Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Friend shocks me by suddenly saying he's female. How to handle this?

463 replies

MiffedatMP · 23/05/2026 17:14

A month ago a male co-researcher and friend I have known for 10 years, "came out as trans" by posting a couple of pics of himself on FB wearing eyeliner and studs in his newly pierced ears, and by changing his pronouns to he/she and saying he is a "trans female".

Just four weeks previously we spent the whole afternoon together and he did not breathe a word about this. He is 45, tall, broad-shouldered, slim-hipped and has angular, very masculine facial features. He looked and acted exactly the same as I have always known him: completely male in looks, speech, mannerisms, dress, etc. Therefore his announcement has come as a complete shock and, to be honest, at first I thought he was playing a prank.

Later this year we are supposed to begin a joint project which entails working closely together for months and I just don't know how to handle the situation. I've been wondering how long I can avoid ever referring to him by any pronoun - easy when it's just the two of us but the moment I have to refer to him as "he" or "her" to another person I am going to have to make a choice. I'm already worrying about this eventuality because it is bound to happen. Also on the project itself... there may be some wording which refers to him by a pronoun and again, I have to make a choice. I don't see how I can get out of this awkward situation. If I refer to him as "she" then I am sort of announcing that I am going along with this nonsense, and if I call him "he" then obviously this is going to cause massive fall out between us. He might storm out and the project abandoned, possibly after many weeks of work.

Even if I can manage to avoid the pronoun thing, how can I stay silent or dodge the subject if he looks me right in the eye and tells me he's now female? He hasn't yet changed his name but if he does I just don't think I can bring myself to call him by a female name.

I thought the easiest thing would be to just cancel the project, but that would make it look like I cancelled "just because he's trans", making me look like the baddie, losing his friendship forever and risking him smearing my good name around our small town, among our many mutual acquaintances, with goodness knows what social/business/friendship repercussions. Ditto if I replace him with someone else - I'd have to give him a reason, which, again, will get me into some kind of trouble, name-called, cancelled, hated because there are quite a few punitive activists where I live.

I understand now why people go along with it - because the alternative is life-changing, possibly life-ruining.

I just really, really wish he hadn't done this because it's made things so awkward.

What would you do?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
Wearenotborg · 24/05/2026 16:24

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:23

It's not. It's society's job to protect everyone

So you work on protecting TIM from men and we’ll work on protecting women from all men. Including those claiming to be women. Like a job share if you will.

Wearenotborg · 24/05/2026 16:23

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:16

How do we tell with our eyes and ears? Many trans women pass very well. Many women are quite butch. What happens if you suspect someone? What do you do? What happens if you are wrong?
Why do we need to personally benefit to do the right thing by someone?

So you could use that argument for transwomen couldn’t you? Why do they need to benefit todo the right thing? So if no one can tell their sex, how do TIM know they’re not male?

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:23

SadSadTimes · 24/05/2026 15:46

"then how are you going to protect trans women from men?"

How is it women's responsibility to protect men who claim to be women from men?

It's not. It's society's job to protect everyone

ScrollingLeaves · 24/05/2026 16:23

ScrollingLeaves · 24/05/2026 16:15

Predators are going to predate, but it helps if you now the predator who has just come in SHOULD NOT BE THERE so you are allowed to SCREAM, SHOUT, KICK or RUN instead of thinking you cannot say a word because they have a right to be there.

This is whether they appear to look a bit like a woman, or look like a man but could be a woman.

re “look like a man but could be a woman”. I did not mean a transman.

I meant, like that transwoman called Alex

A psychotherapist and photographer who started living as a woman while keeping her beard says she wants to "widen the bandwidth of gender".
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/i-want-widen-bandwidth-gender-9686747

Transgender woman kept beard 'to widen bandwidth of gender'

Alex Drummond, from Cardiff, decided to live as a woman six years ago but decided to keep her beard to 'create another space'

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/i-want-widen-bandwidth-gender-9686747

WallaceinAnderland · 24/05/2026 16:23

How do we tell with our eyes and ears? Many trans women pass very well. Many women are quite butch. What happens if you suspect someone? What do you do? What happens if you are wrong?

Suspect someone of what?

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:22

Wearenotborg · 24/05/2026 15:30

Ummm… calm down dude. You seem quite excited by that idea. So how have people known who is a woman for centuries before all this stupidity? You claimed TIM were being murdered in bathrooms at an alarming rate.. how did the men know they were TIM and not women?

For centuries we just relied on gender expression, exactly the same as we do now. Clothes, hair, etc. Which is perfectly fine for casual societal interaction.
I never said trans women were being killed in bathrooms at an alarming rate, I said they were historically murdered by men at an alarming rate, so I understand their caution, the same as I understand yours. If they are dressed or look feminine that is enough for the wrong man to target them, as homophobic men have for decades. Personally I think we should just swerve the issue and have separate gender neutral toilets, but people seem to have a problem with that too.

Wearenotborg · 24/05/2026 16:21

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 15:41

If you accept there is a risk (which I would argue is irrelevant because predators are going to predate and no amount of signage makes a difference), then how are you going to protect trans women from men? Unless you are in favour of providing gender neutral options?

That’s up toTIMs isn’t it. Male on male violence not women’s problem.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 24/05/2026 16:19

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:16

How do we tell with our eyes and ears? Many trans women pass very well. Many women are quite butch. What happens if you suspect someone? What do you do? What happens if you are wrong?
Why do we need to personally benefit to do the right thing by someone?

Many trans women pass very well.

They really really don’t. Even the the really high profile ones who have chemically stopped their puberty or had lots of hormones and surgery still stick like a sore thumb.

You just can’t disguise a male skeleton or that maleness that people born male have.

WallaceinAnderland · 24/05/2026 16:18

I also think that if @LittleMyLabyrinth is just posting in ignorance but with good faith then rather than continue to derail OP's thread, she could go and read all about it on other threads.

Perhaps starting with the 'break it down for me' thread

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/3145470-Break-it-down-for-me?reply=74979263

It's easy for us to forget sometimes that many people don't get it because they have never really thought about it before. We all peaked at some point.

Break it down for me? | Mumsnet

Hi all, I am fairly new to the discussion on the impact that transwomen are having on women generally and I want to more fully understand the issues (...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/womens_rights/3145470-Break-it-down-for-me?reply=74979263

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:17

WallaceinAnderland · 24/05/2026 15:30

Are you telling me that people can't tell a person's sex by looking at them 😂

Yes. Unless you have some way of seeing their chromosomes.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 24/05/2026 16:17

OP, I feel for you. I think it would be best for your sanity and stress levels if you treated it like any other sad situation where your prospective colleague had had some sort of breakdown and was unable to take on the project.

Gender ideology either attracts or makes narcissists who seem to think they are the only person that counts in the world. Then sadly, many people around them reinforce that delusion for varying reasons - often just to feel virtuous.

If he is heading off on his journey to ‘find himself as a woman’ which will be fruitless and never ending (as he is not and never will be a woman), then he is likely to be too distracted to give his best contribution to the project.

Another loss to gender ideology but hopefully a lucky escape for you.

Catiette · 24/05/2026 16:16

I agree, Mmm. I don't believe this poster is arguing in good faith.

Singled sex toilets make no difference = dismissal of a century-old and increasingly global standard, thousands of campaigns and hundreds of charities

Mixed-sex prisons are fine = dismissal of the Geneva Convention, no less

The "maternity service example" not "making sense" = dismissal of the actual systems used, globally, to anticipate and allocate sufficient provision

I mean, I'd be fascinated to see all this actually argued - broken down, justified, supported - as opposed to merely asserted.

But I know why it's not being.

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:16

Wearenotborg · 24/05/2026 15:27

let me guess, you’re gonna bring up “genital inspections”? Yawn. Done redone and debunked.
i mean, we could expect TIM to abide by the law and not use women’s spaces, in which case women could be confident everyone in there was female, or we could use our fucking eyes, hearing and common sense. Is this seriously the best argument you’ve got? You can’t come up with one material benefit to women for letting males in their spaces? So it’s a one way transaction?

How do we tell with our eyes and ears? Many trans women pass very well. Many women are quite butch. What happens if you suspect someone? What do you do? What happens if you are wrong?
Why do we need to personally benefit to do the right thing by someone?

ScrollingLeaves · 24/05/2026 16:15

Predators are going to predate, but it helps if you now the predator who has just come in SHOULD NOT BE THERE so you are allowed to SCREAM, SHOUT, KICK or RUN instead of thinking you cannot say a word because they have a right to be there.

This is whether they appear to look a bit like a woman, or look like a man but could be a woman.

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:13

Mmmnotsure · 24/05/2026 15:24

LittleMyLabyrinth · Today 12:06
I answered that up thread. Feminism is about equal rights. I've yet to be given an example of a right taken away from us by trans women, but I'm open to further information.

Response:
The right not to be subject to mixed-sex imprisonment, which is enshrined in the Geneva Convention. (Cruel and unusual punishment.)

@LittleMyLabyrinth
Perhaps you missed this.
Could you explain if this "further information" changes your view?

I addressed that.

WallaceinAnderland · 24/05/2026 16:13

@LittleMyLabyrinth posted earlier today What rights are you thinking of? I can't think of any that are that specific, but as you say I haven’t given it much thought.

The ignorance around this subject is clear to see. But if she hasn't given it much thought and, in her own words said - idgaf - then it's easy to see how she lacks knowledge and understanding around the subject which many women on these boards have been involved in for years.

It's all very well sitting in a place of privilege knowing that it's not going to be you locked up with a sexual predator.

This was in April this year. A whole year after the Supreme Court judgement.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4glne43101o

A general view of the entrace to HMP Greenock. A small, dark stone wall sits in front of the main building with the name of the prison on a white panel.

Trans prisoner charged with sexual assault in women's jail

Alexandra Stewart, previously known as Alan Baker, was charged over an alleged attack at HMP Greenock.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c4glne43101o

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:12

Catiette · 24/05/2026 14:35

having them being single sex offers no protection anyway

Seriously?!

How do you reconcile the 160% additional punch power of males and their committing 98%+ of sexual assaults with the argument that single sex spaces offer "no" protection? How can anyone say this, in all seriousness?

Are women going to be proportionately more, or less, safe in a small, enclosed space which is open, or closed, to a demographic which is one hundredfold stronger and more sexually aggressive?

Why do so many charities campaign for single-sex toilet access in developing countries? Are you saying that we're more civilised over here? That "our" men are less likely to take advantage of mixed sex, enclosed spaces?! (I really hope not).

This is what I mean by my post above. It's hard to believe someone's arguing in good faith when they make claims like this that are just a blanket denial of overwhelming evidence.

Talk to us about the evidence!

I don't deny the threat that men pose to women. I know that from my own experience. I'm saying that afaik calling something single sex or not makes no difference. Predators find a way, and it's rarely in a public toilet. Signage protects nobody, so how are we actually enforcing it without harming women even more?

WhereYouLeftIt · 24/05/2026 16:10

Laura95167 · 23/05/2026 18:23

Your friend is changing their gender not their sex

In which case, their sex-based pronouns remain he/him.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 24/05/2026 16:08

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:06

Sorry to disappoint, but I'm a straight woman 🤷🏼

That comment didn’t appear to be about you.

ClimbEveryLadder · 24/05/2026 16:08

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 15:41

If you accept there is a risk (which I would argue is irrelevant because predators are going to predate and no amount of signage makes a difference), then how are you going to protect trans women from men? Unless you are in favour of providing gender neutral options?

By your argument transwomen (aka men) are no safer using women’s toilets so they may as well go in with the other men

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:06

Flunkit · 24/05/2026 12:36

I've said this earlier . But it's got lost in the Labyrinthine arguments . I think this fella fancies his chances with lesbian OP if he too becomes a lesbian

Sorry to disappoint, but I'm a straight woman 🤷🏼

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 16:04

Catiette · 24/05/2026 12:36

I have never been able to understand how the existence of trans women could possibly "invalidate" my existence as a woman. Nor how it might infringe on my rights.

There's just been a Supreme Court judgement in the UK that clarified women's rights to single-sex spaces and a word of their own. A parallel case in Oz is likely to go all the way to the top of their justice system. The news is full of reports about women impacted by this issue. Opinion and commentary attest to some public anxiety about this.

In that context, do you know what I don't understand? Why so many replies along the lines of your own, above, seem unable to acknowledge and address these realities.

I was thinking about what you could have posted, from your perspective. What I'd write, if I were arguing your point of view, would be something like:

"I acknowledge that a minority of women are sufficiently concerned about this to have taken the issue to court. However, I don't see this as evidence of women's rights being affected because..." Or how about: "I recognise that there have been issues in which individual women's rights have been affected, but I don't give these particular weight, as..."

My post might then go on to analyse why this evidence of at least some impact on women's rights isn't sufficient to convince me that there's a wider issue. It might then explore different interpretations of the concept of "invalidation", to emphasise why, in my view, the necessity of a court case to establish what women actually are in law doesn't fit this definition.

Why do we, instead of honest acknowledgement of what evidence there is, and careful exploration of the issue, instead just get blanket denial and hyperbole? Emphatic generalisations like, "Never... the existence... my existence... cannot fathom"?

The only explanation I've ever been able to come up with is that the evidence for there being an issue is just too strong to convincingly counter. That the poster in question is running scared.

Acknowledging incontrovertible facts and details, and engaging with associated arguments, can help one to understand other perspectives better. You could do this to test your beliefs that this is a "culture war", and that posters like me are (you intimate above) unthinking puppets manipulated by "the powers that be". Maybe doing so would strengthen your convictions. Maybe it would change your mind! Whichever, though, it would certainly lead to deeper understanding - and more respect from posters here.

As it is, all I can see is myself and other posters diving headfirst into the nuances of a complex issue, exploring it in detail, often acknowledging alternative perspectives...

...And, in response to all this, being told we're "distracted [by] the powers that be [from things of more significance]" - that we are, in as many words, not thinking things through carefully enough.

And this we're told by posters who seem unable to face up even to existence of any opposing evidence and arguments (let alone to convince us of their supposed lack of significance).

There's an irony here.

Edited

Interesting. From my perspective, I have tried to engage in good faith with any and all arguments and facts and explained why they don't convince me so far. I have even agreed on some counts. On multiple occasions I've acknowledged it is an issue for people, and empathized with that. But to me there is an overarching fact that there are infinitely bigger problems, and yet this topic has only been given more and more weight in the past few years. Why? I am naturally suspicious of any culture war because it's invariably powerful people putting vulnerable people against each other for their own gain.

Mmmnotsure · 24/05/2026 16:03

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 15:36

I've addressed upthread that I think trans people need individual provision there, because prisons are such unsafe environments we need to be pragmatic about it. But in theory I don't see how mixed sex imprisonment is inherently cruel or unusual punishment.

But in theory I don't see how mixed sex imprisonment is inherently cruel or unusual punishment.

Really?

Tell that to the women raped (and made pregnant) in prison. Tell that to the women forced to shower with male criminals. Tell that to the incarcerated women who have been victims of MVAWG, whom I believe are in the majority of female prisoners.

I do not think you can be a serious poster.

Catiette · 24/05/2026 16:02

LittleMyLabyrinth · 24/05/2026 15:22

Then how would you check? Who looks enough like a woman? Do we need to submit our bodies for inspection? Do we give away our freedoms to the patriarchy for the "safety" of a self-imposed segregation because we've given up on actually stopping violence? afaik assault in bathrooms and changing rooms is extremely rare compared to other spaces. Should we all be put away in a harem to "protect" us? Do we need to perform extreme femininity to ensure it's never questioned? I just find the whole thing depressing.

Well, quite. Which is why we're arguing for women being defined and accepted in a way that requires no "policing" - the way we'd always been before this.

If you truly believe that our only choice is between 1) the absolute capitulation of all women to opening previously single-sex spaces to males just on their say-so or 2) these extraordinary, hysterical visions of a dystopian hell...

You're arguing either for the silencing of hundreds of thousands of worried females to accommodate a minority of males (1, above) or for the most extraordinary kind of horrors imaginable (2, above).

Frankly, I find this hard to understand. It feels illogical (and far-fetched to say the least!)

So I just go for 3): women fought for and won single-sex spaces, and these have functioned without the slightest issue for over a hundred years; as such, let's show respect for the hundreds of thousands of women who want to retain this precious gain, while building on it - by campaigning to ensure trans people have equivalent accommodations in their turn.

QuintadosMalvados · 24/05/2026 16:00

I think you're just going to have to cut him off, I know it's harsh but you simply can't have anything more to do with him. Ever. This is not about him liking thrash metal and you liking pop.
It's an absolutely fundamental disagreement.
How to go about it? I don't know.

You've got to think of your safety.
He's delusional , you won't be able to support it. People who are delusional don't respond well to having it questioned.
Men are generally stronger than women physically, don't forget.
You might be safer physically if you were a man and a female friend decided to 'become' a male.

It's cut your losses time. Sorry.

Swipe left for the next trending thread