Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Trans People Launch High Street Protest Against Sale of Harry Potter Merchandise

379 replies

IwantToRetire · 17/05/2026 01:31

Trans rights activists launched a peaceful protest outside Waterstones in Guildford this afternoon (May 16), chalking messages on the pavement to draw people’s attention to the company’s marketing of Harry Potter merchandise.

Protest group Defund Transphobes says Harry Potter author JK Rowling uses money from the sale of merchandise to fund what they describe as her “anti trans campaign”.

Continues at https://guildford-dragon.com/trans-people-launch-high-street-protest-against-sale-of-harry-potter-merchandise/

Guildford Dragon NEWS

Guildford News

https://guildford-dragon.com/trans-people-launch-high-street-protest-against-sale-of-harry-potter-merchandise/

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
HenriettaSwanLeavitt · 17/05/2026 09:47

I've never seen that before. Thank you so much for posting it😁The joylessness of the progresive left is one of the reasons I cannot take them seriously.

KnottyAuty · 17/05/2026 09:44

2021x · 17/05/2026 09:37

TRAs are obsessed with her. They are desperate for her to call them out..: they NEED her to put all their hate into.

Reminds if that old John Cleese clip of political extremism and how it is good because it give you a long list of people to hate “and of course moderates”

Thanks for this one too - good viewing over a late breakfast. Still spot on after how many years?!

https://www.facebook.com/thejohncleese/videos/john-cleese-on-the-advantages-of-extremism-/2613979595452814/

3M views · 59K reactions | The Advantages of Extremism! 💥 Did I miss anything? | John Cleese

The Advantages of Extremism! 💥 Did I miss anything?

https://www.facebook.com/thejohncleese/videos/john-cleese-on-the-advantages-of-extremism-/2613979595452814

TWETMIRF · 17/05/2026 09:43

I think the Harry Potter books are made from particularly sharp paper designed to give TQ+ people nasty papercuts. That's why they are unsafe.

Not sure why everyone else is safe, maybe Waterstones are giving protective gloves out to anyone that knows the difference between girls and boys and that's the bigotry?

Okiedokie123 · 17/05/2026 09:42

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 17/05/2026 06:59

Bella is just here to wind up as many people as possible. She was bigging up the ineffable Polanski the other day, saying he would be PM after the next election, what great vibes the Greens give off, or similar. She overplays her hand eventually, as I think she's just done here with her Salman Rushdie smear.

Hmmm. Maybe their name should be ActuallySteve 😂

Datun · 17/05/2026 09:42

takemetosnurch · 17/05/2026 08:17

I'm pretty sure @InstantlyBella is a reincarnation of another poster whose name I can't recall who played a bit of a longer game in terms of 'here are my obviously insane views, I am trolling'.

Totally. Last week it was my dinner party guests, social circle and discussing the failure of the working class.

Now it's my progressive friends and book club complaining about books that we haven't read, but we all feel unsafe.

It's all bollocks. Made up rubbish using buzz words that they predict will trigger people into an acerbic response. As someone said upthread, they should've said folx. Missed a trick.

JimBobsWife · 17/05/2026 09:41

takemetosnurch · 17/05/2026 08:17

I'm pretty sure @InstantlyBella is a reincarnation of another poster whose name I can't recall who played a bit of a longer game in terms of 'here are my obviously insane views, I am trolling'.

Yes, I was just about to post this. Wish I could remember their name. Their posts were very similar in style and used to make me roar with laughter at how ridiculous they were.

teawamutu · 17/05/2026 09:40

Bella types do exist, even if this one doesn't.

For any actual Bellas reading, I'm intrigued to know:

  1. Do you have any opinions you haven't outsourced to other people?
  2. I would feel genuinely unsafe in a society where reading material was vetted by a group who not only didn't read it, but didn't bother their arses to read about it. Clearly no-one must feel unsafe, ever, so what's your support package for me?
ERthree · 17/05/2026 09:39

InstantlyBella · 17/05/2026 01:43

Because it is about standing up for what is right and not making a prestigious bookstore feel unsafe for members of the LGBTQIA+ community.

God lord i have heard it all now, you obviously need help with your MH if a children's book makes you feel unsafe.

2021x · 17/05/2026 09:37

TRAs are obsessed with her. They are desperate for her to call them out..: they NEED her to put all their hate into.

Reminds if that old John Cleese clip of political extremism and how it is good because it give you a long list of people to hate “and of course moderates”

Shedmistress · 17/05/2026 09:32

Well I have my TERF box ticked for the day - being compared to Hitler before breakfast is always a good way to start a Sunday.

I'm off to do pottery.

Okiedokie123 · 17/05/2026 09:28

InstantlyBella · 17/05/2026 06:30

Would you say that to a Muslim if Waterstones stocked a book by notorious Islamophobe Salmon Rushdie? I think you would rightfully find that hurtful and offensive, which is the same for trans people who have their identity disregarded by stocking books written by that woman.

Waterstones does stock books by Salman Rushdie. Including The Satanic Verses.
It sells lots of books with content not everyone likes. Including books by men who’ve decided they are women. I wouldn’t buy those books but I approve of Waterstones decision to sell them. Because free speech is a good thing. Even if what is being said is “wrong”.
Sometimes admittedly I do hide such books behind others….. or move them into the biology section. Or the fantasy fiction shelves!

But I wouldn’t ban them altogether. Because someone else having an opinion different to mine is ok. I am not unsafe!

Instructions · 17/05/2026 09:26

The overlap between people who are full on TRA and adults who make Harry Potter their whole personality and buy all the merchandise is so high that this actually does surprise me.

SorryWeAreClosed · 17/05/2026 09:25

PriOn1 · 17/05/2026 01:41

It absolutely isn’t.

There may be a tiny minority of Waterstones shops where staff try to hide Potter books and merchandise, but every store I’ve been in has had a section dedicated to them.

Agree. I have 4 stores within a short drive of me. I would never expect to find a 'feminist' book out at one of them but have had no problem obtaining any new releases from the other 3 where they are all displayed alongside everything else, occasionally out on the tables or with the little handwritten description cards with them.

Wearenotborg · 17/05/2026 09:17

merrymelody · 17/05/2026 09:14

How do trans people feel unsafe in a bookstore? Who’s threatening them?

Well to be fair, if words are literal violence, surely bookshops and libraries are the worst places in the world. All those words!!! Saying facts!!!! It’s literally traumatising!!!

merrymelody · 17/05/2026 09:14

InstantlyBella · 17/05/2026 01:43

Because it is about standing up for what is right and not making a prestigious bookstore feel unsafe for members of the LGBTQIA+ community.

How do trans people feel unsafe in a bookstore? Who’s threatening them?

houseonthehill · 17/05/2026 09:10

There was an Australian bookshop owner who made a pompous announcement on Twitter a few years ago that his shop would no longer be selling any JKR books because of the damage her ideas did to the Trans community.

Someone replied “Mate… you stock Mein Kampf…”

alliumursinum · 17/05/2026 09:07

I did like Bella's line on another thread about restricting voting to those who are university educated and/or LGBTQIA+ or minoritized in another way - just treading the line of 'something Zack P may say and outright trolling 😂

Shedmistress · 17/05/2026 09:06

Kitt1 · 17/05/2026 09:03

Have you ever thought about writing a satirical comedy show? You clearly have talent in that direction.

Didn't Tracey Ullman already do that Woke Support Group sketch?

I'd post a link but of course YT banned it.

OpheliaWitchoftheWoods · 17/05/2026 09:03

This reply has been withdrawn

This has been withdrawn by MNHQ at the poster's request.

Kitt1 · 17/05/2026 09:03

InstantlyBella · 17/05/2026 06:54

My reading group have him on the list of banned authors (alongside she who shall not be named incidentally so take note Waterstones). I haven't looked too deeply into it but from what I've been told he has written some things that are deeply offensive to the Islamic Community. My reading group is full of very open and commited progressive folks so I trust their judgement.

Have you ever thought about writing a satirical comedy show? You clearly have talent in that direction.

JustAnUdea · 17/05/2026 09:02

Shedmistress · 17/05/2026 08:54

No-one meaning anyone apart from the BBC, the Royal Family, The Government of the day etc etc etc?

No one NOW once the allegations are mainstream.

mrshoho · 17/05/2026 09:01

Sound like this was a fairly small peaceful protest. I can't see this having any significant impact on either Waterstones or the Harry Potter franchise. As long as there's no intimidation towards shoppers or 'piss' protests etc let them crack on. I thought they'd given up on trying to cancel JKR as a hopeless exercise.

RatWrangler · 17/05/2026 08:59

Bella is quite clearly a parody account in the same vein as Dame Katy Denise. I hope they stick around, they've given me a good chuckle.

Shedmistress · 17/05/2026 08:54

JustAnUdea · 17/05/2026 08:46

As a side note....

There is a line when no one protests an "Artist" being "cancelled". Like Rilf Harris kr Jimmy Saville... no one supports them.

Then theres David Walliams and Micheal Jackson who appear to be on the cusp.

So exactly where is the line? Mein Kampf seems to be intersting for historians for example.

No-one meaning anyone apart from the BBC, the Royal Family, The Government of the day etc etc etc?