationale HMRC are putting forward:

HMRC insisted the policy was necessary because the records of transgender people required “greater protection” to ensure confidentiality under equality laws.

a person’s trans status will certainly not be a secret, not least because they’ll never stop bloody going on about it, but also because people have eyes. I met two trans people yesterday. One was indisputably a man despite his fake boobs and breathy voice and the other a woman despite her beard and plaid shirt.

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 27/05/2026 18:47

Yup, have read it now. This is a discrimination case waiting to be won. Anyone else who has a protected characteristic should be able to make a case, because they've issued this new edict on the basis of trans people's "gender reassignment" status. Which is favoring one protected characteristic over another.

What would be really interesting, is for someone who doesn't have a GRC to try to sue HMRC for discrimination. Would possibly start to hash out in law, what does "gender reassignment " actually mean?

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 27/05/2026 18:41

Window dressing, I would imagine. Because HMRC must now start following the law, they have give the activists something, so they don't turn up with a piss protest.

Bavariamaria · 27/05/2026 18:33

Fucking hell. That is bloody ridiculous.

Shedmistress · 27/05/2026 18:31

Gosh all these holiness, wonder if it is the same dept as the DBS trans hotline who've had to be given a bit more work to do as they've never had one bloody call?