Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Giggle v Tickle Friday 15th May 2pm AEST

644 replies

impossibletoday · 11/05/2026 06:40

Giggle v Tickle
Friday 15th May
2pm AEST
Live streamed

https://x.com/i/status/2053669311504642197

OP posts:
Thread gallery
30
ThatCyanCat · 23/05/2026 07:10

Oh God he's doing the Transman Gotcha now. I didn't realise he was this new to it. He really should read the SC ruling, it's only about half as long as his posts and it actually makes sense.

ThatBlackCat · 23/05/2026 06:53

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 06:36

That no matter how inconvenient the existence of trans men are to the gender critical movement they prove transgenderism isn't about male domination….hence their 'inconvenience'.

You have zero point at all, and I think you know it. Trans men aren't taking away female only spaces or rights. They aren't getting us redefined. Transwomen are, hence it is about male domination.

The very fact you mention transmen and how we don't talk about them, is actually proof that the issue is males and male domination. Not 'transgenderism' - and never has been. You actually prove our point!

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 06:36

borntobequiet · 23/05/2026 06:14

Your point being?

That no matter how inconvenient the existence of trans men are to the gender critical movement they prove transgenderism isn't about male domination….hence their 'inconvenience'.

ThatBlackCat · 23/05/2026 06:34

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 06:10

Uh huh, there's thing call a 'trans man'.

Uh huh, transmen are FEMALE, and as such....no threat to us. 🙄

So, your point is?

borntobequiet · 23/05/2026 06:14

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 06:10

Uh huh, there's thing call a 'trans man'.

Your point being?

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 06:10

ThatBlackCat · 23/05/2026 04:16

Oh what a joke! You talk about colonisation, and can't see what is right smack bang in front of you: MALE COLONISATION OF FEMALE SPACES. Colonisation of our spaces, our identity, and our language. Cultural appropriation. And you actively want this.

Edited

Uh huh, there's thing call a 'trans man'.

Cattywillow · 23/05/2026 05:48

Getting so close there with colonisation… keep going…

ElenOfTheWays · 23/05/2026 04:30

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 03:52

Because social, political, and economic hierarchies like class structures, racial stratification & patriarchy systematically favour those at the top while disenfranchising marginalised groups where unequal protection & resource distribution eventuate…& we are seeing that in real time with trans people as they aren't considered to be deserving of acknowledgment let alone equal rights due to hierarchal structures.

Gender critical advocates like the Patriarchy consider biological essentialism as the tippy top of their structures that clearly has disadvantaged implications on those without.

Hierarchal structural disadvantage is not the same as making practical compromises because rights conflict. The problem eventuates when false concerns about rights are able to be easily weaponised against the bottom of the hierarchy…because they are at the bottom.

AI AI O

Heggettypeg · 23/05/2026 04:18

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 03:52

Because social, political, and economic hierarchies like class structures, racial stratification & patriarchy systematically favour those at the top while disenfranchising marginalised groups where unequal protection & resource distribution eventuate…& we are seeing that in real time with trans people as they aren't considered to be deserving of acknowledgment let alone equal rights due to hierarchal structures.

Gender critical advocates like the Patriarchy consider biological essentialism as the tippy top of their structures that clearly has disadvantaged implications on those without.

Hierarchal structural disadvantage is not the same as making practical compromises because rights conflict. The problem eventuates when false concerns about rights are able to be easily weaponised against the bottom of the hierarchy…because they are at the bottom.

You really don't seem to know much about what's gone on in the UK. Vast swathes of the establishment signed up to Stonewall and similar organisations and were fed misinformation which over-privileged trans "rights" at the expense of women's rights in law. Women had to go to the courts to re-assert the facts, and much of the establishment is still dragging its heels over a year later. So enough with the "disadvantaged minority"; they had the ear of power for many years and made ample use of it.

ThatBlackCat · 23/05/2026 04:16

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 00:35

It is not 'contestable' that male people with a transgender identity are a safety risk

Clearly it is given its legal for trans women to use female public restrooms in many countries & jurisdictions globally including in Europe, Scandinavia, Asia & North America so any tenuous speculation regarding prison data made is obviously not reflective of safety concerns in all of these countries. Again there are no broad movements in them to change laws which is the ultimate barometer of safety concerns.

And I do hold 'cards' in the Australian discussion, being an Australian and all. So, no. I am not 'colonising' anything and it is rather offensive to suggest that I am.

You aren't just advocating for a system to be imposed in Britain but for an imposition of a British system upon the rest of the world which in essence a form of colonisation. Of course this isn't anything new for British arrogance that always seems to end in tears.

Perhaps your time might be better spent on what forces have enabled Britain to be riddled with mismanagement, poverty & crime that have created their burgeoning prison system that's being exploited to push political pet projects home…and abroad rather than deal with the real underlying causes.

In other words, mind your own back yard first….it certainly needs tending.

Oh what a joke! You talk about colonisation, and can't see what is right smack bang in front of you: MALE COLONISATION OF FEMALE SPACES. Colonisation of our spaces, our identity, and our language. Cultural appropriation. And you actively want this.

ThatBlackCat · 23/05/2026 04:08

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 03:56

Using a single, isolated or rare experience to draw a sweeping conclusion about an entire population, group, or system isn't a valid argument.

There is nothing 'isolated' or 'rare' about male violence against females. Centuries/millennia of history of how men treat women demonstrates this. Rape, Domestic Violence demonstrates this. The patriarchy and womens oppression demonstrates this. Pretending males are not a threat as a whole, is disingenuous and batshit crazy.

Giggle v Tickle  Friday 15th May  2pm AEST
borntobequiet · 23/05/2026 04:05

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 03:06

It's uncontroversial that the gender critical movement was created in & is substantially strongest in Britain. And there's been a lot speculation of why this phenomena is so captivating there. Hierarchy & class social structures being a long lasting historical cultural feature is probably the culprit in my view.

Ben Elton once was asked why it was he married an Australian rather than a British woman & his reply was British women in his experience were obsessed by class structure so that was one of the reasons.

Interestingly JKRowling made some interesting admissions in her recent Witch Trial podcast where she talked about how much class impacted her at school & college because of the poverty she experienced in her life. And yet now she clings ever so tightly to a hierarchical structure.

It's a funny thing that sometimes the thing that we seek to escape from we perpetuate because of an unconscious learning. I notice this in some immigrants from baltic countries where they wanted to escape authoritarian landscape but their own political views have authoritarian consequences. Learned habits however fought die hard it seems.

Edited

Ben Elton once was asked why it was he married an Australian rather than a British woman & his reply was British women in his experience were obsessed by class structure so that was one of the reasons.

Ooh, the Ben Elton argument, why not bring out the big guns, point them the wrong way and neglect to load them.

ThatBlackCat · 23/05/2026 04:05

Gretel346 · 22/05/2026 08:58

Because the law in your country says so. Not in mine.

What behaviour from men do you think makes it necessary to prevent them from entering women's spaces?

I don't think its necessary to exclude trans women because I don't believe they are a threat to women's safety.

Firstly, why do you think a male is not a threat to womens safety, just because he wears a dress?

Secondly, as prison data shows that transwomen sexually offend 5 times higher than other males, and these cases show, transwomen are an extreme threat to women.

Giggle v Tickle  Friday 15th May  2pm AEST
Giggle v Tickle  Friday 15th May  2pm AEST
Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 04:00

Shedmistress · 23/05/2026 03:58

Yeah yeah yeah, you did a word salad humanities course.

Men who say they are women and who get special rights to do what they want and go where they want ARE the patriarchy.

Which is why real feminists say no.

'word salad' = my brain hurts if oversimplifications don't happen

Shedmistress · 23/05/2026 03:58

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 03:52

Because social, political, and economic hierarchies like class structures, racial stratification & patriarchy systematically favour those at the top while disenfranchising marginalised groups where unequal protection & resource distribution eventuate…& we are seeing that in real time with trans people as they aren't considered to be deserving of acknowledgment let alone equal rights due to hierarchal structures.

Gender critical advocates like the Patriarchy consider biological essentialism as the tippy top of their structures that clearly has disadvantaged implications on those without.

Hierarchal structural disadvantage is not the same as making practical compromises because rights conflict. The problem eventuates when false concerns about rights are able to be easily weaponised against the bottom of the hierarchy…because they are at the bottom.

Yeah yeah yeah, you did a word salad humanities course.

Men who say they are women and who get special rights to do what they want and go where they want ARE the patriarchy.

Which is why real feminists say no.

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 03:56

TheKhakiQuail · 23/05/2026 03:40

The risk is obviously greater for a woman if she is alone with a man, but having other people around isn't always enough. A man was charged with sexual intercourse without consent on a plane last month, the woman who reported it was seated next to him on a flight to Australia.

Using a single, isolated or rare experience to draw a sweeping conclusion about an entire population, group, or system isn't a valid argument.

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 03:52

Heggettypeg · 23/05/2026 03:30

What's "hierarchical" about not wanting to share a prison cell with a man? Or not wanting a man doing your rape counselling? Or wanting to be in a lesbian space without a man trying to guilt-trip you into straight sex? Or just wanting a bit of privacy from the male gaze when you change out of scrubs at the end of a nursing shift? Or not wanting children fast-tracked into making life-changing decisions about their bodies before they understand the implications? Your anti-British prejudice is leading you into some very strange assumptions.

Because social, political, and economic hierarchies like class structures, racial stratification & patriarchy systematically favour those at the top while disenfranchising marginalised groups where unequal protection & resource distribution eventuate…& we are seeing that in real time with trans people as they aren't considered to be deserving of acknowledgment let alone equal rights due to hierarchal structures.

Gender critical advocates like the Patriarchy consider biological essentialism as the tippy top of their structures that clearly has disadvantaged implications on those without.

Hierarchal structural disadvantage is not the same as making practical compromises because rights conflict. The problem eventuates when false concerns about rights are able to be easily weaponised against the bottom of the hierarchy…because they are at the bottom.

ThatBlackCat · 23/05/2026 03:48

Gretel346 · 22/05/2026 08:49

How you deduced that from my comment is rather bizarre.

The comment was in reference to cis gender non conforming women being falsely accused of the wrong sex by enforcers of the new guidelines because they are 'guessing'.

In terms of trans identities using the ladies I imagine some will continue to do so because they sufficiently pass & as such can't be detected under 'sophisticated' gender stereotyping 'tracking' surveillance systems. This maybe illegal but to suggest it's 'predatory' is an irrational stretch.

ETA I missed the last bit. Any male in a female only intimate single sex space is automatically a predator. By default.

Giggle v Tickle  Friday 15th May  2pm AEST
SexRealistic · 23/05/2026 03:48

Germany

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/commentary/germanys-self-determination-act-one-year-on/

Canada

https://fairplayforwomen.com/examples/

https://www.feministcurrent.com/2017/03/10/whats-current-two-women-kicked-shelter-voicing-concerns-sharing-room-trans-identified-male/

Like has happened in the UK mainstream media are silenced on reporting on these issues due to laws that dictate that men who want to be women must indeed be considered women.

Imagine if a new law was issued that said all horses were now cows. And then you had years of long stories about cow racing and cow jumping et from the press. Pictures of cows doing dressage, except they were all long horses. If it was illegal to point out that it was indeed actually a horse and it was horse racing - you’d not actually get real information and the level of self censoring would be huge.

2+2 = 5

It’s not a trans issue. It’s a human rights issue. Women’s rights have been non existent and when we made momentum men came along to attempt to remove them.

If women includes men who for whatever reason say they are women jt makes a nonsense of the classification. And therefore totaly wipes out women’s rights.

That is truly chilling and sign of the oppressive misogynistic and controlling world few some people are living under.

Germany's Self-Determination Act: One Year On

Since its implementation, anybody who doesn't accept a person's new name or gender must expect heavy fines.

https://europeanconservative.com/articles/commentary/germanys-self-determination-act-one-year-on/

ThatBlackCat · 23/05/2026 03:41

Gretel346 · 22/05/2026 08:49

How you deduced that from my comment is rather bizarre.

The comment was in reference to cis gender non conforming women being falsely accused of the wrong sex by enforcers of the new guidelines because they are 'guessing'.

In terms of trans identities using the ladies I imagine some will continue to do so because they sufficiently pass & as such can't be detected under 'sophisticated' gender stereotyping 'tracking' surveillance systems. This maybe illegal but to suggest it's 'predatory' is an irrational stretch.

In the extremely rare occasions a woman is questioned by a fellow woman, it takes less than 30 seconds for the woman to turn around, speak, and it becomes obvious they are indeed a woman. No biggie. This ridiculous catastrophising by those manipulatively pushing an agenda to destroy womens rights. We can all see it for what it is. Disingenuousness.

The absurdity of this position is that the vanishingly rare woman who might be accused of being trans and be questioned is reason to allow a legion of males into female spaces.

TheKhakiQuail · 23/05/2026 03:40

Gretel346 · 22/05/2026 09:52

Nor do women have to fear men……unless they are alone with them.

Permission structures don't tend to hold much power over abusers.

The risk is obviously greater for a woman if she is alone with a man, but having other people around isn't always enough. A man was charged with sexual intercourse without consent on a plane last month, the woman who reported it was seated next to him on a flight to Australia.

SexRealistic · 23/05/2026 03:38

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 03:06

It's uncontroversial that the gender critical movement was created in & is substantially strongest in Britain. And there's been a lot speculation of why this phenomena is so captivating there. Hierarchy & class social structures being a long lasting historical cultural feature is probably the culprit in my view.

Ben Elton once was asked why it was he married an Australian rather than a British woman & his reply was British women in his experience were obsessed by class structure so that was one of the reasons.

Interestingly JKRowling made some interesting admissions in her recent Witch Trial podcast where she talked about how much class impacted her at school & college because of the poverty she experienced in her life. And yet now she clings ever so tightly to a hierarchical structure.

It's a funny thing that sometimes the thing that we seek to escape from we perpetuate because of an unconscious learning. I notice this in some immigrants from baltic countries where they wanted to escape authoritarian landscape but their own political views have authoritarian consequences. Learned habits however fought die hard it seems.

Edited

Poor Gretel. You argue like a three year old.

Why did you do X?

Oh but look at the wind, a frog, the class structure, Scandinavia.

It is really hard to keep a straight argument because it’s based on nonsense.

I would find it hard to argue with people who objected to trans-racial identities, or trans-age identities, or even trans-disability identities.

The reason for classification is that it matters for a whole host of reasons. Safety, dignity, respect but also part of being in a democratic society.

I have no skin in the game trying to defend Britian - but since for all of time bar a mad decade or so - the vast majority of nations have not enabled men with a gender identity to breach women’s boundaries. For an even shorter time period some gullible people have suggested that men can in fact become women.

It is well publicized that the 12 EU nations, Canada and Australia who have been at the vanguard of trans women are women and self-ID do have major issues but the censorship and the laws have quelled debate and silenced women’s voices.

The rest of the world isn’t living in censorship and control. People can say freely - the Emperor has no clothes on - his balls are hanging out.

ThatBlackCat · 23/05/2026 03:32

Gretel346 · 22/05/2026 08:38

Based on typical associations with cis people.

There is no such thing as 'cis people'. And I understand the word 'cis' can get your post deleted.

Heggettypeg · 23/05/2026 03:30

Gretel346 · 23/05/2026 03:06

It's uncontroversial that the gender critical movement was created in & is substantially strongest in Britain. And there's been a lot speculation of why this phenomena is so captivating there. Hierarchy & class social structures being a long lasting historical cultural feature is probably the culprit in my view.

Ben Elton once was asked why it was he married an Australian rather than a British woman & his reply was British women in his experience were obsessed by class structure so that was one of the reasons.

Interestingly JKRowling made some interesting admissions in her recent Witch Trial podcast where she talked about how much class impacted her at school & college because of the poverty she experienced in her life. And yet now she clings ever so tightly to a hierarchical structure.

It's a funny thing that sometimes the thing that we seek to escape from we perpetuate because of an unconscious learning. I notice this in some immigrants from baltic countries where they wanted to escape authoritarian landscape but their own political views have authoritarian consequences. Learned habits however fought die hard it seems.

Edited

What's "hierarchical" about not wanting to share a prison cell with a man? Or not wanting a man doing your rape counselling? Or wanting to be in a lesbian space without a man trying to guilt-trip you into straight sex? Or just wanting a bit of privacy from the male gaze when you change out of scrubs at the end of a nursing shift? Or not wanting children fast-tracked into making life-changing decisions about their bodies before they understand the implications? Your anti-British prejudice is leading you into some very strange assumptions.

ThatBlackCat · 23/05/2026 03:30

Gretel346 · 22/05/2026 08:37

This is beyond silly.

No, it's fact. Male and female skeletal structure are different.

After all, it's how forensics and detectives sex a skeleton of the body of a murdered/missing person. Are you calling that 'beyond silly'? Or have you just realised you've been bested by science, technology and facts so are desperately flailing about?

One look at a body and the height, gait, limb length, hips (or lack of) male jawbone etc all give it away. That is.... SKELETAL STRUCTURE.