Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

How do you handle gender identity disagreements within a long-standing social group?

205 replies

GuinevereOfTheRoyalCourt · 25/05/2026 14:55

I am very firmly of the opinion that no child can be 'transgender', and that instead we should just embrace the fact that some are gender non-conforming and allow them to express themselves however they choose. I view the use of puberty blockers, x-sex hormones and 'gender-affirming' surgery on children as immoral.

I have participated in a club (my hobby) for many years which mostly includes middle-aged women of a similar age with teenage children. I have been aware for some time (at least 4 years) that one of the women probably had a trans child because of snippets of conversations that I've overheard and generic WhatsApp posts about trans rights.

Anyway, during a recent social gathering - one of the other ladies enquired about the child and it was clear that they have been transitioned for some time but are still only mid-teens. The mother of this child (who I've always got on with well in a superficial small-talk way) is clearly of a very similar mindset to Susie Green. I was quite horrified about what she was saying, but I sat in complete silence. All the other ladies were being really sympathetic and supportive.

This has really played on my mind. I hate confrontations and I really don't want to have any fallings out as this club is really important to me. However, I feel terrible that no other opinion was being expressed and that my silence effectively makes me complicit in the harm of a child.

How do other people deal with this sort of situation? I can't help feeling that most people don't even give much thought to this issue (hence the supportive voices from everyone else) and that we'll only stop this happening if they get to hear the 'other side'. But how can that happen if people like me feel too afraid to speak up?

OP posts:
Corvidsarethebest · 29/05/2026 12:22

Baileyonice · 29/05/2026 06:34

That's a fair enough critique when it comes to simple straightforward issues but its not regression to accept one's limitations when it comes to professional expertise particularly on highly complex specialised matters like medical health issues. See vaccines as well as gender affirming care.

There's a humility that's been replaced by unwarranted arrogance & I suspect a great deal of that is based on increased political polarisation where expertise gets in the way. People's 'advice' is highly influenced by their personal biases normalising misinformation & disinformation Any layman giving 'challenging' 'advice' comes with a red flag these days & that's all the reason to avoid it.

I agree with this. People seem to have ridiculously firm views on all types of expertise these days that in the past would have been the province of the doctor treating them or the lawyer advising them. People knew what they didn't know, and perhaps there was too much deference, but they didn't constantly opine on how best to do things, even when we couldn't possibly really know, as no fantastic scientific evidence exists around, say, gendered care or trans. We don't know, we are best guessing, some people best guessed one way, some best guessed another, and slowly but surely some evidence is being built (though that has its problems, ethically, to expose people to treatments that may harm them).

If I were a parent in this situation, I'd be joining talk groups of parents that had been through it, and charities that are set up to support parents, preferably from a range of viewpoints.

I wouldn't want every single person I knew to pile in and tell me their views on trans.

It's like when someone gets cancer, everyone weighs in with their fantastic suggestions (have you thought of running marathons/visualisation/travelling to far distant land to get surgery irrelevant for you/reading about treatments you can't have for various reasons?)

If people ask for advice from you give it. If it's just opinions you feel the need to express, just express them somewhere where it won't cause emotional upset in the hearer, they have enough to worry about. The circle approach is excellent- the inner circle people express outward, and the outer people go outer still. Don't be an outer person trying to express something to an inner circle person who is directly affected.

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 29/05/2026 11:19

I think challenging the parent in this situation would be counterproductive. They will likely be very defensive and angry which will paint you as an aggressor and them as a victim.

if you want to stay in the group then I would just keep your thoughts to yourself.

Costatesco · 29/05/2026 10:04

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

QldGCandproud · 29/05/2026 08:32

Liznug · 25/05/2026 19:03

You would start arguing / debating with a parent about their child? No, I wouldn’t.

Added to which , an absolute waste of breath

Why are you replying on this board if you are just insulting everyone?

QldGCandproud · 29/05/2026 08:27

I think you are right be remain careful in a group that is valuable to you. You are unlikely to change any minds in that situation. I was thinking maybe to burn off steam you could channel those feelings into a letter to a local MP or some NGO or something to let them know they are supporting this nonsense... what's personal is political and all that 🌻

TheKeatingFive · 29/05/2026 08:13

Baileyonice · 28/05/2026 23:08

Depends on the discussion. It would for me if the discussion was about the exclusion of basic human rights for some.

Politics is down stream from personality so I doubt the so called 'friend' can actually truly function as one.

What basic human rights are being affected?

GargoylesofBeelzebub · 29/05/2026 07:52

Baileyonice · 28/05/2026 23:45

Identity is universally recognised as a foundational human right. Under international law, this right encompasses two core pillars: legal identity and personal/social identity.

So Rachel Dolezal is black right?

Baileyonice · 29/05/2026 06:34

ThePM · 29/05/2026 06:06

Agree that we have psychologically regressed.
Actually one of the reasons was when we as a society started to talk in parallel and expected uncritical validation.

We stopped learning how to challenge politely and in a way which maintains the relationship.

We stopped being curious about the motivations and deeper thoughts of others.

It isn’t that long ago that “I see it differently “ or “I don’t think I share your opinion on that” were fairly acceptable.

That's a fair enough critique when it comes to simple straightforward issues but its not regression to accept one's limitations when it comes to professional expertise particularly on highly complex specialised matters like medical health issues. See vaccines as well as gender affirming care.

There's a humility that's been replaced by unwarranted arrogance & I suspect a great deal of that is based on increased political polarisation where expertise gets in the way. People's 'advice' is highly influenced by their personal biases normalising misinformation & disinformation Any layman giving 'challenging' 'advice' comes with a red flag these days & that's all the reason to avoid it.

ThePM · 29/05/2026 06:06

BeKindWisely · 28/05/2026 08:11

No, I just want to be able to have conversations, sharing snd listening to different perspectives.

This. Yes.

This is what has been lost. This black and white, right or wrong, good or bad, approach is deeply, psychologically and socially unhealthy in current society.

It is as if we have psychologically regressed en mass.
How did this happen?

Mature functioning is in grappling with the complexities, and in recognising shared humanity despite differences of opinion.

I despair.

Agree that we have psychologically regressed.
Actually one of the reasons was when we as a society started to talk in parallel and expected uncritical validation.

We stopped learning how to challenge politely and in a way which maintains the relationship.

We stopped being curious about the motivations and deeper thoughts of others.

It isn’t that long ago that “I see it differently “ or “I don’t think I share your opinion on that” were fairly acceptable.

Eatenbysomefishes · 29/05/2026 05:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

halfpastten · 29/05/2026 01:31

thirdfiddle · 28/05/2026 11:26

Trans isn't special. I refuse to play along with this myth that you either agree with them 100% or hate them and want them to die. How are we going to dispel that if we treat doubt about the trans agenda as some kind of taboo that can't be mentioned in polite company? There's a middle ground between full blown debate and pretending you don't have concerns.

Agree with this. The topic needs to be normalised rather than polarised.

halfpastten · 29/05/2026 01:22

If the subject comes up I will share my views. But I don't start the topic. However I am still stunned by how uninformed and blinkered many people are, especially those who get their news from the Guardian or BBC. This week i was talking to an old friend who told me how her niece was transitioning ftm. And how much happier the niece seemed. So I talked to her about the impact of large doses of testosterone on young female bodies - from initial cocaine-like euphoria, to early menopause, osteoporosis and brain issues as well as hair/voice effects. And i recommended Hannah Barnes' book Time to Think. She was grateful for the information and maybe it will ripple through and do some good. Many of us, who've been in the Terf trenches, have become very knowledgeable about the practical issues around gender identity. Most people are clueless. I genuinely think we can do a lot of good if we impart this information sensitively in a timely manner.

Baileyonice · 28/05/2026 23:45

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/05/2026 23:42

Let’s chat about the “exclusion of basic human rights” - who and what do you mean?

Identity is universally recognised as a foundational human right. Under international law, this right encompasses two core pillars: legal identity and personal/social identity.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 28/05/2026 23:42

Baileyonice · 28/05/2026 23:08

Depends on the discussion. It would for me if the discussion was about the exclusion of basic human rights for some.

Politics is down stream from personality so I doubt the so called 'friend' can actually truly function as one.

Let’s chat about the “exclusion of basic human rights” - who and what do you mean?

AWeeCupOfTeaAndAnIndividualFruitTrifle · 28/05/2026 23:39

As for its being abusive, the thing is, presuming this started before any post-Cass changes, what the parent was doing was legal. I would regard it as similar to a parent using corporal punishment in areas where that is still legal.

But it wasn't something that was considered perfectly normal and fine for decades, if not centuries, but the tide has changed on public opinion about it... it would have been extremely obvious to most people throughout time that you were either male or female and that was that - and that something like this, even if it had been possible back then, was very clearly not a good or wise thing to do.

We don't have laws specifically banning people from doing things that people are not doing in the first place; the laws have to catch up and be brought in because people start doing bad and dangerous things - often only once new technology and scientific breakthroughs start making it possible for them to even consider doing so.

Baileyonice · 28/05/2026 23:24

GuinevereOfTheRoyalCourt · 25/05/2026 14:55

I am very firmly of the opinion that no child can be 'transgender', and that instead we should just embrace the fact that some are gender non-conforming and allow them to express themselves however they choose. I view the use of puberty blockers, x-sex hormones and 'gender-affirming' surgery on children as immoral.

I have participated in a club (my hobby) for many years which mostly includes middle-aged women of a similar age with teenage children. I have been aware for some time (at least 4 years) that one of the women probably had a trans child because of snippets of conversations that I've overheard and generic WhatsApp posts about trans rights.

Anyway, during a recent social gathering - one of the other ladies enquired about the child and it was clear that they have been transitioned for some time but are still only mid-teens. The mother of this child (who I've always got on with well in a superficial small-talk way) is clearly of a very similar mindset to Susie Green. I was quite horrified about what she was saying, but I sat in complete silence. All the other ladies were being really sympathetic and supportive.

This has really played on my mind. I hate confrontations and I really don't want to have any fallings out as this club is really important to me. However, I feel terrible that no other opinion was being expressed and that my silence effectively makes me complicit in the harm of a child.

How do other people deal with this sort of situation? I can't help feeling that most people don't even give much thought to this issue (hence the supportive voices from everyone else) and that we'll only stop this happening if they get to hear the 'other side'. But how can that happen if people like me feel too afraid to speak up?

I suspect many people forget issues are often complex, individual & as such require professional expertise rather than the arrogance of armchair 'experts'.

We live in a dangerous post truth age now where populist thinking has dangerously over reached its capabilities & is normalised as legitimate arbiter. That many are actually quite comfortable with the politicisation of health care rather than the domain of health professionals is indeed a worrying trend.

Baileyonice · 28/05/2026 23:08

Proberts90 · 27/05/2026 10:34

Ok your friendships could be destroyed by a disagreement over such issues

My close friendships wouldn’t be. Thirty years of support and love upended by a disagreement over a discussion? Nope

Depends on the discussion. It would for me if the discussion was about the exclusion of basic human rights for some.

Politics is down stream from personality so I doubt the so called 'friend' can actually truly function as one.

thirdfiddle · 28/05/2026 22:48

Expressing sympathy would be a good start at getting a GC pov across in a supportive way actually. In TRA world it's all yay let's celebrate. Sympathy is a normal reaction to a child going on heavy duty medication that could be for life, cause them to need surgeries etc.

Eatenbysomefishes · 28/05/2026 21:00

JohnnyMcGrathSaysFuckOff · 28/05/2026 20:31

I regard it as harmful to let children eat a lot of ultra-processed food or have a smartphone.

But I would never tell the mums in my group that if they were wanging on about their kids getting phones.

I'll talk about what I do with my child but not anyone else's.

As for its being abusive, the thing is, presuming this started before any post-Cass changes, what the parent was doing was legal. I would regard it as similar to a parent using corporal punishment in areas where that is still legal. I don't agree with it, but it was a legal parenting choice when they made it, and they don't need my views.

Nailed it

JohnnyMcGrathSaysFuckOff · 28/05/2026 20:31

I regard it as harmful to let children eat a lot of ultra-processed food or have a smartphone.

But I would never tell the mums in my group that if they were wanging on about their kids getting phones.

I'll talk about what I do with my child but not anyone else's.

As for its being abusive, the thing is, presuming this started before any post-Cass changes, what the parent was doing was legal. I would regard it as similar to a parent using corporal punishment in areas where that is still legal. I don't agree with it, but it was a legal parenting choice when they made it, and they don't need my views.

Paddingtonsmarmaladesandwich2 · 28/05/2026 19:53

Edenmum2 · 25/05/2026 17:21

I think you are overestimating how much difference your opinion would make

Yes and actually make people double down

Paddingtonsmarmaladesandwich2 · 28/05/2026 19:44

Strandas · 25/05/2026 15:06

Not every social interaction needs to be a learning experience. I have people in my social group who I don’t have the same views as. I don’t think my friends are idiots, or unable to do any research to different points of view, they are all intelligent adults who are entitled to an opinion, or not to voice an opinion if they so wish.

If someone is going through a hard time and others are expressing sympathy, sometimes that’s all it is. You don’t need to necessarily agree with something to realise that people can be affected by it and sometimes just need a ‘there, there, poor you’, rather than someone to try and solve their problems which is what the other women might be trying to do.

This

thirdfiddle · 28/05/2026 19:41

Again, trans isn't special. Just have a normal conversation. If you'd join in any other conversation they initiate about their families then there's no need to sit in dogged silence on this one. If this parent is really Susie-Green-esque they're going to say some things that seem very extreme to most people in the room. If they're actually more middle of the road then you probably have way more in common than you both think, and conversation will help both of you realise that.

To shake off the silly atmosphere around trans issues, think about how you might interact if they said they were training as a homeopathist, or converting to catholicism or Islam, or leaving their baby home alone while they pop to the shops, or whatever else you may feel strongly about. You wouldn't start a stand up row but you wouldn't hide that it worries you either.

Eatenbysomefishes · 28/05/2026 19:08

All sounds a bit sixth form common room chat to me from the OP

Corvidsarethebest · 28/05/2026 17:02

I would also say I know several families who have had trans issues surface in teenagehood, and all have handled it pretty well and, despite doing some of the things people deem 'wrong' (such as agreeing to change pronouns or names), they have adults who seem to have mostly sorted through this stage and found a way to live that is happy and healthy. None has surgically transitioned. I no longer see this as an inevitable pathway but rather a stepping stone to firming up identity later in life, and often similar to people changing hair, looks, clothes, names, and so on, which happens outside trans contexts as well. Sexuality also seems to sort similarly in the teen to early adult period these days, much earlier than when people had to hide being gay and then ended up coming out much later.

Swipe left for the next trending thread