Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Unite the Kingdom - LWS/WRN

395 replies

Tooting33 · 17/05/2026 08:59

I am just wondering why Tommy Robinson is so appealing to a number of sex-realist women. Kellie Jay Keen spoke at the event. My local LWS group are fully supportive, as are the leaders of my local WRN groups.
Is anyone else finding it is harder to network with gender critical/sex realist women without them also being Reform/Restore/Tommy Robinson supporters?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
ArabellaScott · 19/05/2026 11:52

And what is it you are expecting or asking for? Is it a general tutting, or a broader will-you-condemnathon you're after? Or is it just a quick 'aint it awful'?

I've actually lost track of who we're supposed to be burning at the stake today and why. I don't suppose it matters, really. Just a bit of general fomenting.

5128gap · 19/05/2026 11:52

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 19/05/2026 11:30

I have female colleagues who's fear has greatly increased with the rise of this rhetoric, who have been spat at and had hijabs pulled from their heads.

And your sure that's down to TR and has nothing to do with the Pro-pally mob prancing through the streets chanting hate and bigotry riling people up. It's all down to the 'far right ' right.

You think that ordinary decent men suddenly lose the run of themselves and start spitting at and assaulting Muslim women, because they don't like pro Palestine marches? And that's more likely to be the case than that they were already predisposed to racism and misogyny and have been encouraged to enact it? That's your stance, is it?

DangerousMind · 19/05/2026 11:45

HenriettaSwanLeavitt · 19/05/2026 08:41

Yes, it is obvious that she sits on the right currently. Whether she would return to the left if they changed in some significant way, I don't know.

However, I would take issue with this statement: Whether that tarnishes the image of feminism in general, it’s difficult to say.

KJK repeatedly states that she is NOT a feminist. So people projecting a feminist identity on to her in order to then discredit feminism are the real problem here. Also, your framing is quite one-sided too. When you say 'tarnish the image' you are assuming that no true feminist can sit on the right. Presumably if she did claim to be a feminist then she would be burnishing the image of feminism for right-leaning people. Whether 'feminists' think that would be a bad thing or not presumably depends on whether they believe that feminism is exclusively a left-wing project.

Whether you like it or not, KJK is associated with feminism and feminists, so whatever she does or says can reflect on them. It’s up to the individual, obviously, to make a judgement on how they feel about it. As for feminism being exclusively a left-wing project? That’s an interesting statement. Women of all creeds and ideologies need feminist thought - so no.

5128gap · 19/05/2026 11:43

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 19/05/2026 11:27

So you have no idea what her account or accusation was and as we know that many people are ‘advised’ to plead guilty to crimes, any guilty plea is not necessarily indicative of anything.

Yet regardless of this lack of information you press on trying to make this a ‘feminist’ issue and are now making ridiculous accusations about my views and politics because I point out that things may not be all as they are initially presented by a clearly biased publication quoting an extreme activist organisation who themselves have an extremely poor record on VWAG as PP points out.

Ask yourself why, in the extremely detailed and comprehensive character assassination article, there are no details on what the woman claims had happened. THAT makes me suspicious.

I have no idea what you are trying to gain by pursuing this route but it’s not really working.

If you are here to support the far right

Such a repetitive and now meaningless accusation. What do you mean by ‘far right’?

I'm making this a feminist issue because it's the feminist board, a corner of MN where I come to discuss feminist issues. We are discussing a case involving a man convicted of an assault on a woman. If that's not a feminist issue, what is?
So, if we might centre the woman, tell me, what did she say about the assault? And what about her evidence leads you to conclude that the man's conviction was unsound?

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 19/05/2026 11:30

I have female colleagues who's fear has greatly increased with the rise of this rhetoric, who have been spat at and had hijabs pulled from their heads.

And your sure that's down to TR and has nothing to do with the Pro-pally mob prancing through the streets chanting hate and bigotry riling people up. It's all down to the 'far right ' right.

5128gap · 19/05/2026 11:29

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 19/05/2026 11:23

Is it okay to say, ‘women of colour?’ I honestly thought that was the wrong phrase in the UK and had been deemed racist.

Its the term that I use professionally in a diverse environment, as do my colleagues when self describing, and have never yet been corrected. Happy to use a different term if it causes offence to anyone on here.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 19/05/2026 11:27

5128gap · 19/05/2026 09:37

Given he pled guilty to assaulting her, I'd imagine at the very least she claimed...he assaulted her..? And that there was sufficient evidence to support her that he was advised it would be in his best interests to submit a guilty plea.
Other than the fact the perpetrator's politics align with your own, do you have any reason for wanting to discredit a female victim of male violence?
If you are here to support the far right, then you can surely do so on the strength of their superior ideology, as you see it. Casting doubt on the validity of a man's conviction for assault on a woman to further a far right agenda seems rather out of step with feminism and women's rights.

So you have no idea what her account or accusation was and as we know that many people are ‘advised’ to plead guilty to crimes, any guilty plea is not necessarily indicative of anything.

Yet regardless of this lack of information you press on trying to make this a ‘feminist’ issue and are now making ridiculous accusations about my views and politics because I point out that things may not be all as they are initially presented by a clearly biased publication quoting an extreme activist organisation who themselves have an extremely poor record on VWAG as PP points out.

Ask yourself why, in the extremely detailed and comprehensive character assassination article, there are no details on what the woman claims had happened. THAT makes me suspicious.

I have no idea what you are trying to gain by pursuing this route but it’s not really working.

If you are here to support the far right

Such a repetitive and now meaningless accusation. What do you mean by ‘far right’?

EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 19/05/2026 11:23

5128gap · 19/05/2026 11:21

TR doesn't impact me either. I'm a white woman. He does however impact women of colour. Stirring up racism will hurt women and make them less safe as they are the soft targets. I have female colleagues who's fear has greatly increased with the rise of this rhetoric, who have been spat at and had hijabs pulled from their heads. I don't think as a feminist who happens to be white its right to look the other way because TR and his ilk might spare me on account of my skin colour.

Is it okay to say, ‘women of colour?’ I honestly thought that was the wrong phrase in the UK and had been deemed racist.

5128gap · 19/05/2026 11:21

ArabellaScott · 19/05/2026 11:09

the thing is that I don't know much about Tommy Robinson and I really can't be arsed investigating. How does it impact me what he does or says?

We need political change, we need to reach people to bring the issues to the fore. For me, that's women's rights. And those apply to everyone, and we need everyone - left, right, weird combinations of both.

TR doesn't impact me either. I'm a white woman. He does however impact women of colour. Stirring up racism will hurt women and make them less safe as they are the soft targets. I have female colleagues who's fear has greatly increased with the rise of this rhetoric, who have been spat at and had hijabs pulled from their heads. I don't think as a feminist who happens to be white its right to look the other way because TR and his ilk might spare me on account of my skin colour.

5128gap · 19/05/2026 11:12

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 19/05/2026 11:01

Why are the global left in this country so obsessed with TR, the Green Party is full of so much worse and they're a political party that has made substantial gains recently but it's the 'racists thug ' influencer from up north that they're wetting themselves over. 😂

Oh give over with the hyperbole and demeaning language. Women 'Wetting themselves'? Really?
Some women are expressing concern about the views and behaviour of TR and his supporters. Which ime is pretty mainstream, even amongst right leaning people.

ArabellaScott · 19/05/2026 11:09

the thing is that I don't know much about Tommy Robinson and I really can't be arsed investigating. How does it impact me what he does or says?

We need political change, we need to reach people to bring the issues to the fore. For me, that's women's rights. And those apply to everyone, and we need everyone - left, right, weird combinations of both.

ArabellaScott · 19/05/2026 11:04

TooBigForMyBoots · 19/05/2026 10:29

Nonsense. I am working class, I am not scum.Hmm

Tommy Robinson is a grifting racist thug, that's why he is scum. I wish people would do their own research instead of believing everything he says.

'scum' isn't a word I use for anyone. Dehumanisation is not okay.

TheywontletmehavethenameIwant · 19/05/2026 11:01

Why are the global left in this country so obsessed with TR, the Green Party is full of so much worse and they're a political party that has made substantial gains recently but it's the 'racists thug ' influencer from up north that they're wetting themselves over. 😂

Betano · 19/05/2026 10:56

TallSturdyGirl · 19/05/2026 10:00

No! Tommy many names.

I find it fascinating has TR is criticised for using a name which isn’t his and yet Zack Polanski seems to dodge similar criticism.

TooBigForMyBoots · 19/05/2026 10:29

Menopausalsourpuss · 19/05/2026 04:08

You clearly know nothing about his back story which he has told lots of times. A family member was groomed and that's what led him to campaign. Imo he doesn't say anything that different from poshos like Douglas Murray but is looked down on as scum because he is working class. Wish people would do their own research and not believe everything the telly tells them.

Edited

Nonsense. I am working class, I am not scum.Hmm

Tommy Robinson is a grifting racist thug, that's why he is scum. I wish people would do their own research instead of believing everything he says.

MalagaNights · 19/05/2026 10:26

These threads also make me laugh in the confidence with which the scolding assumes all the women on here are, or should be, or should at least regret not being anymore, left-wing feminists.

It's not the left wing feminst board.

It's feminist and women's rights.

I'm right wing and focused on women's rights. I think lots of left wing feminism has been hugely damaging to women. But I agree with them sex is real and important.

So I say: Get lost with your sixth-form politics of 'we all agree right??'

No I don't agree. And I don't have to apologise or explain and grovel to some leftist prefects that I am still a Good Person.

ApplebyArrows · 19/05/2026 10:24

It's especially galling with Robinson because what he's leading is so clearly a men's movement, an offshoot of football hooliganism dressed up as politics. You can just tell that a big chunk of his supporters are probably domestic abusers.

Some of the motivations are probably genuinely feminist: the view that Islam and immigration are harmful to women, and a sense that the hard right are the only people taking this seriously.

Imnobody4 · 19/05/2026 10:18

When Corbyn was elected as Labour leader the Muslim Women's Network asked to meet him to discuss misogyny in their community eg not being allowed to stand as candidates without male permission. He never met with them.

Labour are not a feminist party, they passed the early sex discrimination legislation and then just sat back, job done. They are unable to square the circle on a clear approach on women's rights and Islam.
The left need to face up to their own problems instead of attacking KJK.
There's a line in a Leonard Cohen song;
'I fought for something final, not the right to disagree' The right to disagree is the most fundamental right. The left seem incapable of grasping that.

MalagaNights · 19/05/2026 10:16

HenriettaSwanLeavitt · 19/05/2026 08:41

Yes, it is obvious that she sits on the right currently. Whether she would return to the left if they changed in some significant way, I don't know.

However, I would take issue with this statement: Whether that tarnishes the image of feminism in general, it’s difficult to say.

KJK repeatedly states that she is NOT a feminist. So people projecting a feminist identity on to her in order to then discredit feminism are the real problem here. Also, your framing is quite one-sided too. When you say 'tarnish the image' you are assuming that no true feminist can sit on the right. Presumably if she did claim to be a feminist then she would be burnishing the image of feminism for right-leaning people. Whether 'feminists' think that would be a bad thing or not presumably depends on whether they believe that feminism is exclusively a left-wing project.

Exactly.

All this handwringing because some people who are sex realists are not also left wing feminists.

That should hardly be a surprise.

In fact the majority of people who are sex realists are not left wing feminists because most people know sex is real, and very few people are left wing feminists.

So if you're going to agonise about the fact that people you don't like agree with you that sex is real, you are going to make yourself very unhappy.

Left wing women are reportedly the most unhappy group. I wonder if this is one of the reason why? They cannot psychologically tolerate the reality that the Bad People also sometimes agree with them. It seems to eat away at them.

SionnachRuadh · 19/05/2026 10:11

Let's take our second city. Akhmed Yakoob and his posse of Islamic Peaky Blinders have become quite a serious political force in Birmingham.

I don't see anyone saying Mr Yakoob is a diamond geezer, because that's just not plausible. What we do is skip right over Mr Yakoob and have a heated debate about whether Mr Murray is a bad man for noticing Mr Yakoob's existence and even writing articles mentioning him.

CornishDaughteroftheDawn · 19/05/2026 10:07

ArabellaScott · 19/05/2026 09:26

One could ask whether the Gov's relentless panics about TommyR, Andrew Tate, and that docudrama Adolescence are even real, tbh.

VAWG is endemic, and they don't seem too fussed about doing anything about it. Far easier to waffle about some TV drama and a grotty wee permatanned nyaff with sticky out ears who appears to be a ridiculous cartoon villain even to teenage boys.

Grooming gangs is one thing, as is letting prisoners out of jail early, putting male rapists in women's prisons, etc.

I'm not a fan of populist uprisings, but they are pretty predictable when a populace loses faith in democracy and politics. We've been saying this for years and get attacked for being 'rightwing' for predicting pretty much all of this.

People are hacked off. Govt don't listen.

And all the righteous people can lecture them all day long on how awful they are, and every time they do, we inch further towards the UK version of Trump, which is to say, Reform, etc.

Exactly this.

ArabellaScott · 19/05/2026 10:01

Oh, I see. Does he make a lot of money?

TallSturdyGirl · 19/05/2026 10:00

ArabellaScott · 19/05/2026 09:55

Who, Murray? Vast sums? How? As an author?! 😂

No! Tommy many names.

ArabellaScott · 19/05/2026 09:56

Murray isn't that famous. I've no idea how much money he makes, to be fair. Could be in the region of the average author/journo, which is to say, fuckall.

ArabellaScott · 19/05/2026 09:55

TallSturdyGirl · 19/05/2026 09:39

His actions are about himself, gaining money and fame. He is making a vast sum of money by creating hatred and divide.

Who, Murray? Vast sums? How? As an author?! 😂