Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Sunderland Minster refusing to comply with Supreme Court ruling

439 replies

labtest57 · 26/05/2026 22:21

This is from their Facebook page today. No consideration for the women who do not want men in their spaces.

Sunderland Minster refusing to comply with Supreme Court ruling
OP posts:
Thread gallery
31
Supporterofwomensrights · 27/05/2026 23:57

Expressing much love and thanks to Martina! 💗

MarieDeGournay · 27/05/2026 23:52

Distractable · 27/05/2026 19:10

Perhaps they deleted because now Martina has tweeted about it! https://x.com/Martina/status/2059690478069600347

Whaaat? Actual Martina Navratilova? Wow!
Maybe she'd like to come and post on this threadGrin

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 27/05/2026 20:18

It very simple, although I expect a lot of people will continue to argue that it's complicated. Just obey the law. The rest of us have to.

SexRealistic · 27/05/2026 20:11

DialSquare · 27/05/2026 19:44

Yep. They seemed so proud of themselves until the backlash.

Well it wasn’t a backlash yet - I imagine that’s to come. When the legal impact bears down they’ll catch a grip.

They probably heard a bit of noise outside their usual echo chamber and took a wobble.

loislovesstewie · 27/05/2026 20:05

Oh damn! My bon mots have been binned! Was it something I said Sunderland Minster?

Mmmnotsure · 27/05/2026 19:56

DialSquare · 27/05/2026 19:44

Yep. They seemed so proud of themselves until the backlash.

They are clearly the righteous ones. And they themselves thanked so many people who commented agreeing with them.

It's all a bit brave Sir Robin.

DialSquare · 27/05/2026 19:44

SexRealistic · 27/05/2026 19:39

So sure so strong so righteous!

Until facts & law kick in.

Yep. They seemed so proud of themselves until the backlash.

BridgetPhillipsonIsACowardlyJobsworth · 27/05/2026 19:42

Yes, you'd think if she really believed in this action, she'd be prepared to defend it! I sincerely hope that she, as a Christian canon, doesn't hold her Christian views as lightly.

SexRealistic · 27/05/2026 19:39

Distractable · 27/05/2026 19:07

They've completely deleted the post on FB now https://www.facebook.com/sunderlandminster

So sure so strong so righteous!

Until facts & law kick in.

HappilyHarriet · 27/05/2026 19:29

Distractable · 27/05/2026 19:10

Perhaps they deleted because now Martina has tweeted about it! https://x.com/Martina/status/2059690478069600347

Great work you dreadful middle aged women!! That’s at least one person who has just been peaked by the great Martina herself!

WarriorN · 27/05/2026 19:27

I don’t know if this image has been shared yet?

Sunderland Minster refusing to comply with Supreme Court ruling
SexRealistic · 27/05/2026 19:19

WarriorN · 27/05/2026 19:18

Brilliant!

All three terven groups in the NE have at least 1 person someone writing that I know of.

Delighted to hear that.

Well done the Terven.

SexRealistic · 27/05/2026 19:18

POWNewcastleEastWallsend · 27/05/2026 18:58

LWS North East are on to it - I'll pass on your template letter 🙏 xx

Glad to hear it. Anything else you need let me know.

I would really like a copy of their insurance certificates.

Until the risk passes to people for their actions we will see more and more of this.

WarriorN · 27/05/2026 19:18

Distractable · 27/05/2026 19:10

Perhaps they deleted because now Martina has tweeted about it! https://x.com/Martina/status/2059690478069600347

Brilliant!

All three terven groups in the NE have at least 1 person someone writing that I know of.

RhannionKPSS · 27/05/2026 19:12

😂

POWNewcastleEastWallsend · 27/05/2026 18:58

SexRealistic · 27/05/2026 13:19

Here you go

Draft Complaint Letter
[Your Full Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]
[Date]
The Directors / PCC / Relevant Authority
Sunderland Minster
[Full Address of Sunderland Minster – e.g., via their website or public records]
CC:

  • Diocese of Durham (Bishop and relevant safeguarding/ legal officers)
  • Employers’ Liability and Public Liability Insurers (if known, or request details)
  • Health and Safety Executive (HSE)
  • Charity Commission (if applicable as a registered charity)
Subject: Formal Complaint – Non-Compliance with Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992, Equality Act 2010 Implications, Safeguarding Failures, and Insurance Invalidity at Sunderland Minster Dear Sir/Madam, I am writing to formally complain about Sunderland Minster’s public position and practices regarding single-sex toilets and related policies, which appear to place the organisation, its directors/PCC members, staff, volunteers, and the wider Diocese in breach of legal obligations. 1. Breach of Workplace (Health, Safety and Welfare) Regulations 1992 Following the High Court judgment in Good Law Project v EHRC (and related clarification of the law post-For Women Scotland), it is clear that Regulation 20 of the 1992 Workplace Regulations requires suitable and sufficient sanitary conveniences, with separate rooms for men and women (based on biological sex), unless each convenience is in a separate lockable room for single occupancy.2327 Sunderland Minster has publicly posted a notice acknowledging a breach of these regulations by failing to provide single-sex toilets based on biological sex. You have also publicly stated your intention to continue permitting biological males (trans women) to use female facilities. This directly contravenes the requirement for single-sex provision “for reasons of conventional decency” and privacy.2 2. Public Intention to Breach the Law and Insurance Implications Your organisation is on record stating that it intends to continue this policy despite the clarified legal position. A deliberate and public intention to breach statutory health and safety regulations is likely to invalidate both employers’ liability insurance and public liability insurance. This exposes directors/PCC members personally, as well as the organisation, to significant financial and legal risk in the event of any incident, claim, or regulatory action. I request full details of your current insurance policies and confirmation that insurers have been notified of this stated position. 3. Website and Policy Non-Compliance Your website and public materials appear to lack appropriate, up-to-date policies compliant with current equality and health & safety law. In particular, there is a concerning absence of clear, lawful safeguarding policies that reflect the legal position on single-sex spaces. This falls short of expected standards for an organisation open to the public, including families and children. 4. Safeguarding and Child Protection Concerns Your public statement invites teenage girls (and other women) who feel uncomfortable to ask clergy or volunteers (unknown adults) to accompany them to the toilets and wait outside the stall. This involves unknown or minimally vetted adults being alone with or in close proximity to children in a state of undress in a supervisory capacity.2 This raises serious safeguarding issues, including:
  • Potential lack of DBS checks, specific training, or insurance for such supervision.
  • Risk of distress, inappropriate interaction, or safeguarding breaches.
  • Failure to prioritise the dignity, privacy, and safety of girls and women.
Such practices have direct implications for the personal liability of directors/PCC members (“Friends of the Sunderland Minster” or equivalent) and potential reputational and legal exposure for the Diocese of Durham. I urge you to immediately:
  1. Revert to full compliance with the 1992 Workplace Regulations by providing single-sex toilet facilities based on biological sex (or adequate single-occupancy alternatives).
  2. Remove or correct the non-compliant notice and public statements.
  3. Review and update all policies, including safeguarding, equality, and health & safety, to ensure legal compliance.
  4. Notify insurers and conduct a full risk assessment.
  5. Engage with the Diocese for oversight and support.
I reserve the right to escalate this matter to the HSE, Charity Commission, relevant regulators, and/or pursue other legal remedies if not addressed promptly. I look forward to your full response within 14 days, including details of steps taken to achieve compliance. Yours faithfully, [Your Full Name]

Send to the people linked above including Directors and Diocese emails. Also safeguarding lead.

  • Customise with your details and any specific evidence (e.g., screenshots of the notice/Facebook post).
  • Consider sending via recorded delivery/email with read receipts.
  • If you are a regular attendee, parent, or local resident, mention your legitimate interest.

Is there is WRN group or similar who could coordinate?

LWS North East are on to it - I'll pass on your template letter 🙏 xx

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 27/05/2026 16:36

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

WarriorN · 27/05/2026 16:22

N’er fear; they’ve discovered the recommendation button on fb 😁

Sunderland Minster refusing to comply with Supreme Court ruling
FarriersGirl · 27/05/2026 15:49

OMG I have enjoyed this thread. Growing up in an 'ecclesiastical' home I can honestly say that the deeply sexist culture of the church and its naivety on safeguarding primed me to become an atheist feminist a bit later in life. So many people within it are well meaning but blinkered to the harms that religion causes.

Mmmnotsure · 27/05/2026 15:40

murasaki · 27/05/2026 15:37

When they won't see reason, the only way to prove how silly this is is to take the piss....

I'm imagining it like a really bad relay race at a primary school.

That missing laughter emoji again.

Along with lots of little children needing the toilet NOW, Miss.

They can’t risk little girls going into the toilet on their own thinking it’s the ladies when there might be a biological male
in there, surely, can they?

I hope they have lots of volunteers.

Popdropper · 27/05/2026 15:38

murasaki · 27/05/2026 15:37

When they won't see reason, the only way to prove how silly this is is to take the piss....

I'm imagining it like a really bad relay race at a primary school.

You have no idea how much this appeals to my (admittedly puerile) sense of humour Smile

murasaki · 27/05/2026 15:37

When they won't see reason, the only way to prove how silly this is is to take the piss....

I'm imagining it like a really bad relay race at a primary school.

Popdropper · 27/05/2026 15:36

murasaki · 27/05/2026 15:30

It needs a test run, like man Friday, but just women, all needing the loo in 5 minute intervals.

Ooh, we could have a MN day out! Grin