Please or to access all these features

Feminism: Sex and gender discussions

Cameron Diaz “has third child” aged 53

269 replies

Namingbaba · 06/05/2026 17:00

It worries me that some people just read headlines like this and think all these women have children naturally. At least that’s the impression I got from reading the comments on this story. The surrogacy sometimes isn’t even mentioned.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
suggestusernamepls · 07/05/2026 22:44

ladygindiva · 07/05/2026 14:08

I know a woman who had a baby naturally at 51. Not impossible.

No, it's not. My grandmother had a baby aged 50. It was confirmed two months ago by my gynecologist that at almost 53 I am still ovulating regularly, I have regular cycles and my hormones are just fine. I can probably have a baby. I don't want to, but I probably could.

Bertiebiscuit · 07/05/2026 22:00

The super rich can buy anything and everything, Law and common human decency no longer applies to them. They can buy children, rent poor women's wombs, fly around in private jets every day while preaching about the environment, disgusting creatures. Nothing has any consequences for them.

DungareesTrombonesDinos · 07/05/2026 21:06

Surrogacy is disgusting and so is selfishly renting someone's womb when you are 53.

ChocolateAddictAlways · 07/05/2026 20:55

MassiveWordSalad · 07/05/2026 10:57

All surrogacy is human trafficking and people like Cameron Diaz putting a glamorous face to it are legitimising the less salubrious baby farm businesses in places like India and Ukraine.

Does anyone remember baby Gammy? A Thai woman was carrying for an Australian couple about a decade ago. She agreed to the process as her family were experiencing severe financial hardships. She was expecting twins, one with downs syndrome. When the twins were born the couple initially took the healthy baby and left. There was public outcry, I think a Go Fund Me was set up for the baby but the couple did later return to Thailand and said they always planned to take the baby boy, Gammy, at a later date. The courts were involved and it all became very messy.

For me, this case raised lots of concerns about international surrogacy in the Global South not fitting into any established legal framework. It didn't seem like any legal protections were in place at that time for the mother and baby, especially as it ended up in a courtroom. I think Thailand has now changed surrogacy laws for foreigners. It was food for thought for a lot of people.

UltimateSloth · 07/05/2026 18:56

ladygindiva · 07/05/2026 14:08

I know a woman who had a baby naturally at 51. Not impossible.

The midwife who delivered my youngest told me she had delivered a baby recently from a woman of 50. Natural conception. It's rare but not impossible. I believe Victoria Coren Mitchell was pregnant with the child she had at 51 and didn't use a surrogate although ofc she may have used donor or frozen eggs, we don't know.

DramaAndBullshit · 07/05/2026 18:02

L0V315 · 07/05/2026 08:27

Fucking disgusting, so handmaid's tale and gaslights people into believing that pregnancy is easy after 40.

The only time I think that surrogacy should be allowed is if a woman willingly does it for a family member, such as a sister. I would have happy carried a baby for my sister if she couldn't carry one herself.

I agree. Carrying a baby for a sibling is a whole different thing to commercial surrogacy. Celebs like Cameron Diaz should be adopting to give homes to children who need them, not renting a womb.

Luddite26 · 07/05/2026 15:03

Oh yes just remembered my absent father who I eventually met when I was 28 went on to have another child when he was 56. Then died age 71 when she was 15. Well done that man.

Luddite26 · 07/05/2026 14:59

LondonTipton99 · 07/05/2026 13:46

Yes there is. Very wrong. Purposely having a baby with an unknown donor is so, so fucking wrong for a start.

In my heart I agree with this as I grew up without a father. Gives you issues.
But on the same level in my experience a shit parent does more damage than an absent one.
Two of my grandchildren have a father who thought it was ok to smash their Xmas tree up and their mum and then demand he sees them while not providing for them. He's damaging them which is really sad.

Going now to read some Phillip Larkin.

Luddite26 · 07/05/2026 14:51

Davros · 07/05/2026 08:31

Victoria Coren-Mitchell had a baby at 51

Agree I came to say this. Glad I checked first that it had been said !
I often think about Victoria when I am shattered !
I've looked after my grandsons for years then another was born when I was 50 and another when I was 52. DD went back to work when both were a week old. I have had them full time and they both started nursery at 6 months for 3 mornings.
DD Breastfed till both were over a year we had a good routine but it was still tiring and I haven't done night feeds and financial provision. BUT I have found it a lot harder in my 50s looking after babies and toddlers and the mental load of child rearing these days. So I don't know how much of all that Cameron Diaz or any other celebrity with plenty of funds have to do.
I'm sure the surrogate was happy with the money though, I mean she had a choice and chose to provide the child commodity for the rich couple.

loislovesstewie · 07/05/2026 14:32

I assume there was also a contingency if the baby was born with a disability?

viques · 07/05/2026 14:11

Neurodiversitydoctor · 07/05/2026 09:27

And they cut her money because one of the twins she was carrying died! Apparently this was agreed in the contract. Talk about a business arrangement covering every eventuality.

ladygindiva · 07/05/2026 14:08

Lomonald · 06/05/2026 17:44

Nobody is thinking a 53 year old woman is having a baby naturally though her age alone will pique interest to read further into it, i am 55 ive not had a period for 5 years far less conceive a baby 2 years ago.

I know a woman who had a baby naturally at 51. Not impossible.

Ohpleeeease · 07/05/2026 14:07

That word “welcomed” is doing some heavy lifting.

LondonTipton99 · 07/05/2026 14:05

Cheese55 · 07/05/2026 13:52

Unknown donor maybe but not a proper donor from a clinic. They also wouldn't allow single adoptions if single women (because it usually is) offer a child a substandard life.

with adoptions the child is already here. Thats not purposely going out of your way to bring a child into the world.

loislovesstewie · 07/05/2026 14:04

TiredOldHen · 07/05/2026 12:48

You sound very young.

They have been together for over 20 years and seem very happy and compatible. There is no money or power imbalance and no incentive to be together other than they want to be. She has not ‘bought’ him, they both work and are on the similar levels financially. This smacks a bit of the idea of old people having sex is yucky. 😊

No, I'm old. I'm 70.I find that it seems OK if women do it but wrong if men do. I can't imagine having a relationship with a man of a similar age to my children. .for starters we would be at different stages of our lives,which is evidenced by having a child at an age where women either have teens, or in some cases are already grandmothers.
Your arguments are exactly the same ones that men make when they justify having relationships with women young enough to be their daughters.
Edited to say thanks for thinking I'm young.

LondonTipton99 · 07/05/2026 14:03

Cheese55 · 07/05/2026 13:52

Unknown donor maybe but not a proper donor from a clinic. They also wouldn't allow single adoptions if single women (because it usually is) offer a child a substandard life.

Even that is awful

from birth, no earlier than that, you are already down one parent! And that’s fair on the child? That’s a good parenting decision for your child? No. Nope.

having one loving parent is better than being in the care system. That’s not a valid point to what we are talking about.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 07/05/2026 13:53

Cheese55 · 07/05/2026 13:44

There is nothing wrong with bringing up a child without a father. Sometimes this is better

All children have fathers. Most will have some desire to have contact at some point.

Cheese55 · 07/05/2026 13:52

Unknown donor maybe but not a proper donor from a clinic. They also wouldn't allow single adoptions if single women (because it usually is) offer a child a substandard life.

LondonTipton99 · 07/05/2026 13:46

Cheese55 · 07/05/2026 13:44

There is nothing wrong with bringing up a child without a father. Sometimes this is better

Yes there is. Very wrong. Purposely having a baby with an unknown donor is so, so fucking wrong for a start.

sittingonabeach · 07/05/2026 13:46

@Cheese55 I don’t think you should purposely bring a child into this world without one

Cheese55 · 07/05/2026 13:44

LondonTipton99 · 07/05/2026 13:30

Rather selfish is an understatement!

I think purposely going it alone (even if you have read the profile of the donor and the kid will potentially be able to make contact at 18) is still abhorrent. Of course even worse if it's anonymous. Just awful to inflict that trauma on a child.

There is nothing wrong with bringing up a child without a father. Sometimes this is better

LondonTipton99 · 07/05/2026 13:30

florence1234567 · 07/05/2026 11:33

The problem I see with the whole thing is that it's most likely not her own eggs (unless she froze them many years ago).

I always thought it was rather selfish to use an anonymous sperm or anymous egg donation.

In my opinion a child should have a right to find out their genetic link.

Everyone should be able to know where their biological roots are.

Rather selfish is an understatement!

I think purposely going it alone (even if you have read the profile of the donor and the kid will potentially be able to make contact at 18) is still abhorrent. Of course even worse if it's anonymous. Just awful to inflict that trauma on a child.

LondonTipton99 · 07/05/2026 13:27

Westfacing · 07/05/2026 08:34

I can understand an older woman wanting a baby if in her younger years she didn't meet the right partner; or had children from a previous partner and desperate for one with the latest beau. Not everyone can follow the usual path to marriage and motherhood

But according to Wiki, Cameron Diaz has been married to the same guy for 11 years and they already have two children! IMO it's an indulgence to lumber a child with a 53 year-old mother - she may be gorgeous, healthy and wealthy but she's still 53

But at the same time, no one has the right to have a baby, even if you really, really want one. If it doesn't happen to you in your younger years for whatever reason, does that mean you ignore what's best for the potential baby and do it anyway later on and in whatever way possible? No matter your age, or whether there will be a father or not?

sittingonabeach · 07/05/2026 13:18

@TiredOldHen i think it is more the thought of having a relationship with someone similar age to their adult DC that people are finding yucky

sittingonabeach · 07/05/2026 13:16

@Cheese55 it was something that can be screened for and other countries don’t limit the number of donations used, and indeed donations are sent to clinics across the globe including UK ones

The donor/donations were through official clinics.