Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

EHRC Code of Practice on Services, Public Functions and Associations has been laid - here is the Code itself

386 replies

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/05/2026 16:37

Written Statement made by: Secretary of State for Education and Minister for
Women and Equalities (Bridget Phillipson) on 21 May 2026:

https://commonsbusiness.parliament.uk/Document/105423/Pdf?subType=Standard

I have approved the draft Code submitted on 4 September 2025 and as updated by the EHRC in April 2026 following engagement with government and their consideration of consultation responses and further legal analysis.
The current Code was produced in 2011 and there have been significant developments since then, including the Supreme Court ruling in For Women Scotland, resulting in the EHRC wanting to update the Code.
Following last year’s Supreme Court ruling, the draft Code’s content on sex and gender reassignment has changed substantially from the 2011 version. The ruling made it clear that sex means biological sex for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 and that trans people are still protected by the Act under the protected characteristic of ‘gender reassignment’.

The Code of Practice on Services, Public Functions and Associations itself:

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/equality-act-2010-draft-code-of-practice-for-services-public-functions-and-associations-2026

Equality Act 2010: Draft Code of Practice for services, public functions and associations, 2026

The Equality and Human Rights Commission's draft updated Code of Practice for services, public functions and associations.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/equality-act-2010-draft-code-of-practice-for-services-public-functions-and-associations-2026

OP posts:
Thread gallery
32
SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/05/2026 17:02

allthingsinmoderation · 21/05/2026 16:59

How can there be loop holes? if you provide womens single sex spaces ,they must not include any males (even ones with a certificate) or they are not single sex surely?
Unless you do away with womens spaces ,surely they must be male free?

The main loopholes are:

  • “Balancing” language: organisations can claim they weighed women’s rights against trans inclusion and decided their current mixed-sex policy is “proportionate”.
  • “Exceptional circumstances”: the Code leaves room for case-by-case exceptions, which activist organisations may turn into routine opposite-sex access.
  • Weak enforcement detail: it says sex matters, but also says official documents do not reliably prove sex, so organisations may claim enforcement is impossible.
  • Too much discretion: providers are told to make judgements, which lets captured schools/councils hide behind “complexity”.
  • Soft language: lots of “may”, “could”, “usually”, “likely”, “good practice”, rather than hard “must”.
  • Trans impact still centred: providers are repeatedly told to consider disadvantage to excluded trans people, which can be used to minimise the rights of women and girls.

I stress I am using an LLM to analyse the very large document, but these seem like genuine loopholes

OP posts:
Helleofabore · 21/05/2026 17:02

page 38

Sex

What the Act says

2.87 Sex is a protected characteristic and refers to a male or a female of any age. In relation to a group of people it refers to either men and / or boys, or women and / or girls (section 11(a) and (b) and section 212, paragraph 1).

2.88 The Supreme Court in For Women Scotland ruled that ‘sex’, ‘woman’ and ‘man’ in the Act mean biological sex, biological woman and biological man. The
judgment uses the expression ‘biological sex’ to describe the sex of a person
at birth. Earlier case law12 has set out the indicators of biological sex.

2.89 A Gender Recognition Certificate (GRC) does not change a person’s sex for the purposes of the Act. Read paragraphs 2.49 to 2.53 for more information
on GRCs. Read paragraphs 13.161 to 13.182 for more information about when
and how it may be appropriate to request information or evidence of the sex of
a person at birth.

2.90 A comparator for the purposes of showing sex discrimination will be a
person of the opposite sex. Sex does not include gender reassignment
(read paragraphs 2.49 to 2.53) or sexual orientation (read paragraphs
2.92 to 2.96).

2.91 There are specific provisions which apply where the treatment of a woman
is because of her pregnancy and maternity, or because she is breastfeeding
(section 13, paragraph 6(a) and section 13, paragraph 7). Read paragraphs
4.54 to 4.73 for more information.

page 39

Sexual orientation

What the Act says

2.92 Sexual orientation is a protected characteristic (section 12, paragraph 1). Under the Act, this means a person’s sexual orientation towards:
-persons of the same sex (the person is a lesbian woman or a gay man)
-persons of the opposite sex (the person is heterosexual)
-persons of either sex (the person is bisexual)

2.93 Sexual orientation relates to how people feel as well as their actions.

2.94 Sexual orientation discrimination includes discrimination because someone is of a particular sexual orientation, and it also covers discrimination connected
with manifestations of that sexual orientation. These may include someone’s
appearance, the places they visit or the people they associate with.

2.95 When the Act refers to the protected characteristic of sexual orientation (section 12, paragraph 2), it means the following:

-a reference to a person who has this protected characteristic is a reference to a person who is of a particular sexual orientation

-a reference to people who share the protected characteristic is a reference to people who are of the same sexual orientation

2.96 Gender reassignment is a separate protected characteristic and unrelated to sexual orientation, despite often being grouped together (for example, under
the acronym ‘LGBTQ+ people’).

allthingsinmoderation · 21/05/2026 16:59

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/05/2026 16:44

It's a bit big

First run through says This is a very significant improvement. It moves the law back onto reality: sex means sex, women means female, men means male, and single-sex spaces cannot be redefined into mixed-sex spaces by identity language.

But there will be loop holes, there are always loopholes

The next fight will be implementation: forcing schools, councils, leisure providers, charities and public bodies to produce written policies, risk assessments and equality analyses that actually comply with the Code rather than just waving vaguely at “inclusion”.

We will have to hold people's feet to the fire for a long time yet

Edited

How can there be loop holes? if you provide womens single sex spaces ,they must not include any males (even ones with a certificate) or they are not single sex surely?
Unless you do away with womens spaces ,surely they must be male free?

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/05/2026 16:57

Always keeping an eye on the other side of the debate as well https://www.reddit.com/r/transgenderUK/comments/1tjocnh/guidance_is_out/

OP posts:
Helleofabore · 21/05/2026 16:54

Woohoo

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/05/2026 16:46

Thingybob · 21/05/2026 16:45

Is it the government server that is struggling to cope with demand?

I'm finding downloading this pdf more difficult then getting Glastonbury tickets

Deep link if it helps? https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a0de69fe0994f7c13d7b411/EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_services__public_functions_and_associations__2_.pdf

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/6a0de69fe0994f7c13d7b411/EHRC_Code_of_Practice_for_services__public_functions_and_associations__2_.pdf

OP posts:
Thingybob · 21/05/2026 16:45

Is it the government server that is struggling to cope with demand?

I'm finding downloading this pdf more difficult then getting Glastonbury tickets

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/05/2026 16:44

MalagaNights · 21/05/2026 16:41

Thank you SSSiS.

Someone who can read and analyse fast...tell us what it stays!!

It's a bit big

First run through says This is a very significant improvement. It moves the law back onto reality: sex means sex, women means female, men means male, and single-sex spaces cannot be redefined into mixed-sex spaces by identity language.

But there will be loop holes, there are always loopholes

The next fight will be implementation: forcing schools, councils, leisure providers, charities and public bodies to produce written policies, risk assessments and equality analyses that actually comply with the Code rather than just waving vaguely at “inclusion”.

We will have to hold people's feet to the fire for a long time yet

OP posts:
MalagaNights · 21/05/2026 16:41

Thank you SSSiS.

Someone who can read and analyse fast...tell us what it stays!!

WallaceinAnderland · 21/05/2026 16:40

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/05/2026 16:38

Quick! To the analysis!!

😂

My breath is baited

SingleSexSpacesInSchools · 21/05/2026 16:38

Quick! To the analysis!!

OP posts: