Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Giggle v Tickle Friday 15th May 2pm AEST

644 replies

impossibletoday · 11/05/2026 06:40

Giggle v Tickle
Friday 15th May
2pm AEST
Live streamed

https://x.com/i/status/2053669311504642197

OP posts:
Thread gallery
30
Helleofabore · 16/05/2026 09:46

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 08:24

Australians just don't care though. It is seen as a silly culture war issue that is a distraction from the real issues. Tax, housing, healthcare, education and work are pretty much the only issues aussies pay attention to.

Also it is harder to change something once it is in law. Sex-based rights were removed from Australian law in 2013.

Edited to add that one of the reasons politicians pick up on it is it can make your opposition look really, really bad.

The last party who tried to advocate for sex-based rights in Australia last year got absolutely smashed at the election. Aussies just hate culture war issues. Btw, our current PM has said many times a woman is an adult human female https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4WCFLqSISys

Edited

I know many who do care though. I have watched it grow in significance here in the UK over the past years and I predict that Australian will start to understand more and more that there is a problem as the cases gain more publicity. The cases such as Buckley vs Sussex and the case against Kirrily Smith will come through and will build awareness.

More and more people are being impacted directly. I was sitting in a pub in a regional town in Australia a while ago listening to a group of male people with transgender identities discussing the way they deal with women, and even children, who try to either question their presence or, in one instance, a female gym manager asked one to use the individual gender neutral change cubicle they had and not to go into the female change from. He told her he was a woman and she couldn’t do anything about him being in the female change room and offered to show her his genitals as proof. The things the people in that group were saying to little children and to women were appalling and safeguarding issues.

The number of women being negatively impacted by these male people has been growing. I don’t believe that those impacted believe it is an imported culture war. I only know one person there who does think it is a ‘culture’ war because she lives a life where it doesn’t impact her at all at the moment.

The rest, including rural women, are aware and are concerned.

My friends and family won’t talk about it to just anyone though and they won’t talk about it to someone they don’t trust deeply. I have watched while one woman who I know feels strongly about it, deflected with some trite sound bite to someone else.

I watched similar dynamics here 5 or 6 years ago, it took a while for women to feel they can discuss it safely. But in Australia when you have court cases such as Jasmine Sussex’s and Kirrily Smith’s coming through.

Let’s not forget this case from Canberra either where Beth Rep had to pay $10K to Clinch back in 2020. This case had a chilling effect that is still felt.

www.abc.net.au/news/2020-09-09/canberra-radio-newsreader-told-to-pay-transgender-activist-10000/12642722?utm_source=abc_news_app&utm_medium=content_shared&utm_campaign=abc_news_app&utm_content=link

Datun · 16/05/2026 09:12

Theeyeballsinthesky · 16/05/2026 09:10

All the "no one cares you silly women" is all very redolent of how it was here about 7 years ago. No one would write about it here either abd all the politicians were terrified too say anything. We kept bring told no one cares, no one cares so why are you bothering too

turns out ppl did care though

Yes I can remember politicians saying it never comes up on the doorstep.

And then it did

Datun · 16/05/2026 09:10

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 08:38

It's only a credibility killer if he says a woman can have a penis, which is not his stance. He has always responded by saying adult human female.

Yes I agree. Adherence to the ideology is the killer

Theeyeballsinthesky · 16/05/2026 09:10

All the "no one cares you silly women" is all very redolent of how it was here about 7 years ago. No one would write about it here either abd all the politicians were terrified too say anything. We kept bring told no one cares, no one cares so why are you bothering too

turns out ppl did care though

KnottyAuty · 16/05/2026 09:07

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 07:40

They still are pretty skeptical because they think it is an import from trump/america. Here in Australia it is seen as an imported culture war issue from the US

Edited

yep that is what I thought - and then the Sandie Peggie case happened. There will be a drip drip drip of awareness raising stories. Here in the UK the yougov national polling is very clear, people are supportive of trans rights and their ability to live freely, but over time they have realised that the demands of "living freely" are unreasonable impositions on others. so the polls still support trans people's rights, but simultaneously are hardening on sports, single sex spaces, medicalisation of children etc. It takes a long time because the media redfuse to report accurately - if at all - but the more people find out about the genderist movement, the less they like it. Australia will be the same as here in time - it's just going to take longer. Interesting also that 2 major Commonwealth countries (inc Canada) that have gone in so hard on this. I wonder what it is in the culture that has lead things this way?

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 08:47

ThatCyanCat · 16/05/2026 08:42

Does it love a female underdog?

Most support Sall, but also don't care much about it. Aussies will probably move onto something else after a day or so once they lose interest.

ThatCyanCat · 16/05/2026 08:42

Cattywillow · 16/05/2026 05:06

I think many people on this thread underestimate just how much this issue has flown under the radar in Australia. Yes we are captured but also it’s just not on the radar for the vast majority of people. This ruling has brought to light the mad legal situation we’ve ended up in and has, at last, reached mainstream media (albeit fairly quietly). I think it has now appeared on the radar and, hopefully, by the time it reaches the High Court, people will have realised the implications of the ‘be kind’ approach. Unfortunately it’s very unsafe to campaign on this issue in Australia and so it will be hard to find ways to raise awareness in the interim. I do wish Sall had got a win, but Australia loves an underdog and I’m hoping the loss will create the outrage needed to get people’s attention.

Does it love a female underdog?

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 08:38

It's only a credibility killer if he says a woman can have a penis, which is not his stance. He has always responded by saying adult human female.

Datun · 16/05/2026 08:34

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/05/2026 08:28

As I said on another thread I don’t think Reform (probably because its boring women’s stuff) fully realise the potential goldmine that this issue is for them to undermine the credibility of Labour/Greens/Lib Dems while presenting themselves as the antidote. “Starmer is for they/them, Reform UK is for you”. Even better for them if Labour pick Rayner, Burnham or Milliband. Genderists and those adjacent don’t perceive just how mad genderism sounds to the average person, however much they then shrug their shoulders and dismiss it as of little relevance to their lives. It’s a credibility killer.

It’s a credibility killer.

it really is. The clip of the PM talking about it to Piers Morgan was very short. And deflected the issue by saying a woman is an adult female.

He appeared to then start to talk about campaigners that he didn't agree with her, which I'm assuming might be Posey Parker?

She made that party leader look like an absolute idiot and ruined his career, if I remember correctly.

Any adherence to this ideology, whatsoever, will bring someone down if you have the time to question them

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/05/2026 08:30

Sorry for the brief derail into UK politics!

Datun · 16/05/2026 08:29

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 08:24

Australians just don't care though. It is seen as a silly culture war issue that is a distraction from the real issues. Tax, housing, healthcare, education and work are pretty much the only issues aussies pay attention to.

Also it is harder to change something once it is in law. Sex-based rights were removed from Australian law in 2013.

Edited to add that one of the reasons politicians pick up on it is it can make your opposition look really, really bad.

The last party who tried to advocate for sex-based rights in Australia last year got absolutely smashed at the election. Aussies just hate culture war issues. Btw, our current PM has said many times a woman is an adult human female https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4WCFLqSISys

Edited

It's interesting though, that the prime minister IS being asked about it. He IS talking about it. It's becoming more topical.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/05/2026 08:28

Datun · 16/05/2026 08:10

Well I hope you're wrong.

The issue can make politicians look absolutely unhinged, cowardly and incoherent. In a way that comes across as quite shocking.

See Nichola Sturgeon refusing to call a convicted rapist a man, and inventing rapist gender on the spot.

Plus Trump's genius advert of saying Kamila Harris is for they/them, I am for you.

The issue went from nowhere, to foremost amongst politicians.

Edited to add that one of the reasons politicians pick up on it is it can make your opposition look really, really bad. Misogynistic, out of touch and not a little crazy.

It's a piece of piss to reduce any politician to a gibbering fool, merely by asking them what woman is.

Edited

As I said on another thread I don’t think Reform (probably because its boring women’s stuff) fully realise the potential goldmine that this issue is for them to undermine the credibility of Labour/Greens/Lib Dems while presenting themselves as the antidote. “Starmer is for they/them, Reform UK is for you”. Even better for them if Labour pick Rayner, Burnham or Milliband. Genderists and those adjacent don’t perceive just how mad genderism sounds to the average person, however much they then shrug their shoulders and dismiss it as of little relevance to their lives. It’s a credibility killer.

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 08:24

borntobequiet · 16/05/2026 08:12

People may not actually vote on the issue, but it goes a long way to undermine the credibility of politicians who spout such obvious untruths. And the credibility of many politicians is already precarious.

Genderism ultimately destroys everything it infiltrates, even if it takes time.

Australians just don't care though. It is seen as a silly culture war issue that is a distraction from the real issues. Tax, housing, healthcare, education and work are pretty much the only issues aussies pay attention to.

Also it is harder to change something once it is in law. Sex-based rights were removed from Australian law in 2013.

Edited to add that one of the reasons politicians pick up on it is it can make your opposition look really, really bad.

The last party who tried to advocate for sex-based rights in Australia last year got absolutely smashed at the election. Aussies just hate culture war issues. Btw, our current PM has said many times a woman is an adult human female https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4WCFLqSISys

Before you continue to YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/4WCFLqSISys

Ereshkigalangcleg · 16/05/2026 08:18

Exactly. If you want to beclown yourself in front of the electorate, say that women can have a penis on TV, it never fails.

borntobequiet · 16/05/2026 08:12

People may not actually vote on the issue, but it goes a long way to undermine the credibility of politicians who spout such obvious untruths. And the credibility of many politicians is already precarious.

Genderism ultimately destroys everything it infiltrates, even if it takes time.

Datun · 16/05/2026 08:10

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 07:58

The problem is it is a low salience issue here. Regardless of how people may feel about it, they don't care enough to vote on it. People will always vote on issues that affect themselves directly (cost of living, housing, education). Reporting on it more will not change someone's vote (and ultimately that it only what politicians respond to).

Edited

Well I hope you're wrong.

The issue can make politicians look absolutely unhinged, cowardly and incoherent. In a way that comes across as quite shocking.

See Nichola Sturgeon refusing to call a convicted rapist a man, and inventing rapist gender on the spot.

Plus Trump's genius advert of saying Kamila Harris is for they/them, I am for you.

The issue went from nowhere, to foremost amongst politicians.

Edited to add that one of the reasons politicians pick up on it is it can make your opposition look really, really bad. Misogynistic, out of touch and not a little crazy.

It's a piece of piss to reduce any politician to a gibbering fool, merely by asking them what woman is.

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 07:58

Datun · 16/05/2026 07:46

Yes, it was dismissed as culture wars and fearmongering here, too.

But when you put politicians on the spot about rapists in women's prisons, it starts to look a little different.

Normal people really can't believe that politicians will say that some women have penises.

When it becomes clear that adherence to the ideology must be absolute, things start to change.

Sport's another one that gets people going. The blatant unfairness of it, and how batshit it is.

The problem is the reporting. If it never gets reported, people don't realise the prevalence of it.

But once it becomes an issue for a politician, that changes.

The problem is it is a low salience issue here. Regardless of how people may feel about it, they don't care enough to vote on it. People will always vote on issues that affect themselves directly (cost of living, housing, education). Reporting on it more will not change someone's vote (and ultimately that it only what politicians respond to).

Datun · 16/05/2026 07:46

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 07:40

They still are pretty skeptical because they think it is an import from trump/america. Here in Australia it is seen as an imported culture war issue from the US

Edited

Yes, it was dismissed as culture wars and fearmongering here, too.

But when you put politicians on the spot about rapists in women's prisons, it starts to look a little different.

Normal people really can't believe that politicians will say that some women have penises.

When it becomes clear that adherence to the ideology must be absolute, things start to change.

Sport's another one that gets people going. The blatant unfairness of it, and how batshit it is.

The problem is the reporting. If it never gets reported, people don't realise the prevalence of it.

But once it becomes an issue for a politician, that changes.

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 07:40

Datun · 16/05/2026 07:34

People didn't care about it here, until they realised what was going on.

They still are pretty skeptical because they think it is an import from trump/america. Here in Australia it is seen as an imported culture war issue from the US

Datun · 16/05/2026 07:34

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 07:30

I’m in Australia. People don’t care about this issue here as they dismiss it as culture war/ trumpism.

People didn't care about it here, until they realised what was going on.

PeachyDaisy · 16/05/2026 07:30

I’m in Australia. People don’t care about this issue here as they dismiss it as culture war/ trumpism.

Datun · 16/05/2026 07:16

Helleofabore · 16/05/2026 01:41

The opposition leader has released a statement making this a manifesto item.

https://x.com/senatorcash/status/2055434872035086583?s=46

STATEMENT BY AngusTaylorMP

Yesterday the Full Federal Court confirmed that Australian law does not properly protect single sex spaces for women and girls. Most Australians would find that hard to believe. A coalition government I lead will fix this. We will amend the Sex Discrimination Act to ensure that women and girls (and men and boys) have protections based on biological sex.

We will define biological sex in the Act. Male or female. The sex you are born. And we will protect single-sex spaces across Australian life.

This is not radical. It is common sense.

Let me be clear about what this is not. This is not about targeting transgender Australians. Every protection they currently have remains. We are not removing a single protection from anyone. But we are recognising something that should never have been in doubt: biological sex is real, it matters, and women and girls deserve spaces where it is respected.

This will be a first-term priority.

The Prime Minister now has a simple question to answer. Does he believe women and girls deserve protections based on biological sex?

This will start it.

This is the beginning of politicians saying men can grow a cervix and ninety nine percent of women don't have a penis.

QldGCandproud · 16/05/2026 06:09

mb2512cat · 15/05/2026 09:15

Just to flag that Julia ‘I will not be lectured about sexism and misogyny’ Gillard is a guest speaker at the Hay Festival on May 25th. Perhaps an audience member could ask her about her amendment to the Australian Sex Discrimination Act and in the light of Giggle vs Tickle if it’s working out as she envisaged?

OMG, please do, but be prepared for a word salad about "inclusion"

QldGCandproud · 16/05/2026 05:57

This is a 6 minute listen by one of the awesome womens advocacy groups in Australia for anyone who is interested.
Please do, this is a great summary.
But I'll try to explain the current political situation:

There are 2 main parties in Aus, plus the Greens. These parties range from full throated support (Greens) to full support (Labour), to "this is just a fringe issue and we're not getting involved in culture wars" (Liberals). The Libs are in deep shit vote-wise, and it is these guys who are now suddenly coming out of the woodwork, "shocked" at the loss of womens rights. They did have 9 years in power without doing anything about the changes Labor made to our sex Discrimination Act, which has resulted in the court being unable to side with Sal Grover in this case.
There is a party called One Nation. One Nation has some policies which I just can't get behind, but is the only party who's leader has repeatedly attempted to table a reinstatement of the definition of women in Australia's Sex Discrimination Act, and been voted down by the other three parties. They are Bona Fide in support of women in this regard. One Nation is usually well behind in terms of numbers, but just last weekend they smashed the 2 main parties in a by-election, winning a long-held Liberal seat in the Federal House of reps, and the major parties are scared.
So, the only way we can force any government to address this is to threaten them with a vote for One Nation, and I hope that is enough and that enough people will do so, but the thought of One Nation in power is frankly scary, they are pretty divisive and probably not fit to govern.

open.spotify.com/episode/3rfdl27BPRthqhFamRhtv9?si=K-7s2DWGQk-RpjORYVNa2A

Cattywillow · 16/05/2026 05:08

MyAmpleSheep · 16/05/2026 02:31

It might be the other way around. If some significant politicians pick up the ball and make it an issue then some of the media will do so as well. Maybe that's what we're seeing.

Yes. And this has happened. The (albeit crippled) opposition has already promised to fix the legal situation if elected and called on the ruling party to announce its plan.

Swipe left for the next trending thread